Skip to main content

Introduction to the special issue on normative multiagent systems

Abstract

This special issue contains four selected and revised papers from the second international workshop on normative multiagent systems, for short NorMAS07 (Boella et al. (eds) Normative multiagent systems. Dagstuhl seminar proceedings 07122, 2007), held at Schloss Dagstuhl, Germany, in March 2007. At the workshop a shift was identified in the research community from a legal to an interactionist view on normative multiagent systems. In this editorial we discuss the shift, examples, and 10 new challenges in this more dynamic setting, which we use to introduce the papers of this special issue.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    Anderson M., Leigh Anderson S. (2007) Machine ethics: Creating an ethical intelligent agent. AI Magazine 28(4): 15–26

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Boella, G., Caire, P., & van der Torre, L. (to appear). Norm negotiation in online multi-player games. Knowledge and Information Systems.

  3. 3.

    van der Boella G., van der Torre L., Verhagen H. (2006) Introduction to normative multiagent systems. Computation and Mathematical Organizational Theory, Special Issue on Normative Multiagent Systems 12(2–3): 71–79

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Boella, G., van der Torre, L., & Verhagen, H. (Eds.) (2007) Normative multiagent systems. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (Vol. 07122). Schloss Dagstuhl, Germany: Internationals Begegnungs- und Forschungszentrum für Informatik (IBFI).

  5. 5.

    van der Broersen J., van der Dastani M., van der Hulstijn J., van der Torre L. (2002) Goal generation in the BOID architecture. Cognitive Science Quarterly 2(3–4): 428–447

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Caire, P., Villata, S., Boella, G., & van der Torre, L. (2008). Conviviality masks in multiagent systems. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS’08).

  7. 7.

    Castelfranchi C. (1998) Modeling social action for AI agents. Artificial Intelligence 103(1–2): 157–182

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Castelfranchi C. (2003) Formalising the informal? Dynamic social order, bottom-up social control, and spontaneous normative relations. Journal of Applied Logic 1(1–2): 47–92

    MATH  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. University of California Press.

  10. 10.

    Goble, L., & Meyer, J. J. Ch. (Eds.) (2006). Deontic logic and artificial normative systems. In Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Deontic Logic in Computer Science, DEON 2006, Utrecht, The Netherlands, July 12–14, 2006, Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 4048). Springer.

  11. 11.

    Goble, L., & Meyer, J. J. Ch. (Eds.). (in press). Revised versions of papers presented in at the proceeding of the eighth international workshop on deontic logic in computer science (DEON06). Journal of Applied Logic.

  12. 12.

    Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday.

  13. 13.

    Hansen, J., Pigozzi, G., & van der Torre, L. (2007). Ten philosophical problems in deontic logic. In G. Boella, L. van der Torre, & H. Verhagen (Eds.), Normative multi-agent systems. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (Vol. 07122). Schloss Dagstuhl, Germany: Internationales Begegnungs- und Forschungszentrum für Informatik (IBFI).

  14. 14.

    Lomuscio, A., & Nute, D. (Eds.) (2004). Deontic logic in computer science. In 7th International Workshop on Deontic Logic in Computer Science, DEON 2004, Madeira, Portugal, May 26–28, 2004. Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 3065). Springer.

  15. 15.

    Lomuscio, A., & Nute, D. (2005). Revised versions of papers presented in at the proceeding of the seventh international workshop on deontic logic in computer science (DEON04). Journal of Applied Logic, 3(3–4).

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Luck, M., McBurney, P., & Preist, C. (2003). Agent technology: Enabling next generation computing (A roadmap for agent based computing). AgentLink.

  17. 17.

    Ludlow P., Wallace M. (2007) The second life herald. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Searle J.R. (1995) The construction of social reality. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Shoham Y., Tennenholtz M. (1995) On social laws for artificial agent societies: Off-line design. Artificial Intelligence 73(1–2): 231–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Strauss A. (1978) Negotiations: Varieties, contexts, processes and social order. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Taylor, M. (2004) Oh no it isn’t: Audience participation and community identity. Trans, Internet Journal for cultural sciences, 1(15).

  22. 22.

    van den Besselaar P. (2001) E-community versus e-commerce: The rise and decline of the Amsterdam digital city. AI and Society 15(3): 280–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    van der Meyden, R., & van der Torre, L. (Eds.) (in press). Deontic logic in computer science. In 9th International Conference on Deontic Logic in Computer Science, DEON 2008, Luxembourg, July 16–18, 2008, Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 5076). Berlin: Springer.

  24. 24.

    Verhagen, H. (2000). Norm autonomous agents. PhD thesis, Department of System and Computer Sciences, The Royal Institute of Technology and Stockholm University, Sweden.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leendert van der Torre.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boella, G., van der Torre, L. & Verhagen, H. Introduction to the special issue on normative multiagent systems. Auton Agent Multi-Agent Syst 17, 1–10 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-008-9047-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Norms
  • Multiagent Systems
  • Normative multiagent systems
  • Social mechanism design
  • Artifical social systems