Abstract
Fertilizer tree technologies such as intercropping, relay cropping, improved fallows and biomass transfer have been promoted as sustainable, low-input alternative or complimentary inputs to inorganic fertilizers in Malawi. However, research into the long term effects of their adoption on household food security and poverty reduction is limited. This study examined whether these technologies contribute to rural household of subsistence farmers in terms of food security and livelihoods improvement in two districts of Malawi. The study shows that fertilizer tree technologies increase crop production and provide additional income to households through sources such as sale of agroforestry tree seed and fuelwood. The choice of the technologies is driven by the size of the land holdings and more benefits are associated with large land holdings. While fertilizer tree technologies contribute to the reduction in hunger months, this is usually compromised at the household level by the inability to achieve livelihood security, absorb and cope with shocks and overall improved welfare.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Ajayi OC, Franzel S, Kuntashula E, Kwesiga F (2003) Adoption of improved fallow technology for soil fertility management in Zambia: empirical studies and emerging issues. Agrofor Syst 59:317–326
Ajayi OC, Akinnifesi FK, Gudeta S, Chakeredza S (2007a) Adoption of renewable soil fertility replenishment technologies in southern African region: lessons learnt and the way forward. Nat Resour Forum 31(4):306–317
Ajayi OC, Akinnifesi F, Sileshi G, Chakeredza S, Matakala P (2007b) Economic framework for integrating environmental stewardship into food security strategies in low-income countries: case of agroforestry in southern African region. Afr J Environ Sci Technol 1:59–67
Akinnifesi FK, Chirwa PW, Ajayi OC, Sileshi G, Matakala P, Kwesiga FR, Harawa H, Makumba W (2008) Contributions to agroforestry research to livelihood of smallholder farmers in southern Africa: 1. Taking stock of the adaptation, adoption and impact of fertilizer tree options. Agric J 3:58–75
Akinnifesi FK, Ajayi OC, Sileshi G, Chirwa PW, Chianu J (2010) Fertilizer trees for sustainable food security in the maize-based production systems of East and Southern Africa. A review. Agron Sustain Dev. doi:10.1051/agro/2009058
Babbie E, Mouton J (2001) The practice of social research. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Clewer AG, Scarisbrick DH (2006) Practical statistics and experimental design for plant and crop science. Wiley, Chichester
Dixon J, Gulliver A, Gibbon D (2001) Farming systems and poverty improving farmers’ livelihoods in a changing world. FAO and World Bank, Rome
Ellis F, Kutengule M, Nyasulu A (2003) Livelihoods and rural poverty reduction in Malawi. World Dev 31:1495–1510
Eriksen SH, Brown K, Kelly PM (2005) The dynamics of vulnerability: locating coping strategies in Kenya and Tanzania. Geogr J 171:287–305
Harrigan J (2008) Food insecurity, poverty, and the Malawian Starter Pack: fresh start or false start? Food Policy 33:237–249
Jacoby HG, Skoufias E (1997) Risk, financial markets, and human capital in a developing country. Rev Econ Stud 64:311–335
Keil A, Zellers M, Franzel S (2005) Improved tree fallows in smallholder maize production in Zambia: do initial testers adopt the technology? Agrofor Syst 64:225–236
Mafongoya PL, Bationo A, Kihara J, Waswa BS (2006) Appropriate technologies to replenish soil fertility in southern Africa. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 76:137–151
Malawi Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security (2008) Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security Agricultural Development Programme Project ID Number: MASIP/TA/ADP-SP 1901/14. Environmental and social impact assessment final draft report. Lilongwe
Malawi Vulnerability Assessment Committee (MVAC) (2005) Malawi baseline livelihood profiles: version 1
Phiri D, Franzel S, Mafongoya P, Jere I, Katanga R, Phiri S (2004) Who is using the new technology? The association of wealth status and gender with the planting of improved tree fallows in eastern province, Zambia. Agric Syst 79:131–144
Place F, Adato M, Hebinck P (2007) Understanding rural poverty and investment in agriculture: an assessment of quantitative and qualitative research in western Kenya. World Dev 35:312–325
Sanchez PA (2002) Soil fertility and hunger in Africa. Science 295:2019–2020
Sanchez PA, Shepherd KD, Soule MJ, Place FM, Buresh RJ, Izac AN, Mokwunye AU, Kwesiga FR, Ndirity CG, Woomer PL (1997) Soil fertility replenishment in Africa: an investment in natural resource capital. In: Buresh RJ, Sanchez PA, Calhoun F (eds) Replenishing soil fertility in Africa SSSA special publication number 51. SSSA, Madison
Scoones I, Toulmin C (1999) Policies for soil fertility management in Africa. Department for International Development, London
Skoufias E (2003) Economic crises and natural disasters: coping strategies and policy implications. World Dev 31:1087–1102
Sunderlin WD, Angelsen A, Belcher B, Burgers P, Nasi R, Santoso L, Wunder S (2005) Livelihoods, forests, and conservation in developing countries: an overview. World Dev 33:1383–1402
Thangata PH, Alavalapati JRR (2003) Agroforestry adoption in southern Malawi: the case of mixed intercropping of Gliricidia sepium and maize. Agric Syst 78:57–71
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Quinion, A., Chirwa, P.W., Akinnifesi, F.K. et al. Do agroforestry technologies improve the livelihoods of the resource poor farmers? Evidence from Kasungu and Machinga districts of Malawi. Agroforest Syst 80, 457–465 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-010-9318-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-010-9318-7
Keywords
- Fertilizer tree technologies
- Adoption
- Food security
- Households
- Livelihood security