Skip to main content

Employing a socio-ecological systems approach to engage harmful algal bloom stakeholders

Abstract

Harmful algal blooms (HABs) pose substantial health risks to seafood consumers, drinking water supplies, and recreationalists with apparent increases associated with anthropogenic eutrophication of freshwaters and coastal areas. Attempts to intervene in these blooms can be met with reticence by citizens, non-governmental organizations, and officials, often due to local perceptions and beliefs. Hence, the social sciences have an important role to play in HAB research and mitigation. Much of the social science HAB research to date has focused on how best to communicate associated risks and appropriate behavioral responses to affected local communities. The emphasis has been on the direct human impacts, particularly in the areas of health outcomes and identification of any sociocultural and economic barriers to proposed mitigation. While this focus is warranted and valuable, there is also a need to understand HABs as part of a larger human–environmental coupled system, where blooms trigger a wide range of cultural and behavioral responses that are driven by how blooms impact other social and ecosystem dynamics. The research presented here describes a case study of a Microcystis aeruginosa bloom in a lake in the Chesapeake Bay watershed where anthropologists worked with HAB researchers. The results of this interdisciplinary collaboration show that approaching the bloom and mitigation within a ‘socio-ecological systems’ framework provides stakeholders with a range of rationales and approaches for addressing HAB mitigation, enhancing both short-term successes and longer-term opportunities, even if M. aeruginosa is still present in the lake.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  • Anderson DM, Glibert PM, Burkholder JM (2002) Harmful algal blooms and eutrophication: nutrient sources, composition, and consequences. Estuaries 25:704–726. doi:10.1007/BF02804901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachman LJ, Phillips PJ (1996) Hydrologic landscapes on the Delmarva Peninsula Part 2: estimates of base-flow nitrogen load to Chesapeake Bay. J Am Water Resour Assoc 32(4):779–791. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.1996.tb03475.x

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer M (ed) (2006) Harmful algal research and response: a human dimensions strategy. National Office for Marine Biotoxins and Harmful Algal Blooms, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F, Ross H (2013) Community resilience: toward an integrated approach. Soc Nat 26(1):5–20. doi:10.1080/08941920.2012.736605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard HR (ed) (2013) Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Sage, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodin Ö, Crona BI (2009) The role of social networks in natural resource governance: what relational patterns make a difference? Glob Environ Change 19(3):366–374. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brownlee EF, Sellner SG, Sellner KG (2003) The effects of barley straw (Hordeum vulgare) on freshwater and brackish phytoplankton and cyanobacteria. J Appl Phycol 15:525–531. doi:10.1023/B:JAPH.0000004353.15684.25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brownlee EF, Sellner SG, Sellner KG (2005) Prorocentrum minimum blooms: potential impacts on dissolved oxygen and Chesapeake Bay oyster settlement and growth. Harmful Algae 4:593–602. doi:10.1016/j.hal.2004.08.009

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bukaveckas PA, Barry LE, Beckwith MJ, David V, Lederer B (2011) Factors determining the location of the chlorophyll maximum and the fate of algal production within the tidal freshwater james river. Estuaries Coasts 34:569–582. doi:10.1007/s12237-010-9372-4

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caroline County Department of Planning and Codes (2011) Caroline County Lake Williston 12 HUC Watershed [map], scale not given

  • Collins SL, Carpenter SR, Swinton SM et al (2010) An integrated conceptual framework for long-term social-ecological research. Front Ecol Environ 9(6):351–357. doi:10.1890/100068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cote M, Nightingale AJ (2012) Resilience thinking meets social theory: situating social change in socio-ecological systems (SES) research. Prog Hum Geogr 36(4):475–489. doi:10.1177/0309132511425708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig LS, Palmer MA, Richardson DC, Filoso S, Bernhardt ES, Bledsoe BP, Doyle MW, Groffman PM, Hassett BA, Kaushal SS, Mayer PM, Smith SM, Wilcock PR (2008) Stream restoration strategies for reducing river nitrogen loads. Front Ecol Environ 6:529–538. doi:10.1890/070080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dam HG, Colin SP (2005) Prorocentrum minimum (clone Exuv) is nutritionally insufficient, but not toxic to the copepod Acartia tonsa. Harmful Algae 4(3):575–584. doi:10.1016/j.hal.2004.08.007

