Skip to main content

Carbon sequestration through agroforestry in indigenous communities of Chiapas, Mexico

Agroforestry Systems volume 78, pages 39–51 (2010)Cite this article

Abstract

The importance of agroforestry systems as carbon sinks has recently been recognized due to the need of climate change mitigation. The objective of this study was to compare the carbon content in living biomass, soil (0–10, 10–20, 20–30 cm in depth), dead organic matter between a set of non-agroforestry and agroforestry prototypes in Chiapas, Mexico where the carbon sequestration programme called Scolel’te has been carried out. The prototypes compared were: traditional maize (rotational prototype with pioneer native trees evaluated in the crop period), Taungya (maize with timber trees), improved fallow, traditional fallow (the last three rotational prototypes in the crop-free period), Inga-shade-organic coffee, polyculture-shade organic coffee, polyculture-non-organic coffee, pasture without trees, pasture with live fences, and pasture with scattered trees. Taungya and improved fallow were designed agroforestry prototypes, while the others were reproduced traditional systems. Seventy-nine plots were selected in three agro-climatic zones. Carbon in living biomass, dead biomass, and soil organic matter was measured in each plot. Results showed that carbon in living biomass and dead organic matter were different according to prototype; while soil organic carbon and total carbon were influenced mostly by the agro-climatic zone (P < 0.01). Carbon density in the high tropical agro-climatic zone (1,000 m) was higher compared to the intermediate and low tropical agro-climatic zones (600 and 200 m, respectively, P < 0.01). All the systems contained more carbon than traditional maize and pastures without trees. Silvopastoral systems, improved fallow, Taungya and coffee systems (especially polyculture-shade coffee and organic coffee) have the potential to sequester carbon via growing trees. Agroforestry systems could also contribute to carbon sequestration and reducing emissions when burning is avoided. The potential of organic coffee to maintain carbon in soil and to reduce emissions from deforestation and ecosystem degradation (REDD) is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  • Acosta M (2003) Diseño y aplicación de un método para medir los almacenes de carbono en sistemas con vegetación forestal agrícola de ladera de México. Colegio de Postgraduados, Instituto de Recursos Naturales, Programa Forestal. Doctoral Thesism, Montecillo, Mexico, 121 p

  • Albrecht A, Kandji ST (2003) Carbon sequestration in tropical agroforestry systems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 99:15–27

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht A, Cadisch G, Blanchart E, Sitompul SM, Vanlauwe B (2004) Below-ground inputs: relationships with soil quality, soil C storage and soil structure. In: van Noordwijk M, Cadisch G, Ong CK (eds) Below-ground interactions in tropical agroecosystems. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 193–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JM, Ingram JSI (1993) Tropical soil biology and fertility: a handbook of methods. CAB International, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • BSAS (2008) Livestock and global climate change. Cambridge University Press. British Society of Animal Science, UK 216 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Batjes NH (1999) Management options for reducing CO2-concentrations in the atmosphere by increasing carbon sequestration in the soil. NRP report: 410-200-131, International Soil Reference and Information Centre, Wageningen

  • Brown S (1996) Present and potential roles of forests in the global climate change debate. Unasylva 185:3–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown S (1997) Estimating biomass and biomass change of tropical forests. A primer. FAO Forestry Paper No.134. Rome, Italy

  • Cairns MA, Brown S, Helmer EH, Baumgardner EH (1997) Root biomass allocation in the world’s upland forest. Oecología 111:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callo-Concha DA (2001) Cuantificación del carbono secuestrado por algunos sistemas agroforestales y testigos en tres pisos ecológicos de la Amazonia el Perú. Universidad Autónoma Chapingo. Master in Science in Agroforestry for Sustainable Development. Mexico, 72 p

  • Canadell JG, Raupach MR (2008) Managing forests for climate change mitigation. Science 320(5882):1456–1457

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Castellanos J, Maass M, Kummerow J (1991) Root biomass of a dry deciduous tropical forest in Mexico. Plant Soil 131:225–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chave J, Andalo C, Brown S, Cairn MA, Chambers JQ, Eamus D, Fölster H, Fromard F, Higuchi N, Kira T, Lescure JP, Nelson BW, Ogawa H, Puig H, Riéra B, Yamakura T (2005) Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests. Oecologia 145:87–99

