Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reducing soil compaction after thinning work in agroforestry plantations

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Afforestation of marginal farmland with fast-growing tree species is a cost-effective way to produce wood fiber for industrial and energy use. The final harvest is often performed with terrain chipping, in order achieve high productivity and minimum-cost supply. Several machine manufacturers have developed new chipper models, specifically designed for this practice in agroforestry plantations. Soil impacts, particularly soil compaction, represent a concern in such practice. This study evaluated the impact of terrain chipping work on soil compaction in agroforestry plantations. This study tested two different options for the chipper, and namely: a new all-road chipper specifically designed for agroforestry plantations (evaluated under two tire-pressure configurations) and capable of both cross-country and road traffic, and a high-mobility chipper truck. In contrast, one option was tested for the chip shuttle, which consisted in a farm tractor equipped with a two-axle trailer. The four treatments were tested on three different sites, representing the most common soil conditions encountered in the new agroforestry plantations. Soil texture ranged from loam to sandy loam. The occurrence of soil compaction in the upper 30 cm of the soil was evaluated with two different methods: bulk density determination and penetration resistance sampling. Measurements were conducted in the machine tracks after a single pass. The two methods seemed to give contradictory results, especially in two of the three test sites. In general bulk density seemed more sensitive to changes than penetration resistance after a single passage. Bulk density measurements showed that the all-road chipper at low tire pressure and the chipper truck caused soil compaction at almost all sites. In contrast, the all-road chipper at standard tire pressure and the chip shuttle were much gentler on the soil. The limited increments found in this study are likely dependant on a relatively high soil density before traffic. The higher impact of the all-road chipper after reducing tire pressure is contrary to expectations, probably due to the use of relatively stiff tires that may deny the benefits of deflation. This study indicates that wellorganized terrain chipping may not cause such high soil compaction levels as to jeopardize tree root development and growth, despite the heavy weight of the equipment used for this task. In that regard, the specially-designed all-road chipper performs better than the chipper truck.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abeels PFJ (1989). Forest machine design and soil damage reduction. In: Crohain C (ed) Proceedings of the seminar on the impact of mechanization of forest operations to the soil. FAO/ECE/ILO; Leuven, Belgium, pp 195–2010

  • Ampoorter E, Goris R, Cornelis W, Verheyen K (2007) Impact of mechanized logging on compaction status of sandy forest soils. For Ecol Manag 241:162–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ampoorter E, Van Nevel L, De Vos B, Hermy M, Verheyen K (2010) Assessing the effects of initial soil characteristics, machine mass and traffic intensity on forest soil compaction. For Ecol Manag 260:1664–1676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayers P, Perumpral J (1982) Moisture and density effect on cone index. Transactions of the ASAE 25:1169–1172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biddoccu M, Ferrari S, Opsi F, Cavallo E (2016) Long-term monitoring of soil management effects on runoff and soil erosion in sloping vineyards in Alto Monferrato (North–West Italy). Soil Till. Res. 155:176–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Björheden R (2008) Optimal point of comminution in the biomass supply chain. In: Proceedings of the Nordic-Baltic conference on forest operations, Copenhagen 23–25 September 2008. Danish forest and lanscape, Copenhagen, Denmark

