Advertisement

Adsorption

, Volume 23, Issue 5, pp 685–697 | Cite as

Orthogonal numerical simulation on multi-factor design for rapid pressure swing adsorption

  • XinGang ZhengEmail author
  • Hua Yao
  • Yun Huang
Article

Abstract

A two-dimensional model is established to simulate the rapid pressure swing adsorption (RPSA) process used for air separation with single bed. The model considers the transport phenomena occurring in both axial and radial direction. The decision variables include five factors (two heights of dead zone, durations of pressurization and adsorption steps, product extraction ratio), and the performance indexes consist of four variables (product purity, product recovery, bed size factor and average volume product yield). Based on an L16 (45) orthogonal design, 16 cases are arranged and the corresponding simulations are performed until the cycle steady states are reached from a given initial state. Range analysis is used to investigate the relative importance of the five factors on each performance index. Each factor’s optimal level and the corresponding combination is found out for each performance index successively.

Keywords

Two-dimensional Rapid/pressure swing adsorption Orthogonal design Dynamic simulation Air separation Oxygen concentrator 

List of symbols

a

Thermal diffusion coefficient, m2 s-1

dp

Diameter of adsorbent particle, m

Dim

Mass dispersion rate, m2 s-1

ef

Total fluid energy, kJ kg-1

ep

Total solid medium energy, kJ kg-1

F

Momentum source term, kg m-2 s-2

Hin

Dead-zone height of feed-in, m

Hout

Dead-zone height of product-end, m

ΔH

Heat of adsorption, J mol-1

Ki

Langmuir parameter, mol kg-1 kPa-1

Kij

Summation of experimental results of factor j at level i

\(\bar{K}_{ij}\)

The average of K ij

k1

Langmuir temperature dependence constant, mol kg-1 kPa-1

k2, k4

Langmuir temperature dependence constant, K

k3

Langmuir temperature dependence constant, kPa-1

k

Mass transfer rate coefficient, s-1

kt

Turbulent kinetic energy, m2 s-2

keff

Effective bed thermal conductivity, W m-2 K

kp

Solid medium thermal conductivity, W m-2 K

kf

Fluid phase thermal conductivity, W m-2 K

\(\dot{m}_{{\text {O}_{2} }}\)

O2-enriched product gas per cycle, lbs moles cycle-1

Mi

Molar weight of component i, kg mol-1

Mw

Molar weight of fluid, kg mol-1

q

Solid-phase adsorbate concentration, mol kg -1

\(q_{feed}\)

Feeding flow rate, kg s-1

qpenetrate

Molar flow rate of gas penetrated, mol s-1

\(\bar{q}_{prod}\)

Average product flow rate, L min-1

\(\bar{q}_{purge}\)

Average purge mass flow rate, kg s-1

q*

Adsorbate concentration in equilibrium with gas phase, mol kg -1

Qpenetrate

Total amount of gas penetrated from the adsorber top per cycle, mol

Qproduct

Total amount of production obtained per cycle, mol

Qpurge

Total mount enriched gas used to purge the adsorber per cycle, mol

r

Radial coordinate, m

R

Gas constant, J mol-1 K-1/ radius of bed, m

Rec

Oxygen recovery

Si

Mass source term of the ith component, kg m-3 s-1

Sm

Total mass source term, kg m-3 s-1

tc

Total cycle time of PSA process, s

T

Temperature, K

Tad

Adsorption time, s

Tdp

Desorption time,s

Tpg

Purge time, s

Tpr

Pressurization time, s

ui

Velocity in the i direction, m s-1

\({\mathbf{u}}\)

Velocity vector, m s-1

w

The total amount of zeolite adsorbent in the system, lbs

y

Distance from the adsorber side wall, m

yi

Mass fraction of component i

yO2

Transient oxygen mole fraction

\(y_{{{\text O}_{2} ,feed}}\)

Oxygen mass fraction in feed-in gas

\(\bar{Y}_{{{\text O}_{2} }}\)

Average oxygen mole fraction of product gas

\(\bar{Y}_{{{ \text O}_{2} ,n}}\)

Average oxygen mole fraction of product gas of the nth cycle

z

Axial coordinate, m

Greek symbols

ε

Porosity of the fixed bed

εt

Dissipation rate of turbulence kinetic energy, m2 s-3

ρp

Density of adsorbent particle, kg m-3

ρf

Fluid density, kg m-3

γ

Product extraction ratio

Subscripts

f

Fluid

p

Particle

r

Radial

i

Species

*

Equilibrium

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the financial support provided by the National Key Technology R&D Program (No. 2015BAA01B02), Ministry of Science and Technology, People’s Republic of China. The authors also thank the anonymous reviewers and the editor for their valuable comments.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 Oxygen contour varying with time inside adsorber .mpeg: This animation shows the oxygen concentration varying with time during 14 cycles. (MOV 11884 KB)

Supplementary material 2 yo2’s variation along axial line.mpeg: This animation shows the axial oxygen concentration’s variation during 14 cycles. (MOV 17918 KB)

Supplementary material 3 yo2’s swing of point pvent.mpeg: This animation shows the oxygen concentration’s swing of point pvent during 14 cycles. (MOV 3036 KB)

Supplementary material 4 pressure’s swing of point pvent.mpeg: This animation shows the pressure’s swing of point pvent during 14 cycles. (MOV 3260 KB)

References

  1. Beck, J., Friedrich, D., Brandani, S., Fraga, E.S.: Multi-objective optimisation using surrogate models for the design of VPSA systems. Comput. Chem. Eng. 82, 318–329 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beh, C.C.K., Webley, P.A.: A practical method for the dynamic determination of the product oxygen concentration in pressure-swing adsorption systems. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 42, 5287–5292 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chai, S.W., Kothare, M.V., Sircar, S.: Rapid pressure swing adsorption for reduction of bed size factor of a medical oxygen concentrator. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 50, 8703–8710 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chai, S.W., Kothare, M.V., Sircar, S.: Numerical study of nitrogen desorption by rapid oxygen purge for a medical oxygen concentrator. Adsorption 18, 87–102 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cruz, P., Magalhães, F.D., Mendes, A.: On the optimization of cyclic adsorption separation processes. AlChE J. 51, 1377–1395 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ergun, S.: Fluid flow through packed columns. Chem. Eng. Prog. 48(2), 89–94 (1952)Google Scholar
  7. Ferreira, D., Boaventura, M., Bárcia, P., Whitley, R.D., Mendes, A.: Two-stage vacuum pressure swing adsorption using AgLiLSX zeolite for producing 99.5+% oxygen from air. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 55, 722–736 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fiandaca, G., Fraga, E.S., Brandani, S.: A multi-objective genetic algorithm for the design of pressure swing adsorption. Eng. Optim. 41, 833–854 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fischer, R., Wanka, E.R., Einhaeupl, F., Voll, K., Schiffl, H., Lang, S.M., Gruss, M., Ferrari, U.: Comparison of portable oxygen concentrators in a simulated airplane environment. Respir. Med. 107, 147–149 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gu, D., Sun, J., Ma, C., Lu, J.: Orthogonal test of self-pumping mechanical seals based on numerical simulation. CIESC J. 66, 2464–2473 (2015) (In chinese with english abstract)Google Scholar
  11. Haghpanah, R., Majumder, A., Nilam, R., Rajendran, A., Farooq, S., Karimi, I.A., Amanullah, M.: Multiobjective optimization of a four-step adsorption process for postcombustion CO2 capture via finite volume simulation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52, 4249–4265 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Khajuria, H., Pistikopoulos, E.N.: Optimization and control of pressure swing adsorption processes under uncertainty. AlChE J. 59, 120–131 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kim, Y.H., Lee, D.G., Moon, D.K., Byeon, S.-H., Ahn, H.W., Lee, C.H.: Effect of bed void volume on pressure vacuum swing adsorption for air separation. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 31, 132–141 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ko, D., Moon, I.: Multiobjective optimization of cyclic adsorption processes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 41, 93–104 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Li, J.: The experimental study of a new pressure equalization step in the pressure swing adsorption cycle of a portable oxygen concentrator. Biomed. Mater. Eng. 24, 1771–1779 (2014)Google Scholar
  16. Li, Y.F., Christophe, J., Anderson, C.J., Xiao, G., Webley, P.A., Hoadley, A.F.A.: Multi-objective optimisation of a hybrid vacuum swing adsorption and low-temperature post-combustion CO2 capture. J. Clean. Prod. 111, 193–203 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu, Y., Sun, F.: Parameter estimation of a pressure swing adsorption model for air separation using multi-objective optimisation and support vector regression model. Expert Syst. Appl. 40, 4496–4502 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Liu, Y.S., Zheng, X.G., Dai, R.F.: Numerical study of flow maldistribution and depressurization strategies in a small-scale axial adsorber. Adsorption 20, 757–768 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rama Rao, V., Kothare, M.V., Sircar, S.: Novel design and performance of a medical oxygen concentrator using a rapid pressure swing adsorption concept. AlChE J. 60, 3330–3335 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rama Rao, V., Kothare, M.V., Sircar, S.: Anatomy of a rapid pressure swing adsorption process performance. AlChE J. 61, 2008–2015 (2015a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rama Rao, V., Wu, C.W., Kothare, M.V., Sircar, S.: Comparative perfomances of two commercial samples of LiLSX zeolite for production of 90% oxygen from air by a novel rapid pressure swing adsorption system. Sep. Sci. Technol. 50, 1447–1452 (2015b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rama Rao, V., Kothare, M.V., Shivaji, S.: Performance of a medical oxygen concentrator using rapid pressure swing adsorption process: effect of feed air pressure. AlChE J. 62, 1212–1215 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rege, S.U., Yang, R.T.: Limits for separation by adsorption with LiX zeolite. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 36(12), 5358–5865 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ruthven, D.M., Farooq, M.S., Knaebel, K.S.: Pressure Swing Adsorption. VCH Publishers, New York (1994)Google Scholar
  25. Sankararao, B., Gupta, S.K.: Multi-objective optimization of pressure swing adsorbers for air separation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 46, 3751–3765 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wei, Z., Wu, C.-S., Ni, Y.: Optimum hydrodynamic design of helical strake on spar platforms based on orthogonal design and CFD method. J. Ship Mech. 17, 1133–1139 (2013) (chinese with english abstract)Google Scholar
  27. Wu, C.-W., Vemula, R.R., Kothare, M.V., Sircar, S.: Experimental study of a novel rapid pressure-swing adsorption based medical oxygen concentrator: effect of the adsorbent selectivity of N2 over O2. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 55, 4676 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Yang, R.T.: Gas Separation by Adsorption Processes. Imperial College Press, London (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yin, S.H., Wu, A.X., Li, X.W.: Orthogonal polar difference analysis for sensitivity of the factors influencing the ore pillar stability. J. China Coal Soc. 37, 48–52 (2012) (chinese with english abstract)Google Scholar
  30. Zheng, X.G., Liu, Y.S., Liu, W.H.: Two-dimensional modeling of the transport phenomena in the adsorber during pressure swing adsorption process. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 49, 11814–11824 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Žilinskas, A., Fraga, E.S., Beck, J., Varoneckas, A.: Visualization of multi-objective decisions for the optimal design of a pressure swing adsorption system. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 142, 151–158 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Process EngineeringChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations