Abstract
Buffers have been found to reduce non-point source pollution (NPSP) from watersheds. Hydrologic simulation models assist in predicting the effects of buffers on runoff and sediment losses from small watersheds. The objective of this study was to calibrate, validate and simulate runoff and sediment losses and compare buffer effects on NPSP losses relative to control watersheds (no buffer) for seven years. The experimental design consists of four watersheds under pasture management which were monitored from 2002 through 2008; two with agroforestry buffers (AgB 100 and AgB 300) and two control watersheds (CW 400 and CW 600). Pasture areas included red clover (Trifolium pretense L.) and lespedeza (Kummerowia stipulacea Maxim.) planted into fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) while the agroforestry buffer area included Eastern cottonwood trees (Populus deltoids Bortr. ex Marsh.) planted into fescue. The APEX model was calibrated from 2002 to 2005 and was validated from 2006 to 2008. The r 2 and NSE values for the calibration and validation periods of the runoff varied from 0.52 to 0.78 and 0.50 to 0.74, respectively. The model did not predict sediment loss very well probably due to insufficient number of measured events and low measured sediment loss. The measured runoff was 57% higher for CW watersheds compared to AgB watersheds. The measured sediment loss was 95% higher for CW watersheds compared to AgB watersheds. After calibrating and validating the model, it was run for long-term scenario analyses for 10 years from 1999 to 2008. Simulated buffer width had a significant influence on runoff. Simulated runoff decreased by 24% when the buffer width was doubled compared to losses associated with the measured buffer width. Simulated runoff from the CW watersheds was 11% higher with double stocking density (relative to measured density) compared to AgB watersheds with double stocking density. With half stocking density (relative to measured density), the AgB watershed had 18% lower runoff compared to CW. Results from this study imply that establishment of agroforestry buffers on grazed pasture watersheds reduce runoff and sediment losses compared to control watersheds without buffers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abu-Zreig M, Rudra RP, Whitely HR, Lalonde MN, Kaushik NK (2003) Phosphorus removal in vegetated filter strips. J Environ Qual 32:613–619
Arnold JG, Srinivasan R, Muttiah RS, Williams JR (1998) Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment—pt1: model development. J Am Water Res Assoc 34:73–89
Baker JL, Mickelson SK, Arora K, Misra AK (2000) The potential of vegetated filter strips to reduce pesticide transport. In: Steinheimer TR et al (eds) Agrochemical movement: perspective and scale. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 272–287
Daniels RB, Gilliam JW (1996) Sediment and chemical load reduction by grass and riparian filters. Soil Sci Soc Am J 60:246–251
De la Cruz RE, Vergara NT (1987) Protective and ameliorative roles of agroforestry: an overview. In: Vergara NT, Briones ND (eds) Agroforestry in the humid tropics. Environment and Policy Institute Southeast Asian Regional Center for Graduate Study, Honolulu, Hawaii, pp 3–30
FAPRI (2002) Food and agricultural policy research institute college of agriculture food and natural resources. University of Missouri, Columbia, MO
Farrand DT, Udawatta RP, Garrett HE (2002) Predicting environmental benefits of Agroforestry practices in northern Missouri using APEX. Agronomy abstracts. In: Annual meetings Indianapolis, Indiana. American Society of agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, 10–14 Nov 2002
Gassman PW, Williams JR, Benson VW, Izaurralde RC, Hauck LM, Jones CA, Atwood JD, Kiniry JR, Flowers JD (2005) Historical development and applications of the EPIC and APEX models working paper 05-WP 397. Centre for agricultural and rural development, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa
Gassman PW, Reyes M, Green CH, Arnold JG (2007) The soil and water assessment tool: historical development applications and future directions. Trans ASABE 50(4):1211–1250
Gilliam JW (1994) Riparian wetlands and water quality. J Environ Qual 23:896–900
Hargreaves GH, Samani ZA (1985) Reference crop evapotranspiration from temperature. Appl Eng Agric 1:96–99
Harman WL, Wang E, Williams JR (2004) Reducing atrazine losses: water quality implications of alternative runoff control practices. J Environ Qual 33:7–12
Izaurralde RC, Williams JR, McGill WB, Rosenberg NJ (2006) Simulating soil C dynamics with EPIC: model description and testing against long-term data. Ecol Model 192(3–4):362–384
Kiniry JR, Blanchet R, Williams JR, Texier V, Jones CA, Cabelguenne M (1992) Sunflower simulation using EPIC and ALMANAC models. Field Crops Res 30:403–423
Knisel WG (1980) CREAMS: a field scale model for chemical runoff and erosion from agricultural management systems: conservation research report no 26. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, 640 pp
Kumar S, Anderson SH, Bricknell LG, Udawatta RP, Gantzer CJ (2008) Soil hydraulic properties influenced by agroforestry and grass buffers for grazed pasture systems. J Soil Water Conserv 63:224–232
Kumar S, Anderson SH, Udawatta RP (2010) Agroforestry and grass buffer influences on CT-measured macropores under grazed pasture systems. Soil Sci Soc Am J 74:1–10
Lee KH, Isenhart TM, Schultz RC (2003) Sediment and nutrient removal in an established multi-species riparian buffer. J Soil Water Conserv 58(1):1–8
Leonard RA, Knisel WG, Still DA (1987) GLEAMS: groundwater loading effects of agricultural management system. Trans ASAE 30(5):1403–1418
Line DE, Harman WA, Jennings GD, Thompson EJ, Osmond DL (2000) Nonpoint-source pollutant load reductions associated with livestock exclusion. J Environ Qual 29:1882–1890
Lovell ST, Sullivan WC (2006) Environmental benefits of conservation buffers in the United States: evidence promise and open questions. Agr Ecosyst Environ 112:249–260
Lowrance R, Crow SR (2002) Implementation of riparian buffer systems for landscape management. In: Ryszkowski L (ed) Landscape ecology in agroecosystems management. CRC Press, Washington, DC, pp 145–158
Moriasi DN, Arnold JG, Van Liew MW, Bingner RL, Harmel RD, Veith TL (2007) Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans ASABE 50(3):885–900
Mudgal A, Baffaut C, Anderson SH, Sadler EJ, Thompson AL (2010) APEX model assessment of variable landscapes on runoff and dissolved herbicides. Trans ASABE 53:1047–1058
Muschler RG, Bonnemann A (1997) Potentials and limitations of agroforestry for changing land-use in the tropics: experiences from Central America. For Ecol Manage 91:61–73
Nash JE, Sutcliffe JE (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models: part 1. A discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10(3):282–290
Parton WJ, Scurlock JMO, Ojima DS, Gilmanov TG, Scholes RJ, Schimel DS, Kirchner T, Menaut JC, Seastedt T, Garcia E, Kamnalrut MA, Kinyamario JI (1993) Observations and modeling of biomass and soil organic matter dynamics for the grassland biome worldwide. Global Biogeochem Cycles 7:785–809
Parton WJ, Ojima DS, Cole CV, Schimel DS (1994) A general model for soil organic matter dynamics: sensitivity to litter chemistry texture and management. In: Quantitative modeling of soil forming processes, SSSA Spec public no 39, Madison, WI, pp 147–167
SAS Institute (1999) SAS user’s guide statistics. SAS Inst, Cary, NC
Singh VP, Frevert DK (2006) Watershed Models. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton, FL
Udawatta RP, Krstansky JJ, Henderson GS, Garrett HE (2002) Agroforestry practices runoff and nutrient loss: a paired watershed comparison. J Environ Qual 31:1214–1225
Udawatta RP, Garrett HE, Kallenbach RL (2010) Agroforestry and grass buffer effects on water quality in grazed pastures. Agro Syst 79:81–87
Wang E, Xin C, Williams JR, Xu C (2006) Predicting soil erosion for alternative land uses. J Environ Qual 35:459–467
Wang X, Gassman PW, Williams JR, Potter S, Kemanian AR (2008) Modeling the impacts of soil management practices on runoff sediment yield maize productivity and soil organic carbon using APEX. Soil Till Res 101:78–88
Williams JR (1990) The erosion productivity impact calculator (EPIC) model: a case history. Phil Trans R Soc Lond 329:421–428
Williams JR, Izaurralde RC (2005) The APEX model. BRC Rep (2005)-02, Blackland Res Center, Texas, A&M University, Temple, TX
Williams JR, Sharpley AN (1989) EPIC-erosion/productivity impact calculator: 1. Model documentation technical bulletin no 1768. USDA Agricultural Research Service, Washington DC
Williams JR, Wang E, Meinardus A, Harman WL, Siemers M, Atwood JD (2006a) APEX users guide v2110. Texas A&M University, Texas Agricultural Extension Service, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Blacklands Research Center, Temple, TX
Williams JR, Harman WL, Magre M, Kizil U, Lindley JA, Padmanabhan G, Wang E (2006b) APEX feedlot water quality simulation. Trans ASABE 49:61–73
Williams JR, Izaurralde RC, Steglich EM (2008) Agricultural policy/environmental eXtender model: theoretical documentation version 0604 (draft). BREC report # 2008-17. Texas AgriLIFE Research, Texas A&M University, Temple, TX
Acknowledgments
This work was funded through the University of Missouri Center for Agroforestry under cooperative agreements 58-6227-1-004 with the USDA-ARS. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kumar, S., Udawatta, R.P., Anderson, S.H. et al. APEX model simulation of runoff and sediment losses for grazed pasture watersheds with agroforestry buffers. Agroforest Syst 83, 51–62 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-010-9350-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-010-9350-7