Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Agro-economy of tree wind break systems in Kyrgyzstan, Central Asia

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tree wind break systems are found in many parts of the world. In particular in windy and arid regions they help to increase crop yields and reduce crop water consumption. Due to these reasons, tree wind breaks have a long tradition in Central Asia and were strongly propagated there during Soviet Union times. After the Soviet Union had disintegrated and the countries in Central Asia had become independent, energy supplies from Russia ceased and fuel wood became the primary energy source for large parts of the population, in particular rural population. Consequently, most of those tree wind breaks were cut down for fuel wood during the 1990s. Now, governments wish to restore these systems, but many farmers are skeptical about the economic returns from investment in tree wind breaks. Against this background, this study calculated revenues, costs, and profits for tree wind break systems of poplars combined with wheat, barley, corn, alfalfa, cotton, and rice in Kyrgyzstan, based on interviews and field observations. Tree wind breaks with more than one row of trees (multiple row type) did not result in financial gains for most crop tree wind break systems compared to open field conditions, while single tree wind breaks were cost-neutral or resulted in small economic gains, also under different discount rates and revenues attained from crops and trees. Among the different grid sizes, the 200 m × 200 m grid attained the highest financial surplus compared with open field conditions and other grid sizes. Thereby, effectively it is recommended to establish tree wind breaks along existing field borders or irrigation ditches while keeping an average distance between tree lines of 200 m, in order not to impede farm operations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albenskii AV, Kalashnikov AF, Ozolin GP, Nikitin PL, Surmach GP, Kulik NF, Senkevich AA, Kasyanov FM, Pavlovskii ES, Roslyakov NV (1972) Agroforestry melioration. Lesnaya promyshlennost, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Alemu MM (2016) Ecological benefits of trees as windbreaks and shelterbelts. Int J Ecosyst 6:10–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Azarov A, Maurer MK, Weyerhaeuser H, Darr D (2019) The impact of uncertainty on smallholder farmers’ income in Kyrgyzstan. Agric Rural Dev Trop Subtrop 120:183–195. https://doi.org/10.17170/kobra-20191127816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandle JR, Hodges L, Zhou XH (2004) Windbreaks in North American agricultural systems. Agrofor Syst 61:65–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulychev A, Onishenko L (1979) Field protective forest lines and their effectiveness in Chuy Valley. Kyrgyzstan, Frunze

    Google Scholar 

  • Caborn JM (1957) Shelterbelts and microclimate. Forestry Commission Bulletin No. 29. Edinburgh

  • Cleugh HA, Prinsley R, Bird PR, Brooks SJ, Carberry PS, Crawford MC, Jackson TT, Meinke H, Mylius SJ, Nuberg IK, Sudmeyer RA, Wright AJ (2002) The Australian National Windbreaks Program: overview and summary of results. Aust J Exp Agric 42(6):649–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danilov G (1971) Protective forest stands and system of cultivation. Lesnaya Promyshlennost, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwivedi RP, Singh KKR, Rizvi RH, Chauhan J (2007) Socio-economic analysis of agroforestry systems in western Uttar Pradesh. Indian Res J Ext Edu 7:18–22

    Google Scholar 

  • EURAF (2020) Agroforestry in Ukraine. https://euraf.isa.utl.pt/countries/ukraine. Assessed 3 Apr 2020

  • FAOSTAT (2020) http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data. Assessed 15 Mar 2020

  • Ghan PA, Djanaeva VM, Karafa-Korbut IG, Krivosheeva LS, Kunchenko AI, Orlova NI, Protopopov GF, Prutenskii DI, Tkachenko VI (1961) Trees and shrubs of Kyrgyzstan. Academia NAUK Kyrgyz SSR, Frunze

    Google Scholar 

  • Isebrands JG, Richardson J (2014) Poplars and Willows-Trees for Society and the Environment. FAO CABI

