Abstract
Research on coffee agroforestry systems in Central America has identified various environmental factors, management strategies and plant characteristics that affect growth, yield and the impact of the systems on the environment. Much of this literature is not quantitative, and it remains difficult to optimise growing area selection, shade tree use and management. To assist in this optimisation we developed a simple dynamic model of coffee agroforestry systems. The model includes the physiology of vegetative and reproductive growth of coffee plants, and its response to different growing conditions. This is integrated into a plot-scale model of coffee and shade tree growth which includes competition for light, water and nutrients and allows for management treatments such as spacing, thinning, pruning and fertilising. Because of the limited availability of quantitative information, model parameterisation remains fraught with uncertainty, but model behaviour seems consistent with observations. We show examples of how the model can be used to examine trade-offs between increasing coffee and tree productivity, and between maximising productivity and limiting the impact of the system on the environment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aguilar A, Beer JW, Vaast P, Jimenez F, Staver C, Kleinn C (2001) Desarrollo del cafe asociado con Eucalyptus deglupta o Terminalia ivorensis en la etapa de establecimiento. Agrofor en las Am 8:28–31
Amaral JAT, DaMatta FM, Rena AB (2001) Effects of fruiting on the growth of Arabica coffee trees as related to carbohydrate and nitrogen status and to nitrate reductase activity. Revista Brasileira De Fisiologia Vegetal 13:66–74
Babbar LI, Zak DR (1994) Nitrogen cycling in coffee agroecosystems: net N mineralization and nitrification in the presence and absence of shade trees. Agric Ecosyst Environ 48:107–113
Babbar LI, Zak DR (1995) Nitrogen loss from coffee agroecosystems in Costa Rica—leaching and denitrification in the presence and absence of shade trees. J Environ Qual 24:227–233
Barradas VL, Fanjul L (1986) Microclimatic characterization of shaded and open-grown coffee (Coffea arabica L.) plantations in Mexico. Agric For Meteorol 38:101–112
Beer JW (1992) Production and competitive effects of the shade trees Cordia alliodora and Erythrina poeppigiana in an agroforestry system with Coffea arabica. University of Oxford, Oxford, p 230
Beer J, Muschler R, Kass D, Somarriba E (1997) Shade management in coffee and cacao plantations. Agrofor Syst 38:139–164
Bouman BAM, Van Keulen H, Van Laar HH, Rabbinge R (1996) The ‘School of de Wit’ crop growth simulation models: a pedigree and historical overview. Agric Syst 52:171–198
Campanha MM, Santos RHS, de Freitas GB, Martinez HEP, Garcia SLR, Finger FL (2005) Growth and yield of coffee plants in agroforestry and monoculture systems in Minas Gerais, Brazil. Agrofor Syst 63:75–82
Cannell MGR (1985) Physiology of the coffee crop. In: Clifford MN, Willson KC (eds) Coffee: botany, biochemistry and production of beans and beverage. Croom Helm, London, pp 108–134
Dauzat J, Rapidel B, Berger A (2001) Simulation of leaf transpiration and sap flow in virtual plants: model description and application to a coffee plantation in Costa Rica. Agric For Meteorol 109:143–160
Dereffye P (1981) Random mathematical model and simulation of growth and structure of the coffee tree Robusta. 1. Study of behavior of meristems and growth of the vegetative axes. Cafe Cacao The 25:83–102
Dereffye P (1983) Random mathematical model and simulation of growth and structure of the coffee tree Robusta. 4. Programming of a 3-dimensional drawing of the structure of a tree for a micro-computer—application to the coffee tree. Cafe Cacao The 27:3–20
Dix ME, Bishaw B, Workman SW, Barnhart MR, Klopfenstein NB, Dix AM (1999) Pest management in enery- and labor-intensive agroforestry systems. In: Buck LE, Lassoie JP, Fernandes ECM (eds) Agroforestry in sustainable agricultural systems. CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA, pp 131–155
Driessen PM (1986) The water balance of the soil. In: Van Keulen H, Wolf J (eds) Modelling of agricultural production: weather, soils and crops. PUDOC, Wageningen, pp 76–116
FAO (1995) FAOCLIM 1.2. A CD-ROM with a compilation of monthly worldwide agroclimatic data. FAO, Rome, p 68
Farquhar GD, Von Caemmerer S, Berry JA (1980) A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta 149:78–90
Farre I, van Oijen M, Leffelaar PA, Faci JM (2000) Analysis of maize growth for different irrigation strategies in northeastern Spain. Eur J Agron 12:225–238
Fournier LA (1988) El cultivo del cafeto (Coffea arabica L.) al sol o a la sombra: un enfoque agronomico y ecofisiologico. Agron Costarricense 12:131–146
Franck N, Vaast P (2009) Limitation of coffee leaf photosynthesis by stomatal conductance and light availability under different shade levels. Trees-Struct Funct 23:761–769
Gifford R (1980) Carbon storage in the biosphere. In: Pearman G (ed) Carbon dioxide and climate. Australian Academy of Sciences, Canberra, pp 167–181
Gifford RM (2003) Plant respiration in productivity models: conceptualisation, representation and issues for global terrestrial carbon-cycle research. Funct Plant Biol 30:171–186
Goudriaan J (1990) Atmospheric CO2, global carbon fluxes and the biosphere. In: Rabbinge R, Goudriaan J, Van Keulen H, Penning de Vries FWT, van Laar HH (eds) Theoretical production ecology: reflections and prospects. PUDOC, Wageningen, pp 17–40
Goudriaan J, Ketner P (1984) A simulation study for the global carbon cycle, including man’s impact on the biosphere. Clim Change 6:167–192
Hartemink AE (2005) Plantation agriculture in the tropics—environmental issues. Outlook Agric 34:11–21
Hergoualc’h K, Skiba U, Harmand JM, Henault C (2008) Fluxes of greenhouse gases from Andosols under coffee in monoculture or shaded by Inga densiflora in Costa Rica. Biogeochemistry 89:329–345
Höglind M, Schapendonk AHCM, Van Oijen M (2001) Timothy growth in Scandinavia: combining quantitative information and simulation modelling. New Phytol 151:355–367
Imbach AC, Fassbender HW, Beer J, Borel R, Bonnemann A (1989) Agroforestry systems of Arabica Coffee and Laurel (Cordia-Alliodora) and of Arabica Coffee and Poro (Erythrina-Poeppigiana) in Turrialba, Costa-Rica. 6. Water balances, rainfall interception and lixiviation of nutrients. Turrialba 39:400–414
Johns TC, Gregory JM, Ingram WJ, Johnson CE, Jones A, Lowe JA, Mitchell JFB, Roberts DL, Sexton DMH, Stevenson DS, Tett SFB, Woodage MJ (2003) Anthropogenic climate change for 1860 to 2100 simulated with the HadCM3 model under updated emissions scenarios. Clim Dyn 20:583–612
Kass DCL, Thurston HD, Schlather K (1999) Sustainable mulch-based cropping systems with trees. In: Buck LE, Lassoie JP, Fernandes ECM (eds) Agroforestry in sustainable agricultural systems. CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA, pp 361–379
Keith H, Raison RJ, Jacobsen KL (1997) Allocation of carbon in a mature eucalypt forest and some effects of soil phosphorus availability. Plant Soil 196:81–99
Kropff MJ (1993) Mechanisms of competition for water. In: Kropff MJ, van Laar HH (eds) Modelling crop–weed intercations. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 63–76
Malhi Y, Baldocchi DD, Jarvis PG (1999) The carbon balance of tropical, temperate and boreal forests. Plant Cell Environ 22:715–740
Matthews R, Stephens W, Hess T, Mason T, Graves A (2000) Applications of crop/soil simulation models in developing countries. Cranfield University, Silsoe, UK, p iv + iii + 173
Matthews R, Van Noordwijk M, Gijsman AJ, Cadisch G (2004) Models of below-ground interactions: their validity, applicability and beneficiaries. In: Van Noordwijk M, Cadisch G, Ong CA (eds) Below-ground interactions in tropical agroecosystems. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 41–60
Mobbs DC, Cannell MGR, Crout NMJ, Lawson GJ, Friend AD, Arah J (1998) Complementarity of light and water use in tropical agroforests—I. Theoretical model outline, performance and sensitivity. For Ecol Manag 102:259–274