  • Botta G, Tolon Becerra A, Bellora Tourn F (2009) Effect of the number of tractor passes on soil rut depth and compaction in two tillage regimes. Soil Till Res 103:381–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buresti-Lattes E, Mori P (2006) Legname di pregio e biomassa nella stessa piantagione. Sherwood 127:5–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Buresti-Lattes E, Mori P (2009) Impianti policiclici permanenti. Sherwood 150:5–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Buresti-Lattes E, Mori P (2012) Piantagioni policicliche: elementi di progettazione e collaudo. Sherwood 189:12–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Campanella R, Robertson P, Gillespie D (1983) Cone penetration testing in deltaic soils. Can Geotech J 20:23–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell D, Dickson J, Ball B (1984) Effect of under-inflation of tractor tyres on seedbed compaction and winter barley establishment and yield. J Agric Eng Res 29:151–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cogliastro A, Gagnon D, Bouchard A (1997) Experimental determination of soil characteristics optimal for the growth of ten hardwoods planted on abandoned farmland. For Ecol Manag 96:49–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman MD, Isebrands JG, Tolsted DN, Tolbert VR (2004) Comparing soil carbon of short rotation poplar plantations with agricultural crops and woodlots in North Central United States. Environ Manag 33:299–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Wit M, Faaij A (2010) European biomass resource potential and cost. Biomass Bioenerg 34:188–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djomo SN, Kasmioui OE, Ceulemans R (2011) Energy and greenhouse gas balance of bioenergy production from poplar and willow: a review. GCB Bioenerg 3:181–197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • EEA (2006) How much bioenergy can Europe produce without harming the environment? Report no 7/2006, 72

  • Eliasson L (2005) Effects of forwarder tyre pressure on rut formation and soil compaction. Silva Fennica 39:549–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Froehlich HA, Miles D, Robbins R (1986) Growth of young Pinus ponderosa and Pinus contorta on compacted soil in central Washington. For Ecol Manag 15:285–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geyer W, Ponder F Jr (2013) Transferring site information for black walnut from native woodlands in southeastern Kansas USA to identify sites for agroforestry practices. Agrofor Syst 87:13–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez A, Powers RF, Singer MJ, Horwath WR (2002) Soil compaction effects on growth of young ponderosa pine following litter removal in California’s Sierra Nevada. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66:1334–1343

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gondard H, Romane F, Aronson J, Shater Z (2003) Impact of soil surface disturbances on functional group diversity after clear-cutting in Aleppo pine (Pinus halepensis) forests in southern France. For Ecol Manag 180:165–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grečenko A, Prikner P (2014) Tire rating based on soil compaction capacity. J Terrramech 52:77–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grigal D (2000) Effects of extensive forest management on soil productivity. For Ecol Manag 138:167–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halliday D, Resnick R (1963) Physics, for students of science and engineering, combined edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilman P (1981) Root penetration of douglas-fir seedlings into compacted soil. For Sci 27:660–666

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller M, Keoleian G, Volk T (2003) Life cycle assessment of a willow bioenergy cropping system. Biomass Bioenergy 25:147–165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herrick JE, Jones TL (2002) A dynamic cone penetrometer for measuring soil penetration resistance. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66:1320–1324

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoogwijk M, Faaij A, Van der Broek R, Berndes G, Gielen D, Turkenburg W (2003) Exploration of the ranges of the global potential of biomass for energy. Biomass Bioen 25:119–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones CA (1983) Effect of soil texture on critical bulk density for root growth. Soil Sci Soc Am J 47:1208–1211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kärhä K (2011) Industrial supply chains and production machinery of forest chips in Finland. Biomass Bioenergy 35(8):3404–3413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleibl M, Klvač R, Lombardini C, Porhaly J, Spinelli R (2014) Soil compaction and recovery after mechanized final felling of Italian coastal pine plantations. Croat J For Eng 35:63–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight S, Rula A (1961) Measurement and estimation of the trafficability of fine-grained soils. In: Proceedings of the 1st conference of ISTVS, Torino-St.Vincent, 12–16 June 1961, pp 371–384

  • Kofman P, Spinelli R (1997) Recommendations for the establishment of short rotation coppice based on practical experience of harvesting trials in Denmark and Italy. Asp Appl Biol Biomass Energy Crops 49:61–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Lhotský J (2000) Zhutňování půd a opatření proti němu. Ústav zemědělských a potravinářských informací, Praha. 62 (in Czech)

