Skip to main content
Log in

Associations between the big five personality factors and multiple mini-interviews

  • Published:
Advances in Health Sciences Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Given the accumulating evidence that performance in medical school and beyond is related to personality, it is important for research to consider how personality assessment can be included as part of the process of selecting medical students. Interviews are one way of measuring personality and this study extends prior research investigating whether the multiple mini interview (MMI) is related to the five factor model of personality. In contrast to prior results (Kulasegaram et al. in Adv Health Sci Edu 15:415–423, 2010), examination of MMI scores for 868 applicants to an Australian medical school over 3 years showed significant uncorrected correlations every year with extraversion (.19, .19, .30) and conscientiousness (.20, .22, .25) and with agreeableness in 2 years (.17, .19). Investigation of personality at a facet-level revealed differing relationships with the MMI within the five factors of personality. MMI scores were also correlated in 2 years (.17, .22) with a situational judgment test of interpersonal understanding (UMAT Section 2) but were unrelated to tests of logical reasoning ability (UMAT Section 1), non-verbal reasoning (Section 3), or past academic performance (Higher School Certificate results).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albanese, M., Snow, M., Skochelak, S., Huggett, K., & Farrell, P. (2003). Assessing personal qualities in medical school admissions. Academic Medicine, 78, 313–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big 5 personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9(1/2), 9–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campion, M. A., Palmer, D. K., & Campion, J. E. (1997). A review of structure in the selection interview. Personnel Psychology, 50, 655–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, J. J., Kavanagh, E. J., & Viswesvaran, C. (2007). The convergent validity between self and observer ratings of personality: A meta-analytic review. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15(1), 110–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1995). Domains and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using the revised NEO personality inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64(1), 21–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, E. M., & Nugent, E. (2011). Personality factors and medical training: A review of the literature. Medical Education, 45, 132–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eva, K. W., Reiter, H. I., Trinh, K., Wasi, P., Rosenfeld, J., & Norman, G. R. (2009). Predictive validity of the multiple mini-interview for selecting medical trainees. Medical Education, 43(8), 767–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Merivield, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7–28). Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, B., & Hesketh, B. (2004). Why openness to experience is not a good predictor of job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 243–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, B., & Wilson, I. (2010). Interviewer bias in medical student selection. The Medical Journal of Australia, 193(6), 343–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough, L., & Dilchert, S. (2010). Personality: Its measurement and validity for employee selection. In J. Farr, & N. Tippins (Eds.), Handbook of employee selection (pp. 299–319). New York, NY, US: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

  • Hough, L. M. (1992). The “Big Five” personality variables—Construct confusion: Description versus prediction. Human Performance, 5(1 & 2), 139–155.

  • Huffcutt, A. L., Conway, J. M., Roth, P. L., & Stone, N. J. (2001). Indentification and meta-analytic assessment of psychological constructs measured in employment interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 897–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huffcutt, A. L., & Culbertson, S. S. (2011). Interviews. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 2). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulasegaram, K., Reiter, H. I., Wiesner, W., Hackett, R. D., & Norman, G. R. (2010). Non-association between Neo-5 personality tests and multiple mini-interview. Advances in Health Science Education, 15, 415–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lievens, F., Ones, D., & Dilchert, S. (2009). Personality scale validities increase throughout medical school. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1514–1535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. M., & Costa, P. T. (1994). A contemplated revision of the NEO five-factor inventor. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 587–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, A., & Puddey, I. B. (2011). Admission selection criteria as predictors of outcomes in an undergraduate medical course: A prospective study. Medical Teacher. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2011.577123.

  • Motowidlo, S. J., Borman, W. C., & Schmit, M. J. (1997). A theory of individual differences in task and contextual performance. Human Performance, 10, 71–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K. R., & Davidshofer, C. O. (1994). Psychological testing: Principles and applications. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musson, D. M. (2009). Personality and medical education. Medical Education, 43, 395–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, D. B., Conner, M., Jones, F., McMillan, B., & Ferguson, E. (2009). Exploring the benefits of conscientiousness: An investigation of the role of daily stressors and health behaviors. Annuls of Behavioral Medicine, 37, 184–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiter, H. I., Eva, K. W., Rosenfeld, J., & Norman, G. R. (2007). Multiple mini-interviews predict clerkship and licensing examination performance. Medical Education, 41, 378–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Griffin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Griffin, B., Wilson, I. Associations between the big five personality factors and multiple mini-interviews. Adv in Health Sci Educ 17, 377–388 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-011-9316-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-011-9316-1

Keywords

Navigation