Muetzelfeldt RI, Sinclair FL (1993) Ecological modelling of agroforestry systems. Agrofor Abstr 6:207–247
Muschler RG, Bonnemann A (1997) Potentials and limitations of agroforestry for changing land-use in the tropics: experiences from Central America. For Ecol Manag 91:61–73
Nair PKR, Buresh RJ, Mugendi DN, Latt CR (1999) Nutrient cycling in tropical agroforestry systems: myths and science. In: Buck LE, Lassoie JP, Fernandes ECM (eds) Agroforestry in sustainable agricultural systems. CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA, pp 1–31
Nunes MA, Bierhuizen JF, Ploegman C (1968) Studies on productivity of coffee. I. Effect of light, temperature and CO2 concentration on photosynthesis of Coffea arabica. Acta Bot Neerl 1:93–102
Nygren P (1993) Simulation of the shading pattern of periodically pruned trees in agroforestry systems. Pesqui Agropecu Bras 28:177–188
Penman HL (1948) Natural evaporation for open water, bare soil and grass. Proc R Soc Lond, Ser A 193:120–146
Ramirez LG (1993) Produccion de café (Coffea arabica) bajo diferentes niveles de fertilizacion con y sin sombra de Erythrina poeppigiana (Walpers) O.F. Cook. In: Westley SB, Powell MH (eds) Erythrina in the new and old worlds. Nitrogen Fixing Tree Association, Paia, USA, pp 121–124
Renard KG, Foster GR, Weesies GA, Porter JP (1991) RUSLE—revised universal soil loss equation. J Soil Water Conserv 46:30–33
Reynolds-Vargas JS, Richter DD, Bornemisza E (1994) Environmental impacts of nitrification and nitrate adsorption in fertilized Andisols in the Valle Central of Costa Rica. Soil Sci 157:289–299
Rodriguez D, Van Oijen M, Schapendonk AHMC (1999) LINGRA-CC: a sink-source model to simulate the impact of climate change and management on grassland productivity. New Phytol 144:359–368
Ryan MC, Graham GR, Rudolph DL (2001) Contrasting nitrate adsorption in Andisols of two coffee plantations in Costa Rica. J Environ Qual 30:1848–1852
Starr GC, Lal R, Malone R, Hothem D, Owens L, Kimble J (2000) Modeling soil carbon transported by water erosion processes. Land Degrad Dev 11:83–91
Vahrson W-G (1991) Taller de erosion de suelos: resultados, comentarios y recomendaciones. Agron Costarric 15:197–203
Van Kanten R (2003) Competitive interactions in agroforestry systems: competitive interactions between Coffea arabica L. and fast-growing timber shade trees in southern Costa Rica. GTZ, Eschborn, Germany, p xii + 66
Van Noordwijk M, Rahayu S, Williams SE, Hairiah K, Khasanah N, Schroth G (2004) Tree root architecture. In: Van Noordwijk M, Cadisch G, Ong CA (eds) Below-ground interactions in tropical agroecosystems. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 83–107
Van Oijen M, Ewert F (1999) The effects of climatic variation in Europe on the yield response of spring wheat cv. Minaret to elevated CO2 and O3: an analysis of open-top chamber experiments by means of two crop growth simulation models. Eur J Agron 10:249–264
Van Oijen M, Dreccer MF, Firsching K-H, Schnieders BJ (2004) Simple equations for dynamic models of the effects of CO2 and O3 on light-use efficiency and growth of crops. Ecol Model 179:39–60
Van Oijen M, Rougier J, Smith R (2005) Bayesian calibration of process-based forest models: bridging the gap between models and data. Tree Physiol 25:915–927
Van Oijen M, Dauzat J, Harmand J-M, Lawson G, Vaast P (2010) Coffee agroforestry systems in Central America: I. A review of quantitative information on physiological and ecological processes. Agrofor Syst (submitted)
Von Gadow K, Hui G (1999) Modelling forest development. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, vii + 213 pp
Young A (1997) Agroforestry for soil management, 2nd edn. CAB International, Wallingford, vii + 320 pp
Acknowledgments
This work was part of the project “Sustainability of Coffee Agroforestry Systems in Central America” (CASCA) supported by the European Union under contract ICA4-2001-10071. We acknowledge our colleagues in the project for the many useful discussions on agroforestry modelling and data availability.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1. Rainfall generator for Central America
