Advertisement

Intraspecific differences in relative isotopic niche area and overlap of co-occurring sharks

  • David Samuel ShiffmanEmail author
  • Les Kaufman
  • Michael Heithaus
  • Neil Hammerschlag
Article

Abstract

Few studies have assessed whether patterns of resource partitioning among sympatric marine predators vary between different habitats. This type of data is important for understanding food web functioning as well as for supporting an ecosystem-based fisheries management plan. In this study, we used δ13C and δ15N stable isotope analysis to assess the relative isotopic niche area (i.e., which species has the largest and smallest isotopic niche area within a study site) and core isotopic niche overlap between 299 sharks of 11 co-occurring shark species that vary in size, diet and behavior in three coastal study areas in South Florida. Overall, results show that the relative isotopic niche area and patterns of core isotopic niche overlap between some sympatric shark species varied between sites, suggesting plasticity in resource use and competitive interactions between shark species (e.g., 85% of blacktip shark Carcharhinus limbatus standard ellipse area overlapped with the blacknose shark C. acronotus ellipse in Biscayne Bay, but there was no overlap between these species’ ellipses in nearby Florida Bay). Therefore, patterns of resource use and trophic interactions documented among species from one site may not be applicable to a neighboring location. These findings may have implications for food web models that incorporate trophic data from different areas for a species when local data are unavailable.

Keywords

Stable isotope analysis Food web ecology Predator prey interactions Sharks Florida Everglades 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the other members of author D.S.’s dissertation committee: Dr. Nicholas K Dulvy, Dr. Andrew R Binder and Gina Maranto. We would like to thank Robert Michener, the manager of author L. K.’s stable isotope laboratory, for his assistance with sample preparation and analysis and his detailed description of laboratory methods. We would like to thank Dr. Catherine Macdonald, Christian Pankow, Rachel Skubel, Emily Nelson and Jacob Jerome for their assistance with sample management and retrieval, and Lindsay Jennings for her assistance with the UM Shark Research and Conservation Program’s sample database. Sample processing fees were provided by more than 100 unique crowdfunding donors through the SciFund Challenge. The American Elasmobranch Society provided a student travel grant for author D.S. to present this research at the 2016 AES conference, and we thank the scientists who attended that presentation for their helpful feedback. Figure 1 was created by author NH’s masters student Abby Tinari, and we thank her for her assistance. This research was carried out under the following permits: University of Miami Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee 15-238, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission SAL 15-0957-SR, Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary 2015-168, National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration Highly Migratory Species SHK-EFP-16-02, Biscayne National Park 2015-SCI-0012 and Everglades National Park 2015-SCI-0011. The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Author Contributions

This work represents Ph.D. dissertation research by author D.S., who performed data analysis and writing. Authors M.H. and N.H. served on D.S.’s dissertation committee and provided guidance on the planning of this project as well as provided guidance on analysis and write-up. Author L.K. assisted with data analysis and write-up.

Supplementary material

10452_2019_9685_MOESM1_ESM.docx (557 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 556 kb)

