Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 91, Issue 2, pp 295–306 | Cite as

Management of carob tree orchards in Mediterranean ecosystems: strategies for a carbon economy implementation

  • Pedro José CorreiaEmail author
  • José Filipe Guerreiro
  • Maribela Pestana
  • Maria Amélia Martins-Loução


This paper offers a different framework for managing Mediterranean drought carob-tree orchard ecosystems. Two dry-farming systems were compared during two consecutive years: pure productive orchards and mixed orchards in a total of 360 mature trees distributed by 18 plots with areas of 0.55 and 0.30 ha per plot, respectively. Carob, fig, almond and olive trees compose mixed orchards. Trees of the mixed orchards were more productive than those of pure orchards. The main problem of both systems was the large variability and the low fruit production due to non-bearing trees, inducing unfavorable economic returns. Yield varied between 7.7 and 28.5 kg tree−1 respectively in pure and mixed orchards. In this paper we propose to use carbon sequestration calculations as an added benefit to farmers. A carbon stocking model estimation was established, based on trunk diameters of different trees. We depicted two management scenarios based on fruits production and carbon sequestration incomes: a low value scenario, using mean fruit production, and a high valuable scenario based on the hypothesis that all trees reached its potential maximum. Since under dry-farming systems fruit production irregularity is still a pendent problem, mixed orchards may offer a potential higher revenue, while maintaining higher crop diversification and whole biodiversity. C sequestration benefit, as here we purpose, may represent 125–300 % of income, respectively under low or high valuable scenario. Thus, CO2 equivalent is a novel ecological economic incentive that may potentiate a new income for farmers while assuring carob ecosystem services.


Carbon sequestration Ceratonia siliqua Ecosystems service Environment Fruit production Gross income 



The authors are grateful to the project AGRO306 coordinated by F. Keil do Amaral for providing some of the experimental data used in this work. Data on Fig. 6 was provided by V. Drago (Leziria, Portugal).


  1. Bengoechea C, Romero A, Villanueva A, Moreno G, Alaiz M, Millán F, Guerrero A, Puppo MC (2008) Composition and structure of carob (Ceratonia siliqua L.) germ proteins. Food Chem 107:675–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blondel J, Aronson J, Boudiou JY, Boeuf G (2010) The Mediterranean Basin biological diversity in space and time. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. Bravo F, Bravo-Oviedo A, Diaz-Baltero L (2008) Carbon sequestration in Spanish Mediterranean forests under two management alternatives: a modelling approach. Eur For Res 127:225–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown S, Gillespie AJR, Chapman J (1986) Biomass of tropical tree plantations and its implications for the global carbon budget. Can J For Res 16:390–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bryan E, Ringler C, Okoba B, Koo J, Herrero M, Silvestri S (2013) Can agriculture support climate change adaptation, greenhouse gas mitigation and rural livelihoods? insights from Kenya. Clim Change 118:151–165Google Scholar
  6. Bugalho MN, Caldeira MC, Pereira JS, Aronson J, Pausas JG (2011) Mediterranean cork oak savannas require human use to sustain biodiversity and ecosystem services. Front Ecol Environ 9:278–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Correia PJ, Martins-Loução MA (2004) Effects of nitrogen and potassium fertilization on vegetative growth and flowering of mature carob trees (Ceratonia siliqua): variations in leaf area index and water use indices. Aus J Exp Agric 44:83–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Correia PJ, Martins-Loução MA (2005) The use of macronutrients and water in marginal Mediterranean areas: the case of carob-tree. Field Crops Res 91:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dakia PA, Wathelet B, Paquot M (2007) Isolation and chemical evaluation of carob (Ceratonia siliqua L.) seed germ. Food Chem 102:1368–1374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Groot RS, Wilson MA, Boumans RMJ (2002) A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystems functions, goods and services. Ecol Econ 41:393–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. del Río M, Sterba H (2009) Comparing volume growth in pure and mixed stands of Pinus sylvestris and Quercus pyrenaica. Ann For Sci 66:502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eichhorn MP, Paris P, Herzog F, Incoll LD, Liagre F, Mantzanas K, Mayus M, Moreno G, Papanastasis VP, Pilbeam D, Pisanelli A, Dupraz C (2006) Silvoarable systems in Europe—past, present and future prospects. Agrofor Syst 67:29–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Forrester DI, Vanclay JK, Forrester RI (2011) The balance between facilitation and competition in mixtures of Eucalyptus and Acacia changes as stands develop. Oecologia 166:265–272CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Franco de Oliveira AL (1986) Composição das folhas. AIDA: 1 Encontro sobre linhas de investigação de alfarroba. CCRA, Oeiras, pp 28–30Google Scholar
  15. Haselberg von C (1986) Factors influencing flower and fruit development in carob (Ceratonia siliqua L.). 3rd International Carob Symposium. Book of Abstracts, Tavira, p 11Google Scholar
  16. INE (2011) Statistics Portugal. Accessed 2013
  17. Kelty MJ (1992) Comparative productivity of monocultures and mixed species stands. In: Kelty MJ, Larson BC, Oliver CD (eds) The ecology and silviculture of mixed-species forests. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 125–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Köpp E, Sobral M, Soares T, Worner M (1989) Os solos do Algarve e as suas características. DGHA-DRAA-GTZ, FaroGoogle Scholar
  19. Martins A, Marques G, Borges O, Portela E, Lousada J, Raimundo F, Madeira M (2011) Management of chestnut plantations for a multifunctional land use under Mediterranean conditions: effects on productivity and sustainability. Agrofor Syst 81:175–189Google Scholar
  20. Martins-Loução MA (1990) Carob (Ceratonia siliqua L.). In: Bajaj YPS (ed) Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry, vol 10. Springer Verlag, New York, pp 658–675Google Scholar
  21. Mitrakos K (1981) Plant life under Mediterranean climate conditions. Port Acta Biol XVI(1–4):33–44Google Scholar
  22. Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG et al (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Nair PKR, Kumar BM, Nair VD (2009) Agroforestry as a strategy for carbon sequestration. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 172:10–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Novara A, Pereira P, Santoro A, Kuzyakov Y, La Mantia T (2014) Effect of cactus pear cultivation after Mediterranean maquis on soil carbon stock, δ13C spatial distribution and root turnover. Catena 118:84–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ochoa-Hueso R, Allen EB, Branquinho C, Cruz C, Dias T, Fenn ME, Manrique E, Pérez-Corona ME, Sheppard LJ, Stock WD (2011) Nitrogen deposition effects on Mediterranean-type ecosystems: an ecological assessment. Environ Pollut 159:2265–2279CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Oliveira G, Correia O, Martins-Loução MA, Catarino F (1994) Phenological and growth patterns of the Mediterranean Oak. Quercus Suber L. Trees 9:41–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Olivier J, Janssens-Maenhout G, Muntean M, Peters J (2013) Trends in global CO2 emissions: 2013 report. Ispra. Joint Research Centre. PBL Netherlands Environmental Agency, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  28. Paquete BC (1994) Alfarrobeira (Ceratonia siliqua L.). B-Informação económica. Guia do Extensionista. MA/Direção Regional de Agricultura do Algarve, FaroGoogle Scholar
  29. Pinto-Correia T, Ribeiro N, Sá-Sousa P (2011) Introducing the montado, the cork and holm oak agroforestry system of Southern Portugal. Agroforest Syst 82:99–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ribeiro O (1987) Portugal, o Mediterrâneo e o Atlântico, Livraria Sá da CostaGoogle Scholar
  31. Ribeiro PF, Lima Santos J, Bugalho MN, Santana J, Reino L, Beja P, Moreira F (2014) Modelling farming systems dynamics in high nature value farmland under policy change. Agric Ecosyst Environ 183:138–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rita F, Graça J, Espada J (2000) Sistemas de produção de alfarroba e perspectivas de desenvolvimento no concelho de Loulé. In: de Carvalho A, Madeira E (eds) Valorização do pomar tradicional de sequeiro algarvio. Universidade do Algarve, Faro, pp 87–115Google Scholar
  33. Santos LM (1990) Estudo dos agrossistemas do barrocal algarvio. O caso da nave do barão (concelho de Loulé). Dissertation, University of Algarve, FaroGoogle Scholar
  34. Smith BM, Bean SR, Schober TJ, Tilley M, Herald TJ, Aramouni F (2010) Composition and molecular weight distribution of carob germ protein fractions. J Agric Food Chem 58:7794–7800Google Scholar
  35. Somarriba E, Cerda R, Orozco J, Cifuentes M, Dávila H, Espin T, Mavisoy H, Ávila G, Alvarado E, Poveda V, Astorga C, Say E, Dehuevels O (2013) Carbon stocks and cocoa yields in agroforestry systems of Central America. Agric Ecosyst Environ 173:46–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tous J, Romero A, Hermoso JF, Ninot A, Plana J (2008) Fruiting and kernel production characteristics of ten Mediterranean carob cultivars grown in northeastern Spain. J Am Pomol Soc 62:144–150Google Scholar
  37. Vallet P, Pérot T (2011) Silver fir stand productivity is enhanced when mixed with Norway spruce: evidence based on large-scale inventory data and a generic modelling approach. J Veg Sci 22:932–942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vayreda J, Gracia M, Canadell JG, Retana J (2012) Spatial patterns and predictors of forest carob stocks in western Mediterranean. Ecosystems 15:1258–1270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wang Y, Belton S, Bridon H, Garanger E, Wellner N, Parker M, Grant A, Feillet P, Noel T (2001) Physicochemical studies of caroubin: a gluten like protein. J Agric Food Chem 49:3414–3419CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pedro José Correia
    • 1
    Email author
  • José Filipe Guerreiro
    • 2
  • Maribela Pestana
    • 1
  • Maria Amélia Martins-Loução
    • 3
  1. 1.MeditBio – Centre for Mediterranean Bioresources and FoodUniversidade do AlgarveFaroPortugal
  2. 2.AIDA - Associação Interprofissional para o Desenvolvimento da Produção e Valorização da Alfarroba - Loteamento Industrial de LouléLouléPortugal
  3. 3.Ce3C – Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes – Faculdade de CiênciasUniversidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations