Advertisement

Adsorption

, Volume 24, Issue 5, pp 443–458 | Cite as

Interaction of sulfur trioxide molecules with armchair and zigzag stanene-based nanotubes: electronic properties exploration by DFT calculations

  • Amirali Abbasi
  • Jaber Jahanbin Sardroodi
Article

Abstract

Using the density functional theory calculations, we investigated the electronic properties of the armchair (6, 6) and (8, 8) and zigzag (8, 0) stanene based nanotubes as promising sensing materials for SO3 molecules. We analyzed the structural and electronic properties of the adsorption system including the adsorption energies, band structures and projected density of states. We examined both molecular and dissociative adsorption of SO3 on the aforementioned nanotubes. Different orientation of the SO3 molecule towards the nanotube gives rise to the different adsorption configurations. The results suggest that the molecular adsorption of SO3 on the nanotubes is more energetically favorable than the dissociative adsorption, indicating that SO3 tends to be molecularly adsorbed on the buckled nanotubes. Besides, the adsorption of SO3 molecule on the (8, 8) nanotube is much more favorable in energy than the adsorption on the (6, 6) one, suggesting that (8, 8) stanene based nanotube can react with SO3 molecule more efficiently. The considerable adsorption energy values indicate that SO3 molecule chemisorbed on the stanene based nanotubes. This is well confirmed by the large overlaps between the PDOS spectra of the interacting atoms. Mulliken charge analysis reveals a noticeable charge transfer from the stanene based nanotube to the adsorbed gas molecule, suggesting that SO3 acts as a charge acceptor. The calculated band gaps for the armchair (6, 6) and (8, 8) nanotubes are 0.33 and 0.24 eV, respectively while that of zigzag (8, 0) is estimated to be 0.207 eV, which indicate the semiconductor characteristics of the mentioned nanotubes. By analyzing the gas sensing response, we found that the stanene based nanotube would be promising SO3 sensor device. Our obtained results thus provide a theoretical basis for future fabrications of highly efficient sensing materials.

Keywords

Density functional theory PDOS SO3 Stanene based nanotube Band structure 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University.

References

  1. Abbasi, A., Sardroodi, J.J.: N-doped TiO2 anatase nanoparticles as a highly sensitive gas sensor for NO2 detection: insights from DFT computations. Environ. Sci. Nano 3, 1153–1164 (2016a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abbasi, A., Sardroodi, J.J.: Theoretical study of the adsorption of NOx on TiO2/MoS2 nanocomposites: a comparison between undoped and N-doped nanocomposites. J. Nanostruct. Chem. 6, 309–327 (2016b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abbasi, A., Sardroodi, J.J.: Modified N-doped TiO2 anatase nanoparticle as an ideal O3 gas sensor: Insights from density functional theory calculations. Comput. Theor. Chem. 1095, 15–28 (2016c)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Abbasi, A., Sardroodi, J.J.: Molecular design of O3 and NO2 sensor devices based on a novel heterostructured N-doped TiO2/ZnO nanocomposite: a van der Waals corrected DFT study. J Nanostruct. Chem. 7, 345–358 (2017a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Abbasi, A., Sardroodi, J.J.: Prediction of a highly sensitive molecule sensor for SOx detection based on TiO2/MoS2 nanocomposites: a DFT study. J. Sulfur Chem. 38(1), 52–68 (2017b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Abbasi, A., Sardroodi, J.J.: A novel strategy for SOx removal by N-doped TiO2/WSe2 nanocomposite as a highly efficient molecule sensor investigated by van der Waals corrected DFT. Comput. Theor. Chem. 1114, 8–19 (2017c)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Abbasi, A., Sardroodi, J.J.: An innovative gas sensor system designed from a sensitive nanostructured ZnO for the selective detection of SOx molecules: a density functional theory study. New J. Chem. 41, 12569–12580 (2017d)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Abbasi, A., Sardroodi, J.J.: Adsorption and dissociation of SO3 on N-doped TiO2 supported Au overlayers investigated by van der Waals corrected DFT. Surf. Sci. 663, 35–46 (2017e)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Abbasi, A., Sardroodi, J.J.: Investigation of the adsorption of ozone molecules on TiO2/WSe2 nanocomposites by DFT computations: applications to gas sensor devices. Appl. Surf. Sci. 436, 27–41 (2018a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Abbasi, A., Sardroodi, J.J.: Adsorption of toxic SOx molecules on heterostructured TiO2/ZnO nanocomposites for gas sensing applications: a DFT study. Adsorption 24, 29–41 (2018b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Abbasi, A., Sardroodi, J.J.: Density functional theory investigation of the interactions between the buckled stanene nanosheet and XO2 gases (X = N, S, C). Comput. Theor. Chem. 1125, 15–28 (2018c)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Abbasi, A., Sardroodi, J.J., Ebrahimzadeh, A.R., Yaghoobi, M.: Theoretical study of the structural and electronic properties of novel stanene-based buckled nanotubes and their adsorption behaviors. Appl. Surf. Sci. 435, 733–742 (2018d)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bianco, E., Butler, S., Jiang, S., Restrepo, O.D., Windl, W., Joshua, E.: Stability and exfoliation of germanane: a germanium graphane analogue. ACS Nano 7, 4414–4421 (2013)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Castro Neto, A.H., Guinea, F., Peres, N.M.R., Novoselov, K.S., Geim, A.K.: The electronic properties of graphene. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 109–162 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chen, X., Tan, C., Yang, Q., Meng, R., Liang, Q., Cai, M., Zhang, S., Jiang, J.: Ab initio study of the adsorption of small molecules on stanene. J. Phys. Chem. C, 120(26), 13987–13994 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fleming, S., Rohi, A.: GDIS: a visualization program for molecular and periodic systems. Z. Kristallograph. Crystal. Mater. 220, 580–584 (2005)Google Scholar
  17. Grimme, S.: Semiempirical GGA-type density functional constructed with a long-range dispersion correction. J. Comput. Chem. 27(15), 1787–1799 (2006)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hohenberg, P., Kohn, W.: Inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys. Rev. 136, B864 (1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kaloni, T.P., Schwingenschlögl, U.: Stability of germanene under tensile strain. Phys. Lett. 583, 137–140 (2013)Google Scholar
  20. Kohn, W., Sham, L.: Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects. Phys. Rev. 140, A1133 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Koklj, A.: Computer graphics and graphical user interfaces as tools in simulations of matter at the atomic scale. Comput. Mater. Sci. 28, 155–168 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lee, C., Wei, X., Kysar, J.W., Hone, J.: Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science 321, 385–388 (2008)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Li, S.S., Zhang, C.W.: Tunable electronic structures and magnetic properties in two-dimensional stanene with hydrogenation. Mater. Chem. Phys. 173, 246–254 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Manjanath, A., Kumar, V., Singh, A.K.: Mechanical and electronic properties of pristine and Ni-doped Si, Ge, and Sn sheets. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 1667–1671 (2014)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Modarresi, M., Kakoee, A., Mogulkoc, Y., Roknabadi, M.R.: Effect of external strain on electronic structure of stanene. Comput. Mater. Sci. 101, 164–167 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Momma, K., Izumi, F.: VESTA 3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 44, 1272–1276 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Neto, A.C., Guinea, F., Peres, N.M., Novoselov, K.S., Geim, A.K.: The electronic properties of graphene. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 109 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Odom, T.W., Huang, J.-L., Kim, P., Lieber, C.M.: Atomic structure and electronic properties of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Nature 391, 62–64 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ozaki, T.: Variationally optimized atomic orbitals for large-scale electronic structures. Phys. Rev. B 67, 155108 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ozaki, T., Kino, H.: Variationally optimized basis orbitals for biological molecules. J. Chem. Phys. 121, 10879–10888 (2004a)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Ozaki, T., Kino, H.: Numerical atomic basis orbitals from H to Kr. Phys. Rev. B 69, 195113 (2004b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Perdew, J.P., Burke, K., Ernzerhof, M.: Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1396 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schneider, W.F., Li, J., Hass, K.C.: Combined computational and experimental investigation of SOx adsorption on MgO. J. Phys. Chem. B 105, 6972–6979 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schwierz, F.: Graphene transistors. Nat. Nanotechnol. 5, 487–496 (2010)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Tang, S., Cao, Z.: Adsorption of nitrogen oxides on graphene and graphene oxides: insights from density functional calculations. JCP 134, 044710 (2011)Google Scholar
  36. Tang, S., Cao, Z.: Adsorption and dissociation of ammonia on graphene oxides: a first-principles study. J. Phys. Chem. C 116, 8778–8791 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vogt, P., De Padova, P., Quaresima, C., Avila, J., Frantzeskakis, E., Asensio, M.C., Resta, A., Ealet, B., Le Lay, G.: Silicene: compelling experimental evidence for graphenelike two-dimensional silicon. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 155501 (2012)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Xu, Y., Yan, B., Zhang, H.-J., Wang, J., Xu, G., Tang, P., Duan, W., Zhang, S.-C.: Large-gap quantum spin Hall insulators in tin films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 136804 (2013)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhang, X., Gui, Y., Dong, X.: Preparation and application of TiO2 nanotube array gas sensor for SF6-insulated equipment detection: a review. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 11, 302 (2016)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhang, X., Cui, H., Gui, Y., Tang, J.: Mechanism and application of carbon nanotube sensors in SF6 decomposed production detection: a review. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 12, 177 (2017)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhu, F.F., Chen, W.J., Xu, Y., Gao, C.L., Guan, D.D., Liu, C.H., Qian, D., Zhang, S.C., Jia, J.F.: Epitaxial growth of two-dimensional stanene. Nat. Mater. 14, 1020 (2015)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Molecular Simulation Laboratory (MSL)Azarbaijan Shahid Madani UniversityTabrizIran
  2. 2.Computational Nanomaterials Research Group (CNRG)Azarbaijan Shahid Madani UniversityTabrizIran
  3. 3.Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Basic SciencesAzarbaijan Shahid Madani UniversityTabrizIran

Personalised recommendations