References

  1. Anderson WT, Fourqurean JW (2003) Intra-and interannual variability in seagrass carbon and nitrogen stable isotopes from south Florida, a preliminary study. Org Geochem 34(2):185–194Google Scholar
  2. Ault TR, Johnson CR (1998) Spatially and temporally predictable fish communities on coral reefs. Ecol Monogr 68(1):25–50Google Scholar
  3. Behringer DC, Butler MJ (2006) Stable isotope analysis of production and trophic relationships in a tropical marine hard-bottom community. Oecologia 148(2):334–341Google Scholar
  4. Bethea DM, Buckel JA, Carlson JK (2004) Foraging ecology of the early life stages of four sympatric shark species. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 268:245–264Google Scholar
  5. Bethea DM, Hale L, Carlson JK, Cortés E, Manire CA, Gelsleichter J (2007) Geographic and ontogenetic variation in the diet and daily ration of the bonnethead shark, Sphyrna tiburo, from the eastern Gulf of Mexico. Mar Biol 152(5):1009–1020Google Scholar
  6. Carlisle AB, Litvin SY, Madigan DJ, Lyons K, Bigman JS, Ibarra M, Bizzarro J (2016) Interactive effects of urea and lipid content confound stable isotope analysis in elasmobranch fishes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 74(3):419–428Google Scholar
  7. Castro JI (2000) The biology of the nurse shark, Ginglymostoma cirratum, off the Florida east coast and the Bahama Islands. Environ Biol Fishes 58(1):1–22Google Scholar
  8. Chasar LC, Chanton JP, Koenig CC, Coleman F (2005) Evaluating the effect of environmental disturbance on the trophic structure of Florid Bay using multiple stable isotope analyses of contemporary and historical specimens. Limnol Ocean 50(4):1059–1072Google Scholar
  9. Cortés E (1999) Standardized diet compositions and trophic levels of sharks. ICES J Mar Sci 56(5):707–717Google Scholar
  10. Cortés E, Gruber SH (1990) Diet, feeding habits and estimates of daily ration of young lemon sharks, Negaprion brevirostris (Poey). Copeia 1990:204–218Google Scholar
  11. Creel S, Creel NM (1996) Limitation of African wild dogs by competition with larger carnivores. Conserv Biol 10(2):526–538Google Scholar
  12. Creel S, Creel NM (1998) Six ecological factors that may limit African wild dogs, Lycaon pictus. Anim Conserv 1:1–9Google Scholar
  13. Daly R, Froneman PW, Smale MJ (2013) Comparative feeding ecology of bull sharks (Carcharhinus leucas) in the coastal waters of the southwest Indian Ocean inferred from stable isotope analysis. PLoS ONE 8(10):e78229Google Scholar
  14. Davenport SR, Bax NJ (2002) A trophic study of a marine ecosystem off southeastern Australia using stable isotopes of carbon and nitrogen. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59(3):514–530Google Scholar
  15. Dicken ML, Hussey NE, Christiansen HM, Smale MJ, Nkabi N, Cliff G, Winter SP (2017) Diet and trophic ecology of the tiger shark from South African waters. PLoS ONE 12(6):e0177897Google Scholar
  16. Drymon JM, Powers SP, Carmichael RH (2012) Trophic plasticity in the Atlantic sharpnose shark (Rhizoprionodon terraenovae) from the north central Gulf of Mexico. Environ Biol Fishes 95(1):21–35Google Scholar
  17. Dulvy NK, Fowler SL, Musick JA, Cavanaugh RD, Kyne PM, Harrison LR, Carlson JK, Davidson LNK, Fordham SV, Francis MP, Pollock CM, Simpfendorfer CA, Burgess GH, Carpenter KE, Compagno LJV, Ebert DA, Gibson C, Heupel MR, Livingstone SR, Sanciangco JC, Stevens JD, Valenti S, White WT (2014) Extinction risk and conservation of the world’s sharks and rays. eLife 3:ee590Google Scholar
  18. Ford RM (2012) Diet and Reproductive Biology of the Blacknose Shark (Carcharhinus acronotus) from the Southwestern Atlantic Ocean. Thesis, University of North FloridaGoogle Scholar
  19. Fourqurean JW, Robblee MB (1999) Florida Bay: a history of recent ecological changes. Estuaries 22(2):345–357Google Scholar
  20. Fourqurean JW, Schrlau JE (2003) Changes in nutrient content and stable isotope ratios of C and N during decomposition of seagrasses and mangrove leaves along a nutrient availability gradient in Florida Bay, USA. Chem Ecol 19(5):373–390Google Scholar
