Skip to main content
Log in

Forage availability in a silvopastoral system having different densities of Leucaena leucocephala under Voisin grazing management

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Available forage biomass, botanical and forage chemical compositions, stocking rates, and resting times of plants after grazing were assessed in a silvopastoral system (using Voisin grazing) having 15,000 (D15) and 25,000 Leucaena leucocephala trees ha−1 (D25), associated with Digitaria eriantha. A randomized complete block design with two replicates was used. Biomass samples were collected from July 2017 to July 2018, when grass (during rainy and transition seasons) and trees (during the dry season) achieved their optimal resting points and sheep grazed paddocks (stock density: 34–204 AU ha−1 according to season). Biomass yield was higher in D25 (15,958 ± 1190 kg DM ha−1, p < 0.05) with higher carrying capacity (2.93 ± 0.43 AU ha−1 year−1). Yield fluctuated over time (p < 0.0001) with greater biomass (p < 0.05) during the rainy (up to 3722 ± 121 kg DM ha−1), than in the transition (1800 ± 121 kg DM ha−1) and dry seasons (511 ± 121 kg DM ha−1). Between 59 and 65% of the biomass was grass during the transitional and rainy seasons, while during the dry season, 100% of the biomass was from the trees and crude protein was greater in trees (24%) than in grass (10%) biomass. Rest periods for the paddocks varied according to grazing season (from 31 to 120 days). Higher tree density increased forage biomass and yield in the silvopastoral system, which was maintained throughout the year even with seasonal precipitation because the trees sustained growth for an extended period during the year.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Source: weather station at Colegio de Postgraduados

Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ANKOM (2010) Ankom Technology. Instrument manuals. https://ankom.com/sites/default/files/document-files/A2000_Manual.pdf. Accessed 15 Aug 2018

  • AOAC (1980) Official Methods 4.2.11 Protein (crude) in animal feeds, forage (plant tissue), grain and oilseeds. In: Vanderzant C, Splittstoesser DF (eds) Official methods of analysis of Association of Official Analytical Chemists International, 13th edn. AOAC International, Washington. http://eoma.aoac.org. Accessed 20 Feb 2018

  • Barahona R, Sánchez S (2005) Limitaciones físicas y químicas de la digestibilidad de pastos tropicales y estrategias para aumentarla. Ciencia y Tecnologia Agropecuaria 6(1):69–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bautista-Tolentino M, López-Ortiz S, Pérez-Hernández P et al (2011) Agro and silvopastoral systems in the community of El Limón, Paso de Ovejas, Veracruz, México. Trop Subtrop Agroecosyst 14:63–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgarín J, Lemus C, Sanguines L, Aguirre J, Ramos A, Soca M, Arece J (2009) Evaluación de dos especies de Leucaena, asociadas a Brachiaria brizantha y Clitoria ternatea en un sistema silvopastoril de Nayarit, México. II. Producción y composición bromatológica de la biomasa. Pastos y Forrajes 32(4):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell MM, Richards JH (1989) Hydraulic lift: water efflux from upper roots improves effectiveness of water uptake by deep roots. Oecologia 79:1–5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Casanova-Lugo F, Petit-Aldana J, Solorio-Sánchez FJ, Parsons D, Ramírez-Avilés L (2014) Forage yield and quality of Leucaena leucocephala and Guazuma ulmifolia in mixed and pure fodder bank systems in Yucatan, México. Agroforest Syst 88:29–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CNA (2019) Comision Nacional del Agua. Coordinacion General de Servicio Meteorologico Nacional. Mexico. http://sina.conagua.gob.mx/sina/tema.php?tema=precipitacion&ver=reporte&o=1&n=nacional. Accessed 18 Dec 2019

  • Dawson TE (1993) Hydraulic lift and water use by plants: implications for water balance, performance and plant–plant interactions. Oecologia 95:565–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francisco AG (2003) Manejo estratégico de las defoliaciones en especies arbóreas. Pastos y Forrajes 26(3):185–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Gargano AO, Adúriz MA, Arelovich HM, Amela MI (2001) Forage yield and nutritive value of Eragostris curvula and Digitaria eriantha in central-south semi-arid Argentina. Trop Grassl 35:161–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaviria X, Sossa CP, Montoya C et al (2012) Producción de carne en sistemas silvopastoriles intensivos en el trópico bajo colombiano. Conference paper, VII Congreso Latinoamericano Sistemas Agroforestales para la Producción Animal Sostenible, Brasil. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262936613. Accessed 20 Jan 2019

  • Gaviria X, Rivera J, Barahona R (2015) Calidad nutricional y fraccionamiento de carbohidratos y proteínas en los componentes forrajeros de un sistema silvopastoril intensivo. Pastos y Forrajes. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=26913925100. Accessed 16 Mar 2019

  • Greco SA, Cavagnaro JB (2002) Effects of drought in biomass production and allocation in three varieties of Trichloris crinite P. (Poaceae) a forage grass from the arid Monte region of Argentina. Plant Ecol 164:125–135. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021217614767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guenni O, Marin D, Baruch Z (2002) Responses to drought of five Brachiarias species. I. Biomass production, leaf growth, root distribution, water use and forage quality. Plant Soil 243:229–241. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019956719475

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys LR (1994) Tropical forages, their role in sustainable agriculture. Longman, Scientific and Technical, Essex

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishihara KL, Honda MDH, Bageel A, Borthakur D (2018) Leucaena leucocephala: A leguminous tree suitable for eroded habitats of Hawaiian Islands. In: Dagar J, Singh A (eds) Ravine lands: greening for livelihood and environmental security. Springer, Singapore, pp 413–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8043-2_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Juárez RAS, Cerrillo SMA, Gutiérrez OE et al (2009) Estimación del valor nutricional de pastos tropicales a partir de análisis convencionales y de la producción de gas in vitro. Tec Pecu Mex 47:55–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Kottek M, Grieser J, Beck C et al (2006) World map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorol Z 15(3):259–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López OS (2018) ¿Qué es la ganadería sustentable? In: Halffter G, Cruz M, Huerta C (eds) Ganadería Sustentable en el Golfo de México. Instituto de Ecología A.C., Mexico, pp 65–74

    Google Scholar 

  • López-Vigoa O, Sánchez-Santana T, Iglesias-Gómez JM et al (2017) Los sistemas silvopastoriles como alternativa para la producción animal sostenible en el contexto actual de la ganadería tropical. Pastos y Forrajes 40(2):83–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahecha L, Durán CV, Rosales M, Molina CH, Molina E (2000) Consumo de pasto estrella africana (Cynodon plectostachyus) y leucaena (Leucaena leucocephala) en un sistema silvopastoril. Pasturas Tropicales 22(1):26–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Manríquez-Mendoza LY, López-Ortiz S, Pérez-Hernández P et al (2011) Agronomic and forage characteristics of Guazuma ulmifolia Lam. Trop Subtrop Agroecosyst 14:453–463

    Google Scholar 

  • Matumuini FNE, Mboko AV, Moupela C et al (2017) Variation of the chemical composition of four forage shrubs (Albizia lebbeck, Leucaena leucocephala, Morinda lucida and Senna siamea) in dry season in southeast of Gabon. J Appl Biosci 117:11696–11703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maya GE, Durán CV, Ararat JE (2005) Altura, disponibilidad de forraje y relación hoja-tallo del pasto Estrella solo y asociado con leucaena. Acta Agron 54(2):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Motulsky HJ (2019) Equation: exponential growth, GraphPad curve fitting guide. https://www.graphpad.com/guides/prism/7/curve-fitting/index.htm?reg_exponential_growth.htm. Accessed 2 June 2019

  • Murphy W, Rice JR, Dugdale DT (1986) Dairy farm feeding and income effects of using Voisin grazing management of permanent pastures. Am J Altern Agric 1:147–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira-Prendes JA, Afif-Khouri E, Palencia-García P (2014) Producción, composición botánica y fertilidad del suelo en prados de riego del suroccidente de Asturias. In: 53ª Reunión Científica de la SEEP. 9–12 de junio, pp 247–254

  • Ortega-Gómez R, Castillo-Gallegos E, Jarillo-Rodríguez J et al (2011) Nutritive quality of ten grasses during the rainy season in a hot-humid climate and ultisol soil. Trop Subtrop Agroecosyst 13(3):481–491

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega-Vargas E, Burgueño-Ferreira JA, Ávila-Reséndiz C et al (2017) Morphological and physiological response of Guazuma ulmifolia Lam. to different pruning dates. Agroforest Syst 93(2):461–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro LC (2015) Pastoreo Racional Voisin: Tecnología Agroecológica para el Tercer Milenio. Editorial Hemisferio Sur S.A., Buenos Aires

    Google Scholar 

  • Roca AJ, Vera JC, Guevara RV et al (2014) Influencia de Prosopis juliflora: en composición botánica del pastizal, producción de leche y conducta de vacas mestizas en pastoreo. Rev Prod Anim 26(1):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojas HS, Olivares PJ, Jiménez GR, Hernández CE (2005) Manejo de praderas asociadas de gramíneas y leguminosas para pastoreo en el trópico. Rev Electron Vet 6:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • SAGARPA (2009) Secretaria de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación, Comité Técnico Consultivo de Coeficientes de Agostadero (COTECOCA). http://aplicaciones.semarnat.gob.mx/estadisticas/compendio2010/archivos/02_agrigan/d2_agrigan04_06.pdf. Accessed 14 Mar 2019

  • Santiago I, Lara A, Romero LA, Huerta M, Krishnamurthy L, Muñoz-González JC (2016) Composición química y mineral de leucaena asociada con pasto estrella durante la estación de lluvias. Rev Mex Cienc Agríc 16:3173–3183

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS (2008) Statistical analysis system. SAS/STAT® 9.2. User’s guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS (2013) Statistical analysis system. SAS/STAT® 12.3 User’s guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary. https://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/statug/66103/HTML/default/viewer.htm#titlepage.htm. Accessed 23 Mar 2019

  • Schorth G (1998) A review of belowground interactions in agroforestry, focusing on mechanisms and management options. Agroforest Syst 43:5–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tikam K, Phatsara C, Mikled C, Vearasilp T et al (2013) Pangola grass as forage for ruminant animals: a review. SpringerPlus 2:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valles B, Castillo E, Hernández T (1992) Producción estacional de leguminosas forrajeras en Veracruz, México. Pasturas Tropicales 14(2):32–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Valles B, Castillo E, Barragán J, Jarillo J, Ocaña E (2010) Dinámica de una pastura mixta bajo apacentamiento intensivo en el trópico húmedo veracruzano. AIA 14(1):3–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Veneciano JH, Frigerio KL, Frasinelli CA (2006) Acumulación de forraje e indicadores de calidad en Digitaria eriantha cv. Irene bajo diferentes frecuencias de defoliación. RIA 35(3):121–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Voisin A (1959) Grass productivity. Philosophical Library Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silvia López-Ortiz.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Azuara-Morales, I., López-Ortiz, S., Jarillo-Rodríguez, J. et al. Forage availability in a silvopastoral system having different densities of Leucaena leucocephala under Voisin grazing management. Agroforest Syst 94, 1701–1711 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-020-00487-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-020-00487-5

Keywords

Navigation