Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 85, Issue 2, pp 263–278 | Cite as

Uses, management, and population status of the baobab in eastern Burkina Faso

  • Katharina Schumann
  • Rüdiger Wittig
  • Adjima Thiombiano
  • Ute Becker
  • Karen Hahn
Article

Abstract

Many cash-poor households in the semi-arid tropics strongly depend on non-timber forest products (NTFPs) for livelihood. Increasing threats on NTFP-providing tree species, due to land-use intensification, require ecological studies as well as additional information about species’ uses and management provided by local people. The objectives of our study were to (i) document uses and management of the baobab (Adansonia digitata L.), (ii) investigate knowledge distribution among genders and different villages, and (iii) assess the population status of the baobab in eastern Burkina Faso. We conducted an ethnobotanical survey among Gulimanceba people and performed a quantitative analysis using different measures of knowledge. Interviews reveal that the baobab is harvested by local people for 25 use-types. The fruits are the most important plant part and baobab products are of special importance for nutritional uses. Local management of baobab seems to be so far sufficient to maintain baobab populations. The fact that we found some differences in uses and management of baobab between genders and villages emphasizes the importance of gender- and region-related management recommendation. People are able to use and manage the baobab in a relative sustainable way as human population density is relatively low and as they have relatively good access to the forest compared to other regions of Burkina Faso. However, in the light of land-use and climate changes, adapted management strategies are required. We conclude that ethnobotanical studies on a small-scale level are of high importance in order to develop management strategies that are reliable in a specific region.

Keywords

Adansonia digitata Gulimanceba Non-timber forest products Quantitative ethnobotany Traditional knowledge 

References

  1. Assogbadjo AE, Sinsin B, Codjia JTC, Van Damme P (2005) Ecological diversity and pulp, seed and kernel production of the baobab (Adansonia digitata) in Benin. Belg J Bot 138:47–56Google Scholar
  2. Assogbadjo AE, Glele Kakaı R, Chadare FJ, Thomson L, Kyndt T, Sinsin B, Van Damme P (2008) Folk classification, perception and preferences of baobab products in West Africa: consequences for species conservation and improvement. Econ Bot 62:74–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Assogbadjo AE, Kyndt T, Chadare FJ, Sinsin B, Gheysen G, Eyog-Matig O, Van Damme P (2009) Genetic fingerprinting using AFLP cannot distinguish traditionally classified baobab morphotypes. Agrofor Syst 75:157–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buchmann C, Prehsler S, Hartl A, Vogl CR (2009) To plant or not to plant? Cultural reasons and barriers for adoptive transplantation of wild fruit trees in West Africa’. In Tielkes E (ed) International research on food security, natural resource management and rural development—Tropentag 2009—biophysical and socio-economic frame conditions for the sustainable management of natural resources. DITSL GmbH (German Institute for Agriculture in the Tropics and Subtropics), Witzenhausen, Germany, ISBN:978-3-9801686-7-0Google Scholar
  5. Buchmann C, Prehsler S, Hartl A, Vogl CR (2010) The importance of baobab (Adansonia digitata L.) in rural West African subsistence—suggestion of a cautionary approach to international market export of baobab fruits. Ecol Food Nutr 49:145–172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Byg A, Baslev H (2001) Diversity and use of palms in Zahamena, Eastern Madagascar. Biodivers Conserv 10:951–970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Choudhury K, Jansen LJM (1998) Terminology for integrated resources planning and management. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  8. CUC (Centre for Underutilised Crops) (2010) Baobab: Adansonia digitata, Manuel pratique pour les médiateurs et paysans. University of Southampton, SouthamptonGoogle Scholar
  9. Cuni Sanchez A (2011) The status of baobab tree populations in southern Malawi: implications for further exploitation. For Tree Livelihood 20:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cuni Sanchez A, De Smedt S, Haq N, Samson R (2011) Comparative study on baobab fruit morphological variation between western and south-eastern Africa: opportunities for domestication. Genet Resour Crop Evol 58:1143–1156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cunningham AB (2001) Applied ethnobotany: people, wild plant use and conservation. WWF. Earthscan Publications Ldt, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. De Caluwé E, De Smedt S, Assogbadjo AE, Samson R, Sinsin B, Van Damme P (2009) Ethnic differences in use value and use patterns of baobab (Adansonia digitata L.) in northern Benin. Afr J Ecol 47:433–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Delvaux C, Sinsin B, Van Damme P (2010) Impact of season, stem diameter and intensity of debarking on survival and bark re-growth pattern of medicinal tree species, Benin, West Africa. Biol Conserv 143:2664–2671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dhillion SS, Gustad G (2004) Local management practices influence the viability of the baobab (Adansonia digitata Linn.) in different land use types, Cinzana, Mali. Agric Ecosyst Environ 101:85–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Djossa BA, Fahr J, Wiegand T, Ayihouénou BE, Kalko EE, Sinsin BA (2008) Land use impact on Vitellaria paradoxa C.F. Gaerten stand structure and distribution patterns: a comparison of Biosphere Reserve of Pendjari in Atacora district in Benin. Agroforest Syst 72:205–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dovie DBK (2003) Rural economy and livelihoods from the non-timber forest products trade. Compromising sustainability in southern Africa? Int J Sust Dev World 10:247–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dovie DBK, Witkowski ETF, Shackleton CM (2008) Knowledge of plant resource use based on location, gender and generation. Appl Geogr 28:311–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Edkins MT, Kruger LM, Harris K, Midgley JJ (2007) Baobabs and elephants in Kruger National Park: nowhere to hide. Afr J Ecol 46:119–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gaoue OG, Ticktin T (2007) Patterns of harvesting foliage and bark from the multipurpose tree Khaya senegalensis in Benin: variation across ecological regions and its impacts on population structure. Biol Conserv 137:424–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gaoue OG, Ticktin T (2009) Fulani knowledge of the ecological impacts of Khaya senegalensis (Meliaceae) foliage harvest in benin and its implications for sustainable harvest. Econ Bot 63:256–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guinko S (1984) La végétation de la Haute Volta. University of Bordeaux III, DissertationGoogle Scholar
  22. Gustad G, Dhillion SS, Sidibé D (2004) Local use and cultural and economic value of products from trees in the parklands of the municipality of Cinzana, Mali. Econ Bot 58:578–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Heubach K (2012) The socio-economic importance of non-timber forest products for rural livelihoods in West African savanna ecosystems: current status and future trends. University Frankfurt am Main, DissertationGoogle Scholar
  24. Heubach K, Wittig R, Nuppenau EA, Hahn K (2011) The economic importance of non-timber forest products (NTFPs) for livelihood maintenance of rural west African communities: a case study from northern Benin. Ecol Econ 70:1991–2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 25:1965–1978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. INSD (Institut National de la Statistique et de la Démographie) (2007) Recensement général de la population et de l’habitation de 2006 du Burkina Faso. Ministère de l’Administration Territoriale, Burkina FasoGoogle Scholar
  27. Kristensen M, Lykke AM (2003) Informant-based valuation of use and conservation preferences of savanna trees in Burkina Faso. Econ Bot 57:203–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lykke AM (1998) Assessment of species composition change in savanna vegetation by means of woody plants size class distributions and local information. Biodivers Conserv 7:1261–1275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lykke AM, Kristensen MK, Ganaba S (2004) Valuation of local use and dynamics of 56 woody species in the Sahel. Biodivers Conserv 13:1961–1990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McCune B, Mefford MJ (2006) PC-ORD, multivariate analysis of ecological data, version 5.3.1. Software, Gleneden BeachGoogle Scholar
  31. Monteiro JM, Albuquerque UP, Lins-Neto EMF, Araújo EL, Amorim ELC (2006) Use patterns and knowledge of medicinal species among two rural communities in Brazil’s semi–arid Northeastern region. J Ethnopharmacol 105:173–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Paré S, Savadogo P, Tigabu M, Ouadba JM, Odén PC (2010) Consumptive values and local perception of dry forest decline in Burkina Faso, West Africa. Environ Dev Sustain 12:277–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Patrut A, Von Reden KF, Lowy DA, Alberts AH, Pohlman JW, Wittmann R, Gerlach D, Xu L, Mitchell CS (2007) Radiocarbon dating of a very large African baobab. Tree Physiol 27:1569–1574PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. R Development Core Team (2009) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  35. Romero C, Dovie D, Gambiza J, Luoga E, Schmitt S, Grundy I (2001) Effects of commercial bark harvesting on Adansonia digitata (baobab) in the Save-Odzi valley, Zimbabwe, with considerations for its management. Hotspring Working Group. IES Working Paper 18:28–50Google Scholar
  36. Schumann K, Wittig R, Thiombiano A, Becker U, Hahn K (2010) Impact of land-use type and bark- and leaf-harvesting on population structure and fruit production of the baobab tree (Adansonia digitata L.) in a semi-arid savanna, West Africa. For Ecol Manage 260:2035–2044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shackleton C, Shackleton S (2004) The importance of non-timber forest products in rural livelihood security and as safety nets: a review of evidence from South Africa. S Afr J Sci 100:658–664Google Scholar
  38. Sidibé M, Williams JT (2002) Baobab. Adansonia digitata. International Centre for underutilised crops, SouthamptonGoogle Scholar
  39. Sidibé M, Scheuring JF, Tembely D, Sidibé MM, Hofman P, Frigg M (1996) Baobab—homegrown vitamin C for Africa. Agrofor Today 8:13–15Google Scholar
  40. Ticktin T (2004) The ecological implications of harvesting non-timber forest products. J Appl Ecol 41:11–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wickens GE (1982) The baobab—Africa’s upside-down tree. Kew Bull 37:172–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. TLFQ (Trésor de la Langue Francaise au Québec) (2011) http://www.tlfq.ulaval.ca/axl/afrique/burkina.htm (22 November 2011)
  43. Wickens GE, Lowe P (2008) The baobabs: pachycauls of Africa, Madagascar and Australia. Springer, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yazzie D, Vanderjagt DJ, Pastuzyn A, Okolo A, Glew RH (1994) The amino acid and mineral content of baobab (Adansonia digitata L.) leaves. J Food Compos Anal 7:189–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katharina Schumann
    • 1
  • Rüdiger Wittig
    • 1
    • 2
  • Adjima Thiombiano
    • 3
  • Ute Becker
    • 4
  • Karen Hahn
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Ecology, Evolution and DiversityJ.W. Goethe UniversityFrankfurtGermany
  2. 2.Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (BiK-F)FrankfurtGermany
  3. 3.Department of Plant Biology and Physiology, UFR-SVTUniversity of OuagadougouOuagadougouBurkina Faso
  4. 4.Green School in the Botanical Garden of Johannes Gutenberg-University MainzMainzGermany

Personalised recommendations