Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Variability of soil carbon in row crop watersheds with agroforestry buffers

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Good understandings of soil carbon (C) variability are important to develop mitigation strategies for global warming and for enhanced ecosystem services. The objective of this study was to examine agroforestry, corn-soybean (row crop; control) and landscape effects on variations in soil C. One-m deep soil cores were sampled from two paired watersheds under agroforestry management with buffers and corn-soybean rotations and soils were analyzed for soil C, texture, pH, and cation exchange capacity. To observe the effect of landscape positions, both agroforestry and control watersheds were divided according to the landscape positions and area. The agroforestry watershed was divided into 0–2, 3–5, and 6–9 % slope segments and control watershed into 0–2 and 3–9 % slope segments. The results showed non-significant higher values of soil C in the agroforestry watershed after 3 years of establishment compared to the control treatment. Coefficient of variation (CV) showed ranges of variability for soil C by soil depth in both watersheds. Soil C distribution under agroforestry (CV 0.19–0.31) was moderately variable whereas under control (CV 0.30–0.40) it was moderate to most variable. Significantly higher amounts of soil C were observed at lower landscape positions compared to the upper and middle positions probably due to the depositions of eroded plant materials and retention by the grass waterway. Similarly, higher soil C was observed on both watersheds where depths to the claypan were shallow. It might be due to the lower drainage and soil water movement. Establishment of agroforestry practices decreased the variability of soil C, helped increase the soil C during long run as well as helped to enhance the ecosystems services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrouays D, Deslais W, Badeau V (2006) The carbon content of topsoil and its geographical distribution in France. Soil Use Manag 17:7–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batjes NC (2002) A homogenized soil profile data set for global and regional environmental research. http://www.isric.org. Accessed 23 Feb 2014

  • Berg B, McClaugherty C (2003) Plant litter: decomposition, humus formation, carbon sequestration. Springer, New York, p 286

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Birdsey R (1992) Carbon storage and accumulation in United States forest ecosystems. Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-59. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington Office, Washington, p 51

  • Brady NC, Weil RR (2002) The nature and properties of soils, 13th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, p 960

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush JK (2008) Soil nitrogen and carbon after twenty years of riparian forest development. Soil Sci Soc Am J 72:815–822

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon RK, Solomon AM, Brown S, Houghton RA, Trexier MC, Wisniewski J (1994) Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems. Science 263:185–190

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Don A, Schumacher J, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Scholten T, Schulze ED (2007) Spatial and vertical variation of soil carbon at two grassland sites—implications for measuring soil carbon stocks. Geoderma 141:272–282

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eswaran H, van Den Berg E, Reich P (1993) Organic carbon in soils of the world. Soil Sci Soc Am J 57:192–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahnestock P, Lal R, Hall GF (1996) Land use and erosional effects on two Ohio Alfisols: II. crop yields. J Sustain Agric 7:85–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franzluebbers AJ, Stuedemann JA, Wilkinson SR (2001) Bermudagrass management in the Southern piedmont USA. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65:834–841

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Franzmeier DP, Lemme GD, Miles RJ (1985a) Organic carbon in soils of north central United States. Soil Sci Soc Am J 49:702–708

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Franzmeier DP, Lemme GD, Miles RJ (1985b) Organic carbon in soils of north central United States. Soil Sci Soc Am J 49:702–708

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gregorich EG, Greer KJ, Anderson DW, Liang BC (1998) Carbon distribution and losses: erosion and deposition effects. Soil Till Res 47:291–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer RD, Henderson GS, Udawatta RP, Brandt DK (1995) Soil organic carbon in the Missouri forest-prairie ecotone. In: McFee WW, Kelly JM (eds) Carbon forms and functions in forest soils. SSSA, Madison, pp 201–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison RB, Footen PW, Strahm BD (2011) Deep soil horizons: contribution and importance to soil carbon pools and assessing whole-ecosystem response to management and global change. For Sci 57:67–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiederer R (2009) Distribution of organic carbon in soil profile data. EUR 23980 EN. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg p 126