  21. Frisch AJ, Ireland M, Rizzari JR, Lönnstedt OM, Magnenat KA, Mirbach CE, Hobbs JPA (2016) Reassessing the trophic role of reef sharks as apex predators on coral reefs. Coral Reefs 35:1–14Google Scholar
  22. Gallagher AJ, Kyne PM, Hammerschlag N (2012) Ecological risk assessment and its application to elasmobranch conservation and management. J Fish Biol 85(5):1727–1748Google Scholar
  23. Gallagher AJ, Serafy JE, Cooke SJ, Hammerschlag N (2014) Physiological stress response, reflex impairment, and survival of five sympatric shark species following experimental capture and release. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 496:207–218Google Scholar
  24. Gallagher AJ, Shiffman DS, Byrnes EE, Hammerschlag-Peyer CM, Hammerschlag N (2017) Patterns of resource use and isotopic niche overlap among three species of sharks occurring within a protected subtropical estuary. Aquat Ecol 51(3):435–448Google Scholar
  25. Goering J, Alexander V, Haubenstock N (1990) Seasonal variability of stable carbon and nitrogen isotope ratios of organisms in a North Pacific bay. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 30(3):239–260Google Scholar
  26. Graham NA (2007) Ecological versatility and the decline of coral feeding fishes following climate driven coral mortality. Mar Biol 153(2):119–127Google Scholar
  27. Graham F, Rynne P, Estevanez M, Luo J, Ault JS, Hammerschlag N (2016) Use of marine protected areas and exclusive economic zones in the subtropical western North Atlantic Ocean by large highly mobile sharks. Divers Distrib 22(5):534–546Google Scholar
  28. Grubbs RD (2010) Ontogenetic shifts in movements and habitat use. Sharks and their relatives II: Biodiversity, adaptive physiology, and conservation. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 319–350Google Scholar
  29. Guzzo MM, Haffner GD, Legler ND, Rush SA, Fisk AT (2013) Fifty years later: trophic ecology and niche overlap of a native and non-indigenous fish species in the western basin of Lake Erie. Biol Invasions 15(8):1695–1711Google Scholar
  30. Harvey CJ, Hanson PC, Essington TE, Brown PB, Kitchell JF (2002) Using bioenergetics models to predict stable isotope ratios in fishes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59(1):115–124Google Scholar
  31. Hayden B, Holopainen T, Amundsen PA, Eloranta AP, Knudsen R, Praebel K, Kahilainen K (2013) Interactions between invading benthivorous fish and native whitefish in subarctic lakes. Freshw Biol 58(6):1234–1250Google Scholar
  32. Heithaus MR, Burkholder D, Hueter R, Heithaus L, Pratt W, Carrier JC (2007) Spatial and temporal variation in shark communities of the lower Florida Keys and evidence for historical population declines. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 64:1302–1313Google Scholar
  33. Heithaus MR, Vaudo JJ, Kreicker S, Layman CA, Krützen M, Burkholder DA, Gastrich K, Bessey C, Sarabia R, Cameron K, Wirsing A, Thomson JA, Dunphy-Daly MM (2013) Apparent resource partitioning and trophic structure of large-bodied marine predators in a relatively pristine seagrass ecosystem. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 481:225–237Google Scholar
  34. Hussey NE, MacNeil MA, Olin JA, McMeans BC, Kinney MJ, Chapman DD, Fisk AT (2012) Stable isotopes and elasmobranchs: tissue types, methods, applications and assumptions. J Fish Biol 80(5):1449–1484Google Scholar
  35. Hussey NE, MacNeil MA, Siple MC, Popp BN, Dudley SF, Fisk AT (2015) Expanded trophic complexity among large sharks. Food Webs 4:1–7Google Scholar
  36. Jackson AL, Inger R, Parnell AC, Bearhop S (2011) Comparing isotopic niche widths among and within communities: SIBER—Stable Isotope Bayesian Ellipses in R. J Anim Ecol 80(3):595–602Google Scholar
  37. Kieckbusch DK, Koch MS, Serafy JE, Anderson WT (2004) Trophic linkages among primary producers and consumers in fringing mangroves of subtropical lagoons. Bull Mar Sci 74(2):271–285Google Scholar
