Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Soil organic carbon under a linear simultaneous agroforestry system in Uganda

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study was to quantify and compare the amount and distribution of soil organic carbon (SOC) under a linear simultaneous agroforestry system with different tree species treatments. Field work was conducted at Kifu National Forestry Resources Research Institute in Mukono District, Central Uganda, in a linear agroforestry system established in 1995 with four different tree species and a crop only control treatment. Soil samples were collected in 2006 at three depths; 0–25, 25–50, and 50–100 cm, before planting and after harvesting a maize crop. The results indicate that an agroforestry system has significant potential to increase SOC as compared to the crop only control. There was no significant difference in the amount of SOC under exotic and indigenous tree species. Among the exotic species, Grevillea robusta had higher SOC than Casuarina equisetifolia across the entire depth sampled. There is significant difference in SOC among the indigenous species, where Maesopsis eminii has more SOC than Markhamia lutea. Distance from the tree row did not significantly influence SOC concentration under any of the tree species. In selecting a tree species to integrate with crops that will sequester reasonable quantities of carbon as well as boost the performance of the crops, a farmer can either plant an exotic species or an indigenous. In this study, the soil under Grevillea robusta and Maesopsis eminii have the highest potential to store organic carbon compared to soil under other tree species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albrecht A, Kandji ST (2003) Carbon sequestration in tropical agroforestry systems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 99:15–27

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bickelhaupt DH, White EH (1982) Laboratory manual for soil and plant tissue analysis. SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, NY

  • Dixon RK (1995) Agroforestry systems: sources or sinks of greenhouse gases? Agrofor Syst 31:99–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Don A, Schumacher J, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Scholten T, Schulze T (2007) Spatial and vertical variation of soil carbon at two grassland sites—implication for measuring soil carbon stocks. Geoderma 141:272–282

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harwood CE (1992) Grevillea robusta in agroforestry and forestry. Proceedings of an International workshop. ICRAF Publications. English Press, Nairobi

  • Huxley PA (1999) Tropical agroforestry. Blackwell Science, London 371 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Katende AB, Brinie A, Tengnas B (1995) Useful trees and shrubs for Uganda: identification, propagation and management for agricultural and pastoral communities. Regional Soil Conservation Unit, RSCU, SIDA, Kenya

    Google Scholar 

  • Koskela J, Nygren P, Berninger F, Luukkanen O (2000) Implications of the Kyoto Protocol for tropical forest management and land use: prospects and pitfalls. In: Tropical Forestry Reports (Finland), no. 22/Helsinki University (Finland). Department of Forest Ecology, 103 pp

  • Lal R (2004) Agricultural activities and the global carbon cycle. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 70:103–116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD (1996) SAS system for mixed models. SAS Institute Inc, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDicken KG (1994) Selection and management of nitrogen-fixing trees. Winrock International, Morrilton 272 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Montagnini F, Nair PKR (2004) Carbon sequestration: an underexploited environmental benefit of agroforestry systems. Agrofor Syst 61:281–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mutuo PK, Cadisch G, Albrecht A, Palm CA, Verchot L (2005) Potential of agroforestry for carbon sequestration and mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from soils in the tropics. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 71:43–54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson DW, Sommers LE (1996) Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds) Method of soil analysis. Part 2, 2nd edn. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 984–985

    Google Scholar 

  • Oelbermann M, Voroney RP (2007) Carbon and nitrogen in a temperate agroforestry system: using stable isotopes as a tool to understand soil dynamic. Ecol Eng 29:342–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okorio J (2000) Light interception and water use in boundary planting Agroforestry system. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Reading, UK

  • Oliver GR, Beets PN, Garrett LG, Pearce SH, Kimberly MO, Ford-Robertson JB, Robertson KA (2004) Variation in soil carbon in pine plantations and implications for monitoring soil carbon stocks in relation to land-use change and forest site management in New Zealand. For Ecol Manag 203:83–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ong CK, Black CR, Marshall FM, Corlett JE (1996) Principles of resource capture and utilization of light and water. In: Ong CK, Huxely PA (eds) Tree–crop interactions: a physiological approach. Wallingford: CAB International in association with the International Centre for Research in Agroforestry, pp 73–158

  • Peichl M, Thevathasan NV, Gordon AM, Huss J, Abohassan RA (2006) Carbon sequestration potentials in temperate tree-based intercropping systems, southern Ontario, Canada. Agrofor Syst 66:243–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schabenberger O, Pierce FJ (2002) Contemporary statistical models for the plant and soil sciences. CRC Press, Boco Raton 738 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Schöning I, Totsche KU, Kögel-Knabner I (2006) Small scale spatial variability of organic carbon stocks in litter and solum of a forested Luvisol. Geoderma 136:631–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder P (1993) Agroforestry systems: integrated land use to store and conserve carbon. Clim Res 3:53–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soto-Pinto L, Aguirre CM, Jimenez-Ferrer G, Anzueto-Martinez M, Delgadillo M (2007) Environmental services from mulitrata agroforestry systems in Chiapas, Mexico. www.web.catie.ac.cr/cd_multiestrata/Poster/session2/Environmental.pdf. Accessed 17 Jan 2007

  • Thevathasan NV (1998) Nitrogen dynamics and other interactions in a tree–cereal intercropping systems in southern Ontario. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Guelph, Guelph

  • Thevathasan NV, Gordon AM (2004) Ecology of tree intercropping systems in the North temperate region: experiences from southern Ontario, Canada. Agrofor Syst 61:257–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tumwebaze SB (2008) Quantifying the amount and spatial distribution of soil organic carbon under the linear simultaneous agroforestry system. Ph.D. dissertation, State University of New York, College of Environmental Science and Forestry Syracuse, USA

  • Wajja-Musukwe TN (2003) Management of below-ground competition in simultaneous agroforestry systems. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Dundu

  • Wajja-Musukwe T, Julia W, Sprent JI, Ong CK, Douglas JD, Okorio J (2008) Tree growth and management in Ugandan agroforestry systems: effects of root pruning on tree growth and crop yield. Tree Physiol 28(2):233–242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Water Department (1996) Ground water resource assessment at Kifu-Kabembe for borehole construction. In: Okorio J (ed) (2000) Light interception and water use in boundary planting agroforestry system. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Reading, UK

  • Winjum JK, Dixon RK, Schroeder PE (1992) Estimating the global potential of forest and agroforest management practices to sequester carbon. Water Air Soil Pollut 64:213–228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am grateful to International Foundation for Science (IFS) who gave me the first Research Grant for funding the first phase of data collection. I also thank Carnegie Corporation through Makerere University for funding the second phase of my field data collection. I also thank Dr. John Okorio for allowing me to use Kifu National Forestry Resources Research Institute (NaFORRI) for my field experiment. I would like to thank all the people who participated in the field data collection of soil samples, and special thanks go to Chuck Schirmer for his assistance in the soil lab analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan Balaba Tumwebaze.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tumwebaze, S.B., Bevilacqua, E., Briggs, R. et al. Soil organic carbon under a linear simultaneous agroforestry system in Uganda. Agroforest Syst 84, 11–23 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-011-9448-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-011-9448-6

Keywords

Navigation