  • Howlett DS, Mosquera-Lasada MR, Nair PKR, Nair VD, Rigueiro-Rodríguez A (2011) Soil C storage in silvopastoral systems and a treeless pasture in northwestern Spain. J Environ Qual 40:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James J, Devine W, Harrison R, Terry T (2014) Deep soil carbon: quantification and modeling in subsurface layers. Soil Sci Soc Am J. doi:10.2136/sssaj2013.06.0245nafsc

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen LS, McQueen DJ, Shepherd TG (1996) Effects of soil compaction on N-mineralization and microbial-C and -N. I. Field measurements. Soil Till Res 38:175–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jobbágy EG, Jackson RB (2000) The vertical distribution of soil organic carbon and its relation to climate and vegetation. Ecol Appl 10:423–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston MH, Homann PS, Engstrom JK, Grigal DF (1996) Changes in ecosystem carbon storage over 40 years on an old-field forest landscape in east-central Minnesota. For Ecol Manag 83:17–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jose S (2009) Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits: an overview. Agrofor Syst 76:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimble JM, Rice CW, Reed D, Mooney S, Follett RF, Lal R (2007) Economic and social benefits of soil carbon management: policy implications and recommendations. In: Kimble JM (ed) soil carbon management. CRC Press, New York, pp 13–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Kort J, Turnock R (1998) Carbon reservoir and biomass in Canadian prairie shelterbelts. Agrofor Syst 44:175–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (2001) Myths and facts about soils and the greenhouse effect. In: Lal R (ed) Soil carbon sequestration and the greenhouse effect. Soil Science Society of America Inc., Madison, pp 9–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (2010) Enhancing eco-efficiency in agro-ecosystems through soil carbon sequestration. Crop Sci 50:S-120–S-131

  • Lal R, Kimble JM, Follett RF, Cole CV (1998) The potential of U.S. cropland to sequester carbon and mitigate the greenhouse effect. Ann Arbor Press, Chelsea, p 128

  • Lee KH, Jose S (2003) Soil respiration and microbial biomass in a pecan—cotton alley cropping system in Southern USA. Agrofor Syst 58:45–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz K, Lal R (2005) The depth distribution of soil organic carbon in relation to land use and management and the potential of carbon sequestration in subsoil horizons. Adv Agron 88:35–66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meersmans J, De Ridder F, Canters F et al (2008) A multiple regression approach to assess the spatial distribution of soil organic carbon (SOC) at the regional scale. Geoderma 143:1–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Millard B, Singh BK (2009) Does grassland vegetation drive soil microbial diversity? Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 88:147–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montagnini F, Nair PKR (2004) Carbon sequestration: an underexploited environmental benefit of agroforestry systems. Agrofor Syst 61:281–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno G, Obrador JJ, Cubera E, Dupraz C (2005) Fine root distribution in dehesas of central western Spain. Plant Soil 227:153–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan JA, Follett RF, Allen LH, Del GS, Derner JD, Dijkstra F, Franzluebbers A, Fry R, Paustian K, Schoeneberger MM (2010) Carbon sequestration in agricultural lands of the United States. J Soil Water Conserv 65:6A–13A

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nair PKR, Nair VD (2002) Carbon storage in North American agroforestry systems. In: Kimble JM, Heath LS, Birdsey RA, Lal R (eds) The potential of U.S. Forest soil to sequester carbon and mitigate the greenhouse effect. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 333–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair PKR, Kumar BM, Nair VD (2009) Agroforestry as a strategy for carbon sequestration. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 172:10–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oelbermann M, Voroney RP, Kass DCL, Schlönvoigt AM (2006) Soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics using stable isotopes in 19- and 10-year-old tropical agroforestry systems. Geoderma 130:356–367

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Owensby JR, Ezell DS (1992) Monthly station normal of temperature, precipitation, and heating and cooling degree days 1961–1990. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Climate Data Center, Ashville

