Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Water infiltration and soil water content in claypan soils influenced by agroforestry and grass buffers compared to row crop management

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Agroforestry buffers have recently been introduced in temperate regions to enhance conservation of soil and water resources in row crop management. The effects of agroforestry and grass-legume buffers on in situ water infiltration relative to row crop management (RC) were assessed for a claypan soil in northeastern Missouri, USA. Infiltration rates were observed in early June in 2014 and 2015 for watersheds under corn (Zea mays L.)-soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) management; these watersheds had agroforestry buffers (AGB) or grass buffers (GB). The dominant soil for the watersheds was Putnam silt loam (fine, smectitic, mesic Vertic Albaqualf). The watersheds were in no-till management and established in 1991 with agroforestry buffers and GBs implemented in 1997. Agroforestry buffers, 4.5 m wide and 36.5 m apart, consisted of redtop (Agrostis gigantean Roth), brome (Bromus spp.), and birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.) with pin oak (Quercus palustris Menchh.), swamp white oak (Q. bicolor Willd.), and bur oak (Q. macrocarpa Michx.) trees. GBs consisted of redtop, brome, and birdsfoot trefoil. Significant differences were found among the treatments in 2014 for the sorptivity parameter for the fitted infiltration equations with the highest values for agroforestry buffers. Significantly higher saturated hydraulic conductivity values were found for the buffer treatments in 2015. Soil water content measurements were assessed over time for years 2010 and 2011 with sensors at 5, 10, 20 and 40 cm depths for the agroforestry buffer and RC areas. Water content decreased more rapidly during the summer season within agroforestry buffers relative to RC areas; however, water infiltration was higher within agroforestry buffers during the recharge period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson SH, Udawatta RP, Seobi T, Garrett HE (2009) Soil water content and infiltration in agroforestry buffer strips. Agrofor Syst 75(1):5–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford JM, Ferris JE, Remley PA (1987) Interrill soil erosion processes: I. Effect of surface sealing on infiltration, runoff, and soil splash detachment. Soil Sci Soc Am J 51(6):1566–1571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clothier B, Scotter D (2002) Unsaturated water transmission parameters obtained from infiltration. In: Dane JH, Topp GC (eds) Methods of soil analysis, part 4. SSSA, Madison, pp 879–898

    Google Scholar 

  • Commercial Agriculture Program of University Extension (2015) Missouri historical agricultural weather database (online). http://agebb.missouri.edu/weather/history/index.asp?station%20prefix=nov

  • Gold MA, Hanover JW (1987) Agroforestry systems for temperate zone. Agrofor Syst 5(2):109–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green WH, Ampt GA (1911) Studies on soil physics: 1. Flow of air and water through soils. J Agric Sci 4(1):1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield JL (2015) Environmental impact of water use in agriculture. Agron J 107:1554–1556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopmans JW, Clausnitzer V, Kosugi KI, Nielsen DR, Somma F (1997) Vadose zone measurement and modeling. Sci Agric 54:22–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Institute SAS (1999) SAS user’s guide. Statistics. SAS Institute, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Jose S (2009) Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits: an overview. Agrofor Syst 76(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jose S, Gillespie AR, Seifert JR, Biehle DJ (2000) Defining competition vectors in temperate alley cropping system in the Midwestern USA: 2. Competition for water. Agrofor Syst 48(1):41–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovell ST, Sullivan WC (2006) Environmental benefits of conservation buffers in the United States: evidence, promise, and open questions. Agric Ecosyst Environ 112(4):249–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowrance R, Dabney S, Schultz R (2002) Improving water and soil quality with conservation buffers. J Soil Water Conserv 57(2):37A–43A

    Google Scholar 

  • Or D, Wraith JM (2002) Soil water content and water potential relationships. In: Warrick AW (ed) Soil physics companion. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 49–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Parlange JY, Lisle I, Braddock RD, Smith RE (1982) The three-parameter infiltration equation. Soil Sci 133(6):337–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philip JR (1957) The theory of infiltration: 4. Sorptivity and algebraic infiltration equation. Soil Sci 84(3):257–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rachman A, Anderson SH, Gantzer CJ, Alberts EE (2004) Soil hydraulic properties influenced by stiff-stemmed grass hedge systems. Soil Sci Soc Am J 68(4):1386–1393

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Radke JK, Berry EC (1993) Infiltration as a tool for detecting soil changes due to cropping, tillage and grazing livestock. Am J Altern Agric 8(04):164–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds WD, Elrick DE, Youngs EG, Amoozegar A (2002) Field methods (vadose and saturated zone techniques). In: Dick WA (ed) Methods of soil analysis. Part 4. SSSA, Madison, pp 817–826

    Google Scholar 

  • Seobi T, Anderson SH, Udawatta RP, Gantzer CJ (2005) Influence of grass and agroforestry buffer strips on soil hydraulic properties for an Albaqualf. Soil Sci Soc Am J 69(3):893–901

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stone KC, Hunt PG, Novak JM, Johnson MH, Watts DW, Humenik FJ (2004) Stream nitrogen changes in an eastern coastal plain watershed. J Soil Water Conserv 59(2):66–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Topp GC, Ferré PA (2002) The soil solution phase. In: Dick WA (ed) Methods of soil analysis. Part 4. SSSA, Madison, pp 417–573

    Google Scholar 

  • Udawatta RP, Krstansky JJ, Henderson GS, Garrett HE (2002) Agroforestry practices, runoff. And nutrient loss: a paired watershed comparison. J Environ Qual 31(4):1214–1225

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Udawatta RP, Nygren P, Garrett HE (2005) Growth of three oak species during establishment of an agroforestry practice for watershed protection. Can J For Res 35(3):602–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Udawatta RP, Gantzer CJ, Anderson SH, Garrett HE (2008) Agroforestry and grass buffer effects on pore characteristics measured by high-resolution X-ray computed tomography. Soil Sci Soc Am J 72(2):295–304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Udawatta RP, Anderson SH, Motavalli PP, Garrett HE (2011) Calibration of a water content reflectometer and soil water dynamics for an agroforestry practice. Agrofor Syst 82(1):61–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker WJ, Branham B (1992) Environmental impacts of turfgrass fertilization. In: Balogh JC, Walker WJ (eds) Golf course management and construction: environmental issues. Lewis Publ, Chelsea, pp 105–219

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. H. Anderson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sahin, H., Anderson, S.H. & Udawatta, R.P. Water infiltration and soil water content in claypan soils influenced by agroforestry and grass buffers compared to row crop management. Agroforest Syst 90, 839–860 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-016-9899-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-016-9899-x

Keywords

Navigation