Advertisement

Advances in Health Sciences Education

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 529–539 | Cite as

Resigned professionalism? Non-acute inpatients and resident education

  • Meredith VanstoneEmail author
  • Christopher Watling
  • Mark Goldszmidt
  • Charles Weijer
  • Lorelei Lingard
Article

Abstract

A growing group of inpatients on acute clinical teaching units have non-acute needs, yet require attention by the team. While anecdotally, these patients have inspired frustration and resource pressures in clinical settings, little is known about the ways in which they influence physician perceptions of the learning environment. This qualitative study explored residents’ and attending physicians’ perceptions of caring for these patients, including their educational value. Using constructivist grounded theory, we conducted seven homogeneous focus groups and three interviews with residents and attending physicians from neurology and general internal medicine. A constant comparative analytical approach was employed alongside data collection, using theoretical sampling to explore emergent themes. Residents consistently described non-acute patients as non-educational, uninteresting, but still in need of care. Some attending physicians echoed this view, while others described multiple learning opportunities presented by non-acute patients. Both groups described residents as engaging with non-acute patients in a professional capacity, but not as learners. This engagement in a professional capacity could be considered diligent disinterest, or resigned professionalism. A constructivist understanding of the dynamics which influence learning in the workplace was used to explore the reasons why the residents in our study did not recognize the learning opportunities presented by non-acute patients. Our results resonate with Billett’s theory of workplace affordances, which offers an explanation as to why learners may not identify or take advantage of potential learning opportunities. Overall, our study assists our understanding of the sociocultural factors that influence learners’ choices to engage with particular clinical learning opportunities.

Keywords

Resident education Non-acute patients Workplace learning theory Professionalism Learning environment Socio-cultural perspective 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the contributions of the participating residents and attending physicians, the thoughtful suggestions of Dr. Tim Dornan, and funding provided by a Faculty Support for Research in Education Grant from the Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University.

References

  1. Apker, J., & Eggly, S. (2004). Communicating professional identity in medical socialization: Considering the ideological discourse of morning report. Qualitative Health Research, 14(3), 411–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Billett, S. (2001). Learning through work: Workplace affordances and individual engagement. Journal of Workplace Learning, 13(5), 209–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Billett, S. (2002). Workplace pedagogic practice: Co-participation and learning. British Journal of Educational Studies, 50(4), 457–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Billett, S. (2008). Learning throughout working life: A relational interdependence between social and individual agency. British Journal of Educational Studies, 155(1), 39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Billett, S. (2011). Subjectivity, self and personal agency in learning through and for work. In M. Malloch (Ed.), Sage handbook of workplace learning (pp. 60–72). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boex, J. R., & Leahy, P. J. (2003). Understanding residents’ work: Moving beyond counting hours to assessing educational value. Academic Medicine, 78(9), 939–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brasel, K. J., Pierre, A. L., & Weigelt, J. A. (2004). Resident work hours: What they are really doing. Archives of Surgery, 139(5), 490–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Canadian Institute for Health Information (2008). Alternate level of care in Canada. Ottawa: CIHI.Google Scholar
  9. Canadian Institute for Health Information (2010). Health Care in Canada 2010. Ottawa: CIHI.Google Scholar
  10. Canadian Institute for Health Information (2011). Health care in Canada 2011: Focus on seniors and aging. Ottawa: CIHI.Google Scholar
  11. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory : A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Charmaz, K. (2004). Grounded theory. In S. N. Hesse-Biber & P. Leavy (Eds.), Approaches to qualitative research. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
  13. Costa, A. P., & Hirdes, J. P. (2010). Clinical characteristics and service needs of alternate level of care patients waiting for long term care in Ontario hospitals. Healthcare Policy, 6(1), 33–46.Google Scholar
  14. d’Alché-Gautier, M.-J., Maïza, D., & Chastang, F. (2004). Assessing the appropriateness of hospitalisation days in a French University Hospital. International journal of health care quality assurance, 17(2), 87–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Elmes, M., & Gemmill, G. (1990). The psychodynamics of mindlessness and dissent in small groups. Small Group Research, 21(1), 28–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fitzgibbons, J. P., Bordley, D. R., Berkowitz, L. R., Miller, B. W., & Henderson, M. C. (2006). Redesigning residency education in internal medicine: A position paper from the Association of Program Directors in Internal Medicine. Annals of Internal Medicine, 144(12), 920–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fransoo, R., Martens, P., Prior, H., Burchill, C., Koseva, I., & Rajotte, L. (2013). Who is in our hospitals… And why?. Winnipeg, MB: Manitoba Centre for Health Policy.Google Scholar
  18. Green, J. M. (2007). The changed nature of scut: An absence at the bedside. Annals of Internal Medicine, 147(8), 588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gustin, W., Batra, R., Amin, A., & Rucker, L. (2009). Education first: Reforming the first-year curriculum of the internal medicine residency. Academic Medicine, 84(3), 368–373.Google Scholar
  20. Hacking, I. (1999). The social construction of what?. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hsu Blatman, K. (2009). The Institute of Medicine resident work hours recommendations: A resident’s viewpoint. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 5(1), 13.Google Scholar
  22. Kitzinger, J. (1995). Qualitative research: Introducing focus groups. BMJ, 311, 299–302.Google Scholar
  23. Leung, L. P., Cheng, Y. W., & Fan, K. L. (2011). Evaluation of the appropriateness of acute hospitalisations in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine, 18, 277–281.Google Scholar
  24. Lingard, L., Reznick, R., DeVito, I., & Espin, S. (2002). Forming professional identities on the health care team: Discursive constructions of the ‘other’ in the operating room. Medical Education, 36(8), 728–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. P. A. Consulting Group & Balance of Care Group. (2007). Acute hospital bed review: A review of acute hospital bed use in hospitals in the Republic of Ireland with an Emergency department. Dublin: Health Service Executive.Google Scholar
  26. Panis, L. J. G. G., Verheggen, F. W. S. M., & Pop, P. (2002). To stay or not to stay. The assessment of appropriate hospital stay: A Dutch report. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 14(1), 55–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Quinn, A., & Brunett, P. (2009). Service versus education: Finding the right balance: A Consensus statement from the Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors 2009 Academic Assembly “Question 19” Working Group. Academic Emergency Medicine, 16, S15–S18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sanfey, H., Cofer, J., Hiatt, J. R., Hyser, M., Jakey, C., Markwell, S., et al. (2011). Service or education: In the eye of the beholder. Archives of Surgery, 146(12), 1389–1395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Smith, D. E., Johnson, B., & Jones, Y. (2012). Service versus education, what are we talking about? Journal of Surgical Education, 69(3), 432–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Statistics Canada (2010). Population projections for Canada, provinces and territories: 2009 to 2036. Ottawa, Canada: Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
  31. Statistics Canada (2011). Population and Demography, Canada Yearbook 2011. Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
  32. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research :techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (Vol. 2). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Watling, C. J., & Lingard, L. (2012). Grounded theory in medical education research: AMEE Guide No. 70. Medical Teacher, 34(10), 850–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Weinstein, D. F. (2002). Duty hours for resident physicians—Tough choices for teaching hospitals. New England Journal of Medicine, 347(16), 1275–1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Meredith Vanstone
    • 1
    Email author
  • Christopher Watling
    • 2
  • Mark Goldszmidt
    • 3
  • Charles Weijer
    • 4
    • 5
  • Lorelei Lingard
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Centre for Health Economics and Policy AnalysisMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
  2. 2.Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Schulich School of Medicine and DentistryWestern UniversityLondonCanada
  3. 3.Department of Medicine, Center for Education Research and Innovation, Schulich School of Medicine and DentistryWestern UniversityLondonCanada
  4. 4.Rotman Institute of Philosophy, Department of PhilosophyWestern UniversityLondonCanada
  5. 5.Department of Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and DentistryWestern UniversityLondonCanada

Personalised recommendations