  • Jain SK, Singh P (2000) Economic analysis of industrial agroforestry: poplar (Populus deltoides) in Uttar Pradesh (India). Agrofor Syst 49:255–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalashnikov A (1969) Field protective forest lines and their influence on the yield. Ryazan Regional Printing House, Ryazan

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayser B (2020) Hecken als Ertragsfaktor. http://www.agroforst.de/3-ertragshecken.html. Assessed 3 Apr 2020

  • Kort J (1988) Benefits of windbreaks to field and forage crops. Agr Ecosyst Environ 22(23):165–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamers JPA, Michels K, Vandenbeldt RJ (1994) Trees and windbreaks in the Sahel: establishment growth nutritive and calorific values. Agrofor Syst 26:171–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Missall S, Welp M, Thevs N, Abliz A, Halik Ü (2015) Establishment and maintenance of regulating ecosystem services in a dryland area of central Asia illustrated using the Kökyar Protection Forest Aksu NW China as an example. Earth Syst Dyn 6:359–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monteiro SRS, Martins C, Dias AMPG, Cruz H (2020) Mechanical performance of glulam products made with Portuguese poplar. Eur J Wood Wood Prod 78:1007–1015

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • National Agroforestry Center (2020) Windbreaks. U.S. Department of Agriculture. https://www.fs.usda.gov/nac/practices/windbreaks.php. Assessed 2 Apr 2020

  • National Statistical Committee of the Kyrgyz Republic (2020) Open data. http://www.stat.kg/en/opendata. Accessed 07 Apr 2020

  • Ontario Federation of Agriculture (2020) Best management practices field windbreaks. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/environment/bmp/AF167.pdf. Assessed 2 Apr 2020

  • Peri PL, Bloomberg M (2002) Windbreaks in southern Patagonia Argentina: a review of research on growth models windspeed reduction and effects on crops. Agrofor Syst 56:129–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson EB, Peterson NM, McLennan MS (1996) Black cottonwood and balsam poplar managers. Handbook for British Columbia. Ministry of Forests Canada

  • Republic of Tajikistan (2014) Fifth national report on preservation of biodiversity on the Republic of Tajikistan. National Center on Biodiversity and Biosafety of the Republic of Tajikistan (NCBB). Dushanbe. https://www.cbd.int/doc/world/tj/tj-nr-05-en.pdf

  • Ruppert D, Welp M, Spies M, Thevs N (2020) Farmers’ perceptions of tree shelterbelts on agricultural land in rural Kyrgyzstan. Sustainability 12:1093. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAEPF (State Agency of Environment and Forests Kyrgyzstan) 2017 Biodiversity conservation priorities of the Kyrgyz Republic till 2024. https://www.cbd.int/doc/world/kg/kg-nbsap-v3-en.pdf

  • Schroeder WR, Kort J (1989) Shelterbelts in the Soviet Union. J Soil Water Conserv 44:130–134

    Google Scholar 

  • State Committee of Turkmenistan for Environmental Protection and Land Resources (2018) National Forest Program. http://turkmenistan.gov.tm/?id=3309. Assessed 25 Jan 2018

  • Stepanov AM (1987) Agroforestry melioration in irrigated lands. Agropromizdat Moscow

  • Strelkovskii N, Komendantova N, Sizov S, Rovenskaya E (2020) Building plausible futures: scenario-based strategic planning of industrial development of Kyrgyzstan. Futures 124:102646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2020.102646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strenge E, Thevs N, Aliev K, Eraaliev M, Lang P, Baibagysov A (2018) Water consumption of populus alba trees in tree shelterbelt systems in Central Asia—a case study in the Chui Valley, South Eastern Kazakhstan. Central Asian J Water Res 4:48–62. https://doi.org/10.29258/CAJWR/2018-RI.v4-1/48-62.eng

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Susa NI (1959) Agroforestry melioration. Governmental Publishing House for Agriculture, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Thevs N, Gombert AJ, Strenge E, Lleshi R, Aliev K, Emileva B (2019) Tree wind breaks in Central Asia and their effects on agricultural water consumption. Land 8:167–183. https://doi.org/10.3390/land8110167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomás A, Palmer JHN, Graves A, Garcia de Jalón S, Burgess PJ (2018) Integrating a financial module in the web-ecoyield-safe model for bioeconomic assessment of agroforestry ecosystems. In: 4th European agroforestry conference—agroforestry as sustainable land use, 28–30 May 2018, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

  • Tribunskaya V, Kostina N, Sherbakova L, Astafiev N (1974) Agro-economic effectiveness of shelterbelts. Lesnaya Promyshlennost, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (2015a) Concept for conservation and sustainable use of the biological diversity of the Republic of Kazakhstan until 2030. Astana. http://www.fhc.kz/conventions/files/kz-nbsap-rus.pdf

  • UNDP (2015b) Fifth National Report of the Republic of Uzbekistan on Conservation of Biodiversity. https://www.cbd.int/doc/world/uz/uz-nr-05-en.pdf

  • UNECE (2019) Forest Landscape Restoration in the Caucasus and Central Asia—challenges and opportunities. Background paper for the Ministerial Roundtable on Forest Landscape Restoration in the Caucasus and Central Asia, 21–22 June 2018, Astana, Kazakhstan. http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/timber/publications/DP-72-flr-cca-en.pdf

  • Van Acker JCR, Jiang X, Bulcke J (2020) Innovative approaches to increase service life of poplar lightweight hardwood construction products. Current topics and trends on durability of building materials and components. https://www.scipedia.com/public/Acker_et_al_2020a

  • Vasilyev ME (1980) Melioration through forests and harvest. Kainar, Almaty

    Google Scholar 

  • Vorobiev G, Anuchin N (1985) Forest encyclopaedia. Soviet Encyclopaedia, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Wandel J, Pieniadz A, Glauben T (2011) What is success and what is failure of transition? A critical review of two decades of agricultural reform in the Europe and Central Asia region. Post-Commun Econ 23(2):139–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang SH, Zhang LZ, Zhang DS, van der Werf W, Evers JB, Sun HQ, Su ZC, Zhang SP (2016) Density responses and spatial distribution of cotton yield and yield components in jujube (Zizyphus jujube)/cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) agroforestry. Eur J Agron 79:58–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WFP (World Food Program) 2020. WFP Kyrgyz Republic Country Brief. https://docs.wfp.org/api/documents/WFP-0000113476/download/?_ga=2.268292878.1698452485.1586425537-188563853.1586425537. Assessed 15 Mar 2020

  • World Bank (2019) Real interest rate (%)—Kyrgyz Republic. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/FR.INR.RINR?locations=KG. Assessed 15 Dec 2020

  • Yakovleva N (2003) Quality and productivity of domesticated poplar hybrids in Kyrgyzstan. Ilim, Bishkek

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng X, Zhu JJ, Xing ZF (2016) Assessment of the effects of shelterbelts on crop yields at the regional scale in Northeast China. Agric Syst 143:49–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This study was undertaken with support from the Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development of Germany (BMZ), through the Advisory Service on Agricultural Research for Development (BEAF) under Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ), Germany. BMZ funded a research grant of 100,000 EUR. Niels Thevs’ position as an integrated expert at the World Agroforestry Center as well as the sap flow equipment and the climate stations were co-funded by BMZ as part of the Center for International Migration and Development (CIM) program. Students, who contributed to collect data, were funded by DAAD programs Promos and East Partnerships and by ASA (Invent), respectively. We thank the land owners and village administrations in the study sites for their support and permission to work on their land. Furthermore, we thank the reviewers for their valuable comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Niels Thevs.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thevs, N., Aliev, K. Agro-economy of tree wind break systems in Kyrgyzstan, Central Asia. Agroforest Syst 97, 319–334 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-021-00617-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-021-00617-7

Keywords

Navigation