Abstract
Agroforestry has been practiced in the Mid-hills for generations as the main source of the supplement of timber, firewood, and fodder. However, its adoption is influenced by different site-specific factors necessitating site-specific studies. In this regard, this study was conducted in the Mid-hill section of Western Nepal to identify major agroforestry practices and analyze determinants of adoption decisions. This was accomplished through direct observation, focus group discussions (n = 3), key informant interviews (n = 9), and household surveys (n = 200), and collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and ordinal logistic regression. Altogether five different agroforestry practices were found viz. Silvopasture, Commercial crop under tree shade, Home Garden, Trees in and around farmland, and Fruit Tree Orchard. Among them, 50.5% were adopting only one practice, 39.5% were adopting two practices, 10% were adopting more than two practices as per their needs and resources. The households with a male as household head, larger household size, greater landholding and livestock units, higher cash income, support for integrating crops, and at a farther distance from community forest were significantly more likely to get higher ratings for the adoption of agroforestry practices. Whereas, variables like caste, occupation, education, age, access to the forest, and membership in community-based organizations weren’t statistically significant. Findings from this study can provide guidelines to stakeholders working to develop effective agricultural management strategies along with promoting the integration of trees into farming systems that meet farmers’ needs and preferences. However, more research on socially acceptable, ecologically sound, and economically beneficial agroforestry practices as well as specific species combinations suitable to the study area is needed to maximize products and benefits from limited available arable land.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adesina AA, Chianu J (2002) Determinants of farmers’ adoption and adaptation of alley farming technology in Nigeria. Agrofor Syst 55(2):99–112. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020556132073
Adesina AA, Mbila D, Nkamleu GB, Endamana D (2000) Econometric analysis of the determinants of adoption of alley farming by farmers in the forest zone of southwest Cameroon. Agr Ecosyst Environ 80(3):255–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(00)00152-3
Ahmed AU, Hernandez R, Naher F (2016). Adoption of stress-tolerant rice varieties in Bangladesh. In: Technological and institutional innovations for marginalized smallholders in agricultural development. Springer, Cham, pp 241–255
Amatya, S. M., Cedamon, E., & Nuberg, I. (2018). Agroforestry systems and practices in Nepal. Agroforestry systems and practices in Nepal.
Andres C, Comoé H, Beerli A, Schneider M, Rist S, Jacobi J (2016) Cocoa in monoculture and dynamic agroforestry. In: Sustainable agriculture reviews. Springer, Cham, pp 121–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26777-7_3
Catacutan D, Naz F (2015) Gender roles, decision-making and challenges to agroforestry adoption in Northwest Vietnam. Int for Rev 17(4):22–32. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554815816086381
Cedamon E, Nuberg I, Pandit BH, Shrestha KK (2018) Adaptation factors and futures of agroforestry systems in Nepal. Agrofor Syst 92(5):1437–1453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-017-0090-9
Dhakal A (2013) Evolution, adoption and economic evaluation of an agroforestry-based farming system with and without carbon values: the case of Nepal, Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern Queensland. http://eprints.usq.edu.au/id/eprint/27872
Dhakal A, Rai RK (2020) who adopts agroforestry in a subsistence economy? Lessons from the Terai of Nepal. Forests 11(5):565. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11050565
Dhakal A, Cockfield G, Maraseni TN (2012) Evolution of agroforestry based farming systems: a study of Dhanusha District, Nepal. Agrofor Syst 86(1):17–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-012-9504-x
Dhanya B, Viswanath S, Purushothaman S (2013) Crop yield reduction in ficus agroforestry systems of Karnataka, Southern India: perceptions and Realities. Agroecol Sustain Food Syst 37(6):727–735. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2012.757266
Dhakal A, Cockfield G, Maraseni TN (2015) Deriving an index of adoption rate and assessing factors affecting adoption of an agroforestry-based farming system in Dhanusha District, Nepal. Agrofor Syst 89(4):645–661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-015-9802-1
Dhyani S, Maikhuri RK, Dhyani D (2013) Utility of fodder banks for reducing women drudgery and anthropogenic pressure from forests of Western Himalaya. Natl Acad Sci Lett 36(4):453–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40009-013-0143-1
Fischer A, Vasseur L (2002) Smallholder perceptions of agroforestry projects in Panama. Agrofor Syst 54(2):103–113. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015047404867
FRTC (2019) Agroforestry system and practices in Terai and mid-hills of Nepal, Forest Research and Training Center (FRTC), Ministry of Forests and Environment, Kathmandu, Nepal
Idol T, Haggar J, Cox L (2011) Ecosystem services from smallholder forestry and agroforestry in the tropics. In: Integrating agriculture, conservation and ecotourism: examples from the field. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 209–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1309-3_5
Jara-Rojas R, Russy S, Roco L, Fleming-Munoz D, Engler A (2020) Factors affecting the adoption of agroforestry practices: insights from silvopastoral systems of Colombia. Forests 11(6):648. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11060648
