Advertisement

Agroforestry Systems

, 76:327 | Cite as

Silvopastoralism in New Zealand: review of effects of evergreen and deciduous trees on pasture dynamics

  • Raquel BenavidesEmail author
  • Grant B. Douglas
  • Koldo Osoro
Book Review

Abstract

Complex interactions between livestock, trees and pasture occur in silvopastoral systems. Between trees and pasture, competition for soil resources (nutrients and water) occurs, becoming especially relevant when one of them is in scarce supply. Trees reduce light and water reaching the understorey layers according to tree density and canopy size. However, they may ameliorate extreme climatological features (reducing wind speed and evapotranspiration, and alleviating extreme temperatures), and improve soil properties, for example, deciduous tree litter may contribute to increased pH and soil nutrient concentrations. During tree establishment, there are generally negligible effects on pasture, irrespective of tree type. However, there is a decline in pasture production and nutritive value under shade with increasing tree age and higher stand density. Under the same conditions, deciduous trees affect pasture later (extinction point of pasture occurs at 85% of canopy closure) than evergreen trees (about 67% for Pinus radiata D. Don). This is mainly because deciduous trees have a leafless period that enables pasture recovery, and their litter smothers pasture less intensely because of its relatively fast decomposition. Silvopastoral studies conducted in New Zealand are reviewed to discuss these effects, and differences in the effects of evergreen and deciduous trees are shown using the examples of P. radiata, and Populus and Salix spp. respectively, which exist in many temperate countries. Future research needs are outlined.

Keywords

Botanical composition Management Pasture responses Shade Soil properties Yield 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank M. R. Mosquera Losada, I. R. McIvor and A. D. Mackay, for their valuable comments on the manuscript. We are also grateful to library staff of AgResearch Grasslands, Palmerston North, New Zealand, for their inestimable help in reference research, and to Isabelle Vanderkolk for logistical assistance. This research was supported by a fellowship awarded to R. Benavides from the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science, in the context of project AGL2003-05342.

References

  1. Alfredsson H, Condron LM, Clarholm M, Davis MR (1998) Changes in soil acidity and organic matter following the establishment of conifers on former grassland in New Zealand. For Ecol Manage 112:245–252. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00346-6 Google Scholar
  2. Amatya G, Chang SX, Beare MH, Mead DJ (2002) Soil properties under Pinus radiata—ryegrass silvopastoral system in New Zealand. Part II. C and N of soil microbial biomass, and soil N dynamics. Agrofor Syst 54:149–160. doi: 10.1023/A:1015076607090 Google Scholar
  3. Anderson GW, Batini FE (1979) Clover and crop production under 13- to 15-year-old Pinus radiata. Aust J Exp Agric Anim Husb 19:362–638. doi: 10.1071/EA9790362 Google Scholar
  4. Anderson GW, Batini FE (1983) Pasture, sheep and timber production from agro-forestry systems with subterranean clover sown under 15-year old Pinus radiata by a method simulation aerial seeding. Aust J Exp Agric Anim Husb 23:123–130. doi: 10.1071/EA9830123 Google Scholar
  5. Anderson GW, Moore RW (1987) Productivity in the first seven years of a Pinus radiata-annual pasture agroforest in Western Australia. Aust J Exp Agric 27:231–238. doi: 10.1071/EA9870231 Google Scholar
  6. Arneth A, Kelliher FM, McSeveny TM, Byers JN (1998) Net ecosystem productivity, net primary productivity and ecosystem carbon sequestration in a Pinus radiata plantation subject to soil water deficit. Tree Physiol 18:785–793PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Arthur-Worsop MJ (1985) An economic evaluation of agroforestry. N Z Agric Sci 19:99–106Google Scholar
  8. Balocchi OA, Phillips CJC (1997) Grazing and fertilizer management for establishment of Lotus uliginosus and Trifolium subterraneum under Pinus radiata in southern Chile. Agrofor Syst 37:1–14. doi: 10.1023/A:1005833528619 Google Scholar
