Advertisement

Aquatic Ecology

, Volume 50, Issue 1, pp 1–14 | Cite as

Physicochemical predictors of the invasive diatom Didymosphenia geminata at multiple spatial scales in New Zealand rivers

  • Jonathan BrayEmail author
  • Jon S. Harding
  • Cathy Kilroy
  • Paul Broady
  • Philippe Gerbeaux
Article

Abstract

Didymosphenia geminata is an alga of major concern in temperate regions due to ongoing spread and unprecedented bloom formation. The aim of this study was to identify physical and chemical habitat conditions which affect D. geminata at catchment to patch scales. To examine this, we conducted a field-based survey of 55 distinct waterways across the South Island of New Zealand. D. geminata was detected at 82 % of waterways, grew within the periphyton at 54 % and at 25 % occurred as blooms. We tested 137 variables at scales ranging from catchment to small patches. The primary predictors of D. geminata waterway presence were still waterbodies (positive effect P < 0.05) and nitrate + nitrite (negative effect P = 0.08). D. geminata biomass was best explained by increasing river stability (P < 0.01) and decreasing nitrate + nitrite concentrations (P < 0.01). A patch-scale subsidy–stress relationship was also apparent with water velocity (P < 0.05). Our large-scale survey showed D. geminata was influenced by varied conditions at multiple spatial scales, preferentially occurring and blooming within stable, lake or dam-fed oligotrophic habitats. This work supports the finding that D. geminata blooms in response to nutrient limitation; however, results here reinforce that accrual is constrained by physical processes at multiple scales.

Keywords

Didymosphenia geminata Physicochemical Physical Chemical Niche Habitat Preferences Invasive Streams Multiple scales 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The work was funded by the Department of Conservation and Ministry for Primary Industries, New Zealand. Iain Gover and Katie McHugh provided valuable assistance with GIS analysis.

Supplementary material

10452_2015_9543_MOESM1_ESM.docx (38 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 38 kb)
10452_2015_9543_MOESM2_ESM.docx (54 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 54 kb)
10452_2015_9543_MOESM3_ESM.docx (28 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (DOCX 27 kb)
10452_2015_9543_MOESM4_ESM.docx (29 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (DOCX 29 kb)

