Skip to main content
Log in

Agent Based Modelling and Simulation to estimate movement time of pilgrims from one place to another at Allahabad Jn. Railway Station during Kumbh Mela-2019

  • Published:
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Kumbh Mela festival of India is one of the largest mass gathering event of huge religious importance all over the world. Large gatherings in these kind of religious events require rigorous monitoring and attention. Successful organization of such events requires synchronization among officials of different public departments such as police, health, security, communication, railways etc. The railway department plays a significant role in handling huge surge of passengers and their transportation during such events. Every 12-years Kumbh Mela is organized in the city of Prayagraj (formerly Allahabad) in northern India. The Allahabad Jn. railway station experiences huge inflow and outflow of pilgrims during Kumbh Mela. The railway authorities deploy predefined crowd movement strategies and boarding procedures for smooth transportation of pilgrims. However, these strategies are outlined based on previous experiences and ground knowledge of stakeholders. The strategies followed by railway authorities are needed to be evaluated and tested for realistic assessment and possible refinement before actual deployment. Our model is able to capture and simulate the real time behaviour of entities such as pilgrims and trains by programming them as synthetic agents. This model is helpful in analyzing the time taken by a group of pilgrims to move from a designated place to their target platform and board the train. The consumed time is calculated by simulating different movement and boarding procedures including the actual plans followed by the railway authorities. In this way it is possible to assess the efficiency of their movement plans and reasons about possible refinement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abar, S., Theodoropoulos, G. K., Lemarinier, P., & OHare, G. M. (2017). Agent based modelling and simulation tools: A review of the state-of-art software. Computer Science Review, 24, 13–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Allan, R. J. (2010). Survey of agent based modelling and simulation tools. New York: Science & Technology Facilities Council.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Axelrod, R. (2006). Agent-based modeling as a bridge between disciplines. Handbook of Computational Economics, 2, 1565–1584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bandini, S., Manzoni, S., & Vizzari, G. (2009). Agent based modeling and simulation: An informatics perspective. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 12(4), 4.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Berryman, M. (2008). Review of software platforms for agent based models. Technical report. Defence Science and Technology Organisation Edinburgh (Australia) Land

  6. Bonabeau, E. (2002). Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(Suppl. 3), 7280–7287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cao, K., Chen, Y., & Stuart, D. (2016). A fractional micro-macro model for crowds of pedestrians based on fractional mean field games. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 3(3), 261–270.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Cheng, H., & Yang, X. (2012). Emergency evacuation capacity of subway stations. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 43, 339–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheung, C., & Lam, W. H. (1998). Pedestrian route choices between escalator and stairway in MTR stations. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 124(3), 277–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chu, D., Wei, S., & Lin, Y. (2016). The application of pedestrian microscopic simulation technology in researching the influenced realm around urban rail transit station. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 4, 242–246.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Company, A. (2000). Anylogic 8.3, universal edition 2018.

  12. Cui, Q. L., Ichikawa, M., Kaneda, T., & Deguchi, H. (2011). Large scale crowd simulation of terminal station area when Tokai earthquake advisory information is announced officially. In Agent-based approaches in economic and social complex systems VI (pp. 161–174). Berlin: Springer.

  13. Di Gangi, M., Russo, F., & Vitetta, A. (2003). A mesoscopic method for evacuation simulation on passenger ships: Models and algorithms. Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics, 2003, 197–208.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ekyalimpa, R., Werner, M., Hague, S., AbouRizk, S., & Porter, N. (2016). A combined discrete-continuous simulation model for analyzing train-pedestrian interactions. In Proceedings of the 2016 winter simulation conference (pp. 1583–1594). New York: IEEE Press, WSC’16. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3042094.3042296.

  15. Fernández, R., Valencia, A., & Seriani, S. (2015). On passenger saturation flow in public transport doors. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 78, 102–112.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fruin, J. J. (1993). The causes and prevention of crowd disasters. Engineering for Crowd Safety, 1(10), 99–108.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gulhare, S., Verma, A., & Chakroborty, P. (2018). Comparison of pedestrian data of single file movement collected from controlled pedestrian experiment and from field in mass religious gathering. Collective Dynamics, 3, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Helbing, D. (1998). A fluid dynamic model for the movement of pedestrians. Preprint arXiv:cond-mat/9805213.

  19. Helbing, D. (2012). Agent-based modeling. In D. Helbing (Eds.), Social self-organization. Understanding complex systems. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Helbing, D., & Johansson, A. (2009). Pedestrian, crowd and evacuation dynamics. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Helbing, D., & Molnár, P. (1995). Social force model for pedestrian dynamics. Physical Review E, 51, 4282–4286. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.51.4282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Helbing, D., Farkas, I., & Vicsek, T. (2000). Simulating dynamical features of escape panic. Nature, 407(6803), 487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Helbing, D., Farkas, I. J., Molnar, P., & Vicsek, T. (2002). Simulation of pedestrian crowds in normal and evacuation situations. Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics, 21(2), 21–58.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hermant, L. (2007). Human movement behaviour in South African railway stations: Implications for design. In SATC 2011.