  • Paustian K, Levine E, Post WM, Ryzhova IM (1997) The use of models to integrate information and understanding of soil C at the regional scale. Geoderma 79:227–260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Potter KN, Derner JD (2006) Soil carbon pools in central Texas: Prairies, restored grasslands, and croplands. J Soil Water Conserv 61:124–128

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institure Inc. (2002) SAS 9.1 for Windows. Cary, NC

  • Sharrow SH, Ismail S (2004) Carbon and nitrogen storage in agroforests, tree plantations, and pastures in western Oregon, USA. Agrofor Syst 60:123–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey Staff (2000) Soil Survey Laboratory Methods Manual. USDA, Soil Conserv Service, Nat Soil Survey Staff

  • Sparling GP, Wheeler D, Vesely ET, Schipper LA (2006) What is soil organic matter worth? J Environ Qual 35:548–557

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steinbeiss S, BeßLer H, Engels C, Temperton VM, Buchmann N, Roscher C, Kreutziger Y, Baade J, Habekost M, Gleixner G (2008) Plant diversity positively affects short-term soil carbon storage in experimental grasslands. Glob Change Biol 14:2937–2949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Templer PH, Groffman PM, Flecker AS, Power AG (2005) Land use change and soil nutrient transformations in the Los Haitises region of the Dominican Republic. Soil Biol Biochem 37:215–225

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Udawatta RP, Jose S (2011) Carbon sequestration potential of North American agroforestry practices. In: Kumar BM, Nair PKR (eds) Carbon sequestration potential of agroforestry systems: opportunities and challenges. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 17–42

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Udawatta RP, Krstansky JJ, Henderson GS, Garrett HE (2002) Agroforestry practices, runoff, and nutrient loss: a paired watershed comparison. J Environ Qual 31:1214–1225

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Udawatta RP, Nygren P, Garrett HE (2005) Growth of three oak species during establishment of an agroforestry practice for watershed protection. Can J For Res 35:602–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Udawatta RP, Anderson SH, Gantzer CJ, Garrett HE (2006) Agroforestry and grass buffer influence on macropore characteristics. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:1763

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Udawatta RP, Kremer RJ, Adamson BW, Anderson SH (2008) Variations in soil aggregate stability and enzyme activities in a temperate agroforestry practice. Appl Soil Ecol 39:153–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unklesbay AG, Vineyard JD (1992) Missouri geology: three billion years of volcanoes, seas, sediments, and erosion. University of Missouri Press, Columbia, p 189

  • Watson FC (1979) Soil survey of Knox, Monroe, and Shelby Counties, Missouri. USDA, Soil Conservation Service, Missouri Agricultural Experiment Station, US Government Printing Office, Washington

  • Watson RT, Nobel IR, Bolin B, Ravindranathan NR, Verado DJ, Dokken DJ (2000) IPCC special report on land use, land use change, and forestry. http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/special-reports/spm/srl-en.pdf. Accessed 23 Febraury 2014

  • Wilding LP (1985) Spatial variability: It’s documentation, accommodation, and implication to soil surveys. In: Nielsen DR, Bouma J (eds) Soil spatial variability. PURDOC, Wageningen, pp 166–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood S, Sebastian KL, Scherr SJ (2000) Pilot analysis of global ecosystems: agroecosystems. International Food Policy Research Institute and World Resources Institute, Washington, pp 73–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Zabowski D, Whitney N, Gurung J, Hatten J (2011) Total carbon in the coarse fraction and at depth. For Sci 57:11–18

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was funded through the University of Missouri Center for Agroforestry under cooperative agreements with the USDA-ARS Dale Bumpers Small Farm Research Center, Booneville, AR. The authors would like to thank Dr. David Hammer for his assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ranjith P. Udawatta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Udawatta, R.P., Adhikari, P., Anoma Senaviratne, G.M.M.M. et al. Variability of soil carbon in row crop watersheds with agroforestry buffers. Agroforest Syst 89, 37–47 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-014-9740-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-014-9740-3

Keywords

Navigation