Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 80, Issue 3, pp 399–409 | Cite as

Using agroforestry to improve soil fertility: effects of intercropping on Ilex paraguariensis (yerba mate) plantations with Araucaria angustifolia

  • Tal Ilany
  • Mark S. Ashton
  • Florencia Montagnini
  • Constanza Martinez
Article

Abstract

This study assessed the use of agroforestry to improve soil nutrient properties in plantations containing Ilex paraguariensis St. Hilaire (yerba mate). Intercropping within tree plantation systems is widely practiced by farmers around the World, but the influence of different species combinations on system performance still requires further investigation. I. paraguariensis is a major South American crop commonly cultivated in intensive monocultures on low activity clay soils, which are highly prone to nutrient deficiencies. Study plots were established in 20 plantations in Misiones, Argentina. These involved two species combinations (I. paraguariensis monoculture and I. paraguariensis intercropped with the native tree species Araucaria angustifolia) and two age classes (30 and 50 years old). Chemical soil samples were analysed to determine Ca, Mg, K, P, N, C and Al concentrations, effective CEC (eCEC) and pH at two soil depths (0–5 cm and 5–10 cm). In the younger plantations, the agroforestry sites had lower nutrient levels than I. paraguariensis monoculture sites. However, the monoculture plantations were more susceptible than agroforestry sites to a decline in soil nutrient status over time, particularly with respect to Ca, eCEC, N and C for both soil depths. P concentrations were below detection limits for all sites, potentially reflecting the high P-fixing capacity of the kaolinic soils of this region. While agroforestry systems may be better at maintaining soil quality over time, significant growth increase of I. paraguariensis was apparent only for the monoculture sites.

Keywords

Soil quality Tropical soil management Agroforestry Intercropping Yerba mate Argentina 

References

  1. Alves da Silva J, Salomão AN, Gripp A, Leite EJ (1997) Phytosociological survey in Brazilian forest genetic reserve of Caçador. J Plant Ecol 133:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson SH, Udawatta RP, Seobi T, Garrett HE (2009) Soil water content and infiltration in agroforestry buffer strips. Agrofor Syst 75:5–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aranguren J, Escalante G, Herrera R (1982) Nitrogen cycle of tropical perennial crops under shade trees. Plant Soil 67:247–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Babbar LI, Zak DR (1994) Nitrogen cycling in coffee agroecosystems: net N mineralization and nitrification in the presence and absence of shade trees. Agric Ecosyst Environ 48:107–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beer J (1988) Litter production and nutrient cycling in coffee (Coffea arabica) or cacao (Theobroma cacao) plantations with shade trees. Agrofor Syst 7:103–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beer J, Muschler R, Kass D, Somarriba E (1998) Shade management in coffee and cacao plantations. Agrofor Syst 38:139–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cardoso IM, Kuyper TW (2006) Mycorrhizas and tropical soil fertility. Agric Ecosyst Environ 116:72–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chander K, Goyal S, Nandal DP, Kapoor KK (1998) Soil organic matter, microbial biomass and enzyme activities in a tropical agroforestry system. Biol Fertil Soils 27:168–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cockle KL, Leonard ML, Bodrati AA (2005) Presence and abundance of birds in an Atlantic forest reserve and adjacent plantation of shade-grown yerba mate in Paraguay. Biodivers Conserv 14:3265–3288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coleman NT, Weed SB, McCracken RJ (1959) Cation-exchange capacity and exchangeable cations in piedmont soils of North Carolina. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 23:146–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eibl B, Fernandez RA, Kozarik JC, Lupi A, Montagnini F, Nozzi D (2000) Agroforestry systems with Ilex paraguariensis (American holly or yerba mate) and native timber trees on small farms in Misiones, Argentina. Agrofor Syst 48:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Esmelindro AA, Girardi JDS, Mossi A, Jacques RNA, Dariva CU (2004) Influence of agronomic variables on the composition of mate tea leaves (Ilex paraguariensis) extracts obtained from CO2 extraction at 30°C and 175 bar. J Agric Food Chem 52:1990–1995CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ewel JT, Mazzarino MJ, Berish CW (1991) Tropical soil fertility changes under monocultures and successional communities of different structure. Ecol Appl 1:289–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fassbender HW, Alpizar L, Heuveldop J, Folster H, Enriquez G (1990) Modelling agroforestry systems of cacao (Theobroma cacao) with laurel (Cordia alliodora) or poro (Erythrina poeppigiana) in Costa Rica III. Cycles of organic matter and nutrients. Agrofor Syst 6:49–62Google Scholar
  15. Faure G (2001) Origin of igneous rocks: the isotopic evidence. Springer, Berlin, pp 217–218Google Scholar
  16. Fernández R, Montagnini F, Hamilton H (1997) The influence of native tree species on soil chemistry in a subtropical humid forest region of Argentina. J Trop For Sci 10:188–196Google Scholar
  17. Frangi JL, Arturo MF, Goya JF, Vaccaro S, Olivieri NJ, Píccolo GA (2003) Guidelines for the management of south central plantations in Misiones. INTA, Experimental Station Cerro Azul. Technical Bulletin no. 5Google Scholar
  18. Galindo-Leal C, Câmara IG (2003) The Atlantic Forest of South America: biodiversity status, threats, and outlook. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 31–41Google Scholar
  19. Garrity DP (2004) Agroforestry and the achievement of the millennium development goals. Agrofor Syst 61:5–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Glover N, Beer J (1986) Nutrient cycling in two traditional Central American agroforestry systems. Agrofor Syst 4:77–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Heck CI, Mejia EG (2007) Yerba mate tea (Ilex paraguariensis): a comprehensive review on chemistry, health implications, and technological considerations. J Food Sci 72:138–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hendershot WH, Duquette M (1986) A simple barium chloride method for determining cation exchange capacity and exchangeable cations. Soil Sci Soc Am J 50:605–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Holz SC, Placci LG (2003) Socioeconomic roots of biodiversity loss in Misiones. In: Galindo-Leal C, Câmara IG (eds) State of hotspots. The Atlantic Forest of South America: biodiversity status, threats, and outlook. Center for applied biodiversity science at conservation international. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 207–227Google Scholar
  24. Huijun G, Padoch C (1995) Patterns and management of agroforestry systems in Yunnan. Glob Environ Change 5:273–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jacques RNA, Arruda EJ, De Oliverira LCS, De Oliverira AP, Dariva CUJ, De Oliverira V, Carama EB (2007) Influence of agronomic variables on the macronutrient and micronutrient contents and thermal behavior of mate tea leaves (Ilex paraguariensis). J Agric Food Chem 55:7510–7516CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Juo ASR, Franzluebbers K (2004) Soils of the tropics. Geoderma 123:373–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kamprath EJ (1972) Soil acidity and liming. In: Soils of the humid tropics. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, pp 136–149Google Scholar