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming LE, Rivero C, Burns J, Williams C, Bean JA, Shea KA, Stinn J (2002) Blue green algal (cyanobacterial) toxins, surface drinking water, and liver cancer in Florida. Harmful Algae 1(2):157–168. doi:10.1016/S1568-9883(02)00026-4

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao Y, O’Neil J, Stoecker D, Cornwell J (2014) Photosynthesis and nitrogen fixation during cyanobacteria blooms in an oligohaline and tidal freshwater estuary. Aquat Microb Ecol 72:127–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gastrich MD, Wazniak CE (2002) A brown tide bloom index based on the potential harmful effects of the brown tide alga, Aureococcus anophagefferens. Aquat Ecosyst Health 5(4):435–441. doi:10.1080/14634980290002011

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glibert PM, Magnien R, Lomas MW, Alexander J, Fan C, Haramoto E, Trice M, Kana TM (2001) Harmful algal blooms in the Chesapeake and coastal bays of Maryland, USA: comparison of 1997, 1998, and 1999 events. Estuaries 24:875–883. doi:10.2307/1353178

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glibert PM, Wazniak CE, Hall MR, Sturgis B (2007) Seasonal and interannual trends in nitrogen and brown tide in Maryland’s coastal bays. Ecol Appl 17:S79–S87. doi:10.1890/05-1614.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goshorn D, Deeds J, Tango P, Poukish C, Place A, McGinty M, Butler W, Luckett C, Magnien R (2004) Occurrence of Karlodinium micrum and its association with fish kills in Maryland estuaries. In: Steidinger KA, Landsberg JA, Tomas CR, Vargo GA (eds) Harmful algae 2002—proceedings of the Xth international conference on harmful algae. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Florida Institute of Oceanography, St. Petersburg, FL, and IOCUNESCO, Paris, pp 361–363

  • Granéli E, Hansen PJ (2006) Allelopathy in harmful algae: a mechanism to compete for resources? In: Granéli EH, Turner JT (eds) Ecology of harmful algae. Springer, Berlin, pp 189–201

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson LH (2003) Adaptive dancing: interactions between social resilience and ecological crises. In: Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (eds) Navigating socio-ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 33–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson LH, Holling CS (2002) Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding JM, Mann R, Moeller P, Hsia MS (2009) Mortality of the veined rapa whelk, Rapana venosa, in relation to a bloom of Alexandrium monilatum in the York River, United States. J Shellfish Res 28:363–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heisler J, Glibert PM, Burkholder JM, Anderson DM, Cochlan W, Dennison WC, Dortch Q, Gobler CJ, Heil CA, Humphries E, Lewitus A, Magnien R, Marshall HG, Sellner K, Stockwell DA, Stoecher DK, Suddleson M (2008) Eutrophication and harmful algal blooms: a scientific consensus. Harmful Algae 8(1):3–113. doi:10.1016/j.hal.2008.08.006

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoagland P, Anderson DM, Kaoru Y, White AW (2002) The economic effects of harmful algal blooms in the United States: estimates, assessment issues, and information needs. Estuaries 25(4):819–837. doi:10.1007/BF02804908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1986) Resilience of ecosystems; local surprise and global change. In: Clark WC, Munn RE (eds) Sustainable development of the biosphere. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 292–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski NA, Lear DW, Villa O Jr. (1972) Nutrient management in the Potomac estuary. In: Likens GE (ed) Nutrients and eutrophication. Limnol Oceanogr Spec Symp 1

  • Kempton W, Falk J (2000) Cultural models of Pfiesteria: toward cultivating more appropriate risk perceptions. Coast Manag 28:273–285. doi:10.1080/08920750050133548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiryu Y, Shields JD, Vogelbein WK, Zwerner DE, Kator H, Blazer VS (2002) Induction of skin ulcers in Atlantic menhaden by injection and aqueous exposure to the zoospores of Aphanomyces invadans. J Aquat Anim Health 14(1):11–24. doi:10.1577/1548-8667(2002)014<0011:IOSUIA>2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knee KL, Jordan TE (2013) Spatial distribution of dissolved radon in the Choptank River and its tributaries: implications for groundwater discharge and nitrate inputs. Estuaries Coasts 36:1237–1252. doi:10.1007/s12237-013-9619-y

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambin EF (2005) Conditions for sustainability of human-environment systems: information, motivation, and capacity. Glob Environ Change 15(3):177–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landsberg JH (2002) The effects of harmful algal blooms on aquatic organisms. Rev Fish Sci 10(2):113–390. doi:10.1080/20026491051695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Glibert PM, Gao Y (2015) Temporal and spatial changes in Chesapeake Bay water quality and relationships to Prorocentrum minimum, Karlodinium veneficum, and CyanoHAB events, 1991–2008. Harmful Algae 42:1–14. doi:10.1016/j.hal.2014.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipton DW (1999) Pfiesteria economic impact on seafood industry sales and recreational fishing. In: Gardner BL, Koch L (eds) Proceedings, Economics of Policy Options for Nutrient Management and Pfiesteria; 16 November 1998. University of Maryland Center for Agricultural and Natural Resources Policy, Laurel, pp 35–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Luckenbach MW, Sellner KG, Shumway SE, Greene K (1993) Effects of two bloom forming dinoflagellates, Prorocentrum minimum and Gyrodinium uncatenum, on the growth and survival of the eastern oyster Crassostrea virginica (Gmelin 1791). J Shellfish Res 12:411–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie L, Beuzenberg V, Holland P, Mcnabb P, Selwood A (2004) Solid phase adsorption toxin tracking (SPATT): a new monitoring tool that simulates the biotoxin contamination of filter feeding bivalves. Toxicon 44:901–918. doi:10.1016/j.toxicon.2004.08.020

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maryland Department of Natural Resources (2015) Eyes on the Bay: Monitoring Stories and Publication Results. Retrieved from http://mddnr.chesapeakebay.net/eyesonthebay/Publications.cfm

  • Mulholland MR, Morse RE, Boneillo GF, Bernhardt PW, Filippino KC, Procise LA, Blanco-Garcia JL, Marshall HG, Egerton TA, Hunley WS, Moore KA, Berry DL, Gobler CJ (2009) Understanding causes and impacts of the dinoflagellate, Cochlodinium polykrikoides, blooms in the Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries Coasts. doi:10.1007/s12237-009-9169-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Musante K (2015) Participant observation. In: Bernard HR, Gravlee CC (eds) Handbook of methods in cultural anthropology. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, pp 251–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Najjar R, Pyke CR, Adams MB, Breitburg D, Hershner C, Kemp WM, Howarth R, Mulholland MR, Paolisso M, Secor D, Sellner K, Wardrop D, Wood R (2010) Potential climate-change impacts on the Chesapeake Bay. Estuar Coastal Shelf Sci 86:1–20. doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2009.09.026

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neil JM, Davis TW, Burford MA, Gobler CJ (2012) The rise of harmful cyanobacteria blooms: the potential of eutrophication and climate change. Harmful Algae 14:313–334. doi:10.1016/j.hal.2011.10.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2009) A general framework for analyzing sustainability of socio-ecological systems. Science 325:419–421. doi:10.1126/science.1172133

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paavola J, Hubacek K (2013) Ecosystem services, governance, and stakeholder participation: an introduction. Ecol Soc 18(4):42. doi:10.5751/ES-06019-180442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paerl HW, Huisman J (2008) Blooms like it hot. Nature 324(5872):57–58. doi:10.1126/science.1155398

    Google Scholar 

  • Paolisso M (1999) Toxic algal blooms, nutrient runoff, and farming on Maryland’s Eastern Shore. Cult Agric 21(3):53–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paolisso M, Chambers E (2001) Culture, politics, and toxic dinoflagellate blooms: the anthropology of Pfiesteria. Hum Organ 60(1):1–12. doi:10.17730/humo.60.1.7dxhxmbl87fm34q9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paolisso M, Maloney SR (2000) Recognizing farmer environmentalism: nutrient runoff and toxic dinoflagellate blooms in the Chesapeake Bay region. Hum Organ 59(2):209–221. doi:10.17730/humo.59.2.g7627r437p745710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitcher GC, Probyn TA, du Randt A, Lucas AJ, Bernard S, Evers-King H, Lamont T, Hutchings L (2014) Dynamics of oxygen depletion in the nearshore of a coastal embayment of the southern Benguela upwelling system. J Geophys Res Oceans 119:2183–2200. doi:10.1002/2013JC009443

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Place AR, Saito K, Deeds JR, Robledo JAF, Vasta GR (2008) A decade of research on Pfiesteria spp. and their toxins: unresolved questions and an alternative hypothesis. In: Botana LM (ed) Seafood and freshwater Toxins. CRC Press, New York, pp 717–757

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn N (2005) Finding culture in talk: a collection of methods. Palgrave MacMillan, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reece KS, Egerton TA, Fillipino KC, Harris TM, Jones III WM, Mason PL, Mulholland MR, Pease SKD, Scott GP, Smith JL, Vogelbein WK (2015) Emerging patterns and biological impacts of harmful algal blooms in lower Chesapeake Bay. Abstract, poster, and presentation, 8th Symposium on Harmful Algae in the US. p 140

  • Robb M, Greenop B, Goss Z, Douglas G, Adeney J (2003) Application of Phoslock™, an innovative phosphorus binding clay, to two Western Australian waterways: preliminary findings. Hydrobiologia 169:237–243. doi:10.1023/A:1025478618611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanford WE, Pope JP (2013) Quantifying groundwater’s role in delaying improvements to Chesapeake Bay water quality. Environ Sci Technol 47:13330–13338. doi:10.1021/es401334k

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saxby T (2003) USA, MD, VA: Chesapeake Bay (2003) [line map][no scale provided]. Integration and Application Network, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science. Retrieved from http://ian.umces.edu/imagelibrary/displayimage-search-0-5833.html

  • Saxby T (2011) USA: States [map] [no scale provided]. Integration and Application Network, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science. Retrieved from http://ian.umces.edu/imagelibrary/displayimage-search-0-6599.html

  • Schensul SL, Schensul JJ, Singer M, Weeks M, Brault M (2015) Participatory methods and community-based collaborations. In: Bernard HR, Gravlee CC (eds) Handbook of methods in cultural anthropology. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, pp 185–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellner KG, Place A, Williams E, Gao Y, Van Dolah E, Paolisso M, Bowers H, Shannon Roche S (2015). Hydraulics and barley straw (Hordeum vulgare) as effective treatment options for a cyanotoxin-impacted lake. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Harmful Algae. Cawthron Institute, Nelson, AU

  • Spencer D, Lembi C (2007) Evaluation of barely straw as alternative algal control method in northern California rice fields. J Aquat Plant Manag 45:84–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Staver KW, Brinsfield RB (1998) Using cereal grain winter cover crops to reduce groundwater nitrate contamination in the mid-Atlantic coastal plain. J Soil Water Conserv 53(3):230–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Tango P, Butler W, Lacouture R, Goshorn D, Magnien R, Michael B, Hall H, Browhawn K, Wittman R, Betty W (2004). An unprecedented bloom of Dinophysis acuminata in Chesapeake Bay. In: Steidinger KA, Landsberg JA, Tomas CR, Vargo GA (eds) Harmful algae 2002—proceedings of the Xth international conference on harmful algae. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Florida Institute of Oceanography, St. Petersburg, FL, and IOCUNESCO, Paris, France, pp 358–363

  • Thomsen MS, McGlathery KJ, Tyler AC (2006) Macroalgal distribution patterns in a shallow, soft-bottom lagoon, with emphasis on the nonnative Gracilaria vermiculophylla and Codium fragile. Estuaries Coasts 29(3):470–478. doi:10.1007/BF02784994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler MA, Seliger HH (1978) Annual subsurface transport of a red tide dinoflagellate to its bloom area: water circulation patterns and organism distributions in the Chesapeake Bay. Limnol Oceanogr 23:227–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dolah ER, Paolisso MJ, Sellner KG, Place A (2014) Beyond the bloom: using a socio-ecological systems framework to investigate stakeholder response to harmful algal bloom mitigation in the Chesapeake Bay, USA. In: Kim HG, Reguera B, Hallegraeff GM, Lee CK, Han MS and Choi JK (eds) Harmful algae 2012: proceedings of the 15th international conference on harmful algae. International Society for the Study of Harmful Algae, pp 235–238

  • Vogelbein WK, Harris TM, Smith JL, Mason PL, Joes III WM, Reece KS (2015) Emergence of the toxic alga Alexandrium monilatum in the lower Chesapeake Bay: Toxigenicity in aquatic animals. Abstract, poster, and presentation, 8th Symposium on Harmful Algae in the US, p 103

  • Walker B, Salt D (2006) Resilience thinking: sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Wazniak CE, Hall MR, Carruthers TJB, Sturgis B, Dennison WC, Orth RJ (2007) Linking water quality to living resources in a mid-Atlantic lagoon system, USA. Ecol Appl 17:S64–S78. doi:10.1890/05-1554.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weller CM, Watzin MC, Wang D (1996) Role of wetlands in reducing phosphorus loading to surface water in eight watersheds in the Lake Champlain basin. Environ Manag 20:731–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wengraf T (2001) Qualitative research interviewing. SAGE, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (2015) World Sanitation Health: Recreational, or bathing, waters. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/bathing/en/

  • Wutich A, Ryan G, Bernard HR (2015) Text analysis. In: Bernard HR, Gravlee CC (eds) Handbook of methods in cultural anthropology. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, pp 533–560

    Google Scholar 

  • Zurlini G, Riitters K, Zaccarelli N, Petrosillo I, Jones KB, Rossi L (2006) Disturbance patterns in a socio-ecological system at multiple scales. Ecol Complex 3(2):119–128. doi:10.1016/j.ecocom.2005.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the United States (US) National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Prevention, Control, and Mitigation Program (PCM-HAB), Grant Number NA10NOS4780154. This is Contribution Number 5039 for the University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science (UMCES); Number 15-158 for Institute for Marine and Environmental Technology (IMET); and Number 26 for NOAA/NOS/NCCOS/CSCOR PCM-HAB. The authors would like to thank R. Foote, The Girl Scout Council of the Chesapeake Bay, and the Williston Lake community, especially the key informants who shared their stories and insights throughout the course of this project; additional assistance from C. Wazniak and W. Butler from Maryland’s Department of Natural Resources is also appreciated. This manuscript benefited from valuable feedback provided by editor, Bas W. Ibelings and two annonymous reviewers.

Funding

This study was funded by the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOS/NCCOS/CSCOR Prevention Control and Mitigation Harmful Algal Bloom Program (Grant Number NA10NOS4780154).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth R. Van Dolah.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

With the exception of the lead author, none of the authors have any conflicts of interest. Potential conflicts of interest from the lead author include an education stipend received for her work on this project as a Master’s student. Additionally, she received a student travel award to present project research at the 15th International Conference for the Study of Harmful Algae in Busan, South Korea (Oct. 29-Nov. 2, 2012).

Human participants

This research involved human participants.

Informed consent

Data were collected using written informed consent in compliance with the University of Maryland's Institutional Review Board

Additional information

Guest editors: Petra M. Visser, Bas W. Ibelings, Jutta Fastner & Myriam Bormans/Cyanobacterial blooms. Ecology, prevention, mitigation and control.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Van Dolah, E.R., Paolisso, M., Sellner, K. et al. Employing a socio-ecological systems approach to engage harmful algal bloom stakeholders. Aquat Ecol 50, 577–594 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-015-9562-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-015-9562-z

Keywords

  • Socio-ecological systems
  • Stakeholder response
  • Mitigation
  • Microcystis aeruginosa