Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 92, Issue 2, pp 251–262 | Cite as

Soil carbon stocks in planted woodlots and Ngitili systems in Shinyanga, Tanzania

  • A. K. Osei
  • A. A. KimaroEmail author
  • D. Peak
  • A. W. Gillespie
  • K. C. J. Van Rees


Our understanding of the processes influencing the storage and dynamics of carbon (C) in soils under semi-arid agroforestry systems in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is limited. This study evaluated soil C pools in woodlot species of Albizia lebbeck (L.) Benth., Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit, Melia azedarach (L.), and Gmelina arborea Roxb.; and in farmland and Ngitili, a traditional silvopastoral system in northwestern Tanzania. Soil organic carbon (SOC) was analyzed in the whole soil to 1 m depth and to 0.4 m in macroaggregates (2000–250 μm), microaggregates (250–53 μm), and silt and clay-sized aggregates (<53 μm) to provide information of C dynamics and stabilization in various land uses. Synchrotron-based C K-edge x-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) spectroscopy was also used to study the influence of these land use systems on the soil organic matter (SOM) chemistry to understand the mechanisms of soil C changes. Whole soil C stocks in woodlots (43–67 Mg C ha−1) were similar to those in the reserved Ngitili systems (50–59 Mg C ha−1), indicating the ability of the planted woodlots on degraded lands to restore SOC levels similar to the natural woodlands. SOC in the woodlots were found to be associated more with the micro and silt-and clay-sized aggregates than with macroaggregates, reflecting higher stability of SOC in the woodlot systems. The continuous addition of litter in the woodlots preserved recalcitrant aromatic C compounds in the silt and clay-sized aggregates as revealed by the XANES C K-edge spectra. Therefore establishment of woodlots in semi-arid regions in Tanzania appear to make significant contributions to the long-term SOC stabilization in soil fractions.


Carbon sequestration Semi-arid Soil aggregates Synchrotron spectroscopy Woodlots 



The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the University of Saskatchewan as tuition for the first author and the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) via the strategic grant from Dr. Vic Timmer for the woodlot research in Tanzania. Also, extra thanks go to Drs. Ken Van Rees and Derek Peak for providing additional funds towards the first author’s studies. Technical support from Richard Farrell at the Soil Science Department, University of Saskatchewan is greatly appreciated and also to the Soil Science Department University of Saskatchewan; World Agroforestry Centre, Dar es Salaam-Tanzania; Natural Forest Resources Management and Agroforestry Centre (NAFRAC), Shinyanga and Dr. Robert Otsyina at Development Associates, Tanzania. Research described in this paper was performed at the Canadian Light Source, which is supported by the Canadian Foundation for Innovation, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, the University of Saskatchewan, the Government of Saskatchewan, Western Economic Diversification Canada, the National Research Council Canada, and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.


  1. Bationo A, Kihara J, Vanlauwe B, Waswa B, Kimetu J (2007) Soil organic carbon dynamics, functions and management in West African agro-ecosystems. Agric Syst 94:13–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dungait JAJ, Hopkins DW, Gregory AS, Whitmore AP (2012) Soil organic matter turnover is governed by accessibility not recalcitrance. Glob Change Biol 18:1781–1796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gama-Rodrigues EF, Gama-Rodrigues AC, Nair PKR (2011) Soil carbon sequestration in cacao agroforestry systems: a case study from Bahia, Brazil. Adv. Agrofor. 8:85–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gillespie AW, Walley FL, Farrell RE et al (2011) XANES and pyrolysis-FIMS evidence of organic matter composition in a hummocky landscape. Soil Sci Soc Am J 75:1741–1755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gillespie AW, Sanei H, Diochon A et al (2014) Perennially and annually frozen soil carbon differ in their susceptibility to decomposition: analysis of subarctic earth hummocks by bioassay, XANES and pyrolysis. Soil Biol Biochem 68:106–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Guo LB, Gifford RM (2002) Soil carbon stocks and land use change: a meta analysis. Glob Chang Biol 8:345–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hafida Z, Caron J, Angers DA (2007) Pore occlusion by sugars and lipids as a possible mechanism of aggregate stability in amended soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 71:1831–1839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Indorante SJ, Follmer LR, Hammer RD, Koenig PG (1990) Particle-size analysis by a modified pipette procedure. Soil Sci Soc Am J 54:560–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Janzen HH (2004) Review: carbon cycling in earth systems—a soil science perspective. Agric Ecosyst Environ 104:399–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kamwenda GJ (2002) Ngitili agrosilvipastoral systems in the United Republic of Tanzania. Unasylva 211:46–50Google Scholar
  11. Kimaro AA, Isaac ME, Chamshama SAO (2011) Carbon pools in tree biomass and soils under rotational woodlot systems in Eastern Tanzania. In: Kumar BM, Nair PKR (eds) Carbon sequestration potential of agroforestry systems: opportunities and challenges. Advanced Agroforestry, vol 8. Springer, Netherlands, pp 129–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kimaro AA, Novak KD, Shemdoe RS, Chamshama SAO (2014) Carbon stocks in planted woodlots at Kongowe, Kibaha, Tanzania. In: Oelbermann M (ed) Sustainable agroecosystems in climate change mitigation, pp 67–81. doi:  10.3920/978-90-8686-788-2_4
  13. Krull ES, Baldock JA, Skjemstad JO (2003) Importance of mechanisms and processes of the stabilisation of soil organic matter for modelling carbon turnover. Funct Plant Biol 30:207–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lal R (2003) Offsetting global CO2 emissions by restoration of degraded soils and intensification of world agriculture and forestry. Land Degrad Develop 14:309–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Luedeling E, Sileshi G, Beedy T, Dietz J (2011) Carbon sequestration potential of agroforestry systems in Africa. In: Kumar BM, Nair PKR (eds) Carbon sequestration potential of agroforestry systems: opportunities and challenges. Advanced Agroforestry, vol 8. Springer, Netherlands, pp 129–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lugo AE, Brown S (1993) Management of tropical soils as sinks or sources of atmospheric carbon. Plant Soil 149:27–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Marschner B, Brodowski S, Dreves A et al (2008) How relevant is recalcitrance for the stabilization of organic matter in soils? J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 171:91–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Martins MDR, Angers DA, Corá JE (2012) Carbohydrate composition and water-stable aggregation of an Oxisol as affected by crop sequence under no-till. Soil Sci Soc Am J 76:475–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Montagnini F, Nair PKR (2004) Carbon sequestration: an underexploited environmental benefit of agroforestry systems. Agroforest Syst 61:281–295Google Scholar
  20. Nair PKR, Kumar BM, Nair VD (2009) Agroforestry as a strategy for carbon sequestration. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 172:10–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nair PKR, Nair VD, Kumar BM, Showalter JM (2010) Carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems. Adv Agron 108:237–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nyadzi GI, Otsyina RM, Banzi FM, Bakengesa SS, Gama BM, Mbwambo L, Asenga D (2003) Rotational woodlot technology in northwestern Tanzania: tree species and crop performance. Agroforest Syst 59:253–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Oades JM, Waters AG (1991) Aggregate hierarchy in soils. Aust J Soil Res 29:815–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Oelbermann M, Voroney RP, Gordon AM (2004) Carbon sequestration in tropical and temperate agroforestry systems: a review with examples form Costa Rica and southern Canada. Agric Ecosyst Environ 104:359–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Paudel BR, Udawatta RP, Anderson SH (2011) Agroforestry and grass buffer effects on soil quality parameters for grazed pasture ad row-crop systems. Appl Soil Ecol 48:125–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Regier T, Krochak J, Sham TK, Hu YF, Thompson J, Blyth RIR (2007a) Performance and capabilities of the Canadian Dragon: the SGM beamline at the Canadian Light Source. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect A 582:93–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Regier T, Paulsen J, Wright G, Coulthard I, Tan K, Sham TK, Blyth RIR (2007b) Commissioning of the spherical grating monochromator soft X-ray spectroscopy beamline at the Canadian Light Source. AIP Conf Proc 879:473–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Saha SK, Nair PKR, Nair VD, Kumar BM (2010) Carbon storage in relation to soil size-fractions under tropical tree-based land-use systems. Plant Soil 328:433–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. SAS Institute (2008) SAS/STAT user’s guide, vers. 9.2. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
  30. Saxton AM (1998) A macro for converting mean separation output to letter groupings in Proc Mixed. In: 23rd SAS Users Group Intl., SAS Institute Inc., Cary, pp 1243–1246Google Scholar
  31. Sileshi G, Akinnifesi FK, Ajayi OC, Chakeredza S, Kaonga M, Matakala PW (2007) Contributions of agroforestry to ecosystem services in the miombo ecoregion of eastern and southern Africa. Afr J Environ Sci Technol 4:68–80Google Scholar
  32. Six J, Paustian K, Elliott ET, Combrink C (2000) Soil structure and organic matter I. Distribution of aggregate-size classes and aggregate-associated carbon. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:681–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Six J, Conant RT, Paul EA, Paustian K (2002a) Stabilization mechanisms of soil organic matter: implications for C-saturation of soils. Plant Soil 241:155–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Six J, Feller C, Denef K, Ogle SM, de Moraes Sa JC, Albrecht A (2002b) Soil organic matter, biota and aggregation in temperate and tropical soils—effects of no-tillage. Agronomie 22:755–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Six J, Bossuyt H, Degryze S, Dene K (2004) Review: a history of research on the link between (micro)aggregates, soil biota, and soil organic matter dynamics. Soil Tillage Res 79:7–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Solomon D, Lehmann J, Zech W (2000) Land use effects on soil organic matter properties of chromic luvisols in semi-arid northern Tanzania: carbon, nitrogen, lignin and carbohydrates. Agric Ecosyst Environ 78:203–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. URT (United Republic of Tanzania) (2007) Shinyanga regional socio-economic profile. Accessed 15 Jan 2014
  38. von Lützow M, Kögel-Knabner I, Ekschmitt K, Matzner E, Guggenberger G, Marschner B, Flessa H (2006) Stabilization of organic matter in temperate soils: mechanisms and their relevance under different soil conditions- a review. Eur J Soil Sci 57:426–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Walker MS, Desanker PV (2004) The impact of land use on soil carbon in miombo woodlands of Malawi. For Ecol Manag 203:345–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Williams M, Ryan CM, Rees RM, Sambane E, Fernando J, Grace J (2008) Carbon sequestration and biodiversity of re-growing miombo woodlands in Mozambique. For Ecol Manag 254:145–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. K. Osei
    • 1
  • A. A. Kimaro
    • 2
    Email author
  • D. Peak
    • 1
  • A. W. Gillespie
    • 3
    • 4
  • K. C. J. Van Rees
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Soil ScienceUniversity of Saskatchewan 51 Campus DriveSaskatoonCanada
  2. 2.World Agroforestry CentreICRAF-Tanzania ProgrammeDar es SalaamTanzania
  3. 3.Canadian Light Source IncSaskatoonCanada
  4. 4.Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural AffairsGuelphCanada

Personalised recommendations