Advances in Health Sciences Education

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 187–203 | Cite as

What indicates competency in systems based practice? An analysis of perspective consistency among healthcare team members

  • Mark J. Graham
  • Zoon Naqvi
  • John A. Encandela
  • Carma L. Bylund
  • Randa Dean
  • Ayxa Calero-Breckheimer
  • Hilary J. Schmidt
Original Paper

Abstract

In many parts of the world the practice of medicine and medical education increasingly focus on providing patient care within context of the larger healthcare system. Our purpose is to solicit perceptions of all professional stakeholders (e.g. nurses) of the system regarding the U.S. ACGME competency Systems Based Practice to uncover the extent to which there is agreement or discrepancy among key system stakeholders. Eighty-eight multidisciplinary personnel (n = 88) from two academic medical centers were invited to participate in one of 14 nominal group process sessions. Participants generated and prioritized resident characteristics that they believed were important for effective System Based Practices. Through content analysis the prioritized attribute statements were coded to identify embedded themes of resident roles and behavior. From the themes, three major resident roles emerged: resident as Self-Manager, Team Collaborator, and Patient Advocate. No one professional group (e.g., nurses, attending physicians, social workers) emphasized all of these roles. Some concepts that are emphasized in the ACGME definition like using cost–benefit analysis were conspicuously absent from the healthcare team generated list. We showed that there are gaps between the key stakeholders prioritizations about the ACGME definition of SBP and, more generally, the behaviors and roles identified by healthcare team stakeholders beyond the U.S. This suggests that within the process of developing a comprehensive working understanding of the Systems Based Practice competency (or other similar competencies, such as in CanMEDS), it is necessary to use multiple stakeholders in the system (perhaps including patients) to more accurately identify key resident roles and observable behaviors.

Keywords

Systems base practice United States Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education CanMEDS Resident competency Nominal group process 

References

  1. ACGME outcomes project webpage (2007). Viewed 10 Sept. 2007. http://www.acgme.org/outcome/compFull.asp#6
  2. American College of Physicians (ACP) (2008). Achieving a high-performance health care system with universal access: What the United States can learn from other countries. Annals of Internal Medicine, 148(1), 55–75.Google Scholar
  3. Aspinal, F., et al. (2005). What is important to measure in the last months and weeks of life?: A modified nominal group study. International Journal of Nursing Students.Google Scholar
  4. Baker, L. M. (2004). Information needs at the end of life: A content analysis of one person’s story. Journal of the Medical Librarians Association, 92(1), 78–82.Google Scholar
  5. Bleakley, A. (2007). Medical education in transition and the patient as transitional object. Graduate Medical Education Plenary presentation. Washington, D.C.: Association of American Medical Colleges.Google Scholar
  6. Carney, O., McIntosh, J., & Worth, A. (1996). The use of the Nominal Group Technique in research with community nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 23(5), 1024–1029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chatterji, M. (2004). Evidence on “What Works”: An argument for extended-term mixed-method (etmm) evaluation designs. Educational Researcher, 34(5), 14–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. David, R. A., & Reich, L. M. (2005). The creation and evaluation of a systems-based practice/managed care curriculum in a primary care internal medicine residency program. Mt Sinai Journal of Medicine, 72(5), 296–299.Google Scholar
  9. Dyne, P. L., Strauss, R. W., & Rinnert, S. (2002). Systems-based practice: The sixth core competency. Academic Emergency Medicine, 9(11), 1270–1277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Englander, R., Agostinucci, W., Zalneraiti, E., & Carraccio, C. L. (2006). Teaching residents systems-based practice through a hospital cost-reduction program: A “win-win” situation. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 18(2), 150–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Epstein, R. M. (2007). Assessment in medical education. The New England Journal of Medicine, 356(4), 387–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frank J. R. (Ed.). (2005). The CanMEDS 2005 physician competency framework. Better standards. Better physicians. Better care. Ottawa: The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada.Google Scholar
  13. Frank, J. R., & Danoff, D. (2007). The CanMEDS initiative: Implementing an outcomes-based framework of physician competencies. Medical Teacher, 29, 642–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Legrow, K., & Rossen, B. E. (2005). Development of professional practice based on a family systems nursing framework: Nurses’ and families’ experiences. Journal of Family Nursing, 11(1), 38–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. General Medical Council (GMC) [Great Britain]. Good medical practice. (2006). http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/good_medical_practice/index.asp. Viewed on Jan. 29, 2008.
  16. Institute of Medicine, Committee on Quality of Health Care in America (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  17. Kvarnstorm, S., & Cedersund, E. (2006). Discursive patterns in multiprofessional healthcare teams. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 53(2), 244–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lancet (2001). Educating doctors for world health. Lancet: London, 358(9292), 3 November 2001.Google Scholar
  19. Lingard, L., Espin, S., Evans, C., & Hawryluck, L. (2004). The rules of the game: Interprofessional collaboration on the intensive care unit team. Critical Care, 8(6), R403–R408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Moon, R. H. (1999). Finding diamonds in the trenches with the nominal group process. Family Practice Management, 6(5), 49–50.Google Scholar
  21. Owen J. W., & Roberts O. (2005) Globalization, health, and foreign policy: Emerging linkages and interests. Globalization and Health, 1(12), 1744–8603 2005.Google Scholar
  22. Panek, R. C., Deloney, L. A., Park, J., Goodwin, W., Klein, S., & Ferris, E. J. (2006). Interdepartmental problem-solving as a method for teaching and learning systems-based practice. Academic Radiology, 13(9), 1150–1154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Palmer, K. T., Harling, C. C., Harrison, J., Macdonald, E. B., & Snashall, D. C. (2002). Good medical practice: Guidance for occupational physicians. Occupational Medicine, 52(6), 341–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pasquina, P. F., Kelly, S., & Hawkins, R. E. (2003). Assessing clinical competence in physical medicine & rehabilitation residency programs. American Journal of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 82(6), 473–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ranz, J. M., Vergare, M. J., Wilk, J. E., Ackerman, S. H., Lippincott, R. C., Menninger, W. W., et al. (2006). The tipping point from private practice to publicly funded settings for early- and mid-career psychiatrists. Psychiatric Service, 57(11), 1640–1643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Reisdorff, E. J., Hayes, O. W., Walker, G. L., & Carlson, D. J. (2002). Evaluating systems-based practice in emergency medicine. Academic Emergency Medicine, 9(11), 1350–1354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ringsted, C., Hansen, T. L., Davis, D., & Schepbier, A. (2006). Are some of the challenging aspects of the CanMEDS roles valide outside Canada? Medical Education, 40, 807–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Romanow, R. (2002). Building on values: The future of health care in Canada. Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada.Google Scholar
  29. Saleh, K. J., Macaulay, A., Radosevich, D. M., Clark, C. R., Engh, G., Gross, A., et al. (2001). The Knee Society Index of Severity for failed total knee arthroplasty: Development and validation. Clinical Orthopedics Related Research, (392), 153–165.Google Scholar
  30. Swing, S. R. (2002). Assessing the ACGME general competencies: General considerations and assessment methods. Academic Emergency Medicine, 9(11), 1278–1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tomolo, A., Caron, A., Perz, M. L., Fultz, T., & Aron, D. C. (2005). The outcomes card. Development of a systems-based practice educational tool. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 20(8), 769–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zenni, E. A., Ravago, L., Ewart, C., Livingood, W., Wood, D., & Goldhagen, J. (2006). A walk in the patients’ shoes: A step toward competency development in systems-based practice. Ambulatory Pediatrics, 6(1), 54–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark J. Graham
    • 1
  • Zoon Naqvi
    • 1
  • John A. Encandela
    • 1
  • Carma L. Bylund
    • 2
  • Randa Dean
    • 1
  • Ayxa Calero-Breckheimer
    • 1
  • Hilary J. Schmidt
    • 3
  1. 1.Center for Education Research and Evaluation: New York-Presbyterian Hospital at Columbia University Medical Center and Weill Cornell Medical CenterNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral SciencesMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Sanofi-Aventis PharmaceuticalsBridgewaterUSA

Personalised recommendations