Abstract
Critically reflective dialogues (CRD) are important for knowledge sharing and creating meaning in communities. CRD includes different aspects: being open about mistakes, critical opinion sharing, asking for and giving feedback, experimentation, challenging groupthink and research utilisation. In this article we explore whether CRD aspects change over time, through a study of two dialogues each from six different communities of veterinary health professionals. Change was studied from the perspective of observations, through analysing transcripts of dialogues, and from the perspective of community members’ perceptions, through an evaluative discussion with members. The results showed that some communities became more open about mistakes, a finding that is related to an increase in trust. Other observed aspects of CRD seemed to be fairly stable over time. Community members perceived research utilisation and asking for and giving feedback to have been increased. From an analysis of perceptions of the community members it emerged that limited interaction could be associated with the epistemological conceptions of community members.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahuvia, A. (2001). Traditional, interpretive, and reception based content analyses: Improving the ability of content analysis to address issues of pragmatic and theoretical concern. Social Indicators Research, 54(2), 139–172.
Bok, H. G. J., Jaarsma, A. D. C., Teunissen, P. W., Van Der Vleuten, C. P. M., & Van Beukelen, P. (2011). Development and validation of a competency framework for veterinarians. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 38(3), 262–269.
Brouwer, P., Brekelmans, J. M. G., Nieuwenhuis, A. F. M., & Simons, P. R. J. (2012). Community development in the school workplace. International Journal of Educational Management, 26(4), 403–418.
Buetow, S. (2011). The virtue of uncertainty in health care. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 17(5), 873–876.
Butler, A., Reed, M., & Le Grice, P. (2007). Vocational training: trust, talk and knowledge transfer in small businesses. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 14(2), 280–293.
Cho, Y. H., Lee, J., & Jonassen, D. H. (2011). The role of tasks and epistemological beliefs in online peer questioning. Computers & Education, 56(1), 112–126.
De Groot, E. (2012). Learning of veterinary professionals in communities, using the theory of critically reflective work behaviour, with regard to evidence based practice. Dissertation, Utrecht University.
De Groot, E., van den Berg, B. A. M., Endedijk, M. D., Van Beukelen, P., & Simons, P. R. J. (2010). Critically reflective work behaviour within autonomous professionals’ learning communities. Vocations and Learning, 4(1), 41–62.
Dooner, A., Mandzuk, D., & Clifton, R. A. (2008). Stages of collaboration and the realities of professional learning communities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(3), 564–574.
Griffiths, F., Green, E., & Bendelow, G. (2006). Health professionals, their medical interventions and uncertainty: A study focusing on women at midlife. Social Science and Medicine, 62(5), 1078–1090.
Gruenfeld, D. H., Mannix, E. A., Williams, K. Y., & Neale, M. A. (1996). Group composition and decision making: How member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(1), 1–15.
Harford, J., & MacRuairc, G. (2008). Engaging student teachers in meaningful reflective practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(7), 1884–1892.
Hofer, B. K. (2001). Personal epistemology research: Implications for learning and teaching. Educational Psychology Review, 13(4), 353–383.
Holmes, M. A., & Cockcroft, P. (2004). Evidence-based veterinary medicine 1. Why is it important and what skills are needed? In Practice, 26(1), 28–33.
Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.
Knight, L. V., & Mattick, K. (2006). ‘When I first came here, I thought medicine was black and white’: Making sense of medical students’ ways of knowing. Social Science and Medicine, 63(4), 1084–1096.
Lew, M. D. N., & Schmidt, H. G. (2011). Self-reflection and academic performance: Is there a relationship? Advances in Health Sciences Education, 16(4), 529–545.
Lingard, L., Garwood, K., Schryer, C. F., & Spafford, M. M. (2003). A certain art of uncertainty: Case presentation and the development of professional identity. Social Science and Medicine, 56(3), 603–616.
Marshall, M., Sheaff, R., Rogers, A., Campbell, S., Halliwell, S., Pickard, S., et al. (2002). A qualitative study of the cultural changes in primary care organisations needed to implement clinical governance. British Journal of General Practice, 52(481), 641–645.
Moore, D. A. (2003). Introducing the theme—Continuing veterinary medical education: Where are we? Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 30(1), 12.
Norman, G. R. (1999). Examining the assumptions of evidence-based medicine. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 5(2), 139–147.
Olson, C. A., Tooman, T. R., & Alvarado, C. J. (2010). Knowledge systems, health care teams, and clinical practice: a study of successful change. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(4), 491–516.
Oxman, A. D., Thomson, M. A., Davis, D. A., & Haynes, B. (1995). No magic bullets: A systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 153(10), 1423–1431.
Parboosingh, J. T. (2002). Physician communities of practice: Where learning and practice are inseparable. The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 22(4), 230–236.
Piggot-Irvine, E. (2010). Confronting evaluation blindness: Evidence of impact of action science-based feedback. American Journal of Evaluation, 31(3), 314–325.
Profetto-McGrath, J., Hesketh, K. L., Lang, S., & Estabrooks, C. A. (2003). A study of critical thinking and research utilization among nurses. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 25(3), 322–337.
Ranmuthugala, G., Plumb, J. J., Cunningham, F. C., Georgiou, A., Westbrook, J. I., & Braithwaite, J. (2011). How and why are communities of practice established in the healthcare sector? A systematic review of the literature. BMC Health Services Research, 273.
Swanwick, T. (2005). Informal learning in postgraduate medical education: From cognitivism to ‘culturism’. Medical Education, 39(8), 859–865.
Sweet, M., & Michaelsen, L. K. (2007). How group dynamics research can inform the theory and practice of postsecondary small group learning. Educational Psychology Review, 19(1), 31–47.
Thompson, M. (2005). Structural and epistemic parameters in communities of practice. Organization Science, 16(2), 151–164.
Vachon, B., Durand, M., & LeBlanc, J. (2010). Using reflective learning to improve the impact of continuing education in the context of work rehabilitation. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(3), 329–348.
Van Den Bossche, P., Gijselaers, W. H., Segers, M., & Kirschner, P. A. (2006). Social and cognitive factors driving teamwork in collaborative learning environments: Team learning beliefs and behaviors. Small Group Research, 37(5), 490–521.
Van Rossum, E. J., & Hamer, R. N. (2010). The meaning of learning and knowing. Dissertation, Utrecht University.
Van Woerkom, M., & Croon, M. (2008). Operationalising critically reflective work behaviour. Personnel Review, 37(3), 317–331.
Wangensteen, S., Johansson, I. S., Bjorkstrom, M. E., & Nordstrom, G. (2011). Research utilisation and critical thinking among newly graduated nurses: Predictors for research use. A quantitative cross-sectional study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 20(17–18), 2436–2447.
Wood, D. R. (2007). Professional learning communities: Teachers, knowledge, and knowing. Theory into Practice, 46(4), 281–290.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Groot, E., Endedijk, M., Jaarsma, D. et al. Development of critically reflective dialogues in communities of health professionals. Adv in Health Sci Educ 18, 627–643 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-012-9403-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-012-9403-y