  • Magagnotti N, Nati C, Picchi G, Spinelli R (2011) Mechanized thinning of walnut plantations established on ex-arable land. Agroforest Syst 82:77–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magagnotti N, Spinelli R, De Francesco F, Lombardini C (2016) A versatile terrain and roadside chipper for energy wood production in plantation forestry. Baltic Forestry 22(1):107–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Moghaddas E, Stephens S (2008) Mechanized fuel treatment effects on soil compaction in Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer stands. For Ecol Manag 255:3098–3106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page-Dumroese D, Jurgensen M, Terry T (2010) Maintaining soil productivity during forest or biomass-to-energy thinning harvests in the eastern United States. West J Appl For 25:5–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panayiotopoulos KP, Papadopoulou CP, Hatjiioannidou A (1994) Compaction and penetration resistance of an Alfisol and Entisol and their influence on root growth of maize seedlings. Soil Till Res 31:323–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelleri F, Ravagni S, Bidini M, Bianchetto E (2012) Impianti policiclici e multifunzionali: primo esempio in Toscana. Sherwood 187:11–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockwood DL, Naidu C, Carter D, Rahmani M, Spriggs T, Lin C, Alker G, Isebrands JG, Segrest S (2004) Short-rotation woody crops and phytoremediation: opportunities for agroforestry? Agrofor Syst 61–62:51–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe RL, Hanley ME, Goulson D, Clarke DJ, Doncaster CP, Taylor G (2011) Potential benefits of commercial willow short rotation coppice (SRC) for farm-scale plant and invertebrate communities in the agri-environment. Biomass Bioenergy 30:325–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rücknagel J, Hofmann B, Deumelandt P, Reinicke F, Bauhardt J, Hülsbergen K, Christen O (2015) Indicator based assessment of the soil compaction risk at arable sites using the model REPRO. Ecol Ind 52:341–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spinelli R, Hartsough B (2006) Harvesting SRF poplar for pulpwood: experience in the Pacific Northwest. Biomass Bioenergy 30:439–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spinelli R, Nati C, Magagnotti N (2005) Harvesting and transport of root biomass from fast-growing poplar plantations. Silva Fenn 39:539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spinelli R, Schweier J, De Francesco F (2012) Harvesting techniques for non-industrial forestry plantations. Biosyst Eng 113:319–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spinelli R, Lombardini C, Magagnotti N (2013) Salvaging windthrown trees with animal and machine systems. Ecol Eng 53:61–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spinelli R, De Francesco F, Eliasson L, Jessup E, Magagnotti N (2015) An agile chipper truck for space-constrained operations. Biomass Bioenerg 81:137–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stupak A, Asikainen A, Jonsel M, Karltun E, Lunnan A et al (2007) Sustainable utilisation of forest biomass for energy—Possibilities and problems: policy, legislation, certification, and recommendations and guidelines in the Nordic, Baltic, and other European countries. Biomass Bioenerg 31:666–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talbot B, Suadicani K (2005) Analysis of two simulated in-field chipping and extraction systems in spruce thinnings. Biosyst Eng 91(3):283–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDA-ARS (1999) Soil quality test kit guide. USDA-ARS, August 1999, pp 88

  • Vaz CMP, Hopmans W (2001) Simultaneous measurement of soil penetration resistance and water content with a combined penetrometer–TDR moisture probe. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65:4–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Von Wilpert K, Schaffer J (2006) Ecological effects of soil compaction and initial recovery dynamics: a preliminary study. Eur J For Res 125:129–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research leading to these results has received support from the Regione Piemonte within the scope of project MCV2, and was funded with EU structural funds (PSR 2007-2013, Misura 124.2). The Authors wish to tank Sergio Cottura (Mombracco Energy Srl) and Daniele Bertoglio (Pezzolato SpA) for their assistance with the trials.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcella Biddoccu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Spinelli, R., Magagnotti, N., Cavallo, E. et al. Reducing soil compaction after thinning work in agroforestry plantations. Agroforest Syst 93, 1765–1779 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-018-0279-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-018-0279-6

Keywords

Navigation