Jera R, Ajayi OC (2008) Logistic modelling of smallholder livestock farmers’ adoption of tree-based fodder technology in Zimbabwe. Agrekon 47(3):379–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/03031853.2008.9523806
Kaua CG (2020) Socio-economic factors affecting adoption of agroforestry practices in forest adjacent communities: the case of Ndabibi Location, Nakuru County Kenya. East African Journal of Forestry and Agroforestry 2(1):59–67. https://doi.org/10.37284/eajfa.2.1.143
Kunwar RM, Bussmann RW (2006) Ficus (Fig) species in Nepal: a review of diversity and indigenous uses. Lyonia 11(1):85–97
Meijer SS, Catacutan D, Ajayi OC, Sileshi GW, Nieuwenhuis M (2015) The role of knowledge, attitudes and perceptions in the uptake of agricultural and agroforestry innovations among smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa. Int J Agric Sustain 13(1):40–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2014.912493
Mekoya A, Oosting SJ, Fernandez-Rivera S, Van der Zijpp AJ (2008) Multipurpose fodder trees in the Ethiopian highlands: Farmers’ preference and relationship of indigenous knowledge of feed value with laboratory indicators. Agric Syst 96(1–3):184–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2007.08.001
Nair PK (1994) An introduction to agroforestry. Kluwer Academic Publishers, London
Nawaz MF, Yousaf MTB, Yasin G, Gul S, Ahmed I, Abdullah M et al (2018) Agroforestry status and its role to sequester atmospheric CO2 under semi-arid climatic conditions in Pakistan. Appl Ecol Environ Res 16(1):645–661. https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1601_645661
Ndayambaje JD (2013) Trees and woodlots in Rwanda and their role in fuelwood supply. Ph.d. thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen
Ndayambaje JD, Heijman WJ, Mohren GM (2013) Farm woodlots in rural Rwanda: purposes and determinants. Agrofor Syst 87(4):797–814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-013-9597-x
Neupane RP, Sharma KR, Thapa GB (2002) Adoption of agroforestry in the hills of Nepal: a logistic regression analysis. Agric Syst 72(3):177–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X(01)00066-X
Nkamleu GB, Manyong VM (2005) Factors affecting the adoption of agroforestry practices by farmers in Cameroon. Small-Scale for Econ Manag Policy 4(2):135–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-005-0009-6
Oelbermann M, Voroney RP, Gordon AM (2004) Carbon sequestration in tropical and temperate agroforestry systems: a review with examples from Costa Rica and southern Canada. Agr Ecosyst Environ 104(3):359–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-005-0009-6
Oli BN, Treue T, Larsen HO (2015) Socio-economic determinants of growing trees on farms in the middle hills of Nepal. Agrofor Syst 89(5):765–777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-015-9810-1
Paudel D, Tiwari KR, Raut N, Sitaula BK, Poudel P (2019) Agroforestry practices in Midhills of Nepal from gender perspective. Open J for 9(04):323. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojf.2019.94018
Rahman SA, Rahman MF, Sunderland T (2014) Increasing tree cover in degrading landscapes: ‘Integration and Intensification of smallholder forest culture in the Alutilla valley, Matiranga, Bangladesh. Small Scale for 13(2):237–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-013-9251-5
Rahman SA, Jacobsen JB, Healey JR, Roshetko JM, Sunderland T (2017) Finding alternatives to Swidden agriculture: does agroforestry improve livelihood options and reduce pressure on existing forest? Agrofor Syst 91(1):185–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-016-9912-4
Roothaert R, Franzel S, Kiura M (2003) On-farm evaluation of fodder trees and shrubs preferred by farmers in central Kenya. Exp Agric 39(4):423–440. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479703001376
Thapa GB, Paudel GS (2000) Evaluation of the livestock carrying capacity of land resources in the Hills of Nepal based on total digestive nutrient analysis. Agric Ecosyst Environ 78(3):223–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00128-0
Tiwari TP, Brook RM, Sinclair FL (2004) Implications of hill farmers’ agronomic practices in Nepal for crop improvement in maize. Exp Agric 40(4):397–417. https://doi.org/10.1017/S001447970400208X
Tiwari KR, Bajracharya RM, Raut N, Sitaula BK (2017) Agroforestry system: an opportunity for carbon sequestration and climate change adaptation in the mid-hills of Nepal. Octa J Environ Res 5(1):022–031
Toth GG, Nair PR, Duffy CP, Franzel SC (2017) Constraints to the adoption of fodder tree technology in Malawi. Sustain Sci 12(5):641–656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0460-2
Yasin G, Nawaz MF, Siddiqui MT, Niazi NK (2018) Biomass, carbon stocks and CO2 sequestration in three different aged irrigated populous deltoids bartr. Ex marsh. Bund planting agroforestry systems. Appl Ecol Environ Res 16:6239–6252. https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1605_62396252
Acknowledgements
We would like to express our deep gratitude to NORHED SUNREM Himalayan Project for providing funding for this study and to all respondents for their time and hospitality. Also, a big thanks to the field assistant who helped us during our fieldwork.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors do not have any conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Khatri, N.D., Paudel, D., Bhusal, P. et al. Determinants of farmers’ decisions to adopt agroforestry practices: insights from the Mid-hills of Western Nepal. Agroforest Syst 97, 833–845 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-023-00830-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-023-00830-6