Abstract
Data collection by citizen scientists is emerging as an important practice for biodiversity detection, mapping, and compilation of big data in open online platforms such as iNaturalist, acting as a source of biodiversity discovery. However, the validation of species identification is a central issue for the scientific use of these data. Here we compared the list of marine species in the Western Atlantic Ocean obtained in iNaturalist with that generated from scientific collections to understand whether there are taxonomic bias favoring some types of organisms, and to understand the amount of trustful information at the species level in iNaturalist. We also present the first bioblitz results of marine biodiversity in Brazil, an iNaturalist Citizen Science campaign advertised by social media, as a case study. We found that marine taxa with higher richness were well represented in iNaturalist (Arthropoda, Mollusca and Chordata), nonetheless Annelida, Bryozoa, Nematoda, Nemertea, Platyhelminthes, Porifera, Chlorophyta, and Rhodophyta were under-represented. Taxa with small, cryptic, parasitic and/or sessile organisms were poorly represented. According to the methods applied in this study, we showed that 72% of the records are probably well identified, except for Bryozoa and Platyhelminthes. Brazilian marine records in iNaturalist add up to only 1/30 of the total West Atlantic records analyzed but there was a steep increase from 2021 to 2022, as a possible contribution of our bioblitz campaign especially for Arthropoda, Echinodermata, and Annelida. We conclude that the record of marine biodiversity by citizen scientists is a valuable tool, but the engagement of taxonomists is strongly recommended to increase the correct identification of species.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available to all those interested.
References
Amano T, Lamming JD, Sutherland WJ (2016) Spatial gaps in global biodiversity information and the role of citizen science. Bioscience 66(5):393–400. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw022
Araujo ML, Quaresma AC, Ramos FN (2022) GBIF information is not enough: national database improves the inventory completeness of Amazonian epiphytes. Biodivers Conserv 31:2797–2815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-022-02458-x
Barbato D, Benocci A, Guasconi M, Manganelli G (2021) Light and shade of citizen science for less charismatic invertebrate groups: quality assessment of iNaturalist nonmarine mollusc observations in central Italy. J Molluscan Stud 87(4):eyab033. https://doi.org/10.1093/mollus/eyab033
Bellard C, Marino C, Courchamp F (2022) Ranking threats to biodiversity and why it doesn’t matter. Nat Commun 13:2616. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30339-y
Bennett-Smith MF, Majoris JE, Titus BM, Berumen ML (2021) Clownfish hosting anemones (Anthozoa, Actiniaria) of the Red Sea: new associations and distributions, historical misidentifications, and morphological variability. Mar Biodivers Rec 14:22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41200-021-00216-6
Blake C, Rhanor A, Pajic C (2020) The demographics of citizen science participation and its implications for data quality and environmental justice. Citizen Sci Theor Pract 5(1):21. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.320
Bonney R, Cooper CB, Dickinson J, Kelling S, Phillips T, Rosenberg KV, Shirk J (2009) Citizen science: a developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. Bioscience 59(11):977–984. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9
Bonney R, Phillips TB, Ballard HL, Enck JW (2016) Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science? Public Underst Sci 25(1):2–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515607406
Burgess HK, DeBey LB, Froehlich HE, Schmidt N, Theobald EJ, Ettinger AK, HilleRisLambers J, Tewksbury J, Parrish JK (2017) The science of Citizen Science: Exploring barriers to use as a primary research tool. Biol Conserv 208:113–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.014
Callaghan CT, Mesaglio T, Ascher JS, Brooks TM, Cabras AA, Chandler M, Cornwell WK, Ríos-Málaver IC, Dankowicz E, Dhiya’ulhaq NU, Fuller RA, Galindo-Leal C, Grattarola F, Hewitt S, Higgins L, Hitchcock C, Hung KJ, Iwane T, Kahumbu P, Kendrick R, Kieschnick SR, Kunz G, Lee CC, Lin C, Loarie S, Medina MN, McGrouther MA, Miles L, Modi S, Nowak K, Oktaviani R, Olewe BMW, Pagé J, Petrovan S, Saari C, Seltzer C, E, Seregin AP, Sullivan JJ, Sumanapala AP, Takoukam A, Widness J, Willmott K, Wüster W, Young AN (2022) The benefits of contributing to the citizen science platform iNaturalist as an identifier. PLoS Biol 20(11):e3001843. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001843
Carbayo F, Marques AC (2011) The costs of describing the entire animal kingdom. Trends Ecol Evol 26(4):154–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.01.004
Castro ÉP, Bager A (2019) Sistema Urubu: a ciência cidadã em prol da conservação da biodiversidade. Revista Brasileira de Tecnologias Sociais, Itajaí 6 (2):111–130. https://doi.org/10.14210/rbts.v6n2.p111-130
CBD (1992) Convention on the Biological Diversity. Accessed on 15/04/2023 at https://www.cbd.int/convention/text.