References

  1. Aboal M, Marco S, Chaves E, Mulero I, Garcıá-Ayala A (2012) Ultrastructure and function of stalks of the diatom Didymosphenia geminata. Hydrobiologia 695:17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bergey EA, Cooper JT, Phillips BC (2009) Substrate characteristics affect colonization by the bloom-forming diatom Didymosphenia geminata. Aquat Ecol 44:33–40. doi: 10.1007/s10452-009-9247-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bickel TO, Closs GP (2008) Impact of Didymosphenia geminata on hyporheic conditions in trout redds: reason for concern? Mar Freshw Res 59:1028–1033. doi: 10.1071/mf08011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biggs BJF (1996) Patterns of benthic algae of streams. In: Stevenson RJ, Bothwell ML, Lowe RL (eds) Algal ecology: freshwater benthic ecosystems. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 31–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biggs BJF (2000) New Zealand periphyton guideline: detecting, monitoring and managing enrichment of streams. Prepared for Ministry for the Environment, NIWA, Christchurch, New Zealand. http://www.mfe.govt.nz/publications/freshwater-publications/new-zealand-periphyton-guideline-detecting-monitoring-and. Accessed 11 Feb 2010
  6. Biggs BJF, Close ME (1989) Periphyton biomass dynamics in gravel bed rivers: the relative effects of flows and nutrients. Freshw Biol 22:209–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Biggs BJF, Kilroy C (2000) Stream periphyton monitoring manual. Prepared for Ministry for the Environment, NIWA. https://www.niwa.co.nz/freshwater/management-tools/ecological-monitoring/stream-periphyton-monitoring-manual. Accessed 11 Feb 2010
  8. Biggs BJF, Price GM (1987) A survey of filamentous algal proliferations in New Zealand rivers. N Z J Mar Freshw Res 21:175–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Biggs BJF, Stokseth S (1996) Hydraulic habitat suitability for periphyton in rivers. Regul Rivers Res Manag 12:251–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Biggs BJF, Smith RA, Duncan MJ (1999) Velocity and sediment disturbance of periphyton in headwater streams: biomass and metabolism. J N Am Benthol Soc 18:222–241. doi: 10.2307/1468462 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Biggs BJF, Nikora VI, Snelder TH (2005) Linking scales of flow variability to lotic ecosystem structure and function. River Res Appl 21:283–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bonnett ML, Jellyman DJ, Sykes J (2008) Impacts of Didymosphenia geminata on the distribution and abundance of native fish. NIWA Client Report CHC2008-063Google Scholar
  13. Borcard D, Legendre P (2002) All-scale spatial analysis of ecological data by means of principal coordinates of neighbour matrices. Ecol Model 153:51–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bothwell ML, Kilroy C (2011) Phosphorus limitation of the freshwater benthic diatom Didymosphenia geminata determined by the frequency of dividing cells. Freshw Biol 56:565–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bothwell ML, Taylor BW, Kilroy C (2014) The Didymo story: the role of low dissolved phosphorus in the formation of Didymosphenia geminata blooms. Diatom Res 29:229–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brzezinski MA (1985) The Si:C:N ratio of marine diatoms: Interspecific variability and the effect of some environmental variables. J Phycol 21:347–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cassie V (1983) A history of freshwater diatom research in New Zealand. Arch Nat Hist 11:223–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chin WW (2001) PLS-Graph User’s Guide, Version 3.0, February, 2001 edition ©1993–2001. Soft Modeling Inc., HoustonGoogle Scholar
  19. Cullis JDS, Gillis C, Bothwell ML, Kilroy C (2012) A conceptual model for the blooming behavior and persistence of the benthic mat-forming diatom Didymosphenia geminata in oligotrophic streams. J Geophys Res 117:1–11Google Scholar
  20. Ellwood NTW, Whitton BA (2007) Importance of organic phosphate hydrolyzed in stalks of the lotic diatom Didymosphenia geminata and the possible impact of atmospheric and climatic changes. Hydrobiologia 592:121–133. doi: 10.1007/s10750-007-0728-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. ESRI (2013) ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10.2 Redlands. Environmental Systems Research Institute, CAGoogle Scholar
  22. Flöder S, Kilroy C (2009) Didymosphenia geminata (Protista, Bacillariophyceae) invasion, resistance of native periphyton communities, and implications for dispersal and management. Biodivers Conserv 18:3809–3824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gärdes A, Iversen MH, Grossart HP, Passow U (2011) Didymo and other freshwater pests: economic impact assessment. Prepared for Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, p 36. http://www.biosecurity.govt.nz/files/pests/didymo/didymo-and-other-freshwater-pests-eia-aug2011.pdf. Accessed 8 Sept 2013
  24. Gillis C, Chalifour M (2009) Changes in the macrobenthic community structure following the introduction of the invasive algae Didymosphenia geminata in the Matapedia River (Québec, Canada). Hydrobiologia 647:63–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Graham I (2009) A continent of the move: New Zealand geoscience into the 21st century. Craig Potton Publishing, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  26. Griffith MB, Hill BH, Herlihy AT, Kaufmann PR (2002) Multivariate analysis of periphyton assemblages in relation to environmental gradients in Colorado Rocky Mountain streams. J Phycol 38:83–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Harding J et al (2009) Stream habitat assessment protocols for wadeable rivers and streams of New Zealand. University of Canterbury, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  28. Hart DD, Finelli CM (1999) Physical-biological coupling in streams: the pervasive effects of flow on benthic organisms. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 30:363–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hayes JW, Shearer KA, Hay J (2007) Interim report: invertebrate drift and trout growth potential in a Didymo (Didymosphenia geminata) affected reach of the Mararoa River. Prepared for Biosecurity New Zealand. Cawthron Report No. 1178. http://www.biosecurity.govt.nz/files/pests/didymo/didymo-trout-impact-interim-oct-06.pdf. Accessed 26 March 2008
  30. Hillebrand H, Dürselen C-D, Kirschtel D, Pollingher U, Zohary T (1999) Biovolume calculation for pelagic and benthic microalgae. J Phycol 35:403–424. doi: 10.1046/j.1529-8817.1999.3520403.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hutchinson GE (1957) Cold spring harbor symposium on quantitative biology. Concluding Remarks 22:415–427Google Scholar
  32. Hynes HBN (1975) The stream and its valley. Verh Intnat Verein Theor Angew Limnol 19:1–15Google Scholar
  33. Jowett IG, Richardson J (1990) Microhabitat preferences of benthic invertebrates in a New Zealand river and the development of in-stream flow-habitat models for Deleatidium spp. N Z J Mar Freshw Res 24:19–30. doi: 10.1080/00288330.1990.9516399 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kawecka B, Sanecki J (2003) Didymosphenia geminata in running waters of southern Poland—symptoms of change in water quality? Hydrobiologia 495:193–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kilroy C (2007) Predicting the suitability of New Zealand rivers and lakes for colonisation and growth of the invasive, non-indigenous diatom, Didymosphenia geminata: an update. NIWA Client Report: CHC2007-062, September 2007. http://www.biosecurity.govt.nz/files/pests/didymo/didymo-predictive-maps-sep-07.pdf. Accessed 26 March 2008
  36. Kilroy C et al (2006) Ecological studies on Didymosphenia geminata. NIWA Client Report: CHC2005-123 September 2005. http://www.biosecurity.govt.nz/files/pests/didymo/didymo-ecology-dec-07.pdf. Accessed 26 March 2008
  37. Kilroy C, Bothwell ML (2010) Factors affecting the growth and survival of Didymosphenia geminata in rivers and their spring fed tributaries: update of experimental investigations to June 2010. NIWA Client Report: CHC2010-0. http://tinyurl.com/o5e8bsn. Accessed 6 July 2012
  38. Kilroy C, Bothwell ML (2011) Environmental control of stalk length in the bloom-forming, freshwater benthic diatom Didymosphenia geminata (Bacillariophyceae). J Phycol 47:981–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kilroy C, Bothwell ML (2012) Didymosphenia geminata growth rates and bloom formation in relation to ambient dissolved phosphorus concentration. Freshw Biol 57:641–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kilroy C, Bothwell ML (2014) Attachment and short-term stalk development of Didymosphenia geminata: effects of light, temperature and nutrients. Diatom Res 29:237–248. doi: 10.1080/0269249x.2014.889043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kilroy C, Dale M (2006) A comparison of sampling methods for detection of the invasive alga Didymosphenia geminata in New Zealand rivers. NIWA Client Report: CHC2006-078 September 2006. http://www.biosecurity.govt.nz/files/pests/didymo/didymo-sampling-methods-sep-06.pdf. Accessed 26 March 2008
  42. Kilroy C, Unwin M (2011) The arrival and spread of the bloom-forming, freshwater diatom, Didymosphenia geminata, in New Zealand. Aquat Invasions 6:249–262. doi: 10.3391/ai.2011.6.3.02 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kilroy C, Snelder TH, Sykes J (2005) Likely environments in which the non-indigenous freshwater diatom Didymosphenia geminata can survive in New Zealand. NIWA Client Report: CHC2005-043, September 2005. http://www.biosecurity.govt.nz/files/pests/didymo/didymo-likely-environments-sep-05.pdf. Accessed 26 March 2008
  44. Kilroy C, Leathwick J, Dey K, Blair N, Roulston H, Sykes J, Sutherland D (2007) Predicting the suitability of New Zealand rivers and lakes for colonisation and growth of the invasive, non-indigenous diatom, Didymosphenia geminata: an update. NIWA Client Report: CHC2007-062, September 2007. http://www.biosecurity.govt.nz/files/pests/didymo/didymo-predictive-maps-sep-07.pdf. Accessed 26 March 2008
  45. Kilroy C, Larned ST, Biggs BJF (2009) The non-indigenous diatom Didymosphenia geminata alters benthic communities in New Zealand rivers. Freshw Biol 54:1990–2002. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02247.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kirkwood AE, Shea T, Jackson L, McCcauley E (2007) Didymosphenia geminata in two Alberta headwater rivers: an emerging invasive species that challenges conventional views on algal bloom development. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 64:1703–1709. doi: 10.1139/f07-152 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kirkwood AE, Jackson LJ, McCauley E (2009) Are dams hotspots for Didymosphenia geminata blooms? Freshw Biol 54:1856–1863. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02231.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Krammer K, Lange-Bertalot H (1995). Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa: Bacillariophyceae. 1. Teil: Naviculaceae. Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Band 2/1, Fischer Verlag, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  49. Kuhajek JM, Lemoine M, Kilroy C, Cary SC, Gerbeaux P, Wood SA (2014) Laboratory study of the survival and attachment of Didymosphenia geminata in water sourced from rivers throughout New Zealand. Phycologia 53:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kumar S, Spaulding SA, Stohlgren TJ, Hermann KA, Schmidt TS, Bahls LL (2009) Potential habitat distribution for the freshwater diatom Didymosphenia geminata in the continental US. Front Ecol Environ 7:415–420. doi: 10.1890/080054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Larned ST et al (2007) Ecological studies of Didymosphenia geminata in New Zealand, 2006–2007. NIWA Client Report: CHC2007-070, p 120. http://www.biosecurity.govt.nz/files/pests/didymo/didymo-ecology-dec-07.pdf. Accessed 26 March 2008
  52. Larned ST, Packman AI, Plew DR, Vopel K (2011) Interactions between the mat-forming alga Didymosphenia geminata and its hydrodynamic environment. Limnol Oceanogr Fluids Environ 1:4–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Leathwick JR et al (2010) Freshwater ecosystems of New Zealand (FENZ) geodatabase Version one—August 2010 user guide. Department of Conservation, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  54. Lindstrøm EA, Skulberg O (2008) Didymosphenia geminata—a native diatom species of Norwegian rivers coexisting with the Atlantic salmon. In: Bothwell ML, Spaulding SA (eds) Proceedings of the 2007 international workshop on Didymosphenia geminata. Canadian Technical Report on Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, vol 2795, pp 35–40Google Scholar
  55. Løvstad O (2008) A phosphorus-based biological classification system and threshold indicators. Verh Int Ver Limnol 30:565–568Google Scholar
  56. McLaughlin A (2009) Investigating the growth of Didymosphenia geminata and the impact on benthic macroinvertebrate communities in Boulder Creek, a regulated mountain stream, in the summer of 2008. Dissertation, University of ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  57. Miller MP, McKnight DM, Cullis JD, Greene A, Vietti K, Liptzin D (2009) Factors controlling streambed coverage of Didymosphenia geminata in two regulated streams in the Colorado Front Range. Hydrobiologia 630:207–218. doi: 10.1007/s10750-009-9793-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Noga T (2003) Dispersion of Didymosphaenia geminata in the flowing waters of southern Poland - New sites of species occurrence in the Orawska watershed and the Orawska Basin. Oceanol Hydrobiol Stud 32:159–170Google Scholar
  59. Omernik JM (1995) Ecoregions: a spatial framework for environmental management. In: Davis WS, Simon TP (eds) Biological assessment and criteria: tools for water resource planning and decision making. Lewis Publishers, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  60. Pfankuch DJ (1975) Stream reach inventory and channel stability evaluation. USDA Forest Service, MissoulaGoogle Scholar
  61. Poff NL (1997) Landscape filters and species traits: towards mechanistic understanding and prediction in stream ecology. J N Am Benthol Soc 16:391–409. doi: 10.2307/1468026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. R Core Development Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/
  63. Reid B, Torres R (2014) Didymosphenia geminata invasion in South America: ecosystem impacts and potential biogeochemical state change in Patagonian rivers. Acta Oecol 54:101–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Reid BL, Hernández KL, Frangópulos M, Bauer G, Lorca M, Kilroy C, Spaulding S (2012) The invasion of the freshwater diatom Didymosphenia geminata in Patagonia: prospects, strategies, and implications for biosecurity of invasive microorganisms in continental waters. Conserv Lett 5:432–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rost AL, Fritsen CH, Davis C (2011) Distribution of freshwater diatom Didymosphenia geminata in streams in the Sierra Nevada, USA, in relation to water chemistry and bedrock geology. Hydrobiologia 665:157–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Shelby EL (2006) An assessment and analysis of benthic macroinvertebrate communities associated with the appearance of Didymosphenia geminata in the White River below Bull Shoals Dam. Arkansas Dept of Environmental Quality Water Planning Division, p 42. http://www2.adeq.state.ar.us/water/branch_planning/pdfs/didymo_summary.pdf. Accessed 26 May 2015
  67. Snelder TH, Biggs BJF, Weatherhead M (2004) New Zealand river environment classification user guide. Ministry for the Environment, Wellington, New Zealand. http://www.mfe.govt.nz/more/environmental-reporting/about-environmental-reporting-nz/classification-systems-environmental-1. Accessed 5 June 2012
  68. Spaulding S, Elwell L (2007) Increase in nuisance blooms and geographic expansion of the freshwater diatom Didymosphenia geminata: Recommendations for response. In: White Paper. USEPA Region 8 and Federation of Fly Fishers. http://www.epa.gov/Region8/water/didymosphenia/. Accessed 12 Dec 2008
  69. Subakov-Simić G, Cvijan M (2004) Didymosphenia geminata (Lyngb.) M. Schmidt (Bacillariophyta) from the Tisa river (Serbia)—its distribution and specific morphological and ecological characteristics. Algol Stud 114:53–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sundareshwar PV et al (2011) Didymosphenia geminata: algal blooms in oligotrophic streams and rivers. Geophys Res Lett 38:1–5. doi: 10.1029/2010GL046599 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sutherland S, Rodway M, Kilroy C, Jarvie B, Hughes G (2007) The survival of Didymosphenia geminata in three rivers and associated spring-fed tributaries in the South Island of New Zealand. Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries: Biosecurity, New Zealand. http://www.biosecurity.govt.nz/files/pests/didymo/didymo-spring-fed-creek-control-jun-07.pdf. Accessed 26 March 2008
  72. Tarapchak SJ, Moll RA (1990) Phosphorus uptake by phytoplankton and bacteria in Lake Michigan. J Plankton Res 12:743–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Taylor W (2000) Change-point analyzer 2.0 shareware program, Taylor Enterprises, Libertyville, Illinois. http://www.variation.com/cpa
  74. Taylor B (2012) Tritrophic effects of nuisance algal blooms on top predators in rivers. In: Conference proceedings: Ecological Society of America 2012Google Scholar
  75. Taylor BW, Bothwell ML (2014) The origin of invasive microorganisms matters for science, policy, and management: the case of Didymosphenia geminata. Bioscience 64:531–538. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biu060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Townsend SA, Padovan AV (2005) The seasonal accrual and loss of benthic algae (Spirogyra) in the Daly River, an oligotrophic river in tropical Australia. Mar Freshw Res 56:317–327. doi: 10.1071/mf04079 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Underwood GJC, Boulcott M, Raines CA (2004) Environmental effects on exopolymer production by marine benthic diatoms: dynamics, changes in composition, and pathways of production. J Phycol 40:293–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Weilhofer CL, Spaulding SA, Pan Y (2006) Habitat characterization of Didymosphenia geminata in the western US. In: Spaulding S, Wiltshire R, Elwell L (eds) Current Knowledge of Didymosphenia geminata: Developing a Research and Management Response. Conference proceedings: Federation of Fly Fishers and EPA Region 8, held in association with Western Division American Fisheries Society Annual Meeting, May 15–16: 2006, vol 29. Montana State University, Montana, USA, p 26Google Scholar
  79. Whitton BA, Ellwood NTW, Kawecka B (2009) Biology of the freshwater diatom Didymosphenia: a review. Hydrobiologia 630:1–37. doi: 10.1007/s10750-009-9753-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Winterbourn MJ (2005) Rivers and Streams of New Zealand. In: Cushing CE, Cummins KW, Minshall GW (eds) River and stream ecosystems of the world. University of California Press, USAGoogle Scholar
  81. Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Biological SciencesUniversity of CanterburyChristchurchNew Zealand
  2. 2.National Institute of Atmospheric and Water ResearchChristchurchNew Zealand
  3. 3.Department of ConservationChristchurchNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations