Aquatic Ecology

, Volume 45, Issue 1, pp 35–41 | Cite as

Predator-dependent diel migration by Halocaridina rubra shrimp (Malacostraca: Atyidae) in Hawaiian anchialine pools

  • Cayelan C. Carey
  • Moana P. Ching
  • Sarah M. Collins
  • Angela M. Early
  • William W. Fetzer
  • David Chai
  • Nelson G. HairstonJr.
Article

Abstract

Diel migration is a common predator avoidance mechanism commonly found in temperate water bodies and increasingly in tropical systems. Previous research with only single day and night samples suggested that the endemic shrimp, Halocaridina rubra, may exhibit diel migration in Hawaiian anchialine pools to avoid predation by introduced mosquito fish, Gambusia affinis, and perhaps reverse migration to avoid the predatory invasive Tahitian prawn, Macrobrachium lar. To examine this phenomenon in greater detail, we conducted a diel study of H. rubra relative abundance and size at 2-h intervals in three anchialine pools that varied in predation regime on the Kona-Kohala Coast of Hawai‘i Island. We found two distinct patterns of diel migration. In two pools dominated by visually feeding G. affinis, the abundance of H. rubra present on the pool bottom or swimming in the water column was very low during the day, increased markedly at sunset and remained high until dawn. In contrast, in a pool dominated by the nocturnal predator M. lar, H. rubra density was significantly lower during the night than during the day (i.e., a pattern opposite to that of shrimp in pools containing fish). In addition, we observed that the mean body size of the shrimp populations varied among pools depending upon predator type and abundance, but did not vary between day and night in any pools. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that H. rubra diel migratory behavior and size distributions are influenced by predation regime and suggest that diel migration may be a flexible strategy for predator avoidance in tropical pools where it may be a significant adaptive response of endemic species to introduced predators.

Keywords

Gambusia affinis Macrobrachiumlar Mosquito fish ‘Opae‘ula Predator avoidance Tropical pools 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank M. Hamabata and the Kohala Center, Waimea, Hawai‘i, for enthusiastic and generous support. The Cornell University Biogeochemistry and Biocomplexity Initiative and NSF IGERT (DGE 0221658), the Kipuka Native Hawaiian Student Center, and the Center in Tropical Ecology and Evolution in Marine and Terrestrial Environments (NSF CREST 0833211) provided funding. The staff of the Hualalai Resort were extremely accommodating during sampling visits. C. M. Kearns assisted with sample analysis, and members of the Cornell Graduate Field Course in Tropical Ecology helped in the field and provided suggestions on our project.

