Abstract
The restoration of degraded lands has received increased attention in recent years and many commitments have been made as part of global and regional restoration initiatives. Well-informed policy decisions that support land restoration, require spatially explicit information on restoration potentials to guide the design and implementation of restoration interventions in the context of limited resources. This study assessed ecosystems indicators of land degradation using a systematic approach that combines field surveys and remote sensing data into a set of multi-criteria analyses to map restoration potentials in the semi-arid areas. The indicators considered were soil organic carbon, erosion prevalence, enhanced vegetation index, Normalized differences water index and the Net Primary productivity. Three classes of restoration potential were established: (1) areas not in need of immediate restoration due low degradation status, (2) areas with high potential for restoration with moderate efforts required and (3) areas in critical need of restoration and require high level of efforts. Of the total area of the study site estimated at 88,344 km2, 59,146.12 km2, or 66.94% of the theoretically recoverable area, was considered suitable for restoration, of which 38% required moderate efforts while 28% require less efforts. The recoverable areas suitable for restoration could be restored through tree planting, soil and water conservation practices, farmers managed natural regeneration, and integrated soil fertility management. These results can help to spatially identify suitable multifunctional restoration and regeneration hotspots as an efficient way to prioritize restoration interventions in the context of limited resources.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bayala J, Sanou J, Bazié HR, Coe R, Kalinganire A, Sinclair FL (2020) Regenerated trees in farmers’ fields increase soil carbon across the Sahel. Agrofor Syst 94:401–415
Bouwer H (1986) Intake rate: cylinder infiltrometer. Methods Soil Anal Part 1 Phys Mineral Methods 5:825–844
Braun-Blanquet J (1932) Plant sociology. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York
Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45:5–32
Brundu G, Camarda I, (2013) The flora of chad: a checklist and brief analysis. PhytoKeys 1–17
Chen M, Zeng L, Huang Z, Lei L, Shen Y, Xiao W (2021) Evaluating suitability of land for forest landscape restoration: a case study of three gorges reservoir China. Ecol Indic 127:107765
Cowie AL, Orr BJ, Castillo Sanchez VM, Chasek P, Crossman ND, Erlewein A, Louwagie G, Maron M, Metternicht GI, Minelli S, Tengberg AE, Walter S, Welton S (2018) Land in balance: the scientific conceptual framework for land degradation neutrality. Environ Sci Policy 79:25–35
Crossland M, Winowiecki LA, Pagella T, Hadgu K, Sinclair F (2018) Implications of variation in local perception of degradation and restoration processes for implementing land degradation neutrality. Environ Dev 28:42–54
Dai A, Lamb PJ, Trenberth KE, Hulme M, Jones PD, Xie P (2004) The recent sahel drought is real. Int J Climatol 24:1323–1331
Dubovyk O (2017) The role of remote sensing in land degradation assessments: opportunities and challenges. Eur J Remote Sens 50:601–613
Dudley N, Bhagwat SA, Harris J, Maginnis S, Moreno JG, Mueller GM, Oldfield S, Walters G (2018) Measuring progress in status of land under forest landscape restoration using abiotic and biotic indicators. Restor Ecol 26:5–12
Fagan ME, Reid JL, Holland MB, Drew JG, Zahawi RA (2020) How feasible are global forest restoration commitments? Conserv Lett 13:e12700
FAO (2020) global forest resource assessment 2020. FAO, Rome
Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter SR, Chapin FS, Coe MT, Daily GC, Gibbs HK, Helkowski JH, Holloway T, Howard EA, Kucharik CJ, Monfreda C, Patz JA, Prentice IC, Ramankutty N, Snyder PK (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science 309:570–574
Gisladottir G, Stocking M (2005) Land degradation control and its global environmental benefits. Land Degrad Dev 16:99–112
Ilstedt U, Malmer A, Verbeeten E, Murdiyarso D (2007) The effect of afforestation on water infiltration in the tropics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. For Ecol Manag 251:45–51
Jiang P, Thelen KD (2004) Effect of soil and topographic properties on crop yield in a north-central corn-soybean cropping system. Agron J 96:252–258
Jiang X, Shen W, Bai X (2019) Response of net primary productivity to vegetation restoration in Chinese loess plateau during 1986–2015. PLoS ONE 14:e0219270
Kim Y, Huete A, Miura T, Jiang Z (2010) Spectral compatibility of vegetation indices across sensors: band decomposition analysis with Hyperion data. J Appl Remote Sens 4:043520
Lal R (2005) Soil erosion and carbon dynamics. Soil Tillage Res 81:137–142
Lohbeck M, Poorter L, Martínez-Ramos M, Bongers F (2015) Biomass is the main driver of changes in ecosystem process rates during tropical forest succession. Ecology 96:1242–1252
Lorenz K, Lal R, Ehlers K (2019) Soil organic carbon stock as an indicator for monitoring land and soil degradation in relation to United Nations’ sustainable development goals. Land Degrad Dev 30:824–838
Mansourian S, Vallauri D (2014) Restoring forest landscapes: important lessons learnt. Environ Manag 53:241–251
Mbow C, Brandt M, Ouedraogo I, De Leeuw J, Marshall M (2015) What four decades of earth observation tell us about land degradation in the sahel? Remote Sens 7:4048–4067
Mehlich A (1984) Mehlich 3 soil test extractant. a modification of the mehlich 2 extractant. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 15:1409–1416
Menz MHM, Dixon KW, Hobbs RJ (2013) Hurdles and opportunities for landscape-scale restoration. Science 339:526–527
Montoya D, Rogers L, Memmott J (2012) Emerging perspectives in the restoration of biodiversity-based ecosystem services. Trends Ecol Evol 27:666–672
Nimmo JR, Schmidt KM, Perkins KS, Stock JD (2009) Rapid measurement of field-saturated hydraulic conductivity for areal characterization. Vadose Zone J 8:142–149
Oueslati I, Allamano P, Bonifacio E, Claps P (2013) Vegetation and topographic control on spatial variability of soil organic carbon. Pedosphere 23:48–58
Padfield D, Matheson G (2018) nls.multstart: robust non-linear regression using AIC scores. R package version 1.0.0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nls.multstart
Panagos P, Jones A, Bosco C, Kumar PSS (2011) European digital archive on soil maps (EuDASM): preserving important soil data for public free access. Int J Digit Earth 4:434–443
Poorter L, Bongers F, Aide TM, Almeyda Zambrano AM, Balvanera P, Becknell JM, Boukili V, Brancalion PHS, Broadbent EN, Chazdon RL, Craven D, de Almeida-Cortez JS, Cabral GAL, de Jong BHJ, Denslow JS, Dent DH, DeWalt SJ, Dupuy JM, Durán SM, Espírito-Santo MM, Fandino MC, César RG, Hall JS, Hernandez-Stefanoni JL, Jakovac CC, Junqueira AB, Kennard D, Letcher SG, Licona J-C, Lohbeck M, Marín-Spiotta E, Martínez-Ramos M, Massoca P, Meave JA, Mesquita R, Mora F, Muñoz R, Muscarella R, Nunes YRF, Ochoa-Gaona S, de Oliveira AA, Orihuela-Belmonte E, Peña-Claros M, Pérez-García EA, Piotto D, Powers JS, Rodríguez-Velázquez J, Romero-Pérez IE, Ruíz J, Saldarriaga JG, Sanchez-Azofeifa A, Schwartz NB, Steininger MK, Swenson NG, Toledo M, Uriarte M, van Breugel M, van der Wal H, Veloso MDM, Vester HFM, Vicentini A, Vieira ICG, Bentos TV, Williamson GB, Rozendaal DMA (2016) Biomass resilience of neotropical secondary forests. Nature 530:211–214
Pritchard R, Ryan CM, Grundy I, van der Horst D (2018) Human appropriation of net primary productivity and rural livelihoods: findings from six villages in zimbabwe. Ecol Econ 146:115–124
R Core Team (2020) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria
Reynolds WD, Elrick DE (1990) Ponded infiltration from a single ring: I. Analysis of steady flow. Soil Sci Soc Am J 54:1233–1241
Rozendaal DMA, Bongers F, Aide TM, Alvarez-Dávila E, Ascarrunz N, Balvanera P, Becknell JM, Bentos TV, Brancalion PHS, Cabral GAL, Calvo-Rodriguez S, Chave J, César RG, Chazdon RL, Condit R, Dallinga JS, Almeida-Cortez JSD, Jong BD, Oliveira AD, Denslow JS, Dent DH, DeWalt SJ, Dupuy JM, Durán SM, Dutrieux LP, Espírito-Santo MM, Fandino MC, Fernandes GW, Finegan B, García H, Gonzalez N, Moser VG, Hall JS, Hernández-Stefanoni JL, Hubbell S, Jakovac CC, Hernández AJ, Junqueira AB, Kennard D, Larpin D, Letcher SG, Licona J-C, Lebrija-Trejos E, Marín-Spiotta E, Martínez-Ramos M, Massoca PES, Meave JA, Mesquita RCG, Mora F, Müller SC, Muñoz R, Neto SNDO, Norden N, Nunes YRF, Ochoa-Gaona S, Ortiz-Malavassi E, Ostertag R, Peña-Claros M, Pérez-García EA, Piotto D, Powers JS, Aguilar-Cano J, Rodriguez-Buritica S, Rodríguez-Velázquez J, Romero-Romero MA, Ruíz J, Sanchez-Azofeifa A, Almeida ASD, Silver WL, Schwartz NB, Thomas WW, Toledo M, Uriarte M, Sampaio EVDS, Breugel MV, Wal HVD, Martins SV, Veloso MDM, Vester HFM, Vicentini A, Vieira ICG, Villa P, Williamson GB, Zanini KJ, Zimmerman J, Poorter L (2019) Biodiversity recovery of neotropical secondary forests. Sci Adv 5:3114
Schulz JJ, Schröder B (2017) Identifying suitable multifunctional restoration areas for forest landscape restoration in central Chile. Ecosphere 8:e01644
Shepherd KD, Walsh MG (2002) Development of reflectance spectral libraries for characterization of soil properties. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66:988–998
Takoutsing B, Weber J, Aynekulu E, Rodríguez Martín JA, Shepherd K, Sila A, Tchoundjeu Z, Diby L (2016a) Assessment of soil health indicators for sustainable production of maize in smallholder farming systems in the highlands of Cameroon. Geoderma 276:64–73
Takoutsing B, Weber JC, Tchoundjeu Z, Shepherd K (2016b) Soil chemical properties dynamics as affected by land use change in the humid forest zone of Cameroon. Agrofor Syst 90:1089–1102
Takoutsing B, Weber JC, Rodríguez Martín JA, Shepherd K, Aynekulu E, Sila A (2018) An assessment of the variation of soil properties with landscape attributes in the highlands of Cameroon. Land Degrad Dev 29:2496–2505
Terhoeven-Urselmans T, Vagen TG, Spaargaren O, Shepherd KD (2010) Prediction of soil fertility properties from a globally distributed soil mid-infrared spectral library. Soil Sci Soc Am J 74:1792–1799
UNCCD (2017) United nations convention to combat desertification global land outlook bonn
Vågen T-G, Winowiecki LA (2019) Predicting the spatial distribution and severity of soil erosion in the global tropics using satellite remote Sensing. Remote Sens 11:1800
Vågen T-G, Winowiecki A (2020) The Land Degradation surveillance framework field guide. ICRAF, Nairobi
Vågen T-G, Shepherd KD, Walsh MG (2006) Sensing landscape level change in soil fertility following deforestation and conversion in the highlands of Madagascar using Vis-NIR spectroscopy. Geoderma 133:281–294
Vågen T-G, Winowiecki LA, Abegaz A, Hadgu KM (2013) Landsat-based approaches for mapping of land degradation prevalence and soil functional properties in Ethiopia. Remote Sens Environ 134:266–275
Vågen T-G, Winowiecki LA, Tondoh JE, Desta LT, Gumbricht T (2016) Mapping of soil properties and land degradation risk in Africa using MODIS reflectance. Geoderma 263:216–225
Vågen TG, Winowiecki LA, Neely C, Chesterman S, Bourne M (2018) Spatial assessments of soil organic carbon for stakeholder decision-making – a case study from Kenya. Soil 4:259–266
Vågen Tz, Winowiecki L, Tamene T, Tondoh JE (2010) The land degradation surveillance framework (LDSF). World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF)
Venter ZS, Scott SL, Desmet PG, Hoffman MT (2020) Application of Landsat-derived vegetation trends over South Africa: Potential for monitoring land degradation and restoration. Ecol Indic 113:106206
Wilding LP (1985) Spatial variability: its documentation, accommodation and implication to soil surveys
Winowiecki LA, Vågen T-G, Kinnaird MF, O’Brien TG (2018) Application of systematic monitoring and mapping techniques: assessing land restoration potential in semi-arid lands of Kenya. Geoderma 327:107–118
Acknowledgements
We would like to acknowledge the contribution of the field team based in Chad and we are particularly indebted to Muhamad Nabi Ahmed and Benard Onkware for their support during the implementation of the field methodology. Financial supports were provided by the International Fund for Agriculture (IFAD) (Grant number 2000000925), Global Environment Facility (Grant number 2000000926) and the Adaptation for Smallholder Agriculture Program (Grant number 2000000927) through the government of the Republic of Chad. Partial funding for the writing and analysis of the data was obtained from CGIAR Research Program on Forests, Trees and Agroforestry (FTA) and the Swedish Research Council Formas (grant number 2017‐00430). We are indebted Muhamad Nabi Ahmed, Benard Onkware and the entire field team for the implementation of LDSF field methodology.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Takoutsing, B., Winowiecki, L.A., Bargués-Tobella, A. et al. Determination of land restoration potentials in the semi-arid areas of Chad using systematic monitoring and mapping techniques. Agroforest Syst 97, 1289–1305 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-021-00720-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-021-00720-9