Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Community assessment of agroforestry opportunities in GaMothiba, South Africa

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Evaluating environmentally sustainable and culturally sensitive approaches to natural resource management issues is a necessary step towards improving livelihoods in rural South Africa. This study assessed the applicability of various agroforestry practices to natural resource management issues in the village of GaMothiba located in the northwestern region of South Africa. Agroforestry assessments were carried out using a community based approach through the application of participatory rural appraisal (PRA) methods. These methods were selected in order to assess the acceptability of agroforestry practices according to the perspective of the local people. The assessment process culminated in a variety of community designed agroforestry interventions. The acceptability of agroforestry practices is largely influenced by the degree of community cohesion, land rights, and cooperation between traditional and municipal authority figures. Understanding the opportunities and constraints of agroforestry adoption in rural sub-Saharan Africa furthers the movement towards community based natural resource management and ultimately a more sustainable approach to rural development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbalu G, Hassan R (1998) Agricultural productivity and natural resource use. South Africa Food Policy 23(6):477–490

    Google Scholar 

  • Alieri M (1995) Agroecology: the science of sustainable agriculture. Westview Press, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayisi KK, Mkhari JJ, Mollell NM, Ramudzuli MR (1999) Indigenous agroforestry practices in South Africa. University of Limpopo, South Africa

    Google Scholar 

  • Barret CB, Place F, Aboud AA (2002) Natural resource management. In: Africa agriculture: understanding and improving current practices. CABI Publishing, Wallingford

  • Botha J, Witkowski E, Cock J (2006) The South African experience of conservation and social outreach nurseries. Environ Manage 38:733–749

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers R (1997) Whose reality counts? Putting the first last. Bath Press, Bath

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleaver F (2001) Institutions, agency and the limitations of participatory approaches to development. In: Cooke B, Kathari U (eds) Participation: the new tyranny?. Zed Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Colfer C (2005) The equitable forest: diversity, community, and resource management. Resources for the Future, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier P (2007) The bottom billion: why the poorest countries are failing and what can be done about it. Oxford University Press, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Cousins B (ed) (2000) At the crossroads: land and agrarian reform in South Africa into the 21st Century. PLAAS, Cape Town

  • Darkoh MBK (2002) Regional perspectives on agriculture and biodiversity. The drylands of Africa. J Arid Environ 54:261–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dipholo K (2002) Trends in participatory development. J Soc Dev Africa 17(1):59–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Esterhuyse CJ (1994) Agroforestry. In: van der Sijde HANB (ed) Forestry handbook. South African Institute of Forestry, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabrcius C, Koch E (eds) (2004) Rights, resources and rural development: community-based natural resource management in Southern Africa. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2006) Global forest resources assessment 2005. Forestry paper 147. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, UNFAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson WJ, Ingles AW (1998) Participatory techniques for community forestry: a field manual. SADAG-01200, Bellegarde

    Google Scholar 

  • Jama B, Njui A, Njenga K (2003) Management and utilization of dryland forests in sub-Saharan Africa: the role of agroforestry. VITRI/ETFN/IUFRO-SPDC Workshop Trees, Agroforestry and Climate Change in Dryland Africa, Finland 29 June–4 July 2003

  • James D (2007) Gaining ground? Rights and property in South African Land Reform. Routledge-Cavendish, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S (2002) Methods for community participation: a complete guide for practitioners. ITDG Publishing, Southhampton Row

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwesiga F, Akinnfesi F, Mafongoya P, McDermott M, Agumya A (2003) Agroforestry research and development in southern Africa during the 1990s: review and challenges ahead. Agroforest Syst 59:173–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCusker B (2004) Land use and cover change as an indicator of transformation on recently redistributed farms in Limpopo Province, South Africa. Hum Ecol 32(1):49–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nair PKR (1989) ICRAF’s agroforestry systems inventory project. In: Nair PKR (ed) Agroforestry systems in the tropics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngcobo N (2002) State of forest and tree genetic resources in South Africa. Prepared for the SADC regional workshop on forest and tree genetic resources, 5–9 June 2000, Arusha, Tanzania. Forest genetic resources working papers, Working Paper FGR/28E. Forest Resources Development Service, Forest Resources Division, FAO, Rome

  • Ostrom E (1992) Crafting institutions for self-governing irrigation systems. Institute for Contemporary Studies Press, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Percy R (1999) The experiential learning cycle and its application towards the transformation of governmental extension services in sub-Saharan Africa. Int J Lifelong Educ 18(5):370–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocheleau D, Weber F, Field-Juma A (1988) Agroforestry in dryland Africa. English Press, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders D (1991) People’s participation in soil conservation: Lesotho. In: Oakley Peter et al (eds) Projects with people: the practice of participation in rural development. International Labour Office, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair FL (1999) A general classification of agroforestry practice. Agroforest Syst 46:161–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturmheit P (1990) Agroforestry and soil conservation needs of smallholders in Southern Zambia. Agroforest Syst 10:265–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thirtle C, Van Zyl J, Vink N (2000) South African agriculture at the crossroads. St. Martins Press, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Zyl J, Kirsten J, Bingswanger H (1996) Agricultural land reform in south South Africa: policies, markets and institutions. Oxford University press, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Waisbord S (2001) Family tree of theories, methodologies and strategies in development communication. Communication for Social Change, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2007) World development report 2008: agriculture for development. World Bank, Washington DC

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Jacobson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kelso, A., Jacobson, M. Community assessment of agroforestry opportunities in GaMothiba, South Africa. Agroforest Syst 83, 267–278 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-011-9384-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-011-9384-5

Keywords

Navigation