Skip to main content
Log in

Incorporating invertebrate predators into theory regarding the timing of invertebrate drift

  • Published:
Aquatic Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Theory concerning the timing of lotic invertebrate drift suggests that daytime-feeding fish cause invertebrates to restrict their drift behavior to the nighttime. However, there is growing evidence that the nighttime foraging of invertebrate predators also contributes to the nocturnal timing of drift, though it is unclear whether the nocturnal behavior of invertebrate predators is innate or proximately caused by fish. In two experiments, one conducted in a fish-bearing stream and a second in a fishless stream, we compared the drift patterns of Baetidae (Ephemeroptera) from channels with and without benthic invertebrate predators. We tested whether invertebrate predators affect the timing of drift, either as a proximate cause of nocturnal drift in the fishless stream (diel periodicity) or as a proximate cause of a pre-dawn peak in drift in the fish-bearing stream (nocturnal periodicity). In the fish-bearing stream experiment, a pre-dawn increase of baetid drift occurred independently of invertebrate predators, indicating that invertebrate predators were not the proximate cause of nocturnal periodicity in the stream. In the fishless stream experiment, invertebrate predators caused more baetid drift at night than during the day, indicating that invertebrate predators caused the nocturnal drift pattern we observed in the stream, and that invertebrate predators can influence drift timing independently of fish. Therefore, we suggest that both visually feeding fish and nocturnally foraging benthic predators, when present, affect the timing of invertebrate drift; visually feeding fish by reducing daytime drift, and benthic predators by increasing nighttime drift.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan JD (1978) Trout predation and the size composition of stream drift. Limnol Oceanogr 23:1231–1237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allan JD, Castillo MM (2007) Stream ecology: structure and function of running waters. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Corkum LD, Pointing P (1979) Nymphal development of Baetis vagans McDunnough (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae) and drift habits of large nymphs. Can J Zool 57:2348–2354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culp JM, Wrona FJ, Davies RW (1986) Response of stream benthos and drift to fine sediment deposition vs. transport. Can J Zool 64:1345–1351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culp JM, Glozier NE, Scrimegour GJ (1991) Reduction of predation risk under the cover of darkness: avoidance responses of mayfly larvae to a benthic fish. Oecologia 86:163–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas PL, Forrester GE, Cooper SD (1994) Effects of trout on the diel periodicity of drifting in baetid mayflies. Oecologia 98:48–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott JM (1967) The life histories and drifting of the Plecoptera and Ephemeroptera in a dartmoor stream. J Anim Ecol 36:343–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott JM (1973) The diel activity pattern, drifting and food of the leech Erpobdella octoculata (L.) (Hirudinea: Erpobdellidae) in a lake district stream. J Anim Ecol 42:449–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott JM (2000) Contrasting diel activity and feeding patterns of four species of carnivorous stoneflies. Ecol Entomol 25:26–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott JM (2005) Contrasting diel activity and feeding patterns of four instars of Rhyacophila dorsalis (Trichoptera). Freshw Biol 50:1022–1033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott JM, Humpesch U (2010) Mayfly larvae (Ephemeroptera) of Britain and Ireland: keys and a review of their ecology. Windermere: Freshw Biol Assoc 66:152

    Google Scholar 

  • Flecker AS (1992) Fish predation and the evolution of invertebrate drift periodicity: evidence from Neotropical streams. Ecology 73:438–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbins C, Vericat D, Batalla RJ (2007) When is stream invertebrate drift catastrophic? The role of hydraulics and sediment transport in initiating drift during flood events. Freshw Biol 52:2369–2384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilliam JF, Fraser DF (1987) Habitat selection under predation hazard: test of a model with foraging minnows. Ecology 68:1856–1862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurevitch J, Chester S (1986) Analysis of repeated measures experiments. Ecology 67:251–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinterleitner-Anderson D, Hershey AE, Schuldt JA (1992) The effects of river fertilization on mayfly (Baetis sp.) drift patterns and population density in an arctic river. Hydrobiologia 240:247–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huhta A, Muotka T, Juntunen A, Yrjonen M (1999) Behavioural interactions in stream food webs: the case of drift-feeding fish, predatory invertebrates and grazing mayflies. J Anim Ecol 68:917–927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huhta A, Muotka T, Tikkanen P (2000) Nocturnal drift of mayfly nymphs as a post-contact antipredator mechanism. Freshw Biol 45:33–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins TM Jr, Diehl S, Kratz KW, Cooper SD (1999) Effects of population density on individual growth of brown trout in streams. Ecology 80:941–956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen M, Elliott JM, Klemetsen A (2000) Diel fluctuations of invertebrate drift in a Norwegian stream north of the Arctic Circle. Nor J Entomol 47:101–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler SL (1985) Identification of stream drift mechanisms: an experimental and observational approach. Ecology 66:1749–1761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kratz KW (1996) Effects of stoneflies on local prey populations: mechanisms of impact across prey density. Ecology 77:1573–1585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malmqvist B, Sjöström P (1987) Stream drift as a consequence of disturbance by invertebrate predators. Oecologia 74:396–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh AR, Peckarsky BL (1996) Differential behavioural responses of mayflies from streams with and without fish to trout odour. Freshw Biol 35:141–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh AR, Peckarsky BL (1999) Criteria determining behavioural responses to multiple predators by a stream mayfly. Oikos 85:554–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh AR, Peckarsky BL, Taylor BW (2002) The influence of predatory fish on mayfly drift: extrapolating from experiments to nature. Freshw Biol 47:1497–1513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merritt RW, Cummins KW, Berg MB (2008) An introduction to the aquatic insects of North America, 4th edn. Kendall/Hunt, Dubuque

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe NB, Fraser NHC, Burns MD (1999) Food availability and the nocturnal vs. diurnal foraging trade off in juvenile salmon. J Anim Ecol 68:371–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller K (1963) Diurnal rhythm in “organic drift” of Gammarus pulex. Nature 198:806–807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peckarsky BL (1980) Predator-prey interactions between stoneflies and mayflies: behavioral observations. Ecology 61:932–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peckarsky BL, Cowan CA (1995) Microhabitat and activity periodicity of predatory stoneflies and their mayfly prey in a western Colorado stream. Oikos 74:513–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poff NL, Ward JV (1991) Drift responses of benthic invertebrates to experimental streamflow variation in a hydrologically stable stream. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 48:1926–1936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reisen WK, Prins R (1972) Some ecological relationships of the invertebrate drift in Praters Creek, Pickens County, South Carolina. Ecology 53:876–884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz R, Liess M (1999) A field study of the effects of agriculturally derived insecticide input on stream macroinvertebrate dynamics. Aquat Toxicol 46:155–176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Siler ER, Wallace JB, Eggert SL (2001) Long-term effects of resource limitation on stream invertebrate drift. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:1624–1637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka H (1960) On the daily change of the drifting of benthic animals in stream, especially on the types of daily change in taxonomic groups of insects. Bull Freshw Fish Res Lab Tokyo 9:13–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Tikkanen P, Muotka T, Huhta A (1994) Predator detection and avoidance by lotic mayfly nymphs of different size. Oecologia 99:252–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tikkanen P, Muotka T, Huhta A, Juntunen A (1997) The roles of active predator choice and prey vulnerability in determining the diet of predatory stonefly (Plecoptera) nymphs. J Anim Ecol 66:36–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters TF (1962) Diurnal periodicity in the drift of stream invertebrates. Ecology 43:316–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiley MJ, Kohler SL (1981) An assessment of biological interactions in an epilithic stream community using time-lapse cinematography. Hydrobiologia 78:183–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Patrick Grof-Tisza for carrying equipment into Observation Basin and his helpful comments on the manuscript. Sharon Lawler, Bruce D. Hammock, David Herbst, Joseph Kiernan, Michael Monaghan, and several anonymous reviewers also provided helpful comments. We thank Harold Werner and Sequoia-Kings Canyon National Park for permission to conduct research in the park. Funding for the research was provided by grants from the University of California Valentine Eastern Sierra Reserve and California Fly Fishers Unlimited (the Bob Bittner Scholarship).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruce G. Hammock.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Dr. Michael T. Monaghan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hammock, B.G., Krigbaum, N.Y. & Johnson, M.L. Incorporating invertebrate predators into theory regarding the timing of invertebrate drift. Aquat Ecol 46, 153–163 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-012-9388-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-012-9388-x

Keywords

Navigation