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cordero J, Boshier DH (2003) Arboles de Centroamerica: Un manual para extensionistas. Oxford Forestry Institute and Centro Agronomico Tropical de Investigacion y Ensenanza

  • de Jong BH, Montoya-Gomez G, Nelson K, Soto-Pinto L, Taylor J, Tipper R (1995) Community forest management and carbon sequestration: a feasibility study from Chiapas, Mexico. Interciencia 20(6):409–416

    Google Scholar 

  • de Jong B, Ochoa S, Cairns MA (2000) Carbon flux and patterns of land-use/land-cover change in the Selva Lacandona, Mexico. Ambio 29(8):504–511

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon RK (1995) Agroforestry systems: sources or sinks of greenhouse gases? Agrofor Syst 31:99–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon RK, Smith JB, Brown S, Masera O, Mata LJ, Buksha I (1999) Simulations of forest system response and feedbacks to global change: experiences and results from the U.S. Country Studies Program. Ecol Modell 122:289–305

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Esquivel E (2005) Uso de suelo y almacenamiento de carbono en dos comunidades del municipio de Marqués de Comillas, Chiapas. Master Thesis. Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico

  • FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) (2006) La evaluación del almacenamiento del carbono en el suelo y los principales cambios. In: http://www.fao.org/docrep/005/Y2779S/y2779s06.htm. Accessed 15 Jan 2008

  • Frangi JL, Lugo AE (1985) Ecosystem dynamics of a subtropical floodplain forest. Ecol Monogr 55:351–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrity DP (2004) Agroforestry and the achievement of the millennium development goals. Agrofor Syst 61:5–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grewal SS, Singh ML, Singh S (1994) A comparison of two agroforestry systems for soil water and nutrient conservation on degraded land. Soil Technol 7:145–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hairiah K, Sitompul SM, Van Noordwijk M, Palm C (2001) Methods for sampling carbon stocks above and below ground. International Centre for Research in Agroforestry, Bogor

    Google Scholar 

  • Houghton JT, Ding Y, Griggs DJ, Noguer M, van der Linden PJ, Dai X, Maskell K, Johnson CA (eds) (2001) Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim M, Chacon M, Cuartas C, Naranjo C, Ponce G, Vega P, Casasola F, Rojas J (2007) Almacenamiento de carbono en el suelo y la biomasa arbórea en sistemas de usos de la tierra en paisajes ganaderos de Colombia, Costa Rica y Nicaragua. Agroforesteria en las Américas 45:27–35

    Google Scholar 

  • INEGI (Instituto Nacional de Estadistica, Geografia e informatica) (1984) Carta de uso del suelo y vegetacion 1:25000. Maps E 15–8, E 15–11. Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática, Aguascalientes

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2000) IPCC Special report on land use, land-use change and forestry. Special Report. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, USA (http://www.grida.no/publications/other/ipcc_sr/)

  • IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007. Mitigation of climate change. Intergovernmental panel of climate change. Special report. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, USA (http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/ar4-wg3.htm)

  • Jarecki MK, Lal R (2003) Crop management for soil carbon sequestration. CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci 22(5):471–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kass DCL, Foletti C, Szott LT, Landaverde R, Nolasco R (1993) Traditional fallow systems of the Americas. Agrofor Syst 23:207–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiyono Y, Ochiai Y, Chiba Y, Asai H, Saito K, Shiraiwa T, Horie T, Songnoukhai V, Navongxai V, Inoue Y (2007) Predicting chronosequential changes in carbon stocks of pachymorph bamboo communities in slash-and-burn agricultural fallow, northern Lao People’s Democratic Republic. J For Res 12(5):371–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotto-Same J, Woomer PL, Appolinaire M, Louis Z (1997) Carbon dynamics in slash-and-burn agriculture and land use alternatives of the humid forest zone in Cameroon. Agric Ecosyst Environ 65:245–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamprecht H (1990) Silvicultura en los Trópicos. Los ecosistemas forestales en los bosques tropicales y sus especies arbóreas, posibilidades y métodos para un aprovechamiento sostenido. Technical Cooperation, Eschborn

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDicken KG (1997) A guide to monitoring carbon storage in Forestry and agroforestry projects. Winrock International Institute for Agricultural Development. Forest Carbon Monitoring Program

