Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Agroforestry as a sustainable means to farmer–grazier conflict mitigation in Cameroon

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Farmer–grazier conflicts are a major cause of the stagnated development experienced in rural, peri-urban, and suburban areas across Africa and the developing world, as these conflicts often lead to the loss of crops, livestock, and even human lives, precipitating untold misery and excruciating poverty. In Cameroon where this study was undertaken, the situation is simply pathetic as farmer–grazier conflicts occur regularly, especially during the dry season when herders move livestock (especially cattle, sheep and horses) from hills to the valleys (transhumance), in search of pasture, destroying farmers’ crops in the process. It is within this framework that this study sought to look at the contribution of agroforestry practices to farmer–grazier conflict mitigation. Data collection methods for the study were household surveys, key informant interviews and direct observations. Data analysis was done through descriptive and inferential statistics, using two main statistical analyses software: Microsoft Excel 2007 and SPSS 20. Findings revealed that the main cause of farmer–grazier conflicts was limited arable and grazing land (100%), with the main consequences being loss of human lives and crops/livestock (100%). The main agroforestry practices of farmers were home gardens with animals (52%), trees on croplands (60%) and live fences/hedges (52%) while graziers’ agroforestry practices were home gardens with animals (73%), trees on grazing lands (60%) and live fences/hedges (53%). Agroforestry was found to provide many socio-economic and ecosystem benefits to both farmers and graziers like food, fuelwood, fodder, building materials and shade which make farmers and graziers less interdependent. Correlation analysis revealed a strong inverse relationship between the practice of agroforestry and farmer–grazier conflicts (p < 0.01). Chi square test statistic showed a significant relationship between agroforestry practices and farmer–grazier conflicts (p < 0.01). Parameter estimates of the Binary Logistic Regression model revealed that three main agroforestry practices (home garden with animals, trees on crop/grazing lands and home garden) were determinant in mitigating farmer–grazier-conflicts (p < 0.01). This clearly demonstrates that the practice of agroforestry can contribute in a sustainable way to end recurrent farmer–grazier conflicts. The study therefore recommends that more attention be directed towards agroforestry by policy makers and other stakeholders who seek to mitigate the farmer–grazier conflict hot potato.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Ahmed-Gamgum WA (2018) Herdsmen and farmers conflict in Nigeria: another dimension of insecurity. J Pub Admin Soc Welfare Res 3:35–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajake AO (2012) The role of forest trees in indigenous farming systems as a catalyst for forest resources management in the rural villages of Cross Rivers state Nigeria. Glob J Hum Soc Sci 13(1):1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Amare D, Wondie M, Mekuria W, Darr D (2018) Agroforestry of smallholder farmers in Ethiopia: practics and benefits. Small-sc For. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-018-9405-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amonum JI, Babalola FD, Agera SIN (2009) Agroforestry systems in Nigeria: review of concepts and practices. J Res For Wildl Environ 1:18–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Asaah EK, Tchoundjeu Z, Leakey RRB, Takousting B, Njong J, Edang I (2011) Trees, agroforestry and multifunctional agriculture in Cameroon. Int J Agric Sustain 9(1):110–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Asfaw B, Lemenih M (2012) Traditional agroforestry systems as a safe haven for woody plant species: a case study from a topo-climatic gradient in south central Ethiopia. For Trees Livelihoods 19:359–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Atangana A, Khasa D, Chang S, Degrande A (2014) Major agroforestry systems of the humid tropics. Trop Agrofor 1:49–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Awazi NP, Tchamba NM (2018) Determinants of small-scale farmers’ adaptation decision to climate variability and change in the North-West Region of Cameroon. Afr J Agric Res 13:534–543

    Google Scholar 

  • Awazi NP, Tchamba NM (2019) Enhancing agricultural sustainability and productivity under changing climate conditions through improved agroforestry practices in smallholder farming systems in sub-Saharan Africa. Afr J Agric Res 14(7):379–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Awazi NP, Tchamba NM, Tabi FO (2019) An assessment of adaptation options enhancing smallholder farmers’ resilience to climate variability and change: case of Mbengwi Central sub-Division, North-West Region of Cameroon. Afr J Agric Res 14(6):321–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulibaly JY, Chiputwa B, Nakelse T, Kundhlande G (2017) Adoption of agroforestry and the impact on household food security among farmers in Malawi: a review. Agric Syst 155:52–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasam SI, Ibe TE (2018) Farmers-Herders Conflict in Nigeria: reality and Way Forward. Int J Hum Soc Stud 6:220–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimelu MU, Salifu DE, Enwelu AI, Igbokwe EM (2017) Challenges of herdsmen-farmers’ conflict in livestock production in Nigeria: experience of pastoralists in Kogi State, Nigeria. Afr J Agric Res 12:642–650

    Google Scholar 

  • Endale Y, Derero A, Argaw M, Muthuri C (2017) Farmland tree species diversity and spatial distribution pattern in semi-arid East Shewa, Ethiopia. For Trees Livelihoods 26(3):199–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Falanta EM, Bengesi KMK (2018) Drivers and Consequences of Recurrent Conflicts between Farmers and Pastoralists in Kilosa and Mvomero Districts, Tanzania. J Sustain Dev 11:13–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) (2010) Homestead gardens in Bangladesh. Technology for agriculture. Proven technologies for small holders. http://www.fao.org/teca/content/homestead-gardens-bangladesh

  • Jose S (2009) Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits: an overview. Agrofor Syst 76:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar K (2016) Multifunctional agroforestry systems in tropics region. Nat Environ Pollut Technol 15(2):36–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasco RD, Delfino RJP, Catacutan DC, Simelton ES, Wilson DM (2013) Climate risk adaptation by smallholder farmers: the roles of trees and Agroforestry. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 6:83–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasco RD, Espaldon MLO, Habito CMD (2015) Smallholder farmers’ perceptions of climate change and the roles of trees and agroforestry in climate risk adaptation: evidence from Bohol, Philippines. Agroforest Syst 90:521–540

    Google Scholar 

  • Leakey RRB (1996) Definition of agroforestry revisited. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269407082_Leakey_RRB_1996_Definition_of_agroforestry_revisited_Agroforestry_Today_81_5-7

  • Liyama M, Derero A, Kelemu K, Muthuri C, Kinuthia R, Ayenkulu E, Kiptot E, Hadgu K, Mowo J, Sinclair FL (2017) Understanding patterns of tree adoption on farms in semiarid and sub-humid Ethiopia. Agroforest Syst 91:271–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Lott JE, Ong CK, Black CR (2009) Understorey microclimate and crop performance in a Grevillea robusta-based agroforestry system in semi-arid Kenya. Agric For Meteor 149:1140–1151

    Google Scholar 

  • Manu IN, Bime M-J, Engwali FD, Nji A (2014) Effects of farmer-grazer conflicts on rural development: a socio-economic analysis. Scholar J Agric Sci 4:113–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Mbow C, Noordwijk MV, Luedeling E, Neufeldt H, Minang PA, Kowero G (2013) Agroforestry solutions to address food security and climate change challenges in Africa. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 6:61–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Mbow C, Mv Noordwijk, Prabhu R, Simons T (2014) Knowledge gaps and research needs concerning agroforestry’s contribution to Sustainable Development Goals in Africa. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 6:162–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Mkonda M, He X (2017) The potentials of agroforestry systems in East Africa: a case of the eastern arc mountains of Tanzania. Int J Plant Soil Sci 14:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Molua EL (2005) The economics of tropical agroforestry systems: the case of agroforestry farms in Cameroon. For Policy Econ 7(2):199–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Montagnini F (2017) Integrating landscapes: agroforestry for biodiversity conservation and food sovereignty. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Moritz M (2010) Understanding Herder–Farmer Conflicts in West Africa: outline of a Processual Approach. Hum Organ 69:138–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Mugure A, Oino P (2013) Benefits of agroforestry farming practices among rural households in Kenya: experiences among residents of Busia County. Int J Sci Res 2:442–449

    Google Scholar 

  • Munjeb NL, Yerima BPK, Avana TML (2018) Farmer’s perception of soil and watershed degradation and the assessment of soil nutrients status under agroforestry systems in the Western Highlands of Cameroon: case of Ako sub division. J Soil Sci Environ Manag 9(8):119–126

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mwamfupe D (2015) Persistence of Farmer-Herder conflicts in Tanzania. Int J Sci Res Publ 5:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair PKR (1989) Agroforestry systems in the tropics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair PKR (1993) An introduction to agroforestry. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair PKR, Garrity D (2012) Agroforestry—the future of global land use, vol 9. Advances in agroforestry. Advances in Agroforestry, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4676-3

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Negawo JW, Beyene DN (2017) The role of coffee based agroforestry System in tree diversity conservation in Eastern Uganda. J Landsc Ecol 10:5–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Neupane RP, Thapa GB (2001) Impact of agroforestry intervention on soil fertility and farm income under the subsistence farming system of the middle hills, Nepal. Agric Ecosyst Environ 84:157–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguh BS, Zeh AF (2016) Land use dynamics and agro-pastoral conflicts in Menchum Division, Cameroon. Landsc Architect Region Plan 1:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Nze E (2015) The effects of migration by nomadic farmers in the livelihoods of rural crop farmers in Enugu State, Nigeria. Glob J Sci Front Res: D Agric Vet 15:21–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey DN (2007) Multifunctional agroforestry systems in India. Curr Sci 92(4):455–463

    Google Scholar 

  • Quandt A, Neufeldt H, McCabe JT (2018) Building livelihood resilience: what role does agroforestry play? Climate Dev. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2018.1447903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shehu H (2018) The causes and consequences of fulani pastoralist farmers conflict in Nigeria. Int J Innov Res Educ Sci 5:357–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith MS, Mbow C (2014) Editorial overview: sustainability challenges: agroforestry from the past into the future. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 6:134–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobola OO, Amadi DC, Jamala GY (2015) The role of agroforestry in environmental sustainability. IOSR J Agric Vet Sci 8(5):20–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Sop Sop MD, Abossolo SA, Nuebissi SJL, Mbarga MJMV, Batha RAS (2015) Land use conflicts in North West region: the case opposing the Mbororo pastoralist and the indigenous crop cultivators in Tubah Sub-division. World Wide J Multidiscip Res Dev (WWJMRD) 1:54–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaast P, Somarriba E (2014) Trade-offs between crop intensification and ecosystem services: the role of agroforestry in cocoa cultivation. Agrofor Syst 88:947–956

    Google Scholar 

  • Viswanath S, Lubina PA, Subbanna S, Sandhya MC (2018) Traditional Agroforestry Systems and Practices: a Review. Adv Agric Res Technol J 2(1):18–29

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2012) Intensification of livestock production systems in the North West region of Cameroon: A South-to-South collaboration for technology transfer, the Tugi Silvopastoral Project (English). Washington, DC: World Bank. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/648631468224962671/pdf/667940ESW0Box3000ARD120TA0TUSIP0web.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Forestry, University of Dschang, Dschang, Cameroon

    Nyong Princely Awazi & Marie-Louise Avana-Tientcheu

Authors
  1. Nyong Princely Awazi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marie-Louise Avana-Tientcheu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nyong Princely Awazi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Awazi, N.P., Avana-Tientcheu, ML. Agroforestry as a sustainable means to farmer–grazier conflict mitigation in Cameroon. Agroforest Syst 94, 2147–2165 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-020-00537-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-020-00537-y

Keywords

Profiles

  1. Nyong Princely Awazi View author profile