This appendix describes an algorithm for generating time series of daily rainfall from monthly total rainfall. The following figure shows the results of 365 consecutive daily rainfall measurements at Heredia, Costa Rica (10.03°N, 84.14°W, 1180 m altitude), from 1 April 2003 to 31 March 2004:
The figure shows: (a) daily rainfall, (b) the 31-day moving average, (c) the 31-day moving total of rainy days. Average daily rainfall was 5.4 mm with a standard deviation of 9.3 mm, and the total number of rainy days (rain > 0) was 242. Nonlinear regression of (c) on (b) leads to an exponential relation (r2 = 0.90) for the fraction of days without rain as a function of monthly total rainfall:
where fdry is the fraction of days without rain in a given period of 31 days (−) and Σrain is total rainfall in the 31 days. The amount of rainfall on rainy days follows a nearly exponential distribution with the following cumulative density function:
where P is the probability that rainfall is less than x mm on a given rainy day and rainwet is the average rainfall on a rainy day (mm), calculated as:
These equations can be turned into a 5-step algorithm for generating daily rainfall amounts from monthly data: (1) Interpolate the monthly rainfall data to generate a day-by-day time series, (2) Calculate the corresponding time series of fdry using Eq. A1, (3) For each day, assume it is dry if a randomly chosen number between 0 and 1 is less than fdry, (4) For the remaining days calculate the expectation value of rain using A3, (5) For each rainy day, estimate the amount of rain as the expectation value times minus the logarithm of a randomly chosen number between 0 and 1.
Because the algorithm is stochastic it does not reproduce any observed rain data exactly. However, over 90% of generated time series for the Heredia site, matched the observed mean and standard deviation of daily rain fall, and the number of rainy days in the year, within 5, 10 and 5%, respectively. The effectiveness of the algorithm was further verified using the rainfall data from the Turrialba site.
Appendix 2. Spatial dynamics: updating variables when the shaded area changes
In agroforestry systems, the fraction of the field shaded by trees increases when the tree crowns expand and decreases when the trees are pruned or thinned. In our model, the spatial dynamics of shade require that the values of the state variables are continuously updated. The state variables in the model are all expressed per unit shaded or unshaded surface area. When area changes from unshaded to shaded, or vice versa, the state variables in the expanding part of the field become “mixed” with the corresponding variables in the other part. Say A 1 and A 2 are the sun- and shade-areas, X 1 and X 2 are totals of any state variable in these areas, and x 1 and x 2 are the values of the state variable per unit area (x i = X i /A i ). For example, X and x may be coffee biomass (kg) and coffee biomass density (kg m−2), respectively. Then, the following statement from calculus applies:
If all changes in the x i are due to changes in shaded area, we can eliminate the X i and rewrite the statement in terms of x i and A i only:
where x j is the state variable density in the part of the field complementary to x i . If the x i also change because of processes within the two areas (e.g. coffee growth or senescence), we add terms for those processes to the above formula for dx i /dt.
The above formula thus affords an easy means of keeping track of changes in state variables in any agroforestry model where two types of ground cover are distinguished.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
van Oijen, M., Dauzat, J., Harmand, JM. et al. Coffee agroforestry systems in Central America: II. Development of a simple process-based model and preliminary results. Agroforest Syst 80, 361–378 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-010-9291-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-010-9291-1