  25. Hermant, L., & De Gersigny, M. (2010). Microscopic assessment of pedestrian space requirements within railway stations in South Africa. In SATC 2010.

  26. Hermant, L., De Gersigny, M., Hermann, R., & Ahuja, R. (2010). Applying microscopic pedestrian simulation to the design assessment of various railway stations in South Africa. In Proceedings of the 29th Southern African transport conference (SATC 2010) (Vol. 16, p. 19).

  27. Hughes, R. L. (2002). A continuum theory for the flow of pedestrians. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 36(6), 507–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hughes, R. L. (2003). The flow of human crowds. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 35(1), 169–182.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Ijaz, K., Sohail, S., & Hashish, S. (2015). A survey of latest approaches for crowd simulation and modeling using hybrid techniques. In 17th UKSIMAMSS international conference on modelling and simulation (pp. 111–116).

  30. Kachroo, P. (2009). Pedestrian dynamics: Mathematical theory and evacuation control. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Kelley, H. H., Condry, J. C, Jr., Dahlke, A. E., & Hill, A. H. (1965). Collective behavior in a simulated panic situation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1(1), 20–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kim, H., Kwon, S., Wu, S. K., & Sohn, K. (2014). Why do passengers choose a specific car of a metro train during the morning peak hours? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 61, 249–258.

    Google Scholar 

  33. King, D., Srikukenthiran, S., & Shalaby, A. (2013). Using massmotion to analyze crowd congestion and mitigation measures at interchange subway stations: Case of Bloor–Yonge station in Toronto. In Annual meeting of the transportation research board. Toront: ARUP.

  34. Lakoba, T. I., Kaup, D. J., & Finkelstein, N. M. (2005). Modifications of the Helbing–Molnar–Farkas–Vicsek social force model for pedestrian evolution. Simulation, 81(5), 339–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Macal, C. M., & North, M. J. (2005). Tutorial on agent-based modeling and simulation. In Proceedings of the 37th conference on winter simulation, winter simulation conference, WSC’05 (pp. 2–15).

  36. Patange, P., & Bhakhtyapuri, V. (2017). Micro-simulation study on pedestrian flow at railway station. International Journal of Science Technology and Engineering, 3(09), 594–599.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Pettersson, P. (2011). Passenger waiting strategies on railway platforms-effects of information and platform facilities: Case study Sweden and Japan. Master of Science Thesis. Stockholm, Sweden: Royal Institute of Technology (KTH). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  38. Qingyan, D., Xifu, W., Qingchao, S., & Zhang, X. (2011). Modeling and simulation of rail transit pedestrian flow. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 11(5), 99–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Railsback, S. F., & Grimm, V. (2019). Agent-based and individual-based modeling: A practical introduction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Rastogi, R., Thaniarasu, I., & Chandra, S. (2010). Design implications of walking speed for pedestrian facilities. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 137(10), 687–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Rindsfüser, G., & Klügl, F. (2007). Agent-based pedestrian simulation: A case study of the bern railway station. disP—The Planning Review, 43(170), 9–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Shah, J., Joshi, G., & Parida, P. (2013). Behavioral characteristics of pedestrian flow on stairway at railway station. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 104, 688–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Smith, E. R., & Conrey, F. R. (2007). Agent-based modeling: A new approach for theory building in social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(1), 87–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Still, G. K. (2014). Introduction to crowd science. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  45. Tang, M., & Hu, Y. (2017). Pedestrian simulation in transit stations using agent-based analysis. Urban Rail Transit, 3(1), 54–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Teknomo, K., & Gerilla, G. P. (2008). Mesoscopic multi-agent pedestrian simulation. Transportation Research Trends, 1, 323–336.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Wang, P. (2016). Understanding social-force model in psychological principles of collective behavior. Preprint arXiv:1605.05146

  48. Wang, W., Lo, S. M., Liu, S., & Ma, J. (2015). On the use of a pedestrian simulation model with natural behavior representation in metro stations. Procedia Computer Science, 52, 137–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Wang, X., & Li, J. (2013). Study on the simulation models for pedestrian evacuation movement. International Journal of Digital Content Technology and Its Applications, 7(8), 503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Wen, K. C. (2013). A dynamic simulation of crowd flow in Taipei railway and MRT station by multi-agent simulation system. Urban Planning and Design Research, 1(4), 59–68.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Zhang, Q., Han, B., & Li, D. (2008). Modeling and simulation of passenger alighting and boarding movement in Beijing metro stations. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 16(5), 635–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This Project is done as a part of research work by Abha Trivedi (Ph.D. Scholar, GIS Cell, Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology Allahabad, Allahabad) under the guidance of Dr. Mayank Pandey (Associate Professor, Computer Science and Engineering Department, Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology Allahabad, Prayagraj). This research is financially supported by the Allahabad division of North Central Railway (NCR), Prayagraj.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abha Trivedi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (webm 24127 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Trivedi, A., Pandey, M. Agent Based Modelling and Simulation to estimate movement time of pilgrims from one place to another at Allahabad Jn. Railway Station during Kumbh Mela-2019. Auton Agent Multi-Agent Syst 34, 30 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-020-09454-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-020-09454-x

Keywords

Navigation