Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Non-association between Neo-5 personality tests and multiple mini-interview

  • Published:
Advances in Health Sciences Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most medical schools attempt to select applicants on the basis of cognitive and non-cognitive skills. Typically, interpersonal skills are assessed by interview, though relatively few applicants make it to interview. Thus, an efficient paper and pencil test of non-cognitive skills is needed. One possibility is personality tests. Tests of the five factor model of personality, and in particular the factor of conscientiousness, has proven effective in predicting future job performance. Can it serve as a screen for admissions interviews? In particular, correlation with the multiple mini-interviews (MMI) is of interest since the latter is a well validated test of non-cognitive skills. A total of 152 applicants to Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine at McMaster completed the Neo-5 personality test voluntarily in advance of their admissions interviews. Correlations were calculated between personality factors and grade point average (GPA), medical college admissions test (MCAT) and MMI. No statistically significant correlation was found between personality factors and cognitive (GPA, MCAT) measures. More surprisingly, no statistically significant correlation was found between personality factors, including conscientiousness, and the MMI. Personality testing is not a useful screening test for the MMI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albanese, M., Snow, M. H., Skochelak, S. E., Huggett, K. N., & Farrell, P. M. (2003). Assessing personal qualities in medical school admissions. Academic Medicine, 78, 313–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big 5 personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 9–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Strauss, J. P. (1993). Conscientiousness and performance of sales representatives: Test of the mediating effects of goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 8, 715–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bezner, J. R., & Boucher, B. K. (2001). The influence of personality type on decision making in the physical therapy admission process. Journal of Allied Health, 30, 83–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, G. J. (1996). Myers-Briggs type indicator (MBTI): Some psychometric limitations. Australian Psychologist, 30(1), 71–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, T. C., Catano, V. M., & Cunningham, D. P. (2005). Personality as a predictor of professional behaviour in dental school: Comparisons with dental practitioners. Journal of Dental Education, 69, 1222–1236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. C., Johnson, E. K., & Molider, J. B. (1990). The interview in the admission process. Academic Medicine, 3, 167–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eva, K. W., & Reiter, H. I. (2004). Where judgement fails: Pitfalls in the selection process for medical personnel. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 9, 161–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eva, K. W., Reiter, H. I., Rosenfeld, J., & Norman, G. R. (2004a). The ability of the multiple mini-interview to predict preclerkship performance in medical school. Academic Medicine, 10(Suppl), S40–S42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eva, K. W., Reiter, H. I., Trinh, K., Wasi, P., Rosenfeld, J., & Norman, G. R. (2009). Predictive validity of the multiple-mini interview for selecting medical trainees. Medical Education, 4, 767–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eva, K. W., Rosenfeld, J., Reiter, H. I., & Norman, G. R. (2004b). Admissions OSCE: The multiple mini-interview. Medical Education, 38, 314–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, E., James, D., O’Hehir, F., & Sanders, A. (2003). Pilot study of the roles of personality references, and personal statements in relation to performance over the 5 years of a medical degrees. British Medical Journal, 326, 428–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An Alternative description of personality the big 5 factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 765–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreiter, C. D., & Kreiter, Y. (2007). A validity generalization perspective on the ability of undergraduate GPA and the medical college admission test to predict important outcomes. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 19, 95–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreiter, C. D., Yin, P., Solow, C., & Brennan, R. L. (2004). Investigating the reliability of the medical school admissions interview. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 9, 147–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulatanga-Moruzi, C., & Norman, G. R. (2001). Validity of admissions measures in predicting performance outcomes: The contribution of cognitive and non-cognitive dimensions. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 14, 34–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lievens, F., Coetsier, P., De Fruyt, F., & De Maeseneer, J. (2002). Medical students’ personality characteristics and academic performance: a five-factor model perspective. Medical Education, 36, 1050–1056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luh, S. P., Yu, M. N., Lin, Y. R., Chou, M. J., Chou, M. C., & Chen, J. Y. (2007). A study on the personal traits and knowledge base of Taiwanese medical students following problem-based learning instructions. Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore, 36, 743–750.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumsden, M. A., Bore, M., Millar, K., Jack, R., & Powis, D. (2005). Assessment of personal qualities in relation to admission to medical school. Medical Education, 39, 258–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. M., & Costa, P. T. (1994). A contemplated revision of the NEO five-factor inventor. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 587–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. M., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pittenger, D. J. (2005). Cautionary comments regarding the Myers-Briggs type indicator. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 57, 210–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poole, A., Catano, V. M., & Cunningham, D. P. (2007). Predicting performance in canadian dental schools: The new CDA structured interview, a new personality test, and the DAT. Journal of Dental Education, 71, 664–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiter, H. I., Eva, K. W., Rosenfeld, J., & Norman, G. R. (2007). Multiple mini-interviews predict clerkship and licensing examination performance. Medical Education, 41, 378–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smithers, S., Catano, V. M., & Cunninghman, D. P. (2004). What predicts performance in Canadian dental schools? Journal of Dental Education, 68, 598–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, C. B., Dey, E. L., & Fantone, J. C. (2009). Analysis of factors that predict clinical performance in medical school. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 14, 455–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zemke, R. (1992). Second thoughts about MBTI. Training, 28, 43–45.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding was provided by SSHRC (Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council) grant (SSHRC Standard Research Grant 410-2004-0541.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harold I. Reiter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kulasegaram, K., Reiter, H.I., Wiesner, W. et al. Non-association between Neo-5 personality tests and multiple mini-interview. Adv in Health Sci Educ 15, 415–423 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-009-9209-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-009-9209-8

Keywords

Navigation