Advertisement

Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 87, Issue 5, pp 1129–1146 | Cite as

Modeling analysis of potential carbon sequestration under existing agroforestry systems in three districts of Indo-gangetic plains in India

  • AjitEmail author
  • S. K. Dhyani
  • Ramnewaj
  • A. K. Handa
  • Rajendra Prasad
  • Badre Alam
  • R. H. Rizvi
  • Garima Gupta
  • K. K. Pandey
  • Amit Jain
  • Uma
Article

Abstract

The Indo-gangetic plains (IGP) in India occupies 13 % of the total geographical area and produces 50 % of total food grain to feed 40 % population of the country. Dynamic CO2FIX model v3.1 has been used to assess the baseline (2011) carbon and to estimate the carbon sequestration potential (CSP) of agroforestry systems (AFS) for a simulation period of 30 years in three districts viz. Ludhiana (upper IGP in Punjab), Sultanpur (middle IGP in Uttar Pradesh) and Uttar Dinajpur (lower IGP in West Bengal) respectively. The estimated numbers of trees existing in farmer’s field on per hectare basis in these districts were 37.95, 6.14 and 6.20, respectively. The baseline standing biomass in the tree components varied from 2.45 to 2.88 Mg DM ha−1 and the total biomass (tree + crop) from 11.14 to 25.97 Mg DM ha−1 in the three districts. The soil organic carbon in the baseline ranged from 8.13 to 9.12 Mg C ha−1 and is expected to increase from 8.63 to 24.51 Mg C ha−1. The CSP of existing AFS (for 30 years simulation) has been estimated to the tune of 0.111, 0.126 and 0.551 Mg C ha−1 year−1 for Sultanpur, Dinajpur and Ludhiana districts, respectively. CSP of AFS increases with increasing tree density per hectare. Site specific climatic parameters like monthly temperature, annual precipitation and evapotranspiration also moderates the CSP of AFS. The preliminary estimates of the area under AFS’s were 2.06 % (3,256 ha), 2.08 % (6,440 ha) and 12.69 % (38,860 ha) in Sultanpur, Dinajpur and Ludhiana respectively.

Keywords

Carbon sequestration potential (CSP) Agroforestry systems (AFS) Indo-gangetic plains (IGP) Tree biomass Soil carbon Area under agroforestry 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We sincerely thank Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), Directorate of Agricultural Research and Cooperation (DARE), Ministry of Agriculture, New Delhi for the financial assistance provided under NICRA (National Initiative on Climate Resilient Agriculture) project to carry out this work. The authors are extremely grateful to Professor Ranjith Udawatta, University of Missouri, Columbia (USA) for his thoughtful suggestion for the improvement of the article.

References

  1. Ajit, Das DK, Chaturvedi OP, Jabeen N, Dhyani SK (2011) Predictive models for dry weight estimation of above and below ground components of Populus deltoides in India: development and comparative diagnosis. Biomass Bioenergy 35(3):1145–1152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bargali SS, Singh SS, Singh RP (1992) Structure and function of an age series of Eucalyptus plantations in central Himalaya, dry matter dynamics. Ann Bot 69:405–411Google Scholar
  3. CENTURY (1992) Soil organic matter environment. Technical documentations, Agroecosystem version 4.0. Colorado State University, Fort CollinsGoogle Scholar
  4. Chauhan SK, Sharma SC, Chauhan R, Gupta N, Srivastava R (2010) Accounting poplar and wheat productivity for carbon sequestration in agrisilviculture system. Indian For 136(9):1174–1182Google Scholar
  5. De Jong BHJ, Gaona SO, Montalvo QM, Bazan EE, Hernandez NP (2004) Economics of agroforestry carbon Hernandez sequestration. In: Alavalapati JRR, Mercer DE (eds) Valuing agroforestry system. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, pp 123–138. ISBN 1-4020-2412-6Google Scholar
  6. Dhyani SK, Puri DN, Narain P (1996) Biomass production and rooting behaviour of Eucalyptus tereticornis Sm. on deep soils and riverbed bouldery lands of Doon Valley, India. Indian For 122(2):128–136Google Scholar
  7. Dhyani SK, Kareemulla K, Handa AK (2006) Agroforestry potential and returns across agro-climatic zones. NRCAF, JhansiGoogle Scholar
  8. Dhyani SK, Samra JS, Ajit, Handa AK, Uma (2007) Forestry to support increased agricultural production: focus on employment generation and rural development. Agric Econ Res Rev 26(2):179–202Google Scholar
  9. Dhyani SK, Ramnewaj, Sharma AR (2009) Agroforestry, its relation with agronomy, challenges and opportunities. Indian J Agron 54:249–266Google Scholar
  10. Gaboury S, Boucher JF, Villeneuve C, Lord D, Gagnon R (2009) Estimating the net carbon balance boreal open woodland afforestation: a case study in Quebec’s closed crown boreal forest. For Ecol Manag 257:483–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gupta N, Kukal SS, Bawa SS, Dhaliwal GS (2009) Soil organic carbon and aggregation under poplar based agroforestry systems in relation to tree age and soil type. Agrofor Syst 76(1):27–35Google Scholar
  12. Haripriya GS (2001) A frame work for carbon stored in India wood products. Environ Dev Sustain 3:229–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. ISFR (2011) India state of forest report-2011. Forest survey of India, Ministry of environment and forest, Government of India, Dehradun (India)Google Scholar
  14. Jha KK (1995) Stucture and functioning of age series of Teak (Tectona Grandisi Linn.) plantations in Kumaon Himalayan Terai. Ph.D. Thesis. Kumaon University, NanitalGoogle Scholar
  15. Kaonga ML, Smith TBP (2012) Simulation of carbon pool changes in woodlots in eastern Zambia using CO2FIX model. Agrofor Syst 86:213–223. doi: 10.1007/s10457-011-9429-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kaul M, Mohren GMJ, Dadhwal VK (2010) Carbon storage and sequestration potential of selected tree species in India. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 15:489–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kaur B, Gupta SR, Singh G (2002) Carbon storage and nitrogen cycling in silvi-pastoral systems on a sodic soil in northwestern India. Agrofor Syst 54:21–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kumar JIN, Sajish PR, Kumar RN, Patel K (2011) Biomass and net primary productivity in three different aged Butea forest ecosystems in Western India, Rajasthan. Iran J Energy Environ 2(1):1–7Google Scholar
  19. Lal R (2004) Soil carbon sequestration in India. Clim Chang 65:277–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lal R, Singh M (2000) Carbon sequestration potential of Indian forests. Environ Monit Assess 60:315–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liski J, Nissinen ARI, Erhard M, Taskinen O (2003) Climate effects on litter decomposition from Arctic tundra to tropical rainforest. Glob Chang Biol 9:575–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liski J, Palosuo T, Peltoniemi M, Sievanen R (2005) Carbon and decomposition model YASOO for forest soils. Ecol Model 189:168–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Masera O, Garza-Caligaris JF, Kanninen M, Karjalainen T, Liski J, Nabuurs GJ, Pussinen A, De Jong BJ (2003) Modelling carbon sequestration in afforestation, agroforestry and forest management projects: the CO2FIX V. 2 approach. Ecol Model 164:177–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mittal SP, Singh P (1989) Intercropping field crops between rows of Leucaena leucocephala under rainfed conditions in northern India. Agrofor Syst 8(2):165–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mohren GMJ, Goldewijk CGMK (1990) CO2FIX: a dynamic model of the CO2 fixation in the forest stands. De Dorschkamp, Research Institute for Forestry and Urban Ecology. Report No. 624(35)Google Scholar
  26. Mohren GMJ, Garza Caligaris GF, Masera O, Kanninen M, Karjalainen T, Pussinen A, Nabuurs GJ (1999) CO2Fix for windows : a dynamic model of the Co2-fixation in forest, version 1.2. IBN research report 99/3, p 33Google Scholar
  27. Nair PKR, Bannister ME, Nair VD, Alavalapati JJR, Ellis EA, Jose S, Long AJ (2005) Silvopasture in south eastern United States: more than just a new house for an old practice. In: Mosquera-Losoda MR, McAdaur J, Rigueiro-Radriguez A (eds) Silvopastoralism and sustainable land management, CABI Publishing, UK. The proceedings of international congress on silvopastoralism and sustainable management held in Lugo, Spain in April, 2004, pp 72–82Google Scholar
  28. Nair PKR, Nair VD, Kumar BM, Showalter JM (2010) Carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems. In: Donald LS (ed) Advances in agronomy, vol 108. Academic Press, Waltham, pp 237–307Google Scholar
  29. Namburs GJ, Mohren GMJ (1993) Carbon fixation through forest activities: a case study of carbon sequestration potential of selected forest types, commissioned by the foundation face. Institute for Forestry and Nature Research IBN-DLO IBN Research Report 93/4Google Scholar
  30. Namburs GJ, Schelhaas MJ (2002) Carbon profile of typical forest types across Europe assessed with CO2FIX. Ecol Indic 1:213–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Negi JDS (1984) Biologica productivity and cycling of nutrients in managed and man-made ecosystems. Ph.D.Thesis, Garhwal University, Srinagar, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  32. Negi JDS, Bahuguna VK, Sharma DC (1990) Biomass production and distribution of nutrients in 2 years old teak (Tectona grandis) and gamar (Gmelina arborea) plantation in Tripura. Indian For 116(9):681–686Google Scholar
  33. Negi MS, Tandon VN, Rawat HS (1995) Biomass and nutrient distribution in young teak (Tectona grandis) plantation in Tarai Region of Uttar Pradesh. Indian For 121(6):455–463Google Scholar
  34. Pal DK, Bhattacharyya T, Srivastava P, Chandran P, Ray SK (2009) Soils of the Indo-gangetic plains: their historical perspective and management. Curr Sci 96(9):1193–1202Google Scholar
  35. Palosuo T, Liski J, Trofymow JA, Titus BD (2005) Litter decomposition affected by climate and litter quality—testing the Yasso model with litterbag data from the Canadian inter site decomposition experiment. Ecol Model 189:183–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pathak H, Byjesh K, Chakrabarti B, Agarawal PK (2011) Potential and cost of carbon sequestration in Indian agriculture: estimates from long term experiments. Field Crop Res 120:102–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rai P, Solanki KR, Singh UP (2000) Growth and biomass production of multipurpose tree species in natural grassland under semi-arid condition. Indian J Agrofor 2:101–103Google Scholar
  38. Rai AK, Solanki KR, Rai P (2002) Performance of Anogeissus pendula genotypes under agrisilviculture system. Indian J Agrofor 4(1):71–77Google Scholar
  39. Ramnewaj, Dhyani SK (2008) Agroforestry for carbon sequestration: scope and present status. Indian J Agrofor 10:1–9Google Scholar
  40. Ramnewaj Dar SA, Yadav RS, Ajit, Sanker AK, Dhyani SK (2008) Management effect on growth, biomass carbon and nitrogen accumulation in Albizia procera at 4 years in agroforestry system. J Trop For 23(3 & 4):73–80Google Scholar
  41. Rao MR, Ong CK, Pathak P, Sharma MM (1991) Productivity of annual cropping and agroforestry systems on a shallow Alfisol in semi-arid India. Agrofor Syst 15:51–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rao LGG, Joseph B, Sreemannarayana B (2000) Growth and biomass production of some important multipurpose tree species on rainfed sandy loam soils. Indian For 126(7):772–781Google Scholar
  43. Ravindranath NH, Ostwald M (2008) Carbon inventory methods: handbook for greenhouse gas inventory, carbon mitigation and round wood production projects (advance in global change research-29). Springer science, Dordrecht, ISBN 978-1-4020-6546-0Google Scholar
  44. Ravindranath NH, Somashekhar BS, Gadgil M (1997) Carbon flows in Indian forest. Clim Chang 35:297–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Saha S, Nair PKR, Nair VD, Kumar BM (2009) Soil carbon stocks in relation to plant diversity of home gardens in Kerala, India. Agrofor Syst 76:53–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sathaye JA, Ravindranath NH (1998) Climate change mitigation in the energy and the forestry sectors of developing countries. Annu Rev Energy Environ 23:387–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sathye J, Mayers S (1995) Greenhouse gas mitigation assessment. A guide book. Kluwer, DordrehtGoogle Scholar
  48. Schelhaas MJ, Van PW, Esch, Groen TA, Kanninen M, Liski J, Masera O, Mohren GMJ, Nabuurs GJ, Pedroni L, Pussinen A, Vallejo A, Palosuo T, Vilén T (2004) CO2FIX V 3.1—a modelling framework for quantifying carbon sequestration in forest ecosystems. ALTERRA Report 1068 Wageningen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  49. Singh H, Pathak PMK, Raghubanshi AS (2011) Carbon sequestration potential of Indo-gangetic agroecosystem soils. Trop Ecol 52(2):223–228Google Scholar
  50. Swamy SL, Puri S (2005) Biomass production and C-sequestration of Gmelina arborea in plantation and agroforestry system in India. Agrofor Syst 64(3):181–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Swamy SL, Puri S, Singh AK (2003) Growth, biomass, carbon storage and nutrient distribution in Gmelina arborea in plantation and agroforestry system in India. Agrofor Syst 64:181–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tejwani KG (2008) Contribution of agroforestry to economy, livelihood and environment in India: reminisces of a life time between 1957 and 2008. Indian J Agrofor 10(2):1–2Google Scholar
  53. Viswanath S, Peddappaiah RS, Subramoniam V, Manivachakam P, George M (2004) Management of Casuarina equisetifolia in wide-row intercropping systems for enhanced productivity. Indian J Agrofor 6(2):19–25Google Scholar
  54. Watson RT, Noble IR, Bolin B, Ravindranath NH, Verarado DJ, Dokken DJ (eds) (2000) Land use, land use changes and forestry: a special Report of the IPCC. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ajit
    • 1
    Email author
  • S. K. Dhyani
    • 1
  • Ramnewaj
    • 1
  • A. K. Handa
    • 1
  • Rajendra Prasad
    • 1
  • Badre Alam
    • 1
  • R. H. Rizvi
    • 1
  • Garima Gupta
    • 1
  • K. K. Pandey
    • 1
  • Amit Jain
    • 1
  • Uma
    • 1
  1. 1.National Research Centre for Agroforestry (NRCAF)JhansiIndia

Personalised recommendations