  • Mafongoya PL, Dzowela BH (1999) Biomass production of tree fallows and their residual effect on maize in Zimbabwe. Agrofor Syst 47:139–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makundi WR, Sathaye JA (2004) GHG mitigation potential and cost in tropical forestry-relative role for agroforestry. Environ Dev Sustain 6(1/2):235–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masera O, Ordoñez J, Dirzo R (1997) Carbon emissions from Mexican forests: the current situation and long-term scenarios. Clim Change 35:265–295

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Masera OR, Cerón AD, Ordoñez A (2001) Forestry mitigation options for Mexico: finding synergies between national sustainable development priorities and global concerns. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 6:291–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeely JA, Schroth G (2006) Agroforestry and biodiversity conservation—traditional practices, present dynamics, and lessons for the future. Biodivers Conserv 15:549–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melo Cruz OA, Vargas R (2003) Evaluación ecológica y silvicultural de ecosistemas boscosos. Universidad del Tolima, Colombia

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles L, Kapos V (2008) Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation and forest degradation: global land-use implications. Science 320(5882):1454–1455

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moguel P, Toledo VM (1999) Biodiversity conservation in traditional coffee systems of Mexico. Conserv Biol 13(1):9–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montagnini F (ed) (2007) Environmental services of agroforestry systems. Lucknow, International Book Distributing, New York, 126 p

  • Montoya G, de Jong B, Nelson K, Soto L, Farías P, Taylor J, Tipper R (1995) Desarrollo forestal sustentable: captura de carbono en dos zonas Tzeltal y Tojolabal del estado de Chiapas. Cuadernos de Trabajo No.4 Instituto Nacional de Ecología. México, DF, 79 p

  • Murgueitio E (2005) Silvopastoral systems in the neotropics. In: Mosquera MR, McAdam J, Rigueiro-Rodriguez A (eds) International silvopastoral and sustainable land management. CAB, Lugo, pp 24–29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mutuo PK, Cadisch G, Albrecht A, Palm CA, Verchot L (2005) Potential of agroforestry for carbon sequestration and mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from soils in the tropics. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 71(1):43–54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nair PKR (1993) An introduction to agroforestry. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Nations JD, Nigh RB (1980) The evolutionary potential of lacandon maya sustained-yield tropical forest agriculture. J Anthropol Res 36(1):1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyamadzawo G, Chikowo R, Nyamugafata P, Nyamangara J, Giller KE (2008) Soil organic carbon dynamics of improved fallow-maize rotation systems under conventional and no-tillage in Central Zimbabwe. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 81:85–93

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Palm CA, Giller KE, Mafongoya PL, Swift MJ (2001) Management of organic matter in the tropics: translating theory into practice. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 61:63–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paustian K (2000) Modelling soil organic matter dynamics–global challenges. In: Rees RM, Ball BC, Campbell CD, Watson CA (eds) Sustainable management of soil organic matter. CABI, Oxon, pp 45–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Peeters LYK, Soto-Pinto L, Perales H, Montoya G, Ishiki M (2003) Coffee production, timber and firewood in Southern Mexico. Agric Ecosyst Environ 95(2–3):481–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peichl M, Thevathasan NV, Gordon A, Huss J, Abohassan RA (2006) Carbon sequestration potentials in temperature tree-based intercropping systems, southern Ontario, Canada. Agrofor Syst 66:243–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penman J, Gytarsky M, Hiraishi T, Krug T, Kruger D, Pipatti R, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K, Wagner F (2003) Good practice guidance for land use, land-use change and forestry. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Kanagawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfecto I, Rice RA, Greenberg R, van der Voort ME (1996) Shade coffee: a disappearing refuge for biodiversity. Bioscience 46(8):598–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perfecto I, Ambrecht I, Philpott S, Soto-Pinto L, Dietsch T (2007) Shaded coffee and the stability of rainforest margins in Northern Latin America. In: Tscharntke T, Leuschener C, Zeller M, Guhardja E, Bidin A (eds) Stability of tropical rainforest margins. Linking ecological, economic and social constraints of land use and conservation. Springer, New York, pp 227–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Power JS (2004) Changes in soil carbon and nitrogen after contrasting land-use transitions in northeastern Costa Rica. Ecosystems 7:134–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Raintree JB (1987) The state-of-art of agroforestry diagnosis and design. Agrofor Syst 5:219–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao MR, Nair PKR, Ong CK (1998) Biophysical interactions in tropical agroforestry systems. Agrofor Syst 38:3–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards PW (1996) The tropical rain forest, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero-Alvarado Y, Soto-Pinto L, García-Barrios y LE, Barrera Gaytán JF (2002) Coffee yields and soil nutrients under the shades of Inga sp. Vs. multiple species in Chiapas, Mexico. Agrofor Syst 54:215–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roncal-García S, Soto-Pinto L, Castellanos-Albores J, Ramírez-Marcial N, de Jong B (2008) Sistemas agroforestales y almacenamiento de carbono en comunidades indígenas de Chiapas, México. Interciencia 33(3):200–206

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc (2000) SAS/STAT User’s Guide. Release 6.03 edn. SAS Institute, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoeneberger MM (2008) Agroforestry: working trees for sequestering carbon on agricultural lands. Agrofor Syst. Online First

  • Schroeder P (1994) Carbon storage benefits of agroforestry systems. Agrofor Syst 27:89–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott NA, Rodrigues H, Hugues J, Lee T, Davidson EA, Dail DB, Malerba P, Hollinger DY (2004) Changes in carbon storage and net carbon exchange one year after an initial shelterwood harvest at Howland Forest. Environ Manage 33:9–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soto-Pinto L, Romero-Alvarado Y, Caballero-Nieto J, Segura WG (2001) Woody plant diversity and structure of shade-grown-coffee plantations in Northern Chiapas, Mexico. Rev Biol Trop (Costa Rica) 49(3):977–987

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soto-Pinto L, Jimenez-Ferrer G, Vargas-Guillen A, de Jong B, Esquivel-Bazan E (2004) Experiencia agroforestal para la captura de carbono en comunidades indígenas de México. Rev For Iberoam 1:44–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Soto-Pinto L, de Jong B, Jiménez-Ferrer G, Esquivel Bazan E (2007) Exploring the potential of agroforestry and tree plantations as carbon storage systems. APANews 31:10–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel R, Torrie J (1992) Bioestadística. Principios y Procedimientos. Editorial Graf América, México 622 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennigkeit T, Wilkes A (2008) Las finanzas del carbono de los pastizales. Una evaluación en los pastizales comunales. ICRAF, Kunning 38 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian G, Kang BT, Kolawole GO, Idinoba P, Salako FK (2005) Long-term effects of fallow systems and lengths on crop production and soil fertility maintenance in West Africa. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 71:139–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogt KA, Vogt DF, Palmiotto PA, Boon P, O′Hara J, Asbjornsen H (1996) Review of root dynamics in forest ecosystems grouped by climate, climatic forest type and species. Plant Soil 187:159–219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wise R, Cacho O (2005) A bioeconomic analysis of carbon sequestration in farm forestry: a simulation study of Gliricidia sepium. Agrofor Syst 64:237–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young A (1997) Agroforestry for soil management. CAB International, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the farmers and their families of the study communities for their participation. We also thank the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia of Mexico (CONACYT) for financial support (SEP-2004-C01-46244), Cooperative Ambio researchers and consultants for their participation; Marcela Delgadillo, Sandra Roncal, Carlos M. Aguirre, Victor Aguilar for field support; Miguel Lopez Anaya, Juan Martinez and Guadalupe Perez for their support in laboratory analysis; and to Sandy Fournier and anonymous reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Unidad San Cristóbal, Carretera Panamericana y Periférico Sur S/N, 29290, Chiapas, Mexico

    Lorena Soto-Pinto, Manuel Anzueto & Guillermo Jimenez Ferrer

  2. El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Unidad Campeche, Calle 10 × 61 264 Col. Centro, 24000, Campeche, Campeche, Mexico

    Jorge Mendoza

  3. El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Unidad Villahermosa, Carretera Villahermosa/Reforma Km 15.5 Rancheria Guineo 2a. Seccion, 86280, Villahermosa, Tabasco, Mexico

    Ben de Jong

Authors
  1. Lorena Soto-Pinto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Manuel Anzueto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jorge Mendoza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Guillermo Jimenez Ferrer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ben de Jong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lorena Soto-Pinto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Soto-Pinto, L., Anzueto, M., Mendoza, J. et al. Carbon sequestration through agroforestry in indigenous communities of Chiapas, Mexico. Agroforest Syst 78, 39–51 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-009-9247-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-009-9247-5

Keywords

  • Climate change
  • Coffee
  • Improved fallow
  • Maize
  • Reduced deforestation
  • Taungya
  • Silvopastoral systems