  38. Kim SL, Koch PL (2012) Methods to collect, preserve, and prepare elasmobranch tissues for stable isotope analysis. Environ Biol Fish 95(1):53–63Google Scholar
  39. Layman CA, Arrington DA, Montaña CG, Post DM (2007) Can stable isotope ratios provide for community-wide measures of trophic structure? Ecology 88(1):42–48Google Scholar
  40. Layman CA, Araujo MS, Boucek R, Hammerschlag-Peyer CM, Harrison E, Jud ZR, Matich PM, Rosenblatt AE, Vaudo JJ, Yeager LA, Post DM, Bearhop S (2012) Applying stable isotopes to examine food-web structure: an overview of analytical tools. Biol Rev 87(3):545–562Google Scholar
  41. Lirman D, Cropper WP (2003) The influence of salinity on seagrass growth, survivorship, and distribution within Biscayne Bay, Florida: field, experimental, and modeling studies. Estuaries 26(1):131–141Google Scholar
  42. Lowe CG, Wetherbee BM, Crow GL, Tester AL (1996) Ontogenetic dietary shifts and feeding behavior of the tiger shark, Galeocerdo cuvier, Hawaiian waters. Environ Biol Fishes 47(2):203–211Google Scholar
  43. MacNeil MA, Drouillard KG, Fisk AT (2006) Variable uptake and elimination of stable nitrogen isotopes between tissues in fish. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 63(2):345–353Google Scholar
  44. Martínez del Rio C, Wolf N, Carleton SA, Gannes L (2009) Isotopic ecology ten years after a call for more laboratory experiments. Biol Rev 84(1):91–111Google Scholar
  45. Matich P, Heithaus MR (2014) Multi-tissue stable isotope analysis and acoustic telemetry reveal seasonal variability in the trophic interactions of juvenile bull sharks in a coastal estuary. J Anim Ecol 83(1):199–213Google Scholar
  46. Matich P, Ault JS, Boucek RE, Bryan DR, Gastrich KR, Harvey CL, Heithaus M, Rosenblatt A (2017) Ecological niche partitioning within a large predator guild in a nutrient-limited estuary. Limnol Ocean 62(3):934–953Google Scholar
  47. Minagawa M, Wada E (1984) Stepwise enrichment of 15N along food chains: further evidence and the relation between δ15N and animal age. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 48(5):1135–1140Google Scholar
  48. Munroe SEM, Simpfendorfer CA, Heupel MR (2014) Defining shark ecological specialisation: concepts, context, and examples. Rev Fish Biol Fish 24(1):317–331Google Scholar
  49. Munroe SEM, Heupel MR, Fisk A, Logan M, Simpfendorfer CA (2015) Regional movement patterns of a small-bodied shark revealed by stable-isotope analysis. J Fish Biol 86(5):1567–1586Google Scholar
  50. Newman SP, Handy RD, Gruber SH (2010) Diet and prey preference of juvenile lemon sharks Negaprion brevirostris. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 398:221–234Google Scholar
  51. Papastamatiou YP, Wetherbee BM, Lowe CG, Crow GL (2006) Distribution and diet of four species of carcharhinid shark in the Hawaiian Islands: evidence for resource partitioning and competitive exclusion. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 320:239–251Google Scholar
  52. Peterson BJ, Fry B (1987) Stable isotopes in ecosystem studies. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 18:293–320Google Scholar
  53. Pikitch E, Santora C, Babcock EA, Bakun A, Bonfil R, Conover DO, Dayton P, Doukakis P, Fluharty D, Heneman B, Houde ED, Link J, Livingston PA, Mangel M, McAllister M, Pope J, Sainsbury KJ (2004) Ecosystem-based fishery management. Science 305(5682):346–347Google Scholar
  54. Polis GA, Holt RD (1992) Intraguild predation: the dynamics of complex trophic interactions. Trends Ecol Evol 7(5):151–154Google Scholar
  55. Post DM (2002) Using stable isotopes to estimate trophic position: models, methods, and assumptions. Ecology 83(3):703–718Google Scholar
  56. R Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/
  57. Sanford E, Roth MS, Johns GC, Wares JP, Somero GN (2003) Local selection and latitudinal variation in a marine predator-prey interaction. Science 300(5622):1135–1137Google Scholar
  58. Schoener TW (1974) Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science 185(4145):27–39Google Scholar
  59. Serafy JE, Faunce CH, Lorenz JJ (2003) Mangrove shoreline fishes of Biscayne Bay, Florida. Bull Mar Sci 72(1):161–180Google Scholar
  60. Shiffman DS, Gallagher AJ, Boyle MD, Hammerschlag-Peyer CM, Hammerschlag N (2012) Stable isotope analysis as a tool for elasmobranch conservation research: a primer for non-specialists. Mar Fresh Res 63(7):635–643Google Scholar
  61. Shiffman DS, Frazier BS, Kucklick JR, Abel D, Brandes J, Sancho G (2014) Feeding ecology of the sandbar shark in South Carolina estuaries revealed through δ13C and δ15 N stable isotope analysis. Mar Coast Fish 6(1):156–169Google Scholar
  62. Simpfendorfer CA, Heupel MR, White W, Dulvy NK (2011) The importance of research and public opinion to conservation management of sharks and rays: a synthesis. Mar Fresh Res 62:518–527Google Scholar
  63. Swart PK, Saier A, Lamb K (2005) Temporal and spatial variation in the δ15N and δ13C of coral tissue and zooxanthellae in Montastraea faveolata collected from the Florida reef tract. Limnol Ocean 50(4):1049–1058Google Scholar
  64. Syväranta J, Lensu A, Marjomäki TJ, Oksanen S, Jones RI (2013) An empirical evaluation of the utility of convex hull and standard ellipse areas for assessing population niche widths from stable isotope data. PLoS ONE 8(2):e56094Google Scholar
  65. Tamburello N, Côté IM, Dulvy NK (2015) Energy and the scaling of animal space use. Am Nat 186(2):196–211Google Scholar
  66. Terraube J, Arroyo B, Madders M, Mougeot F (2011) Diet specialisation and foraging efficiency underfluctuating vole abundance: a comparison between generalist and specialist avian predators. Oikos 120(2):234–244Google Scholar
  67. Thayer GW, Powell AB, Hoss DE (1999) Composition of larval, juvenile, and small adult fishes relative to changes in environmental conditions in Florida Bay. Estuaries 22(2):518–533Google Scholar
  68. Tilley A, López-Angarita J, Turner JR (2013) Diet reconstruction and resource partitioning of a Caribbean marine mesopredator using stable isotope Bayesian modelling. PLoS ONE 8(11):e79560Google Scholar
  69. Torres LG, Heithaus MR, Delius B (2006) Influence of teleost abundance on the distribution and abundance of sharks in Florida Bay, USA. Hydrobiologia 569:449–455Google Scholar
  70. Trent L, Parshley DE, Carlson JK (1997) Catch and bycatch in the shark drift gillnet fishery off Georgia and east Florida. Mar Fish Rev 59(1):19–28Google Scholar
  71. Vaslet A, Phillips DL, France C, Feller IC, Baldwin CC (2012) The relative importance of mangroves and seagrass beds as feeding areas for resident and transient fishes among different mangrove habitats in Florida and Belize: evidence from dietary and stable-isotope analyses. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 434:81–93Google Scholar
  72. Vaudo JJ, Heithaus MR (2011) Dietary niche overlap in a nearshore elasmobranch mesopredator community. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 425:247–260Google Scholar
  73. Vizzini S, Mazzola A (2003) Seasonal variations in the stable carbon and nitrogen isotope ratios (13C/12C and 15 N/14 N) of primary producers and consumers in a western Mediterranean coasal lagoon. Mar Biol 142(5):1009–1018Google Scholar
  74. Wieters EA, Gaines SD, Navarrete SA, Blanchette CA, Menge BA (2008) Scales of dispersal and the biogeography of marine predator–prey interactions. Am Nat 171(3):405–417Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Samuel Shiffman
    • 1
    • 2
    • 6
    Email author
  • Les Kaufman
    • 3
  • Michael Heithaus
    • 4
  • Neil Hammerschlag
    • 1
    • 2
    • 5
  1. 1.Shark Research and Conservation ProgramUniversity of MiamiMiamiUSA
  2. 2.Leonard and Jayne Abess Center for Ecosystem Science and PolicyUniversity of MiamiCoral GablesUSA
  3. 3.Department of BiologyBoston University Marine ProgramBostonUSA
  4. 4.School of Environment, Arts, and SocietyFlorida International UniversityNorth MiamiUSA
  5. 5.Rosenstiel School for Marine and Atmospheric ScienceUniversity of MiamiMiamiUSA
  6. 6.Earth to Oceans Group, Department of Biological SciencesSimon Fraser UniversityVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations