Agroforestry Systems

, 78:39 | Cite as

Carbon sequestration through agroforestry in indigenous communities of Chiapas, Mexico

  • Lorena Soto-PintoEmail author
  • Manuel Anzueto
  • Jorge Mendoza
  • Guillermo Jimenez Ferrer
  • Ben de Jong


The importance of agroforestry systems as carbon sinks has recently been recognized due to the need of climate change mitigation. The objective of this study was to compare the carbon content in living biomass, soil (0–10, 10–20, 20–30 cm in depth), dead organic matter between a set of non-agroforestry and agroforestry prototypes in Chiapas, Mexico where the carbon sequestration programme called Scolel’te has been carried out. The prototypes compared were: traditional maize (rotational prototype with pioneer native trees evaluated in the crop period), Taungya (maize with timber trees), improved fallow, traditional fallow (the last three rotational prototypes in the crop-free period), Inga-shade-organic coffee, polyculture-shade organic coffee, polyculture-non-organic coffee, pasture without trees, pasture with live fences, and pasture with scattered trees. Taungya and improved fallow were designed agroforestry prototypes, while the others were reproduced traditional systems. Seventy-nine plots were selected in three agro-climatic zones. Carbon in living biomass, dead biomass, and soil organic matter was measured in each plot. Results showed that carbon in living biomass and dead organic matter were different according to prototype; while soil organic carbon and total carbon were influenced mostly by the agro-climatic zone (P < 0.01). Carbon density in the high tropical agro-climatic zone (1,000 m) was higher compared to the intermediate and low tropical agro-climatic zones (600 and 200 m, respectively, P < 0.01). All the systems contained more carbon than traditional maize and pastures without trees. Silvopastoral systems, improved fallow, Taungya and coffee systems (especially polyculture-shade coffee and organic coffee) have the potential to sequester carbon via growing trees. Agroforestry systems could also contribute to carbon sequestration and reducing emissions when burning is avoided. The potential of organic coffee to maintain carbon in soil and to reduce emissions from deforestation and ecosystem degradation (REDD) is discussed.


Climate change Coffee Improved fallow Maize Reduced deforestation Taungya Silvopastoral systems 



The authors would like to thank the farmers and their families of the study communities for their participation. We also thank the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia of Mexico (CONACYT) for financial support (SEP-2004-C01-46244), Cooperative Ambio researchers and consultants for their participation; Marcela Delgadillo, Sandra Roncal, Carlos M. Aguirre, Victor Aguilar for field support; Miguel Lopez Anaya, Juan Martinez and Guadalupe Perez for their support in laboratory analysis; and to Sandy Fournier and anonymous reviewers.


  1. Acosta M (2003) Diseño y aplicación de un método para medir los almacenes de carbono en sistemas con vegetación forestal agrícola de ladera de México. Colegio de Postgraduados, Instituto de Recursos Naturales, Programa Forestal. Doctoral Thesism, Montecillo, Mexico, 121 pGoogle Scholar
  2. Albrecht A, Kandji ST (2003) Carbon sequestration in tropical agroforestry systems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 99:15–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Albrecht A, Cadisch G, Blanchart E, Sitompul SM, Vanlauwe B (2004) Below-ground inputs: relationships with soil quality, soil C storage and soil structure. In: van Noordwijk M, Cadisch G, Ong CK (eds) Below-ground interactions in tropical agroecosystems. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 193–207Google Scholar
  4. Anderson JM, Ingram JSI (1993) Tropical soil biology and fertility: a handbook of methods. CAB International, UKGoogle Scholar
  5. BSAS (2008) Livestock and global climate change. Cambridge University Press. British Society of Animal Science, UK 216 pGoogle Scholar
  6. Batjes NH (1999) Management options for reducing CO2-concentrations in the atmosphere by increasing carbon sequestration in the soil. NRP report: 410-200-131, International Soil Reference and Information Centre, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown S (1996) Present and potential roles of forests in the global climate change debate. Unasylva 185:3–10Google Scholar
  8. Brown S (1997) Estimating biomass and biomass change of tropical forests. A primer. FAO Forestry Paper No.134. Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  9. Cairns MA, Brown S, Helmer EH, Baumgardner EH (1997) Root biomass allocation in the world’s upland forest. Oecología 111:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Callo-Concha DA (2001) Cuantificación del carbono secuestrado por algunos sistemas agroforestales y testigos en tres pisos ecológicos de la Amazonia el Perú. Universidad Autónoma Chapingo. Master in Science in Agroforestry for Sustainable Development. Mexico, 72 pGoogle Scholar
  11. Canadell JG, Raupach MR (2008) Managing forests for climate change mitigation. Science 320(5882):1456–1457CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Castellanos J, Maass M, Kummerow J (1991) Root biomass of a dry deciduous tropical forest in Mexico. Plant Soil 131:225–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chave J, Andalo C, Brown S, Cairn MA, Chambers JQ, Eamus D, Fölster H, Fromard F, Higuchi N, Kira T, Lescure JP, Nelson BW, Ogawa H, Puig H, Riéra B, Yamakura T (2005) Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests. Oecologia 145:87–99CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Cordero J, Boshier DH (2003) Arboles de Centroamerica: Un manual para extensionistas. Oxford Forestry Institute and Centro Agronomico Tropical de Investigacion y EnsenanzaGoogle Scholar
  15. de Jong BH, Montoya-Gomez G, Nelson K, Soto-Pinto L, Taylor J, Tipper R (1995) Community forest management and carbon sequestration: a feasibility study from Chiapas, Mexico. Interciencia 20(6):409–416Google Scholar
  16. de Jong B, Ochoa S, Cairns MA (2000) Carbon flux and patterns of land-use/land-cover change in the Selva Lacandona, Mexico. Ambio 29(8):504–511Google Scholar
  17. Dixon RK (1995) Agroforestry systems: sources or sinks of greenhouse gases? Agrofor Syst 31:99–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dixon RK, Smith JB, Brown S, Masera O, Mata LJ, Buksha I (1999) Simulations of forest system response and feedbacks to global change: experiences and results from the U.S. Country Studies Program. Ecol Modell 122:289–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Esquivel E (2005) Uso de suelo y almacenamiento de carbono en dos comunidades del municipio de Marqués de Comillas, Chiapas. Master Thesis. Instituto Politécnico Nacional, MexicoGoogle Scholar
  20. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) (2006) La evaluación del almacenamiento del carbono en el suelo y los principales cambios. In: Accessed 15 Jan 2008
  21. Frangi JL, Lugo AE (1985) Ecosystem dynamics of a subtropical floodplain forest. Ecol Monogr 55:351–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Garrity DP (2004) Agroforestry and the achievement of the millennium development goals. Agrofor Syst 61:5–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grewal SS, Singh ML, Singh S (1994) A comparison of two agroforestry systems for soil water and nutrient conservation on degraded land. Soil Technol 7:145–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hairiah K, Sitompul SM, Van Noordwijk M, Palm C (2001) Methods for sampling carbon stocks above and below ground. International Centre for Research in Agroforestry, BogorGoogle Scholar
  25. Houghton JT, Ding Y, Griggs DJ, Noguer M, van der Linden PJ, Dai X, Maskell K, Johnson CA (eds) (2001) Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  26. Ibrahim M, Chacon M, Cuartas C, Naranjo C, Ponce G, Vega P, Casasola F, Rojas J (2007) Almacenamiento de carbono en el suelo y la biomasa arbórea en sistemas de usos de la tierra en paisajes ganaderos de Colombia, Costa Rica y Nicaragua. Agroforesteria en las Américas 45:27–35Google Scholar
  27. INEGI (Instituto Nacional de Estadistica, Geografia e informatica) (1984) Carta de uso del suelo y vegetacion 1:25000. Maps E 15–8, E 15–11. Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática, AguascalientesGoogle Scholar
  28. IPCC (2000) IPCC Special report on land use, land-use change and forestry. Special Report. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, USA (
  29. IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007. Mitigation of climate change. Intergovernmental panel of climate change. Special report. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, USA (
  30. Jarecki MK, Lal R (2003) Crop management for soil carbon sequestration. CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci 22(5):471–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kass DCL, Foletti C, Szott LT, Landaverde R, Nolasco R (1993) Traditional fallow systems of the Americas. Agrofor Syst 23:207–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kiyono Y, Ochiai Y, Chiba Y, Asai H, Saito K, Shiraiwa T, Horie T, Songnoukhai V, Navongxai V, Inoue Y (2007) Predicting chronosequential changes in carbon stocks of pachymorph bamboo communities in slash-and-burn agricultural fallow, northern Lao People’s Democratic Republic. J For Res 12(5):371–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kotto-Same J, Woomer PL, Appolinaire M, Louis Z (1997) Carbon dynamics in slash-and-burn agriculture and land use alternatives of the humid forest zone in Cameroon. Agric Ecosyst Environ 65:245–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lamprecht H (1990) Silvicultura en los Trópicos. Los ecosistemas forestales en los bosques tropicales y sus especies arbóreas, posibilidades y métodos para un aprovechamiento sostenido. Technical Cooperation, EschbornGoogle Scholar
  35. MacDicken KG (1997) A guide to monitoring carbon storage in Forestry and agroforestry projects. Winrock International Institute for Agricultural Development. Forest Carbon Monitoring ProgramGoogle Scholar
  36. Mafongoya PL, Dzowela BH (1999) Biomass production of tree fallows and their residual effect on maize in Zimbabwe. Agrofor Syst 47:139–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Makundi WR, Sathaye JA (2004) GHG mitigation potential and cost in tropical forestry-relative role for agroforestry. Environ Dev Sustain 6(1/2):235–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Masera O, Ordoñez J, Dirzo R (1997) Carbon emissions from Mexican forests: the current situation and long-term scenarios. Clim Change 35:265–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Masera OR, Cerón AD, Ordoñez A (2001) Forestry mitigation options for Mexico: finding synergies between national sustainable development priorities and global concerns. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 6:291–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McNeely JA, Schroth G (2006) Agroforestry and biodiversity conservation—traditional practices, present dynamics, and lessons for the future. Biodivers Conserv 15:549–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Melo Cruz OA, Vargas R (2003) Evaluación ecológica y silvicultural de ecosistemas boscosos. Universidad del Tolima, ColombiaGoogle Scholar
  42. Miles L, Kapos V (2008) Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation and forest degradation: global land-use implications. Science 320(5882):1454–1455CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Moguel P, Toledo VM (1999) Biodiversity conservation in traditional coffee systems of Mexico. Conserv Biol 13(1):9–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Montagnini F (ed) (2007) Environmental services of agroforestry systems. Lucknow, International Book Distributing, New York, 126 pGoogle Scholar
  45. Montoya G, de Jong B, Nelson K, Soto L, Farías P, Taylor J, Tipper R (1995) Desarrollo forestal sustentable: captura de carbono en dos zonas Tzeltal y Tojolabal del estado de Chiapas. Cuadernos de Trabajo No.4 Instituto Nacional de Ecología. México, DF, 79 pGoogle Scholar
  46. Murgueitio E (2005) Silvopastoral systems in the neotropics. In: Mosquera MR, McAdam J, Rigueiro-Rodriguez A (eds) International silvopastoral and sustainable land management. CAB, Lugo, pp 24–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mutuo PK, Cadisch G, Albrecht A, Palm CA, Verchot L (2005) Potential of agroforestry for carbon sequestration and mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from soils in the tropics. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 71(1):43–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nair PKR (1993) An introduction to agroforestry. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  49. Nations JD, Nigh RB (1980) The evolutionary potential of lacandon maya sustained-yield tropical forest agriculture. J Anthropol Res 36(1):1–30Google Scholar
  50. Nyamadzawo G, Chikowo R, Nyamugafata P, Nyamangara J, Giller KE (2008) Soil organic carbon dynamics of improved fallow-maize rotation systems under conventional and no-tillage in Central Zimbabwe. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 81:85–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Palm CA, Giller KE, Mafongoya PL, Swift MJ (2001) Management of organic matter in the tropics: translating theory into practice. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 61:63–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Paustian K (2000) Modelling soil organic matter dynamics–global challenges. In: Rees RM, Ball BC, Campbell CD, Watson CA (eds) Sustainable management of soil organic matter. CABI, Oxon, pp 45–53Google Scholar
  53. Peeters LYK, Soto-Pinto L, Perales H, Montoya G, Ishiki M (2003) Coffee production, timber and firewood in Southern Mexico. Agric Ecosyst Environ 95(2–3):481–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Peichl M, Thevathasan NV, Gordon A, Huss J, Abohassan RA (2006) Carbon sequestration potentials in temperature tree-based intercropping systems, southern Ontario, Canada. Agrofor Syst 66:243–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Penman J, Gytarsky M, Hiraishi T, Krug T, Kruger D, Pipatti R, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K, Wagner F (2003) Good practice guidance for land use, land-use change and forestry. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), KanagawaGoogle Scholar
  56. Perfecto I, Rice RA, Greenberg R, van der Voort ME (1996) Shade coffee: a disappearing refuge for biodiversity. Bioscience 46(8):598–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Perfecto I, Ambrecht I, Philpott S, Soto-Pinto L, Dietsch T (2007) Shaded coffee and the stability of rainforest margins in Northern Latin America. In: Tscharntke T, Leuschener C, Zeller M, Guhardja E, Bidin A (eds) Stability of tropical rainforest margins. Linking ecological, economic and social constraints of land use and conservation. Springer, New York, pp 227–263Google Scholar
  58. Power JS (2004) Changes in soil carbon and nitrogen after contrasting land-use transitions in northeastern Costa Rica. Ecosystems 7:134–146Google Scholar
  59. Raintree JB (1987) The state-of-art of agroforestry diagnosis and design. Agrofor Syst 5:219–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rao MR, Nair PKR, Ong CK (1998) Biophysical interactions in tropical agroforestry systems. Agrofor Syst 38:3–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Richards PW (1996) The tropical rain forest, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  62. Romero-Alvarado Y, Soto-Pinto L, García-Barrios y LE, Barrera Gaytán JF (2002) Coffee yields and soil nutrients under the shades of Inga sp. Vs. multiple species in Chiapas, Mexico. Agrofor Syst 54:215–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Roncal-García S, Soto-Pinto L, Castellanos-Albores J, Ramírez-Marcial N, de Jong B (2008) Sistemas agroforestales y almacenamiento de carbono en comunidades indígenas de Chiapas, México. Interciencia 33(3):200–206Google Scholar
  64. SAS Institute Inc (2000) SAS/STAT User’s Guide. Release 6.03 edn. SAS Institute, CaryGoogle Scholar
  65. Schoeneberger MM (2008) Agroforestry: working trees for sequestering carbon on agricultural lands. Agrofor Syst. Online FirstGoogle Scholar
  66. Schroeder P (1994) Carbon storage benefits of agroforestry systems. Agrofor Syst 27:89–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Scott NA, Rodrigues H, Hugues J, Lee T, Davidson EA, Dail DB, Malerba P, Hollinger DY (2004) Changes in carbon storage and net carbon exchange one year after an initial shelterwood harvest at Howland Forest. Environ Manage 33:9–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Soto-Pinto L, Romero-Alvarado Y, Caballero-Nieto J, Segura WG (2001) Woody plant diversity and structure of shade-grown-coffee plantations in Northern Chiapas, Mexico. Rev Biol Trop (Costa Rica) 49(3):977–987Google Scholar
  69. Soto-Pinto L, Jimenez-Ferrer G, Vargas-Guillen A, de Jong B, Esquivel-Bazan E (2004) Experiencia agroforestal para la captura de carbono en comunidades indígenas de México. Rev For Iberoam 1:44–50Google Scholar
  70. Soto-Pinto L, de Jong B, Jiménez-Ferrer G, Esquivel Bazan E (2007) Exploring the potential of agroforestry and tree plantations as carbon storage systems. APANews 31:10–12Google Scholar
  71. Steel R, Torrie J (1992) Bioestadística. Principios y Procedimientos. Editorial Graf América, México 622 pGoogle Scholar
  72. Tennigkeit T, Wilkes A (2008) Las finanzas del carbono de los pastizales. Una evaluación en los pastizales comunales. ICRAF, Kunning 38 pGoogle Scholar
  73. Tian G, Kang BT, Kolawole GO, Idinoba P, Salako FK (2005) Long-term effects of fallow systems and lengths on crop production and soil fertility maintenance in West Africa. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 71:139–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Vogt KA, Vogt DF, Palmiotto PA, Boon P, O′Hara J, Asbjornsen H (1996) Review of root dynamics in forest ecosystems grouped by climate, climatic forest type and species. Plant Soil 187:159–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wise R, Cacho O (2005) A bioeconomic analysis of carbon sequestration in farm forestry: a simulation study of Gliricidia sepium. Agrofor Syst 64:237–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Young A (1997) Agroforestry for soil management. CAB International, WallingfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lorena Soto-Pinto
    • 1
    Email author
  • Manuel Anzueto
    • 1
  • Jorge Mendoza
    • 2
  • Guillermo Jimenez Ferrer
    • 1
  • Ben de Jong
    • 3
  1. 1.El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Unidad San CristóbalChiapasMexico
  2. 2.El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Unidad CampecheCampecheMexico
  3. 3.El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Unidad VillahermosaVillahermosaMexico

Personalised recommendations