Abstract
The objective of this study was to quantify and compare the amount and distribution of soil organic carbon (SOC) under a linear simultaneous agroforestry system with different tree species treatments. Field work was conducted at Kifu National Forestry Resources Research Institute in Mukono District, Central Uganda, in a linear agroforestry system established in 1995 with four different tree species and a crop only control treatment. Soil samples were collected in 2006 at three depths; 0–25, 25–50, and 50–100 cm, before planting and after harvesting a maize crop. The results indicate that an agroforestry system has significant potential to increase SOC as compared to the crop only control. There was no significant difference in the amount of SOC under exotic and indigenous tree species. Among the exotic species, Grevillea robusta had higher SOC than Casuarina equisetifolia across the entire depth sampled. There is significant difference in SOC among the indigenous species, where Maesopsis eminii has more SOC than Markhamia lutea. Distance from the tree row did not significantly influence SOC concentration under any of the tree species. In selecting a tree species to integrate with crops that will sequester reasonable quantities of carbon as well as boost the performance of the crops, a farmer can either plant an exotic species or an indigenous. In this study, the soil under Grevillea robusta and Maesopsis eminii have the highest potential to store organic carbon compared to soil under other tree species.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albrecht A, Kandji ST (2003) Carbon sequestration in tropical agroforestry systems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 99:15–27
Bickelhaupt DH, White EH (1982) Laboratory manual for soil and plant tissue analysis. SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, NY
Dixon RK (1995) Agroforestry systems: sources or sinks of greenhouse gases? Agrofor Syst 31:99–116
Don A, Schumacher J, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Scholten T, Schulze T (2007) Spatial and vertical variation of soil carbon at two grassland sites—implication for measuring soil carbon stocks. Geoderma 141:272–282
Harwood CE (1992) Grevillea robusta in agroforestry and forestry. Proceedings of an International workshop. ICRAF Publications. English Press, Nairobi
Huxley PA (1999) Tropical agroforestry. Blackwell Science, London 371 pp
Katende AB, Brinie A, Tengnas B (1995) Useful trees and shrubs for Uganda: identification, propagation and management for agricultural and pastoral communities. Regional Soil Conservation Unit, RSCU, SIDA, Kenya
Koskela J, Nygren P, Berninger F, Luukkanen O (2000) Implications of the Kyoto Protocol for tropical forest management and land use: prospects and pitfalls. In: Tropical Forestry Reports (Finland), no. 22/Helsinki University (Finland). Department of Forest Ecology, 103 pp
Lal R (2004) Agricultural activities and the global carbon cycle. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 70:103–116
Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD (1996) SAS system for mixed models. SAS Institute Inc, USA
MacDicken KG (1994) Selection and management of nitrogen-fixing trees. Winrock International, Morrilton 272 pp
Montagnini F, Nair PKR (2004) Carbon sequestration: an underexploited environmental benefit of agroforestry systems. Agrofor Syst 61:281–295
Mutuo PK, Cadisch G, Albrecht A, Palm CA, Verchot L (2005) Potential of agroforestry for carbon sequestration and mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from soils in the tropics. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 71:43–54
Nelson DW, Sommers LE (1996) Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds) Method of soil analysis. Part 2, 2nd edn. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 984–985
Oelbermann M, Voroney RP (2007) Carbon and nitrogen in a temperate agroforestry system: using stable isotopes as a tool to understand soil dynamic. Ecol Eng 29:342–349
Okorio J (2000) Light interception and water use in boundary planting Agroforestry system. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Reading, UK
Oliver GR, Beets PN, Garrett LG, Pearce SH, Kimberly MO, Ford-Robertson JB, Robertson KA (2004) Variation in soil carbon in pine plantations and implications for monitoring soil carbon stocks in relation to land-use change and forest site management in New Zealand. For Ecol Manag 203:83–295
Ong CK, Black CR, Marshall FM, Corlett JE (1996) Principles of resource capture and utilization of light and water. In: Ong CK, Huxely PA (eds) Tree–crop interactions: a physiological approach. Wallingford: CAB International in association with the International Centre for Research in Agroforestry, pp 73–158
Peichl M, Thevathasan NV, Gordon AM, Huss J, Abohassan RA (2006) Carbon sequestration potentials in temperate tree-based intercropping systems, southern Ontario, Canada. Agrofor Syst 66:243–257
Schabenberger O, Pierce FJ (2002) Contemporary statistical models for the plant and soil sciences. CRC Press, Boco Raton 738 pp
Schöning I, Totsche KU, Kögel-Knabner I (2006) Small scale spatial variability of organic carbon stocks in litter and solum of a forested Luvisol. Geoderma 136:631–642
Schroeder P (1993) Agroforestry systems: integrated land use to store and conserve carbon. Clim Res 3:53–60
Soto-Pinto L, Aguirre CM, Jimenez-Ferrer G, Anzueto-Martinez M, Delgadillo M (2007) Environmental services from mulitrata agroforestry systems in Chiapas, Mexico. www.web.catie.ac.cr/cd_multiestrata/Poster/session2/Environmental.pdf. Accessed 17 Jan 2007
Thevathasan NV (1998) Nitrogen dynamics and other interactions in a tree–cereal intercropping systems in southern Ontario. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Guelph, Guelph
Thevathasan NV, Gordon AM (2004) Ecology of tree intercropping systems in the North temperate region: experiences from southern Ontario, Canada. Agrofor Syst 61:257–268
Tumwebaze SB (2008) Quantifying the amount and spatial distribution of soil organic carbon under the linear simultaneous agroforestry system. Ph.D. dissertation, State University of New York, College of Environmental Science and Forestry Syracuse, USA
Wajja-Musukwe TN (2003) Management of below-ground competition in simultaneous agroforestry systems. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Dundu
Wajja-Musukwe T, Julia W, Sprent JI, Ong CK, Douglas JD, Okorio J (2008) Tree growth and management in Ugandan agroforestry systems: effects of root pruning on tree growth and crop yield. Tree Physiol 28(2):233–242
Water Department (1996) Ground water resource assessment at Kifu-Kabembe for borehole construction. In: Okorio J (ed) (2000) Light interception and water use in boundary planting agroforestry system. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Reading, UK
Winjum JK, Dixon RK, Schroeder PE (1992) Estimating the global potential of forest and agroforest management practices to sequester carbon. Water Air Soil Pollut 64:213–228
Acknowledgments
I am grateful to International Foundation for Science (IFS) who gave me the first Research Grant for funding the first phase of data collection. I also thank Carnegie Corporation through Makerere University for funding the second phase of my field data collection. I also thank Dr. John Okorio for allowing me to use Kifu National Forestry Resources Research Institute (NaFORRI) for my field experiment. I would like to thank all the people who participated in the field data collection of soil samples, and special thanks go to Chuck Schirmer for his assistance in the soil lab analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tumwebaze, S.B., Bevilacqua, E., Briggs, R. et al. Soil organic carbon under a linear simultaneous agroforestry system in Uganda. Agroforest Syst 84, 11–23 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-011-9448-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-011-9448-6