Gender, religion, and sociopolitical issues in cross-cultural online education
- 1.5k Downloads
Cross-cultural education is thought to develop critical consciousness of how unequal distributions of power and privilege affect people’s health. Learners in different sociopolitical settings can join together in developing critical consciousness—awareness of power and privilege dynamics in society—by means of communication technology. The aim of this research was to define strengths and limitations of existing cross-cultural discussions in generating critical consciousness. The setting was the FAIMER international fellowship program for mid-career interdisciplinary health faculty, whose goal is to foster global advancement of health professions education. Fellows take part in participant-led, online, written, task-focused discussions on topics like professionalism, community health, and leadership. We reflexively identified text that brought sociopolitical topics into the online environment during the years 2011 and 2012 and used a discourse analysis toolset to make our content analysis relevant to critical consciousness. While references to participants’ cultures and backgrounds were infrequent, narratives of political-, gender-, religion-, and other culture-related topics did emerge. When participants gave accounts of their experiences and exchanged cross-cultural stories, they were more likely to develop ad hoc networks to support one another in facing those issues than explore issues relating to the development of critical consciousness. We suggest that cross-cultural discussions need to be facilitated actively to transform learners’ frames of reference, create critical consciousness, and develop cultural competence. Further research is needed into how to provide a safe environment for such learning and provide faculty development for the skills needed to facilitate these exchanges.
KeywordsCross-cultural communication Power Hegemony Critical consciousness
Stacey Friedman, Associate Director Evaluation and Planning at FAIMER for her support. Brownell Anderson and Karen Mann for reviewing the article and for their valuable suggestions. Gwen Martin for editorial assistance.
This work was supported by the Gatorade Trust through funds distributed by the Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, U.S.A. and by the Medical Education Travelling Fellowship awarded by ASME to the first author.
Compliance with ethical standards
IRB approval was obtained through the Foundation University, Pakistan, on commencement of the study; Approval to use the FAIMER data was obtained through FAIMER.
Conflict of interest
- Alexander, J. C. (1987). The micro-macro link. Oakland: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Al-Harthi, A. S. (2005). Distance higher education experiences of Arab Gulf students in the United States: A cultural perspective. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 6(3), 11.Google Scholar
- Arce, J. (1998). Cultural hegemony: The politics of bilingual education. Multicultural Education, 6(2), 10–16.Google Scholar
- Bergman, E., De Feijter, J., Frambach, J., Godefrooij, M., Slootweg, I., Stalmeijer, R., & Van Der Zwet, J. (2012). AM last page: A guide to research paradigms relevant to medical education. Academic medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 87(4), 545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Borg, C., Buttigieg, J. A., & Mayo, P. (2002). Gramsci and education. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
- Burgess, A. C., & Burgess, T. (2005). Guide to Western Canada. Guilford: Globe Pequot.Google Scholar
- FAIMER (Foundation for Advancement of International Medical Education & Research) September 24, 2013-last update. http://www.faimer.org [October/20, 2013].
- Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London; New York: Longman.Google Scholar
- Fiske, J. (1994). Media matters: Everyday culture and political change. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Freire, P. (1993). Pedagogy of the oppressed (Rev ed., p. 1970). New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
- Gee, J. P. (2004). Discourse analysis: What makes it critical. An Introduction to Critical Discourse Analysis in Education, 19–50.Google Scholar
- Gee, J. P. (2014). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Gramsci, A. (1995). Further selections from the prison notebooks. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
- King, T. (2003). The truth about stories: A native narrative. Toronto: House of Anansi.Google Scholar
- Lincoln, Y. S., Lynham, S. A., & Guba, E. G. (2011). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 4, 97–128.Google Scholar
- Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. The Jossey-Bass higher and adult education series. California: ERIC.Google Scholar
- Mezirow, J. (2006). An overview on transformative learning. In Lifelong Learning: Concepts and Contexts (1st ed., pp. 24–38). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Mezirow, J. (1990). How critical reflection triggers transformative learning. In Fostering critical reflection in adulthood (1st ed., pp. 1–20). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass PublishersGoogle Scholar
- Noble, K., Macfarlane, K., & Carmel, J. (2005). Circles of change: Challenging orthodoxy in practitioner supervision. Sydney: Pearson SprintPrint.Google Scholar
- O’Donnell, A. M., Reeve, J., & Smith, J. K. (2007). Educational psychology: Reflection for action. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Teti, A., & Gervasio, G. (2012). After Mubarak, before transition: The challenges for Egyptâ€™s democratic opposition. Interface: A Journal for and About Social Movements, 4(1), 102–112.Google Scholar