Chowdhury S, Braby MF, Fuller RA, Zalucki MP (2021) Coasting along to a wider range: niche conservatism in the recent range expansion of the Tawny Coster, Acraea terpsicore (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Divers Distrib 27:402–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13200
Cranswick AS, Constantine R, Hendriks H, Carroll EL (2022) Social media and citizen science records are important for the management of rarely sighted whales. Ocean Coast Manag 226:106271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2022.106271
Cunha DG, Marques JF, Resende JC, Falco PB, Souza CM, Loiselle SA (2017) Citizen science participation in research in the environmental sciences: key factors related to projects’ success and longevity. An Braz Acad Sci 89(3):2229–2245. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201720160548
Di Cecco GJ, Barve V, Belitz MW, Stucky BJ, Guralnick RP, Hurlbert AH (2021) Observing the observers: How participants contribute data to iNaturalist and implications for biodiversity science. Bioscience 71(11):1179–1188. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biab093
Duncan PF, Ghys A (2019) Shells as collector’s items, chapter 20. In: Smaal AC, Ferreira JG, Grant J, Petersen K, Strand Ø (eds) Goods and services of marine bivalves, Springer Open, Cham, pp 381–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96776-9_20
Earp HS, Liconti A (2020) Science for the future: the use of citizen science in marine research and conservation. In: Jungblut S, Liebich V, Bode-Dalby M (eds) YOUMARES 9—the oceans: our research, our future. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20389-4_1
Echeverria A, Ariz I, Moreno J, Peralta J, Gonzalez EM (2021) Learning plant biodiversity in nature: the use of the citizen–science platform iNaturalist as a collaborative tool in secondary education. Sustainability 13:735. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020735
Ely CV, Bordignon SAL, Trevisan R, Boldrini II (2017) Implications of poor taxonomy in conservation,
Encarnação J, Teodósio MA, Morais P (2021) Citizen science and biological invasions: a review. Front Environ Sci 8:602980. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2020.602980
Engel MS, Ceríaco LM, Daniel GM, Dellapé PM, Löbl I, Marinov M et al (2021) The taxonomic impediment: a shortage of taxonomists, not the lack of technical approaches. Zool J Linn Soc 193(2):381–387. https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlab072
Fink D, Auer T, Johnston A, Strimas-Mackey M, Ligocki S, Robinson O, Hochachka W, Jaromczyk L, Rodewald A, Wood C, Davies I, Spencer A (2022) eBird Status and Trends, Data Version: 2021; Released: 2022. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York. https://doi.org/10.2173/ebirdst.2021
Forti LR, Hepp F, Souza JM, Protazio A, Szabo JK (2022) Climate drives anuran breeding phenology in a continental perspective as revealed by citizen-collected data. Divers Distrib 28:2094–2109. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13610
Fritz U, Ihlow F (2022) Citizen Science, taxonomy and grass snakes: iNaturalist helps to clarify variation of coloration and pattern in Natrix natrix subspecies. Vertebr Zool 72:533–549. https://doi.org/10.3897/vz.72.e87426
Fromont J, Abdul Wahab MA, Gomez O, Ekins M, Grol M, Hooper JNA (2016) Patterns of sponge biodiversity in the Pilbara. Northwestern Aust Divers 8:21. https://doi.org/10.3390/d8040021
Gazdic M, Groom Q (2019) iNaturalist is an unexploited source of plant-insect interaction data. Biodiv Inform Sci Stand 3:e37303. https://doi.org/10.3897/biss.3.37303
Giovos I, Kleitou P, Poursanidis D, Batjakas I, Bernardi G, Crocetta F, Doumpas N et al (2019) Citizen-science for monitoring marine invasions and stimulating public engagement: a case project from the eastern Mediterranean. Biol Invasions 21:3707–3721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-019-02083-w
Goddard JHR, Treneman N, Prestholdt T, Hoover C, Green B, Pence WE et al (2018) Heterobranch sea slug range shifts in the Northeast Pacific Ocean associated with the 2015–16 El Niño. Proc Cal Acad Sci 65(3):107–131
Grieneisen ML, Zhan Y, Potter D, Zhang M (2014) Biodiversity, taxonomic infrastructure, international collaboration, and new species discovery. Bioscience 64(4):322–332. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biu035
Haddad VJr-, Virga R, Bechara A, Silveira FL, Morandini AC, (2013) An outbreak of Portuguese man-of-war (Physalia physalis - Linnaeus, 1758) envenoming in Southeastern Brazil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 46(5):641–644. https://doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-1518-2013
Hartmann MC, Schott M, Dsouza A, Metz Y, Volpi M, Purves RS (2022) A text and image analysis workflow using citizen science data to extract relevant social media records: Combining red kite observations from Flickr, eBird and iNaturalist. Ecol Inform 71:101782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2022.101782
Hochmair HH, Scheffrahn RH, Basille M, Boone M (2020) Evaluating the data quality of iNaturalist termite records. PLoS ONE 15(5): e0226534. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0226534
Hortal J, de Bello F, Diniz-Filho JAF, Lewinsohn TM, Lobo JM, Ladle RJ (2015) Seven shortfalls that beset large-scale knowledge of biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 46(1):523–549
Jesus MD, Sales JBL, Martins RS, Ready JS, Costa TAS, Ablett JD, Schiavetti A (2021a) Traditional knowledge aids description when resolving the taxonomic status of unsettled species using classical and molecular taxonomy: the case of the shallow-water octopus Callistoctopus furvus (Gould, 1852) from the Western Atlantic Ocean. Front Mar Sci 7:595244. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.595244
Jesus MD, Zapelini C, Schiavetti A (2021b) Can citizen science help delimit the geographical distribution of a species? The case of the Callistoctopus sp. (“eastern octopus”) on the Brazilian coast. Ethnobiol Conserv 10:03. https://doi.org/10.15451/ec2020-09-10.03-1-15
Johnson CN, Balmford A, Brook BW, Buettel JC, Galetti M, Guangchun L, Wilmshurst JM (2017) Biodiversity losses and conservation responses in the Anthropocene. Science 356(6335):270–275. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam9317
Journal for Nature Conservation, 36: 10–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2017.01.003.
Kawabe LA, Ghilardi-Lopes NP, Turra A, Wyles KJ (2022) Citizen science in marine litter research: A review. Mar Pollut Bull 182:114011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.114011.
Koo K-S, Oh J-M, Park S-J, Im J-Y (2022) Accessing the accuracy of citizen science data based on iNaturalist Data. Diversity 14:316. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14050316
Kousteni V, Tsiamis K, Gervasini E, Zenetos A, Karachle PK, Cardoso AC (2022) Citizen scientists contributing to alien species detection: the case of fishes and mollusks in European marine waters. Ecosphere 13 (1):e03875. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3875
Langeneck J, Minasidis V, Doumpas N, Giovos I, Kaminas A, Kleitou P, Tiralongo F, Crocetta F (2022) Citizen science helps in tracking the range expansions of non-indigenous and neo-native species in Greece and Cyprus (Eastern Mediterranean Sea). J Mar Sci Eng 10(2):256. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10020256
Lehtiniemi M, Outinen O, Puntila-Dodd R (2020) Citizen science provides added value in the monitoring for coastal non-indigenous species. J Environ Manag 267:110608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110608
Lenoir J, Bertrand R, Comte L, Bourgeaud L, Hattab T, Murienne J, Grenouillet G (2020) Species better track climate warming in the oceans than on land. Nat Ecol Evol 4:1044–1059. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-1198-2
Lodi L, Tardin R (2018) Citizen science contributes to the understanding of the occurrence and distribution of cetaceans in southeastern Brazil: a case study. Ocean Coast Manag 158:45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.03.029
Lonhart SI, Jeppesen R, Beas-Luna R, Crooks JA, Lorda J (2019) Shifts in the distribution and abundance of coastal marine species along the eastern Pacific Ocean during marine heatwaves from 2013 to 2018. Mar Biodivers Rec 12:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41200-019-0171-8
Łukowiak M, Van Soest R, Klautau M, Pérez T, Pisera A, Tabachnick K (2022) The terminology of sponge spicules. J Morphol 283(12):1517–1545. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.21520
Mancinelli G, Bardelli R, Zenetos A (2021) A global occurrence database of the Atlantic blue crab Callinectes sapidus. Sci Data 8(1):111. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-021-00888-w
Mannino AM, Borfecchia F, Micheli C (2021) Tracking marine alien macroalgae in the Mediterranean Sea: the contribution of citizen science and remote sensing. J Mar Sci Eng 9:288. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9030288
Marcovaldi MÂ, Dei Marcovaldi GG (1999) Marine turtles of Brazil: the history and structure of Projeto TAMAR-IBAMA. Biol Conserv 91(1):35–41
Martínez-Sagarra G, Castilla F, Pando F (2022) Seven hundred projects in iNaturalist Spain: performance and lessons learned. Sustainability 14:11093. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141711093
McIntyre AD (1971) Observations on the status of subtidal meiofauna research. In: Proceedings of first international conference of Meiofauna. Smiths Contrib Zool vol 76, pp 149–154
McMullin RT, Allen JL (2022) An assessment of data accuracy and best practice recommendations for observations of lichens and other taxonomically difficult taxa on iNaturalist. Botany 100(6):491–497. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjb-2021-0160
Mesaglio T, Callaghan CT (2021) An overview of the history, current contributions, and future outlook of iNaturalist in Australia. Wildlife Res 48(4):289–303. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR20154
Mesaglio T, Soh A, Kurniawidjaja S, Sexton C (2021) ‘First known photographs of living specimens’: the power of iNaturalist for recording rare tropical butterflies. J Insect Conserv 25:905–911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-021-00350-7
Monge-Nájera J, Seas C (2018) Citizen science and roadkills: trends along project lifespan and comparison of tropical and temperate projects. UNED Res J 10(1):61–66. https://doi.org/10.22458/urj.v10i1.2042
Oliveira SS, Barros B, Pereira JL, Santos PT and Pereira R (2021) Social media use by citizen science projects: characterization and recommendations. Front Environ Sci 9:715319. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.715319
Pandya RE (2012) A framework for engaging diverse communities in citizen science in the US. Front Ecol Envir 10(6):314–317. https://doi.org/10.1890/120007
Pateman R, Dyke A, West S (2021) The diversity of participants in environmental citizen science. Citizen Sci Theor Pract 6(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.369
Pinsky ML, Eikeset AM, McCauley DJ, Payne JL, Sunday JM (2019) Greater vulnerability to warming of marine versus terrestrial ectotherms. Nature 569:108–111. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1132-4
Queiroz-Souza C, Viana B, Ghilardi-Lopes N, Kawabe L, Alexandrino E, França J, Koffler S, Saraiva AM, Loula A (2023) Opportunities and barriers for Citizen Science growth in Brazil: reflections from the first workshop of the Brazilian Citizen Science Network. Citizen Sci Theor Pract 8(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.521
Ribeiro VV, Pinto MAS, Mesquita RKB, Moreira LB, Costa MF, Castro IB (2021) Marine litter on a highly urbanized beach at Southeast Brazil: a contribution to the development of litter monitoring programs. Mar Pollut Bull 163:111978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.1119
Roberts CJ, Vergés A, Callaghan CT, Poore AGB (2022) Many cameras make light work: opportunistic photographs of rare species in iNaturalist complement structured surveys of reef fish to better understand species richness. Biodivers Conserv 31:1407–1425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-022-02398-6
Rocha RM, Zanata TB, Moreno TR (2012) Keys for the identification of families and genera of Atlantic shallow water ascidians. Biota Neotrop 12:269–303
Rosa RM, Cavallari DC, Salvador RB (2022a) iNaturalist as a tool in the study of tropical molluscs. PLoS ONE 17(5):e0268048. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268048
Rosa RM, Salvador RB, Teixeira L, Bornschein MR, Cavallari DC (2022b) The rapid expansion of the Jumping Snail Ovachlamys fulgens in Brazil. Diversity 14:815. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14100815
Ruggiero MA, Gordon DP, Orrell TM, Bailly N, Bourgoin T, Brusca RC et al (2015) A higher level classification of all living organisms. PLoS ONE 10(4):e0119248. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119248
Sakai K, Türkay M (2013) Revision of the genus Ocypode with the description of a new genus, Hoplocypode (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura). Mem Queens Mus 56(2):665–793
Sandahl A, Tøttrup AP (2020) Marine citizen science: recent developments and future recommendations. Citizen Sci: Theory Pract 5(1):24. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.270
Seddon N, Mace GM, Naeem S, Tobias JA, Pigot AL, Cavanagh R, Mouillot D, Vause J, Walpole M (2016) Biodiversity in the Anthropocene: prospects and policy. Proc R Soc B 283:20162094. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.2094
Sherbinin A, Bowser A, Chuang T-R, Cooper C, Danielsen F, Edmunds R et al (2021) The critical importance of citizen science data. Front Clim 3:650760. https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2021.650760
Silva DSM, Tavares GC, Fianco M, González JM (2021) First report of the rare arboreal grasshopper Bactrophora dominans Westwood, 1842 (Insecta, Orthoptera, Caelifera, Romaleidae) from Brazil. Check List 17(3):895–903. https://doi.org/10.15560/17.3.895
Silvertown J (2009) A new dawn for citizen science. Trends Ecol Evol 24(9):467–471
Simon ADF, Adamczyk EM, Basman A, Chu JWF, Gartner HN, Fletcher K et al (2022) Toward an atlas of Salish Sea biodiversity: the flora and fauna of Galiano Island, British Columbia, Canada. Part I. Marine zoology. Biodiv Data J 10:e76050. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.10.e76050
Smith SDA, Nimbs MJ (2022) Citizen scientists record significant range extensions for tropical sea slug species in subtropical eastern Australia. Diversity 14:244. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14040244
Souto RD, Batalhão ACS (2022) Citizen science as a tool for collaborative site specific oil spill mapping: the case of Brazil. An Acad Bras Cienc 94(Suppl. 2):e20211262. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202220211262
Storch D, Šímová I, Smyčka J, Bohdalková E, Toszogyova A, Okie JG (2022) Biodiversity dynamics in the Anthropocene: how human activities change equilibria of species richness. Ecography 4:e05778. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.05778
Strasser BJ, Baudry J, Mahr D, Sanchez G, Tancoigne E (2019) Citizen Science? Rethinking science and public participation. Sci Techn Stud 32(2):52–76. https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.60425
Tanaka KR, Van Houtan KS, Mailander E, Dias B, Galginaitis C, O’Sullivan J, Lowe CG, Jorgensen SJ (2021) North Pacific warming shifts the juvenile range of a marine apex predator. Sci Rep 11:3373. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82424-9
Thornhill I, Loiselle S, Lind K, Ophof D (2016) The Citizen science opportunity for researchers and agencies. Bioscience 66(9):720–721
Tran LT, Bafort Q, Steen F, Gómez Garreta A, D’Hondt S, Miller KA, Vranken S, Žuljević A, Smith JE, De Clerck O (2021) Dictyota cyanoloma (Dictyotales, Phaeophyceae), a newly introduced brown algal species in California. J Phycol 57(1):370–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpy.13100
Tran TT, Carter BE, Castillo Vardaro JA (2022) Predicted threats to a native squirrel from two invading species based on citizen science data. Biol Invasions 24:3539–3553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-022-02859-7
Troudet J, Grandcolas P, Blin A, Vignes-Lebbe R, Legendre F (2017) Taxonomic bias in biodiversity data and societal preferences. Sci Rep 7:9132
Trubovitz S, Lazarus D, Renaudie J, Noble PJ (2020) Marine plankton show threshold extinction response to Neogene climate change. Nature Com 11(1):5069
Van der Wal R, Anderson H, Robinson A, Sharma N, Mellish C, Roberts S, Siddharthan A (2015) Mapping species distributions: a comparison of skilled naturalist and lay citizen science recording. Ambio 44:584–600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0709-x
Van Noordwijk CGE, Baeten L, Turin H, Heijerman T, Alders K, Boer P, Mabelis AA, Aukema B, Noordam A, Remke E, Siepel H, Berg MP, Bonte D (2017) 17 years of grassland management leads to parallel local and regional biodiversity shifts among a wide range of taxonomic groups. Biodivers Conserv 26:717–734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1269-5
Wallingford PD, Sorte CJB (2022) Dynamic species interactions associated with the range-shifting marine gastropod Mexacanthina lugubris. Oecologia 198:749–761. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-022-05128-5
Wilson JS, Pan AD, General DEM, Koch JB (2020) More eyes on the prize: an observation of a very rare, threatened species of Philippine Bumble bee, Bombus irisanensis, on iNaturalist and the importance of citizen science in conservation biology. J Insect Conserv 24:727–729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-020-00233-3
Winterton SL (2020) A new bee-mimicking stiletto fly (Therevidae) from China discovered on iNaturalist. Zootaxa 4816(3):361–369
WoRMS Editorial Board (2023) World Register of Marine Species. https://www.marinespecies.org at VLIZ. Accessed 2023 Apr 08. https://doi.org/10.14284/170
Yiu SKF, Chow CFY, Tsang SHT, Zhang X, Chung JTH, Sin SYT, Chow WK, Chan LL (2022) New record of Japanese SEAHORSE, Hippocampus mohnikei Bleeker, 1853 (Syngnathiformes: Syngnathidae). Hong Kong Waters 18(3):455–461. https://doi.org/10.15560/18.3.455
Acknowledgments
We extend our gratitude to the many collaborators in iNaturalist that helped with the identification of photos during the Biogeomar bioblitz summer 2022. We also thank Fundação Grupo Boticário for financial support to BioGeoMar program (PROG_0027_2019). RMR was supported by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development—Brazil (CNPq, 306788/2022-5, 309295/20181), SNS by São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [Proc. n. 2022/16193-1] and the National Council of Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq 301293/2019-8 and 304267/2022-8). This study is dedicated to Museu Nacional, an important scientific, cultural, and Brazilian historical institution that was severely burned on September 2nd, 2018, and is in the process of reconstruction.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interests
There are no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Handling editor: Lorena Silva do Nascimento.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Rocha, R.M., Azevedo, F., Oliveira, U. et al. West Atlantic coastal marine biodiversity: the contribution of the platform iNaturalist. Aquat Ecol 58, 57–71 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-023-10062-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-023-10062-6