  9. Basher LR, Botha N, Dodd MB, Douglas GB, Lynn I, Marden M, McIvor IR, Smith W (2008) Hill country erosion: a review of knowledge on erosion processes, mitigation options, social learning and their long-term effectiveness in the management of hill country erosion. Landcare Research Contract Report: LC0708/081. Prepared for MAF Policy (POL/INV/0708/03), 201 pGoogle Scholar
  10. Bergez JE, Etienne M, Balandier P (1999) ALWAYS: a plot-based silvopastoral system model. Agrofor Syst 115:1–17Google Scholar
  11. Bird PR (1998) Tree windbreaks and shelter benefits to pasture in temperate grazing systems. Agrofor Syst 41:35–54. doi: 10.1023/A:1006092104201 Google Scholar
  12. Bird PR, Cayley JWD, Kearney GA, Aldridge EK (1994) Pasture growth among various tree species grown at various spacing. In: Proceedings of the Australian Forest Growers (AFG) conference. Launceston, Australia, pp 297–300Google Scholar
  13. Chang SX, Mead DJ (2003) Growth of radiate pine (Pinus radiata D. Don) as influenced by understorey species in a silvopastoral system in New Zealand. Agrofor Syst 59:43–51. doi: 10.1023/A:1026137019822 Google Scholar
  14. Chang SX, Amatya G, Beare MH, Mead DJ (2002) Soil properties under a Pinus radiata–ryegrass silvopastoral system in New Zealand. Part I. Soil N and moisture availability, soil C, and tree growth. Agrofor Syst 54:137–147. doi: 10.1023/A:1015040006181 Google Scholar
  15. Chang SX, Purwoto B, Mead DJ (2003) Effects of pastures species on above- and belowground tree biomass production in a temperate silvopastoral system in New Zealand. In: Proceeding of the Association Temperate Agroforestry (AFTA) conference. The 8th North American Agroforestry conference. Oregon State University, CorvallisGoogle Scholar
  16. Charlton JFL, Douglas GB, Wills BJ, Prebble JE (2003) Farmer experience with tree fodder. In: Charlton JFL (ed) Using trees on farms. Grassland research and practice series no. 10. New Zealand Grassland Association, Wellington, pp 7–16Google Scholar
  17. Clinton PW, Mead DJ (1990) Competition between pine and pasture: an agroforestry study. In: Timber production in land management, AFDI Biennal conference. Bunbury, Western Australia, pp 145–154Google Scholar
  18. Cossens GG, Crossan GS (1991) Akatore Agroforestry Trial. Results from 1974–1990. Agroforestry Research Collaborative. Report no. 12Google Scholar
  19. Cossens GG, Crossan GS (1995) Akatore Agroforestry Trial. Results from 1974–1995. Agroforestry Research Collaborative. Report no.26Google Scholar
  20. Cossens GG, Hawke MF (2000) Agroforestry in Eastern Otago: results from two long-term experiments. Proc N Z Grassl Assoc 62:93–98Google Scholar
  21. Crowe SR, McAdam JH (1992a) Some effects of grazing management on a mixed species swards poplar-sheep agroforestry system. Proc E G F. XIV. Lahti, FinlandGoogle Scholar
  22. Crowe SR, McAdam JH (1992b) Sward dynamics in a mature poplar agroforestry system grazed by sheep. Asp Appl Biol 29:413–418Google Scholar
  23. Davis MR (1995) Soil impacts radiata pine seedlings on chemical properties of some New Zealand grasslands soils. Plant Soil 176:255–262. doi: 10.1007/BF00011789 Google Scholar
  24. Davis MR, Condron LM (2002) Impact of grassland afforestation on soil carbon in New Zealand: a review of paired-site studies. Aust J Soil Res 40:675–690. doi: 10.1071/SR01074 Google Scholar
  25. Davis MR, Lang MH (1991) Increased nutrient availability in topsoils under conifers in the South Island high country. N Z J Sci 21:165–179Google Scholar
  26. de Montard FX, Rapey H, Delpy R, Massey P (1999) Competition for light, water and nitrogen in an association of hazel (Corylus avellana L.) and cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.). Agrofor Syst 43:135–150. doi: 10.1023/A:1026475910260 Google Scholar
  27. De Reffye P, Houllier F, Blaise F, Barthelemy D, Dauzat J, Auclair D (1995) A model simulating above- and below-ground tree architecture with agroforestry applications. Agrofor Syst 30:175–197. doi: 10.1007/BF00708920 Google Scholar
  28. Devkota NR, Kemp PD, Hodgson J (1997a) Screening pasture species for shade tolerance. Proc Agron Soc N Z 27:119–128Google Scholar
  29. Devkota NR, Wall AJ, Kemp PD, Hodgson J (1997b) Relationship between canopy closure and pasture production in deciduous tree based temperate silvopastoral systems. In: Proceedings of the XVIII international grasslands conference. Winnipeg & Saskatoo, Canada, pp 652–653Google Scholar
  30. Devkota NR, Kemp PD, Valentine I, Hodgson J (1998) Performance of perennial ryegrass and cocksfoot cultivars under tree shade. Proc Agron Soc N Z 28:129–135Google Scholar
  31. Douglas GB, Trustrum NA, Brown IC (1986) Effect of soil slip erosion on Wairoa hill pasture production and composition. N Z J Agric Res 29:183–192Google Scholar
  32. Douglas GB, Bulloch BT, Foote AG (1996) Cutting management of willow (Salix spp.) and leguminous shrubs for forage during summer. N Z J Agric Res 39:175–184Google Scholar
  33. Douglas GB, Walcroft AS, Wills BJ, Hurst SE, Foote AG, Trainor KD, Fung LE (2001) Resident pasture growth and the micro-environment beneath young, widely-spaced poplars in New Zealand. Proc N Z Grassl Assoc 63:131–138Google Scholar
  34. Douglas GB, Barry TN, Faulknor PD, Kemp PD, Foote AG, Cameron PN, Pitta DW (2003) Willow coppice and browse blocks: establishment and management. In: Charlton JFL (ed) Proceedings of the sustainable farming fund tree fodder workshop. Grassland research and practice series no. 10. New Zealand Grassland Association. Palmerston North, pp 41–51Google Scholar
  35. Douglas GB, Mackay AD, Budding PJ, Potter JF (2004) Introduction of native plants beneath exotic trees planted to stabilise pastoral land. In: Proceedings of the 13th international soil conservation organisation conference. Brisbane, Australia, 4 pGoogle Scholar
  36. Douglas GB, Walcroft AS, Hurst SE, Potter JF, Foote AG, Fung LE, Edwards WRN, Van Den Dijssel C (2006a) Interactions between widely spaced young poplars (Populus spp.) and introduced pasture mixtures. Agrofor Syst 66:165–178. doi: 10.1007/s10457-005-6641-5 Google Scholar
  37. Douglas GB, Walcroft AS, Hurst SE, Potter JF, Foote AG, Fung LE, Edwards WRN, Van Den Dijssel C (2006b) Interactions between widely spaced young poplars (Populus spp.) and the understorey environment. Agrofor Syst 67:177–186. doi: 10.1007/s10457-005-3394-0 Google Scholar
  38. Dymond JR, Ausseil A, Shepherd JD, Buettner L (2006) Validation of a region-wide model of landslide susceptibility in the Manawatu-Wanganui region of New Zealand. Geomorphology 74:70–79. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.08.005 Google Scholar
  39. Eastham J, Rose CW (1988) Pasture evaporation under tree planting density in an agroforestry experiment. Agric Water Manage 15:87–105. doi: 10.1016/0378-3774(88)90145-X Google Scholar
  40. Etienne M, Herlant P (1997) A model for designing sustainable agroforestry systems. In: Calatrava J, Doppler W (eds) Proceedings of II European symposium rural and framing systems research. pp 52–55Google Scholar
  41. Evans REA (1973) A report of planting methods performances and the results of trials of poplars and willows in south Canterbury. South Canterbury Catchment Board, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  42. Fenton R, James RN, Knowles RL, Sutton WRJ (1972) Growth, silviculture and the implications of two tending regimes for radiata pine. In: Proceedings of the 7th geography conference. NZ Geographical Society (Inc.), pp 15–22Google Scholar
  43. Funk J, Kerr S (2007) Restoring forests through carbon farming on Maori land in New Zealand/Aotearoa. Mt Res Dev 27:202–205. doi: 10.1659/mrd.0921 Google Scholar
  44. Gallardo A (2003) Effect of tree canopy on the spatial distribution of soil nutrients in a Mediterranean dehesa. Pedobiologia (Jena) 47:117–125. doi: 10.1078/0031-4056-00175 Google Scholar
  45. Garrity DP (1996) Tree-soil-crop interactions on slopes. In: Ong CK, Huxley P (eds) Tree-crop interactions: a physiological approach. ICRAF CAB International University Press, Cambridge, pp 299–318Google Scholar
  46. Gautam MK (1998) Rooting characteristics of Pinus radiata D. Don as influenced by understorey competition in an agroforestry system. PhD thesis, Soil, Plant and Ecological Sciences Division, Lincoln University. New Zealand, 164 ppGoogle Scholar
  47. Gautam MK, Mead DJ, Chang SX, Clinton PW (2002) Spatial variation and understorey competition effect of Pinus radiata fine roots in a silvopastoral system in New Zealand. Agrofor Syst 55:89–98. doi: 10.1023/A:1020559624831 Google Scholar
  48. Giddens M, Parfitt RL, Percival HJ (1997) Comparison of some soil properties under Pinus radiata and improved pasture. N Z J Agric Res 40:409–416Google Scholar
  49. Gilchrist AN, Hall JRD, Foote AG, Bulloch BT (1993) Pasture growth around trees planted for grassland stability. In: Proceedings of the XVII grassland congress. Rockhampton, Queensland, pp 2062–2063Google Scholar
  50. Gillingham AG (1984) Agroforestry on steep hill country: results to year 13. In: Bilbrough GW (ed) Proceedings of a technical workshop on agroforestry, ministry of agriculture and fisheries. Wellington, New Zealand, pp 33–38Google Scholar
  51. Grado SC, Hovermale CH, Louis DG (2001) A financial analysis of a silvopasture system in southern Mississippi. Agrofor Syst 53:313–322. doi: 10.1023/A:1013375426677 Google Scholar
  52. Guevara-Escobar A (1999) Aspects of a poplar-pasture system related to pasture production in New Zealand. PhD thesis. Massey University, Palmerston North, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  53. Guevara-Escobar A, Kemp PD, Hodgson J, Mackay AD, Edwards WRN (1997) Case study of a mature Populus deltoides-pasture system in a hill environment. Proc N Z Grassl Assoc 59:179–185Google Scholar
  54. Guevara-Escobar A, Edwards WRN, Morton RH, Kemp PD, Mackay AD (2000) Tree water use and rainfall partitioning in a mature poplar-pasture system. Tree Physiol 20:97–106PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Guevara-Escobar A, Kemp PD, Mackay AD, Hodgson J (2002) Soil properties of a widely spaced, planted poplar (Populus deltoides)-pasture system in a hill environment. Aust J Soil Res 40:873–886. doi: 10.1071/SR01080 Google Scholar
  56. Guevara-Escobar A, Kemp PD, Mackay AD, Hodgson J (2007) Pasture production and composition under poplar in a hill environment in New Zealand. Agrofor Syst 69:199–213. doi: 10.1007/s10457-007-9038-9 Google Scholar
  57. Hawke MF (1991) Pasture production and animal performance under pine agroforestry in New Zealand. For Ecol Manage 45:109–118. doi: 10.1016/0378-1127(91)90210-M Google Scholar
  58. Hawke MF, Dodd MB (2003) Livestock shelter from trees—a review. In: Charlton JFL (ed) Proceedings of the sustainable farming fund tree fodder workshop. Grassland research and practice series no. 10. New Zealand Grassland Association, Palmerston North, pp 65–72Google Scholar
  59. Hawke MF, Knowles RL (1997) Temperate agroforestry systems in New Zealand. In: Gordon AM, Newman SM (eds) Temperate agroforestry systems. CAB International, London, pp 85–118Google Scholar
  60. Hawke MF, O’Connor MB (1993) Soil pH and nutrient levels at Tikitere agroforestry research area. N Z J Sci 23:40–48Google Scholar
  61. Hawke MF, Wedderburn ME (1994) Microclimate changes under Pinus radiata agroforestry regimes in New Zealand. Agric Meteorol 71:133–145. doi: 10.1016/0168-1923(94)90104-X Google Scholar
  62. Hawley JG, Dymond JR (1988) How much do trees reduce landsliding? J Soil Water Conserv 43:495–498Google Scholar
  63. Hewson O (1993) Otago Regional Council: poplars and willows. Tree grower (February) , pp. 27–28Google Scholar
  64. Hicks DL (1991) Effect of soil conservation tree plantings on damage sustained by the Whareama catchment during the storm of 8–11 April 1991. Contract Report 91/106 for Wellington Regional Council, DSIR Land Resources, 29 ppGoogle Scholar
  65. Hicks D (1992) Impact of soil conservation on storm-damaged hill grazing lands in New Zealand. Aust J Soil Water Conserv 5:35–40Google Scholar
  66. Hicks DL (1995) Control of soil erosion on farmland. A summary of erosion’s impact on New Zealand agriculture, and farm management practices which counteract it. MAF Policy Technical Paper 95/4. 45 ppGoogle Scholar
  67. Hicks D, Crippen T (2004) Erosion of Manawatu-Wanganui hill country during the storm on 15–16 February 2004. Report prepared for Horizons Regional Council (Manawatu-Wanganui Regional Council), 56 ppGoogle Scholar
  68. Hurst SE, Walcroft AS, Douglas GB, Foote AG (2000) Tree-pasture-soil interactions. In: Adams JA, Metherell AK (eds) Soil 2000: new horizons for a new century. Australian and New Zealand second joint soils conference. New Zealand Society of Soil Science. Lincoln University, Canterbury, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  69. Husak AL, Grado SC (2002) Monetary and wildlife benefits in a silvopastoral system. South J Appl For 26(3):159–164Google Scholar
  70. Joffre R, Rambal S (1993) How tree cover influences the water balance of Mediterranean rangelands. Ecology 74(2):570–582. doi: 10.2307/1939317 Google Scholar
  71. Kellas JD, Bird PR, Cumming KN, Kearney GA, Ashton AK (1995) Pasture production under series of Pinus radiata-pasture agroforestry systems in South-west Victoria, Australia. Aust J Agric Res 46:1285–1297. doi: 10.1071/AR9951285 Google Scholar
  72. Kemp PD, Mackay AD, Matheson LA, Timmins ME (2001) The forage value of poplars and willows. Proc N Z Grassl Assoc 63:115–119Google Scholar
  73. Kenny GJ (2001) Climate change: likely impacts on agriculture. A report prepared for the ministry for the environment as part of the New Zealand Climate Change Programme. Ministry for the Environment, Wellington. Available in: http://www.climatechange.govt.nz/sp/resources/resourceinformation/pdf/climatechange-agriculture.pdf
  74. Knowles RL (1991) New Zealand experience with silvopastoral systems: a review. For Ecol Manage 45:251–267. doi: 10.1016/0378-1127(91)90221-G Google Scholar
  75. Knowles RL, Hovarth GC, Carter MA, Hawke MF (1997) Using a canopy closure model to predict understorey pasture production in Pinus radiata silvopastoral systems. In: Auclair D, Dupraz C (eds) Agroforestry for sustainable land use- fundamental research and modelling, temperate and mediterranean applications. Kluwer, Montpellier, pp 109–120Google Scholar
  76. Lambert MG, Barker DJ, Mackay AD, Springett JO (1996) Biophysical indicators of sustainability of North island hill pasture systems. Proc N Z Grassl Assoc 57:31–36Google Scholar
  77. MacLaren JP (2000) Plantation forestry: its role as a carbon sink. In: Bouma WJ, Pearman GI, Manning MR (eds) Greenhouse: coping with climate change. CSIRO, Australia, pp 417–436Google Scholar
  78. MacLaren JP, Kimberley MO (1991) Varying selection ratios (initial versus final crop stocking) in Pinus radiata evaluated with the use of MARCL. N Z J Sci 21:62–76Google Scholar
  79. MacLaren JP, Knowles RL (1999) Economics of final crop stocking at the Tikitere Agroforestry Trial. Part 2: Economic comparisons. N Z J Sci 29:175–187Google Scholar
  80. McAdam JH (1996) Vegetation change and management in temperate agroforestry systems. Asp Appl Biol 44:95–100Google Scholar
  81. McCabe SM, Barry TN (1988) Nutritive value of willow (Salix sp) for sheep, goat and deer. J Agric Sci 111:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. McElwee H, Knowles RL (2000) Estimating canopy closure and understorey pasture production in New Zealand-grown poplar plantations. N Z J Sci 30:422–435Google Scholar
  83. McIvor I, Hurst S, Fung L, Van Den Dijssel CS, Douglas G, Foote L (2003) Silvopastoral management of “veronese” poplars on an erosion-prone hillslope. environmental management using soil-plant systems. In: Currie L, Stewart RB, Anderson CWN (eds) Fertiliser and lime research centre. Massey University, New Zealand, pp 177–186Google Scholar
  84. McIvor IR, Metral B, Douglas GB (2005) Variation in root density of poplar trees at different plant densities. Proc N Z Agron Soc 35:66–73Google Scholar
  85. McIvor I, Douglas GB, Hurst S, Hussain Z, Foote AG (2008) Structural root growth of young veronese poplars on erodible slopes in the southern North Island, New Zealand. Agrofor Syst 72:75–86. doi: 10.1007/s10457-007-9090-5 Google Scholar
  86. McPherson GR (1997) Ecology and management of North American Savannas. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, 209 ppGoogle Scholar
  87. McWilliam EL, Barry TN, López-Villalobos N (2005) Organic matter digestibility of poplar (Populus) and willow (Salix) forage trees and its in vitro prediction. J Sci Food Agric 85:1098–1104. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2074 Google Scholar
  88. Mead DJ (1995) The role of agroforestry in industrialized nations: the southern hemisphere perspective with special emphasis on Australia and New Zealand. Agrofor Syst 31:143–156. doi: 10.1007/BF00711722 Google Scholar
  89. Mickovski SB, van Beek LPH (2006) A decision support system for evaluation of eco-engineering strategies for slope protection. J Geotech Geol Eng 24:483–498. doi: 10.1007/s10706-005-4161-8 Google Scholar
  90. Mickovski SB, Stokes A, van Beek LPH (2005) A decision support tool for windthrow hazard assessment and prevention. For Ecol Manage 216:64–76Google Scholar
  91. Miller DEK, Gilchrist AN, Hicks DL (1996) The role of broad-leaved trees in slope stabilisation in New Zealand pastoral farming. In: Ralston MM, Hughey KFD, O’Connor KF (eds) Mountains of east asia and the pacific. New Zealand Centre for Mountain Studies. Lincoln University, New Zealand, pp 96–104Google Scholar
  92. Miller BJ, Clinton PW, Buchan GD, Robson B (1998) Transpiration rates and canopy conductance of Pinus radiata growing with different pasture understories in agroforestry systems. Tree Physiol 18:575–582PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (2006) A National Exotic Forest Description (2006). In: MAF Statistics (online), available in: http://www.maf.govt.nz/statistics/primaryindustries/forestry/forest-resources/national-exotic-forest-2006/nefd-report-2006/page-01.htm. Cited 8 August 2007
  94. Moreno G, Obrador JJ, García A (2007) Impact of evergreen oaks on soil fertility and crop production in intercropped dehesas. Agric Ecosyst Environ 119:270–280. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2006.07.013 Google Scholar
  95. Mosquera-Losada MR, Pinto-Tobalina M, Riguiero-Rodríguez A (2004) The herbaceous component in temperate silvopastoral systems. In: Mosquera-Losada MR, McAdam J, Rigueiro-Rodríguez A (eds) Silvopastoralism and sustainable land management. CAB Internacional, Lugo, pp 93–100Google Scholar
  96. Mosquera-Losada MR, Fernández-Núñez E, Rigueiro-Rodríguez A (2006) Pasture, tree and soil evolution in silvopastoral systems of Atlantic Europe. For Ecol Manage 232:135–145Google Scholar
  97. National Poplar and Willow Users Group (2007) Growing poplar and willow trees on farms. Guidelines for establishing and managing poplar and willow trees on farms, 72 ppGoogle Scholar
  98. New Zealand Poplar Commission (1995) Poplar Agroforestry: an introduction to using poplars for timber. In: Research-HortResearch L (ed) Palmerston NorthGoogle Scholar
  99. O’Meara DM (1995) A comparison of soil fertility under Pinus radiata and pasture in Southland. Research Dissertation, Bachelor of Forestry Science, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, 48 ppGoogle Scholar
  100. Olsen AG, Charlton JFL (2003) Practical tree fodder experience during drought. In: Charlton JFL (ed) Proceedings of the sustainable farming fund tree fodder workshop. Grassland research and practice series no. 10. New Zealand Grassland Association, Palmerston North, pp 17–22Google Scholar
  101. Ong CK, Black CR, Marshall FM, Corlett JE (1996) Principles of resource capture and utilisation of light and water. In: Ong CK, Huxley P (eds) Tree-crop interactions: a physiological approach. ICRAF and CAB International University Press, Cambridge, pp 73–158Google Scholar
  102. Oppong S, Kemp PD, Douglas GB, Bulloch BT (1997) Use of willows (Salix spp) as drought fodder for sheep. In: Proceeding of the XVIII international grasslands congress. Winnipeg, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  103. Oppong SK, Kemp PD, Douglas GB, Foote AG (2001) Browse yield and nutritive value of two Salix species and Dorycnium rectum in New Zealand. Agrofor Syst 51:11–21. doi: 10.1023/A:1006412021394 Google Scholar
  104. Orsborn S, Gawith PG, Cameron DJ (2003) Cost-benefits of supplementing ewes with willow and poplar foliage on a model hill country farm in Wairarapa. In: Charlton JFL (ed) Using trees on farms. grassland research and practice series no. 10. New Zealand Grassland Association, Wellington, pp 35–40Google Scholar
  105. Parfitt RL, Percival HJ, Dahlgren RA, Hill LF (1997) Soil and solution chemistry under pasture and radiata pine in New Zealand. Plant Soil 191:279–290. doi: 10.1023/A:1004266000509 Google Scholar
  106. Park J, Newman SM, Cousins SH (1994) The effects of poplar (P. trichocarpa x deltoides) on soil biological properties in a silvoarable system. Agrofor Syst 25:111–118. doi: 10.1007/BF00705671 Google Scholar
  107. Parminter I, Dodd MB, Mackay AD (2001) Economic analysis of poplar planting on steep hill country. Proc N Z Grassl Assoc 63:127–130Google Scholar
  108. Percival NS, Hawke MF (1985) Agroforestry development and research in New Zealand. N Z Agric Sci 19:86–92Google Scholar
  109. Percival NS, Knowles RL (1988) Relationship between radiata pine and understorey pasture production. In: MacLaren JP (ed) Agroforestry symposium proceedings. Forest Research Institute and New Zealand Ministry of Forestry, Rotorua, New Zealand, pp 153–164Google Scholar
  110. Percival NS, Bond DI, Hawke MF, Andrew BL, Knowles RL (1984a) Effects of radiata pine pasture yields, botanical composition, weed population and production of a range of grass. In: Bilbrough GW (ed) Proceedings of a technical workshop of agroforestry. Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Wellington, pp 13–22Google Scholar
  111. Percival HJ, Hawke MF, Andrew BL (1984b) Preliminary report on climate measurements under Pinus radiata planted on farmland. In: Bilbrough GW (ed) Proceedings of a technical workshop on agroforestry. Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Wellington, pp 57–60Google Scholar
  112. Peri PL, Varella AC, Lucas RJ, Moot DJ (2001) Cocksfoot and Lucerne productivity in a Pinus radiata silvopastoral system: a grazed comparison. Proc N Z Grassl Assoc 63:139–147Google Scholar
  113. Peri PL, Mason EG, Pollock KM, Varella AC, Mead DJ (2002a) Early growth and quality of radiata pine in a silvopastoral system in New Zealand. Agrofor Syst 55:207–219. doi: 10.1023/A:1020588702923 Google Scholar
  114. Peri PL, McNeil DL, Moot DJ, Varella AC, Lucas RJ (2002b) Net photosynthetic rate of cocksfoot leaves under continuous and fluctuation shade conditions in the field. Grass Forage Sci 57:157–170. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2494.2002.00312.x Google Scholar
  115. Peri PL, Lucas RJ, Moot DJ (2007) Dry matter production, morphology and nutritive value of Dactylis glomerata growing under different light regimes. Agrofor Syst 70:63–79. doi: 10.1007/s10457-007-9029-x Google Scholar
  116. Pollock KM, Lucas RJ, Mead DJ, Thomson SE (1994) Forage-pasture production in the first three years of an agroforestry experiment. Proc N Z Grassl Assoc 56:176–185Google Scholar
  117. Pollock KM, Lucas RJ, Pownall DB, Thomson SE (1997) Temperate pasture and sheep performance under radiata pine and in open pasture. In: Proceedings of the XVIII international grassland congress. Winnipeg & Saskatoon, Canada, pp 6–7Google Scholar
  118. Power IL, Dodd MB, Thorrold BS (2001) Deciduous or evergreen: does it make a difference to understorey pasture yield and riparian zone management? Proc N Z Grassl Assoc 63:121–126Google Scholar
  119. Radcliffe JE (1983) Grassland responses to shelter- a review. N Z J Exp Agric 11:5–10Google Scholar
  120. Rozados-Lorenzo MJ, González-Hernádez MP, Silva-Pando FJ (2007) Pasture production under different tree species and densities in an Atlantic silvopastoral system. Agrofor Syst 70:53–62. doi: 10.1007/s10457-007-9032-2 Google Scholar
  121. Salinger J (2000) The genesis of the new ark: integrating preparedness for increasing climate variability and change. In: Managing the impacts of climate variability. NIWA, AucklandGoogle Scholar
  122. Sanderson MA, Stair DW, Hussey MA (1997) Physiological and morphological responses of perennial forages to stress. Adv Agron 59:172–224Google Scholar
  123. Schroth G (1995) Tree root characteristics as criteria for species selection and systems design in agroforestry. Agrofor Syst 30:125–143. doi: 10.1007/BF00708917 Google Scholar
  124. Shrestha RK, Alavalpatu JRR, Kalmbacher RS (2004) Exploring the potential for silvopasture adoption in south-central Florida: an application of SWOT-AHP method. Agric Syst 81:185–199. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2003.09.004 Google Scholar
  125. Sibbald AR, Griffiths JH, Elston DA (1991) The effects of the presence of widely spaced conifers on under-storey herbage production in the U.K. For Ecol Manage 45:71–77. doi: 10.1016/0378-1127(91)90207-C Google Scholar
  126. Singh K, Chauhan HS, Rajput DK, Singh DV (1989) Report of a 60 month study on litter production, changes in soil chemical properties and productivity under Poplar (P. deltoides) and Eucalyptus (E. hybrid) interplanted with aromatic grasses. Agrofor Syst 9:37–45. doi: 10.1007/BF00120154 Google Scholar
  127. Skidmore EL, Jacobs HS, Hagen LJ (1972) Microclimate modification by slat-fence windbreak. Agron J 64:160–162Google Scholar
  128. Solangaarachchi SM, Harper JL (1987) The effect of canopy filtered light on the growth of white clover Trifolium repens. Oecologia 72:372–376. doi: 10.1007/BF00377566 Google Scholar
  129. Stokes A (2002) The biomechanics of tree root anchorage. In: Waisel Y, Eshel A, Kafkafi U (eds) Plant roots—the hidden half. Plenum, New York, pp 175–186Google Scholar
  130. Stokes A, Spanos I, Norris J, Cammeraat LH (eds) (2007) Eco- and ground bio-engineering: the use of vegetation to improve slope stability. Development in plant and soil science, vol 103. Springer, Dordrecht, 438 ppGoogle Scholar
  131. Stout BS, McMahon RJ (1961) Throughfall variation under tree crowns. J Geophys Res 66:1839–1843. doi: 10.1029/JZ066i006p01839 Google Scholar
  132. Suckling FET (1960) Productivity of pasture species on hill country. N Z J Agric Res 3:579–591Google Scholar
  133. Sulaiman Z (2006) Establishment and silvopastoral aspects of willow and poplar. PhD thesis. Massey University, Palmerston NorthGoogle Scholar
  134. Taylor BR, Parkinson D (1988) Aspen and pine leaf litter decomposition in laboratory microcosm. II. Interactions of temperature and moisture level. Can J Bot 66:1966–1973Google Scholar
  135. Thompson RC, Luckman PG (1993) Performance of biological erosion control in New Zealand soft rock hill terrain. Agrofor Syst 21:191–211. doi: 10.1007/BF00705230 Google Scholar
  136. Thorrold BS, Knowles RL, Nicholas ID, Power IL, Carter JL (1997) Evaluation of agroforestry options for three species. Proc N Z Grassl Assoc 59:187–190Google Scholar
  137. Trotter C, Tate K, Scott N, Townsend J, Wilde H, Lambie S, Marden M, Pinkney T (2005) Afforestation/reforestation of New Zealand marginal pasture lands by indigenous shrublands: the potential for Kyoto forest sinks. Ann Sci 62:865–871. doi: 10.1051/forest:2005077 Google Scholar
  138. Van Noordwijk M, Lusiana B (1999) WaNuLCAS, a model of water, nutrient and light capture in agroforestry systems. Agrofor Syst 43:217–242. doi: 10.1023/A:1026417120254 Google Scholar
  139. Vartha EW (1973) Effects of shade on growth of Poa trivialis and perennial ryegrass. N Z J Agric Res 16:38–42Google Scholar
  140. Wall AJ (2006) The effect of poplar stand density on hill country pastures. PhD thesis. Massey University, Palmerston North, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  141. Wall AJ, Mackay AD, Kemp PD, Gillingham AG, Edwards WRN (1997a) The impact of widely spaced soil conservation trees on hill pastoral systems. Proc N Z Grassl Assoc 59:171–177Google Scholar
  142. Wall AJ, Mackay AD, Kemp PD, Gillingham AG, Edwards WRN (1997b) A review of the impacts of widely spaced soil conservation trees on hill pastoral systems. Unpublished report. Massey University, Palmerston North, 135 ppGoogle Scholar
  143. West GG, Dean MG, Percival NS (1991) The productivity of Maku Lotus as a forest understorey. Proc N Z Grassl Assoc 53:169–173Google Scholar
  144. Whiteside ID (1990). STANDPAK stand growth modelling system for radiata pine. In: James RN, Tarlton GL (eds) New approaches to spacing and thinning plantation forestry. Proceeding of a IUFRO symposium Rotorua. New Zealand, pp 106–111Google Scholar
  145. Wilkinson A (1995) The poplar scene—New Zealand and overseas. N Z Tree Grower 17:28–30Google Scholar
  146. Wilkinson A (1999) Poplars and willows for soil erosion control in New Zealand. Biomass Bioenergy 16:263–274. doi: 10.1016/S0961-9534(99)00007-0 Google Scholar
  147. Wilson JR, Ludlow MM (1991) The environment and potential growth of herbage under plantations. In: Shelton HM, Stur WW (eds) Forages for plantation crops. ACIAR, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  148. Yanusa IAM, Mead DJ, Pollock KM, Lucas RJ (1995) Process studies in a Pinus radiata-pasture agroforestry system in a subhumid temperature environment I. Water use and light interception in the third year. Agrofor Syst 32:163–183. doi: 10.1007/BF00711571 Google Scholar
  149. Yeates GW, Saggar S, Daly BK (1997) Soil microbial C, N, and P, and microfaunal populations under Pinus radiata and grazed pasture land-use systems. Pedobiologia (Jena) 41:549–565Google Scholar
  150. Young A (1997) Agroforestry for soil management. CAB International, Wallingford, 320 ppGoogle Scholar
  151. Zabek LM, Prescott CE (2006) Biomass equations and carbon content of aboveground leafless biomass of hybrid poplar in Coastal British Columbia. For Ecol Manage 223:291–302Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raquel Benavides
    • 1
    Email author
  • Grant B. Douglas
    • 2
  • Koldo Osoro
    • 1
  1. 1.SERIDA, Área de Sistemas de Producción AnimalAsturiasSpain
  2. 2.AgResearch GrasslandsPalmerston NorthNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations