Reversible chemisorption of carbon dioxide: simultaneous production of fuel-cell grade H2 and compressed CO2 from synthesis gas

Abstract

One vision of clean energy for the future is to produce hydrogen from coal in an ultra-clean plant. The conventional route consists of reacting the coal gasification product (after removal of trace impurities) with steam in a water gas shift (WGS) reactor to convert CO to CO2 and H2, followed by purification of the effluent gas in a pressure swing adsorption (PSA) unit to produce a high purity hydrogen product. PSA processes can also be designed to produce a CO2 by-product at ambient pressure. This work proposes a novel concept called “Thermal Swing Sorption Enhanced Reaction (TSSER)” which simultaneously carries out the WGS reaction and the removal of CO2 from the reaction zone by using a CO2 chemisorbent in a single unit operation. The concept directly produces a fuel-cell grade H2 and compressed CO2 as a by-product gas. Removal of CO2 from the reaction zone circumvents the equilibrium limitations of the reversible WGS reaction and enhances its forward rate of reaction. Recently measured sorption-desorption characteristics of two novel, reversible CO2 chemisorbents (K2CO3 promoted hydrotalcite and Na2O promoted alumina) are reviewed and the simulated performance of the proposed TSSER concept using the promoted hydrotalcite as the chemisorbent is reported.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Chakravarti, S., Gupta, A., Hunek, B.: Advanced technology for the capture of CO2 from flue gases, First National Conference on Carbon Sequestration, Washington, DC, May 15–17 (2001)

  2. Chue, K.T., Kim, J.N., Yoo, Y.J., Cho, S.H., Yang, R.T.: Comparison of activated carbon and zeolite 13X for CO2 recovery from flue gas by pressure swing adsorption. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 34, 591–598 (1995)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ding, Y., Alpay, E.: Adsorption-enhanced steam-methane reforming. Chem. Eng. Sci. 55, 3929–3940 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fuderer, A., Rudelstorfer, E.: Selective adsorption of gases. U.S. Patent No 3,986,849 (1976)

  5. Hufton, J.R., Mayorga, S., Sircar, S.: Sorption-enhanced reaction process for hydrogen production. AIChE J. 45, 248–256 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hufton, J.R., Weigel, S.J., Waldron, W.F., Rao, M., Nataraj, S., Sircar, S., Gaffney, T.R.: Sorption enhanced reaction process for production of hydrogen. DOE Report DE-FC36-95G010059 (2000)

  7. IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme: Carbon Dioxide Capture from Power Stations. Cheltenham, United Kingdom (1990)

  8. Karasaki, M., Iijima, M., Shigeaki, M.: Removal of CO2 from flue gases. Japanese Patent No 7,313,840 (1995)

  9. Koros, W.J., Chern, R.T.: Separation of gas mixtures using polymeric membranes. In: Rousseau, R.W. (ed.) Handbook of Separation Process Technology, pp. 862–953. Wiley InterScience, New York (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Leci, C.L., Goldthorpe, S.H.: Assessment of CO2 removal from power station flue gas. Energy Convers. Manag. 33, 477–485 (1992)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee, K.B., Beaver, M.G., Caram, H.S., Sircar, S.: Novel thermal swing sorption enhanced reaction process concept for hydrogen production by low temperature steam methane reforming. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 46, 5003–5014 (2007a)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee, K.B., Verdooren, A., Caram, H.S., Sircar, S.: Chemisorption of carbon dioxide on potassium-carbonate-promoted hydrotalcite. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 308, 30–39 (2007b)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee, K.B., Beaver, M.G., Caram, H.S., Sircar, S.: Chemisorption of carbon dioxide on sodium oxide promoted alumina. AIChE J. (2007c, in press)

  14. Levenspiel, O.: Chemical Reaction Engineering: An Introduction to the Design of Reactors. Wiley, New York (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Matsumoto, H., Kitamura, H., Kamata, T., Nishikawa, N., Ishibashi, M.: Fundamental study of CO2 removal from thermal power plant flue gas by hollow-fiber gas-liquid contactor. Kagaku Kogaku Ronbun. 18, 804–812 (1992)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mimura, T., Shimojo, S., Suda, T., Iijima, M., Mitsuoka, S.: Research and development on energy saving technology for flue gas carbon dioxide recovery and steam system in power plant. Energy Convers. Manag. 36, 397–400 (1995)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. National Research Council and National Academy of Engineering: The Hydrogen Economy: Opportunities, Costs, Barriers, and R&D Needs. The National Academic Press, Washington (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Qunying, J., Sixun, L.: Method for continuously gasifying coal (coke) and purifying synthesis gas. Chinese Patent No 1,156,754 (1997)

  19. Rase, H.F.: Chemical Reactor Design for Process Plants. Wiley, New York (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rosen, M.A., Scott, D.S.: An energy-exergy analysis of the Koppers-Totzek process for producing hydrogen from coal. Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. 12, 837–845 (1987)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Schlinger, W.G., Kolaian, J.H., Quintana, M.E., Dorawala, T.G.: Texaco coal gasification process for production of clean synthesis gas from coke. Energy Prog. 5, 234–238 (1985)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sircar, S.: Separation of multi-component gas mixtures. U.S. Patent No 4,077,779 (1979)

  23. Sircar, S.: Separation of methane and carbon dioxide gas mixtures by pressure swing adsorption. Sep. Sci. Technol. 23, 519–529 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sircar, S., Golden, C.M.A.: PSA process for removal of bulk CO2 from a wet high temperature gas. U.S. Patent No 6,322,612 (2001)

  25. Sircar, S., Kratz, W.C.: Simultaneous production of hydrogen and carbon dioxide from steam reformer off-gas by pressure swing adsorption. Sep. Sci. Technol. 23, 2397–2415 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sircar, S., Kumar, R., Anselmo, K.J.: Effects of column non-isothermality or non-adiabaticity on the adsorption breakthrough curves. Ind. Eng. Chem. Proc. Des. Dev. 22, 10–15 (1983)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sircar, S., Hufton, J.R., Nataraj, S.: Process and apparatus for the production of hydrogen by steam reforming of hydrocarbon. U.S. Patent No 6,103,143 (2000)

  28. Stiegel, G.J., Ramezan, M.: An overview of the U.S. Department of Energy’s gasification technology program. ACS Symp. Div. Fuel Chem. 48, 402–404 (2003)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Viaswinkel, E.E., Posthuma, S.A., Zuideveld, P.L.: The Shell gasification technology offers clean solutions for refineries and utility companies. Inst. Chem. Eng. Symp. Ser. 143, 81–90 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Waldron, W.E., Hufton, J.R., Sircar, S.: Production of hydrogen by cyclic sorption enhanced reaction process. AIChE J. 47, 1477–1479 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Xu, J.G., Froment, G.F.: Methane steam reforming, methanation, and water gas shift: I. Intrinsic kinetics. AIChE J. 35, 88–96 (1989)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Sircar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, K.B., Beaver, M.G., Caram, H.S. et al. Reversible chemisorption of carbon dioxide: simultaneous production of fuel-cell grade H2 and compressed CO2 from synthesis gas. Adsorption 13, 385–397 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10450-007-9018-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Thermal swing sorption enhanced reaction
  • Chemisorption
  • Hydrogen
  • Carbon dioxide
  • Promoted hydrotalcite
  • Promoted alumina