Skip to main content

Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits: an overview

Agroforestry Systems volume 76, pages 1–10 (2009)Cite this article

Abstract

Agroforestry systems are believed to provide a number of ecosystem services; however, until recently evidence in the agroforestry literature supporting these perceived benefits has been lacking. This special issue brings together a series of papers from around the globe to address recent findings on the ecosystem services and environmental benefits provided by agroforestry. As prelude to the special issue, this paper examines four major ecosystem services and environmental benefits of agroforestry: (1) carbon sequestration, (2) biodiversity conservation, (3) soil enrichment and (4) air and water quality. Past and present evidence clearly indicates that agroforestry, as part of a multifunctional working landscape, can be a viable land-use option that, in addition to alleviating poverty, offers a number of ecosystem services and environmental benefits. This realization should help promote agroforestry and its role as an integral part of a multifunctional working landscape the world over.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Allen S, Jose S, Nair PKR, Brecke BJ, Nkedi-Kizza P, Ramsey CL (2004) Safety net role of tree roots: experimental evidence from an alley cropping system. For Ecol Manage 192:395–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson SH, Udawatta RP, Seobi T, Garrett HE (2009) Soil water content and infiltration in agroforestry buffer strips. Agrofor Syst 75:5–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandle JR, Hodges L, Zhou X (2004) Windbreaks in sustainable agriculture. Agrofor Syst 61:65–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buck LE, Lassoie JP, Fernandez ECM (1998) Agroforestry in sustainable agricultural systems (advances in agroecology). CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, p 416

    Google Scholar 

  • Bugg RL, Sarrantonio M, Dutcher JD, Phatak SC (1991) Understory cover crops in pecan orchards: possible management systems. Am J Alt Agric 6:50–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassman KG (1999) Ecological intensification of cereal production systems: yield potential, soil quality, and precision agriculture. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:5952–5959

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon RK (1995) Agroforestry system: sources or sinks of greenhouse gases? Agrofor Syst 31:99–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewel JJ (1999) Natural systems as models for the design of suitable systems of land use. Agrofor Syst 45:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO State of Food and Agriculture Report (2007) FAO Economic and Social Development Department, Corporate Document Repository. http://www.fao.org/docrep/010/a1200e/a1200e00.htm Accessed on March 27, 2009

  • Garrett HE, McGraw RL (2000) Alley cropping practices. In: Garrett HE, Rietveld WJ, Fisher RF (eds) North American agroforestry: an integrated science and practice. ASA, Madison, pp 149–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrity DP (2004) Agroforestry and the achievement of the millennium development goals. Agrofor Syst 61:5–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie AR, Miller BK, Johnson KD (1995) Effects of ground cover on tree survival and growth in filter strips of the Cornbelt Region of the midwestern US. Agric Ecosyst Environ 53:263–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey CA, González Villalobos JA (2007) Agroforestry systems conserve species-rich but modified assemblages of tropical birds and bats. Biodivers Conserv 16:2257–2292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey CA, Gonzales JG, Somarriba E (2006) Dung beetle and terrestrial mammal diversity in forest, indigenous agroforestry systems and plantain monocultures in Talamanca, Costa Rica. Biodivers Conserv 15:555–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey CA, Schroth G, Zerbock O (2007) Designing agroforestry systems to mitigate climate change, conserve biodiversity and sustain rural livelihoods. http://web.catie.ac.cr/cd_multiestrata/Poster/session2/Designing_agroforestry.pdf Accessed on March 26, 2009

  • International Assessment of Agricultural Science and Technology for Development (2008) Executive summary of the synthesis report. http://www.agassessment.org/docs/SR_Exec_Sum_280508_English.htm. Accessed on March 27, 2009

  • IPCC (2000) Land use, land-use change, and forestry. A special report of the IPCC. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 375

    Google Scholar 

  • Izac AMN (2003) Economic aspects of soil fertility management and agroforestry practices. In: Schroth G, Sinclair F (eds) Trees crops and soil fertility: concepts and research methods. CABI, Wallingford, UK, p 464

  • Johnson RJ, Beck MM (1988) Influences of shelterbelts on wildlife management and biology. Agric Ecosyst Environ 22(23):301–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jose S, Gillespie AR, Pallardy SG (2004) Interspecific interactions in temperate agroforestry. Agrofor Syst 61:237–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabir EM, Webb EL (2009) Can homegardens conserve biodiversity in Bangladesh? Biotropica 40:95–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby KR, Potvin C (2007) Variation in carbon storage among tree species: implications for the management of a small-scale carbon sink project. For Ecol Manage 246:208–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kremen C (2005) Managing ecosystem services: what do we need to know about their ecology? Ecol Lett 8:468–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar BM, Nair PKR (2004) Tropical homegardens: a time-tested example of sustainable agroforestry. Advances in agroforestry, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee KH, Jose S (2003) Soil respiration and microbial biomass in a pecan–cotton alley cropping system in southern USA. Agrofor Syst 58:45–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee KH, Isenhart TM, Schultz RC (2003) Sediment and nutrient removal in an established multi-species riparian buffer. J Soil Water Conserv 58:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeely JA (2004) Nature vs nurture: managing relationships between forests, agroforestry and wild biodiversity. Agrofor Syst 61:155–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeely JA, Schroth G (2006) Agroforestry and biodiversity conservation–traditional practices, present dynamics and lessons for the future. Biodivers Conserv 15:549–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: biodiversity synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Moguel P, Toledo VM (1999) Biodiversity conservation in traditional coffee systems of Mexico. Conserv Biol 13:11–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montagnini F (2006) Environmental services of agroforestry systems. Food Products Press, USA 126

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair VD, Graetz DA (2004) Agroforestry as an approach to minimizing nutrient loss from heavily fertilized soils: the Florida experience. Agrofor Syst 61:269–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nair PKR, Latt CR (eds) (1997) Directions in tropical agroforestry research. Agrofor Syst 38: 1–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair VD, Nair PKR, Kalmbacher RS, Ezenwa IV (2007) Reducing nutrient loss from farms through silvopastoral practices in coarse-textured soils of Florida, USA. Ecol Eng 29:192–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nair PKR, Kumar BM, Nair VD (2009) Agroforestry as a strategy for carbon sequestration. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 172:10–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perfecto I, Rice R, Greenberg R, van der Voorst ME (1996) Shade coffee: a disappearing refuge for biodiversity. BioScience 46:598–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroth G, Sinclair F (2003) Trees crops and soil fertility: concepts and research methods. CABI, Wallingford, UK, p 464

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroth G, da Fonseca GAB, Harvey CA, Gascon C, Vasconcelos H, Izac AN (2004) Agroforestry and biodiversity conservation in tropical landscapes. Island Press

  • Seiter S, Ingham ER, William RD, Hibbs DE (1995) Increase in soil microbial biomass and transfer of nitrogen from alder to sweet corn in an alley cropping system. In: Ehrenreich JH, Ehrenreich DL, Lee HW (eds) Growing a sustainable future. University of Idaho, Boise, ID, pp 56–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharrow SH, Ismail S (2004) Carbon and nitrogen storage in agroforests, tree plantations, and pastures in western Oregon, USA. Agroforest Syst 60:123–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith MW, Arnold DC, Eikenbary RD, Rice NR, Shiferaw A, Cheary BS, Carroll BL (1996) Influence of ground cover on beneficial arthropods in pecan. Biol Cont 6:164–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Söderström B, Svensson B, Vessby K, Glimskär A (2001) Plants, insects and birds in semi-natural pastures in relation to local habitat and landscape factors. Biodiv Cons 10:1839–1863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamps WT, Linit MJ (1997) Plant diversity and arthropod communities: implications for temperate agroforestry. Agroforest Syst 39:73–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyndall J, Colletti J (2007) Mitigating swine odor with strategically designed shelterbelt systems: a review. Agrofor Syst 69:45–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Udawatta RP, Krstansky JJ, Henderson GS, Garrett HE (2002) Agroforestry practices, runoff, and nutrient loss: a paired watershed comparison. J Environ Qual 31:1214–1225

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Udawatta RP, Gantzer CJ, Anderson SH, Garrett HE (2008a) Agroforestry and grass buffer effects on pore characteristics measured by high-resolution X-ray computed tomography. Soil Sci Soc Am J 72:295–304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Udawatta RP, Kremer RJ, Adamson BW, Anderson SH (2008b) Variations in soil aggregate stability and enzyme activities in a temperate agroforestry practice. Appl Soil Ecol 39:153–160

    Google Scholar 

  • van Noordwijk M, Lawson G, Soumaré A, Groot JJR, Hairiah K (1996) Root distribution of trees and crops: competition and/or complementarity. In: Ong CK, Huxley P (eds) Tree–Crop interactions: a physiological approach. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp 319–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams-Guillén K, Perfecto I, Vandermeer J (2008) Bats limit insects in a tropical agroforestry system. Science 320:70

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Young A (1997) Agroforestry for soil management. 2nd edn. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK. p 320

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to express my sincere thanks to Drs. Michael Jenkins and Michael Banister for their comments and suggestions on an earlier version of the manuscript. Financial support provided by the J. William Fulbright Foreign Scholarship Board and the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, United States Department of State through a Fulbright Scholar Grant during the preparation of this manuscript is also gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida, 351 Newins-Ziegler Hall, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA

    Shibu Jose

Authors
  1. Shibu Jose
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shibu Jose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jose, S. Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits: an overview. Agroforest Syst 76, 1–10 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-009-9229-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-009-9229-7

Keywords

  • Biodiversity conservation
  • Carbon sequestration
  • Clean air
  • Clean water
  • Multifunctional working landscape
  • Soil enrichment