  28. Klein RM (1960) The dynamic aspects of Brazilian-pine. Sellowia 12:17–44Google Scholar
  29. Köppen W (1918) Klassifikation der Klimate nach Temperatur, Niederschlag und Jahreslauf. Peterm Geogr Mitt 64:193–203Google Scholar
  30. Kuo S (1996) Phosphorus. In: Sparks DL (ed) Methods of soil analysis. Part 3, chemical methods. Soil Science Society of America Book Series 5. SSSA and ASA, Madison, WI, pp 869–919Google Scholar
  31. Laurance WF, Peres CA (2006) Emerging threats to tropical forests. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 344 ppGoogle Scholar
  32. Lawson J (2009) Cultivating Green Gold: a political ecology of land use changes for small yerba mate farmers in Misiones, Argentina. MESc Dissertation. Yale University, New Haven CT, pp 47–61Google Scholar
  33. Li J (2005) The effect of plant mineral nutrition on yield and quality of green tea (Camellia sinensis L.) under field conditions. PhD Dissertation. Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, Germany, pp 21–52Google Scholar
  34. Méndez VE, Shapiro EN, Gilbert GS (2009) Cooperative management and its effects on shade tree diversity, soil properties and ecosystem services of coffee plantations in western El Salvador. Agrofor Syst 76:111–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Montagnini F, Nair PKR (2004) Carbon sequestration: an underexploited environmental benefit of agroforestry systems. Agrofor Syst 61:281–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Montagnini F, Eibl B, Fernandez R (2006) Rehabilitation of degraded lands in Misiones, Argentina. Wood For Trop 288:51–65Google Scholar
  37. Moscatelli G, Pazos MS (2000) Soils of Argentina. In: Kheoruenromne I, Theerawong S (eds) Soil science: accomplishments and changing paradigm towards the 21st century, proceedings of the international symposium on soil science, April 17–18. Bangkok, Thailand, pp 81–92Google Scholar
  38. Mutuo PK, Cadisch G, Albrecht A, Palm CA, Verchot L (2005) Potential of agroforestry for carbon sequestration and mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from soils in the tropics. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 71:43–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nair PKR (1998) Directions in tropical agroforestry research: past, present, and future. Agrofor Syst 38:223–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nair PKR, Buresh RJ, Mugendi DN, Latt CR (1999) Nutrient cycling in tropical agroforestry systems: myths and science. In: Buck LE, Lassoie JP, Fernandes ECM (eds) Agroforestry in sustainable agricultural systems. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 1–31Google Scholar
  41. Parrotta JA, Turnbull JW, Jones N (1997) Catalyzing native forest regeneration on degraded tropical lands. For Ecol Manag 99:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. R (2008) Version 1.27. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  43. Saint-Pierre C (1991) Evolution of agroforestry in the Xishuangbanna region of tropical China. Agrofor Syst 13:159–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sanchez PA, Palm CA, Buol SW (2003) Fertility capability soil classification: a tool to help assess soil quality in the tropics. Geoderma 114:157–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. SAS Institute (2002–2003) SAS Version 9.1. SAS Institute, Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
  46. Silba J (1986) An international census of the Coniferae. In: Phytologia memoirs no. 8. H.N. Moldenke and A.L. Moldenke, Corvallis, OR, USAGoogle Scholar
  47. Sileshi G, Schroth G, Rao MR, Girma H (2007) Weeds, diseases, insect pests, and tri-trophic interactions in tropical agroforestry. In: Batish DR, Kohli RK, Jose S, Singh HP (eds) Ecological basis of agroforestry. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 73–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Somarriba E, Beer J, Muschler RG (2001) Research methods for multistrata agroforestry systems with coffee and cacao: recommendations from two decades of research at CATIE. Agrofor Syst 53:195–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stewart N (1960) Tea—a new agricultural industry for Argentina. Econ Geogr 36:267–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sumner ME, Miller WP (1996) Cation exchange capacity and exchange coefficients. In: Sparks DL, Page AL, Helmke PA (eds) Methods of soil analysis: part 3—chemical and microbial properties, 3rd edn. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp 1201–1230Google Scholar
  51. Thomas GW (1996) Soil pH and soil acidity. In: Bigham JM (ed) Methods of soil analysis: Part 3—chemical methods. Soil Science Society of America Book Series No. 5. Soil Science Society of America and American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, USA, pp 475–490Google Scholar
  52. Van der Hoven SJ, Quade J (2002) Tracing spatial and temporal variations in the sources of calcium in pedogenic carbonates in a semiarid environment. Geoderma 108:259–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zuidema PA, Leffelaar PA, Gerritsma W, Mommer L, Anten NPR (2005) A physiological production model for cocoa (Theobroma cacao): model presentation, validation and application. Agric Syst 84:195–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tal Ilany
    • 1
  • Mark S. Ashton
    • 1
  • Florencia Montagnini
    • 1
  • Constanza Martinez
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Forestry and Environmental StudiesYale UniversityNew HavenUSA
  2. 2.School of Forest ScienceNational University of MisionesEldoradoArgentina

Personalised recommendations