Abstract
In humid-temperate silvopastoral systems (SPS), light limitations can affect the growth and persistence of temperate forage species in the understory. Our objectives were to describe the morphogenic and structural changes expressed under tree-shading (UNDER) and under non-limiting light conditions (OPEN), and how these factors could impact growth, persistence and defoliation management practices of perennial C3 grasses of different tolerance to shade: Dactylis glomerata (tolerant), Festuca arundinacea (moderately tolerant) and Phalaris aquatica (heliophilous). The experiment was carried out in thirty-six pots. Half of them in the OPEN and the other, UNDER an experimental stand of Populus deltoides planted at a 4 m × 4 m arrangement (n = 6). There were three general shade response mechanisms determined by tree-shading: a high proportion of growing leaves per tiller, a low number of living leaves and a low leaf lifespan. The increase of the proportion of growing leaves determined the increase in the total green laminae per tiller, leading to a short term increase in light resource acquisition and growth rate. However this common response was driven by different morhogenetic mechanisms in the three species, based on increase of phyllochron, reduction of leaf lifespan or both simultaneously. However, under shading all species had similar low values of leaf lifespan and would have similar optimal defoliation frequencies. An among species trade-off between green lamina length per tiller versus density of tillers per plant was found-i.e. growing versus persisting-but was not associated with differential species shade tolerance. These results contribute to understanding the shade tolerance mechanisms behind the known suitability of the three species under deciduous trees.



Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abraham EM, Kyriazopoulos AP, Parissi ZM et al (2014) Growth, dry matter production, phenotypic plasticity and nutritive value of three natural populations of Dactylis glomerata L. under various shading treatments. Agrofor Syst 88:287–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-014-9682-9
Ballaré CL, Scopel AL, Sánchez RA (1990) Far-red reflected from adjacent leaves: an early signal of competition in plant canopies. Science 247:329–332. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.247.4940.329
Belesky DP (2005) Growth of Dactylis glomerata along a light gradient in the central Appalachian region of the eastern USA: I. Dry matter production and partitioning. Agrofor Syst 65:81–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-004-5725-y
Belesky DP (2006) Regrowth interval influences productivity, botanical composition, and nutritive value of old word bluestem and perennial ryegrass swards. Agron J 98:270–279. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2005-0100
Belesky DP, Burner DM, Ruckle JM (2011) Tiller production in cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata) and tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) growing along a light gradient. Grass Forage Sci 66:370–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.2011.00796.x
Berone GD, Lattanzi FA, Colabelli M, Agnusdei M (2007) A comparative analysis of temperature response of leaf elongation in Bromus stamineus and Lolium perenne plants in the field. Intrinsic and size-mediated effects. Ann Bot 100:813–820. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcm174
Clavijo MP, Cornaglia PS, Gundel PE et al (2010) Limits to recruitment of tall fescue plants in poplar silvopastoral systems of the Pampa, Argentina. Agrofor Syst 80:275–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-010-9329-4
Davidson JL, Milthorpe FL (1966) Leaf growth of Dactylis glomerata L. following defoliation. Ann Bot 30:173–184
Di Rienzo JA, Casanoves F, Balzarini MG et al (2020) InfoStat versión 2020. Centro de Transferencia InfoStat, FCA, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina. http://www.infostat.com.ar
Donaghy DJ, Turner LR, Adamczewski KA (2008) Effect of defoliation management on water –soluble carbohydrate energy reserves, dry matter yields, and herbage quality of Tall Fescue. Agron J 100(1):122–127
Donaghy DJ, Fulkerson B (2001) Principles for developing an effective grazing management system for ryegrass-based pastures. Tasmanian Institute of Agricultural Research, Burnie, Tasmania. 10 p
Durand J-L, Varlet-Grancher C, Lemaire G et al (1991) Carbon partitioning in forage crops. Acta Biotheor 39:213–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00114177
Duru M, Ducrocq H (2000) Growth and senescence of the successive grass leaves on a tiller. Ontogenic development and effect of temperature. Ann Bot 85:635–643. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.2000.1116
Faichney GF, White (1983) Methods for the analysis of feeds eaten by ruminants. In: CSIRO, Melbourne: division of animal production, Ian Clunies Ross animal research laboratory, commonwealth scientific and industrial research organization, Australia. 36 pp
Fulkerson WJ, Donaghy DJ (2001) Plant-soluble carbohydrate reserves and senescence. Key criteria for developing an effective grazing management system for ryegrass-based pastures: a review. Aust J Exp Agric 41:261–275. https://doi.org/10.1071/EA00062
Fustec J, Guilleux J, Le Corff J, Maitre JP (2005) Comparison of early development of three grasses: Lolium perenne, Agrostis stolonifera and Poa pratensis. Ann Bot 96:269–278. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci175
Gastal F, Lemaire G (2002) N uptake and distribution in crops: an agronomical and ecophysiological perspective. J Exp Bot 53(370):789–799 (Inorganic Nitrogen Assimilation Special Issue)
Gatti ML, Ayala Torales AT, Cipriotti PA, Golluscio RA (2013) Leaf and tiller dynamics in two competing C3 grass species: influence of neighbors and nitrogen on morphogenetic traits. Grass Forage Sci 68(1):151–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.2012.00881.x
Gatti ML, Ayala Torales AT, Cipriotti PA, Golluscio RA (2015) Dynamics of structural traits in two competing C3 grass species: influence of neighbours and nitrogen. Grass Forage Sci 70(1):102–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12099
Gautier H, Varlet-Grancher C, Hazard L (1999) Tillering responses to the light environment and to defoliation in populations of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) selected for contrasting leaf length. Ann Bot 83:423–429. https://doi.org/10.1006/ANBO.1998.0840
Hall MB (2003) Challenges with nonfiber carbohydrate methods. J Anim Sci 81:3226–3232. https://doi.org/10.2527/2003.81123226x
Hazard L, Ghesquiere M (1995) Evidence from the use of isozyme markers of competition in swards between short-leaves and long leaved perennial ryegrass. Grass Forage Sci 50:241–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1995.tb02319.x
Hirata M, Pakiding W (2001) Tiller dynamics in a bahia grass (Paspalum notatum) pasture under cattle grazing. Trop Grass 35:151–160
Lemaire G, Agnusdei M (2000) Leaf tissue turnover and efficiency of herbage utilization. In: Lemaire G, Hodgson J, de Moraes A, Nabinger C, de Carvalho PCF (eds) Grassland ecophysiology and grazing ecology. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 265–287. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851994529.0265
Lemaire G, Chapman D (1996) Tissue flows in grazed plant communities. In: Hodgson J, Illius AW (eds) The ecology and management of grazing systems. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 3–36
Lemaire G, Millard P (1999) An ecophysiological approach to modelling resource fluxes in competing plants. J Exp Bot 50:15–28. https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/50.330.15
Lemaire G, Da Silva SC, Agnusdei M, Wade M, Hodgson J (2009) Interactions between leaf lifespan and defoliation frequency in temperate and tropical pastures: a review. Grass Forage Sci 64:341–353
Lin CH, Mc Graw RL, George MF, Garrett HE (1999) Shade effects of forage crops with potential in temperate agroforestry practices. Agrofor Syst 44:109–119. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006205116354
Maddaloni J, Ferrari L (2001) Festuca arundinacea. In: Maddaloni J, Ferrari L (eds), Forrajeras y pasturas del ecosistema templado húmedo de la Argentina [Fodder and pastures of the temperate humid ecosystem of Argentina], pp 165-182. Universidad Nacional de Lomas de Zamora, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias
Matthew C, Assuero SG, Black CK, Sackville Hamilton NR (2000) In: Lemaire G, Hodgson J, de Moraes A, Nabinger C, Carvalho PCF (eds) Grassland ecophysiology and grazing ecology. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp 127–150. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851994529.0265
Mónaco TA, Briske DD (2000) Does resource availability modulate shade avoidance responses to the ratio of red to far-red irradiation? An assessment of radiation quantity and soil volume. New Phytol 146:37–46. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00613.x
Nelson CJ (2000) Shoot morphological plasticity of grasses: leaf growth versus tillering. In: Lemaire G, Hodgson J, de Moraes A, Nabinger C, de Carvalho PCF (eds) Grassland ecophysiology and grazing ecology. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 101–126. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851994529.0101
Nurjaya IGMO, Tow PG (2001) Genotype and environmental adaptation as regulators of competitiveness. In: Tow PG, Lazenby A (eds) Competition and succession in pastures. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 43–62
O’Neal ME, Landis DA, Isaacs R (2002) An inexpensive, accurate method for measuring leaf area and defoliation through digital image analysis. J Econ Entomol 95(6):1190–1194. https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-0493-95.6.1190
Penning PD, Parsons AJ, Orr RJ, Hooper GE (1994) Intake and behaviuor response by sheep to changes in sward characteristics under rotational grazing. Grass Forage Sci 49:476–486. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1994.tb02025.x
Peri PL, Lucas RJ, Moot DJ (2007) Dry matter production, morphology and nutritive value of Dactylis glomerata growing under different light regimes. Agrofor Syst 70:63–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-007-9029-x
Rousseaux MC, Hall AJ, Sánchez RA (2000) Basal leaf senescence in sunflower (Helianthus annus) canopy: responses to increased R:FR ratio. Physiol Plant 110:477–482. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2000.1100408.x
Ryser P, Eek L (2000) Consequences of phenotypic plasticity versus interspecific differences in leaf and root traits poor acquisition of aboveground and belowground resources. Amer J Bot 87(3):403–411. https://doi.org/10.2307/2656636
Schnyder H, Schäufele R, de Visser R, Nelson CJ (2000) An integrated view of C and N uses in leaf growth zones of defoliated grasses. In: Lemaire G, Hodgson J, de Moraes A, Nabinger C, de Carvalho PCF (eds) Grassland ecophysiology and grazing ecology. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 41–60. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851994529.0041
Sims DA, Rahman AF, Cordova VD et al (2005) Midday values of gross CO2 flux and light use efficiency during satellite overpasses can be used to directly estimate eight-day mean flux. Agric Forest Meteorol 131:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2005.04.006
Sugiyama S (1995) The relationship between growth and development of vegetative shoots in genotypes of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.). Ann Bot 76:553–558. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1995.1132
Sugiyama S (1999) Genetic variation in the relative dominance of mixed swards: potential influence and its mechanism. Grassland Sci 44(4):303–309. https://doi.org/10.14941/grass.44.303
Turner LR, Donaghy DJ, Lane PA, Rawnsley RP (2006) Effect of defoliation interval on water-soluble carbohydrate and nitrogen energy reserves, regrowth of leaves and roots, and tiller number of cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.) plants. Aust J Agric Res 57:243–249
Virkajärvi P, Järvenranta K (2001) Leaf dynamics of timothy and meadow fescue under Nordic conditions. Grass Forage Sci 56:294–304. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2494.2001.00276.x
Watson DJ, Avery A, Mitchell GJ, Chinner SR (2001) Grazing management to increase utilization of phalaris-based pasture in dryland dairy systems. Aust J Exp Agric 41(1):29–36
Wilhelm WW, McMaster GS (1995) Importance of the phyllochron in studying development and growth in grasses. Crop Sci 35:1–3. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1995.0011183X003500010001x
Wingler A, Purdy S, Mac Lean JA, Pourtau N (2006) The role of sugars in integrating environmental signals during the regulation of leaf senescence. J Exp Bot 57:391–399. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eri279
Yemm EW, Willis AJ (1954) The estimation of carbohydrates in plants extracts by Antrone. Biochem J 57:508–514. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj0570508
Acknowledgements
We thank Mario Suárez for his help with field work and Dr. Pablo Cipriotti who has provided valuable suggestions that allowed improving the present manuscript.
Funding
This study was funded by Universidad de Buenos Aires (G144, 247BA) and Ministerio de Agricultura Ganadería y Pesca de la Nación Argentina and Proyecto de Manejo Sustentable de Recursos Naturales (BIRF LN 7520 AR: PIA 10104).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Consent for publication
All authors have consented to the publication of this manuscript.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Gatti, M.L., Cornaglia, P.S. & Golluscio, R.A. Morphogenetic and structural responses to tree-shading in three temperate perennial grasses: implications for growth, persistence and defoliation practices. Agroforest Syst 97, 549–559 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-023-00809-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-023-00809-3