References

  1. Aguilera X, Crespo G, Declerck S, De Meester L (2006) Diel vertical migration of zooplankton in tropical, high mountain lakes (Andes, Bolivia). Pol J Ecol 54:453–464Google Scholar
  2. Bailey-Brock JH, Brock RE (1993) Feeding, reproduction, and sense organs of the Hawaiian anchialine shrimp Halocaridina rubra (Atyidae). Pac Sci 47:338–355Google Scholar
  3. Bezerra-Neto JF, Pinto-Coelho RM (2007) Diel vertical migration of the copepod Thermocyclops inversus (Kiefer, 1936) in a tropical reservoir: the role of oxygen and the spatial overlap with Chaoborus. Aquat Ecol 41:535–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boscarino BT, Rudstam LG, Loew ER, Mills EL (2009) Predicting the vertical distribution of the opossum shrimp, Mysis relicta, in Lake Ontario: a test of laboratory-based light preferences. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 66:101–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brock VE (1960) The introduction of aquatic animals into Hawaiian waters. Internat Rev Ges Hydrobiol 45:463–480Google Scholar
  6. Brock RE (1987) Status of the anchialine pond system of the Kona-Hawaii Coast. B Mar Sci 41:633–634Google Scholar
  7. Brock RE, Kam AKH (1997) Biological and water quality characterization of anchialine resources in Kaloko-Honokohua. National Park Resources Studies Unit, University of Hawai‘i Tech Rep 112Google Scholar
  8. Burks RL, Lodge DM, Jeppesen E, Lauridsen TL (2002) Diel horizontal migration of zooplankton: costs and benefits of inhabiting the littoral. Freshw Biol 47:343–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Capps KA, Turner CB, Booth MT, Lombardozzi DL, McArt SH, Chai D, Hairston NG (2009) Behavioral responses of the endemic shrimp Halocaridina rubra (Malacostraca: Atyidae) to an introduced fish, Gambusia affinis (Actinopterygii: Poeciliidae) and implications for the trophic structure of Hawaiian anchialine ponds. Pac Sci 63:27–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chai DK, Cuddihy LW, Stone CP (1989) An inventory and assessment of anchialine pools in Hawaii Volcanoes National Park from Waha’uia to Ka’aha, Puna and Ka’u, Hawai‘i. National Park Resources Study Unit, University of Hawai‘i Tech Rep 69Google Scholar
  11. Dawidowicz P, Pijanowska J, Ciechomski K (1990) Vertical migration of Chaoborus larvae is induced by the presence of fish. Limnol Oceanogr 35:1631–1637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Decaestecker E, DeMeester L, Ebert D (2002) In deep trouble: habitat selection constrained by multiple enemies in zooplankton. P Natl Acad Sci USA 99:5481–5485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gaudreau N, Boisclair D (2000) Influence of moon phase on acoustic estimates of the abundance of fish performing daily horizontal migration in a small oligotrophic lake. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 57:581–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gliwicz ZM (1986) A lunar cycle in zooplankton. Ecology 67:883–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gonzalez MJ (1998) Spatial segregation between rotifers and cladocerans mediated by Chaoborus. Hydrobiologia 388:427–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hairston NG (1980) The vertical distribution of diaptomid copepods in relation to body pigmentation. In: Kerfoot WC (ed) Evolution and ecology of zooplankton communities. University Press of New England, HanoverGoogle Scholar
  17. Hairston NG, Hairston NG (1993) Cause-effect relationships in energy-flow, trophic structure, and interspecific interactions. Am Nat 142:379–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hambright KD, Drenner RW, McComas SR, Hairston NG (1991) Gape-limited piscivores, planktivore size refuges, and the trophic cascade hypothesis. Archiv Hydrobiol 121:389–404Google Scholar
  19. Haupt F, Stockenreiter M, Baumgartner M, Boersma M, Stibor H (2009) Daphnia diel vertical migration: implications beyond zooplankton. J Plankton Res 31:515–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Holthius LB (1963) On red coloured shrimps (Decapoda, Caridea) from tropical land-locked saltwater pools. Zool Meded 38:261–279Google Scholar
  21. Holthius LB (1973) Caridean shrimps found in land-locked saltwater pools at four Indo-West Pacific localities (Sinai Peninsula, Funafuti Atoll, Maui and Hawaii islands), with the description of one new genus and four new species. Zool Verh 128:1–48Google Scholar
  22. Irvine K (1997) Food selectivity and diel vertical distribution of Chaoborus edulis (Diptera, Chaoboridae) in Lake Malawi. Freshwater Biol 37:605–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kanayama RK (1967) Hawaii’s aquatic animal introductions. Proc Annu Conf W Assoc St Game Fish Comm 47:123–131Google Scholar
  24. Lampert W (1989) The adaptive significance of diel vertical migration of zooplankton. Funct Ecol 3:21–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lass S, Spaak P (2003) Chemically induced anti-predator defences in plankton: a review. Hydrobiologia 491:221–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Leech DM, Williamson CE (2001) In situ exposure to UV radiation alters the depth distribution of Daphnia. Limnol Oceanogr 46:416–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Leech DM, Padeletti A, Williamson CE (2005) Zooplankton behavioral responses to solar UV radiation vary within and among lakes. J Plankton Res 27:461–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Loose CJ, Dawidowicz P (1994) Trade-offs in diel vertical migration by zooplankton- the costs of predator avoidance. Ecology 75:2255–2263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Maciolek JA, Brock RE (1974) Aquatic survey of Kona coast ponds, Hawai‘i Island. Sea Grant Advis Rep AR-74-04 US Dept Commerce and Hawai‘i Coop Fish Unit, Honolulu, HIGoogle Scholar
  30. Ohman MD, Frost BW, Cohen EB (1983) Reverse diel vertical migration- an escape from invertebrate predators. Science 220:1404–1407CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Ramos-Jiliberto R, Zuniga LR (2001) Depth-selection patterns and diel vertical migration of Daphnia ambigua (Crustacea: Cladocera) in lake El Plateado. Rev Chil Hist Nat 74:573–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rhode SC, Pawlowski M, Tollrian R (2001) The impact of ultraviolet radiation on the vertical distribution of zooplankton of the genus Daphnia. Nature 412:69–72CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Stearns SC (1983) A natural experiment in life-history evolution–field data on the introduction of mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis) to Hawaii. Evolution 37:601–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tjossem SF (1990) Effects of fish chemical cues on vertical migration behavior of Chaoborus. Limnol Oceanogr 35:1456–1468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Voss S, Mumm H (1999) Where to stay by night and day: size-specific and seasonal differences in horizontal and vertical distribution of Chaoborus flavicans larvae. Freshwater Biol 42:201–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Winder M, Boersma M, Spaak P (2003) On the cost of vertical migration: are feeding conditions really worse at greater depths? Freshwater Biol 48:383–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zaret TM, Suffern JS (1976) Vertical migration in zooplankton as a predator avoidance mechanism. Limnol Oceanogr 21:804–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cayelan C. Carey
    • 1
  • Moana P. Ching
    • 2
  • Sarah M. Collins
    • 1
  • Angela M. Early
    • 1
  • William W. Fetzer
    • 3
  • David Chai
    • 4
  • Nelson G. HairstonJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Corson HallCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  2. 2.Pacific Aquaculture and Coastal Resources CenterUniversity of Hawai‘i–HiloHiloUSA
  3. 3.Cornell Biological Field Station, Department of Natural ResourcesCornell UniversityBridgeportUSA
  4. 4.Kailua-KonaUSA

Personalised recommendations