Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Conversational semantics sustained by commitments

  • Published:
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We propose an operational model that combines message meaning and conversational structure in one comprehensive approach. Our long-term research goal is to lay down principles uniting message meaning and conversational structure while providing an operational foundation that could be implemented in open computer systems. In this paper we explore our advances in one aspect of meaning that in theories of language use is known as “signal meaning”, and propose a layered model in which the meaning of messages can be defined according to their fitness to advance the state of joint activities. Messages in our model are defined in terms of social commitments, which have been shown to entice conversational structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Castelfranchi, C. (1995). Commitments: From individual intentions to groups and organizations. In Proceedings of the first international conference on multi-agent Systems, June 1995, (pp. 41–48), San Francisco, CA.

  2. Chaib-draa B., Labrie M-A., Bergeron M. and Pasquier P. (2006). DIAGAL: An agent communication language based on dialogue games and sustained by social commitments. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 13(1): 61–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge University Press.

  4. Craig, R. T., & Tracy, K. (1983). Conversational coherence: Form, structure, and strategy. Sage Publications.

  5. Diller A. (1990). Z: An introduction to formal methods. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Sussex, England

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Flores R.A. and Kremer R.C. (2003). To commit or not to commit: Modelling agent conversations for action. Computational Intelligence 18(2): 120–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Flores, R. A., & Kremer, R. C. (2004). A principled modular approach to construct flexible conversation protocols. In A. Y. Tawfik, & S. D. Goodwin (Eds.), Advances in Artificial Intelligence: Canadian AI 2004, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 3060, pp. 1–15). May 2004. Springer Verlag.

  8. Flores, R. A., Pasquier, P., & Chaib-draa, B. (2006). What do agents commit to do when they commit to something? Work in progress.

  9. Fornara, N., Vigano, F., & Colombetti, M. Agent communication and institutional reality. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, forthcoming.

  10. Kagal, L., & Finin, T. Modeling communicative behavior using permissions and obligations. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, forthcoming.

  11. Kremer, R. C., & Flores, R. A. (2005). Using a performative subsumption lattice to support commitment-based conversations. In Proceedings of the fourth international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems, July 2005, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

  12. Mallya, A. U., & Singh, M. P. A semantic approach for designing commitment protocols. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, forthcoming.

  13. Parsons, S., McBurney, P., & Wooldridge, M. J. (2004). The mechanics of some formal inter-agent dialogues. In F. Dignum (Ed.), Advances in agent communication, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 2922, pp. 329–348). Springer Verlag.

  14. Pasquier, P., Flores, R. A., & Chaib-draa, B. (2004). Modelling flexible social commitments and their enforcement. In M. P. Gleizes, A. Omicini, & F. Zambonelli (Eds.), Fifth international workshop on engineering societies in the agents world, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 3451, pp. 153–165) Tolouse, France, October 2004. Springer Verlag.

  15. Pitt J. and Mamdani A. (1999). Some remarks on the semantics of FIPAs agent communication language. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 2(4): 333–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Reed, C. A. (1998). Dialogue frames in agent communication. In Proceedings of the third international conference on multiagent systems (ICMAS 98) (pp. 246–253). Paris, France: IEEE Press.

  17. Singh, M. P. (1991). Social and psychological commitments in multiagent systems. In AAAI fall symposium on knowledge and action at social and organizational levels, November 1991, Monterey, California.

  18. Singh M.P. (1998). Agent communicational languages: Rethinking the principles. IEEE Computer 31(12): 40–47

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sirbu M. (1997). Credits and debits on the Internet. IEEE Spectrum 34(2): 23–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Smith, G. (2000). The object-Z specification language. Kluwer Publishers.

  21. Walton, D. N., & Krabbe, E. C. W. (1995). Commitment in dialogue: Basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning. State University of New York Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physics, Computer Science & Engineering, Newport News, VA, 23606, USA

    Roberto A. Flores

  2. Department of Computer Science & Software Engineering, Sainte-Foy, Quebec, G1K 7P4, Canada

    Philippe Pasquier & Brahim Chaib-draa

Authors
  1. Roberto A. Flores
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Philippe Pasquier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Brahim Chaib-draa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberto A. Flores.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Flores, R.A., Pasquier, P. & Chaib-draa, B. Conversational semantics sustained by commitments. Auton Agent Multi-Agent Syst 14, 165–186 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-006-0011-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-006-0011-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation