Advertisement

Examining U.S. and Japanese College Students’ Differences in Psychological Distress: the Mediating Roles of Valued Action and Experiential Avoidance

  • Chad E. Drake
  • Akihiko Masuda
  • David Dalsky
  • Kimberly T. Stevens
  • Sam Kramer
  • Sunni J. Primeaux
  • Takashi Muto
  • Takashi Mitamura
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 96 Downloads

Abstract

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is a counseling modality that features values clarification interventions. However, a well-established ACT-consistent measure of values for practitioners and researchers is lacking. The present study, therefore, examined an exploratory measure called the Valued Time and Difficulty Questionnaire (VTDQ; Wilson et al. 2010) and investigated the possible explanatory role of multiple ACT constructs on psychological distress. Obtained cross-national differences with a sample of 188 U.S. and 223 Japanese students were consistent with previous research. Moreover, a multiple mediator model revealed significant indirect effects of VTDQ subscale scores for time and difficulty on the association between culture and symptoms.

Keywords

Values Experiential avoidance Psychological flexibility Distress Cultural differences 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Abe, J. A. (2004). Self-esteem, perception of relationships, and emotional distress: a cross-cultural study. Personal Relationships, 11(2), 231–247.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2004.00080.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arch, J. J., Wolitzky-Taylor, K. B., Eifert, G. H., & Craske, M. G. (2012). Longitudinal treatment mediation of traditional cognitive behavioral therapy and acceptance and commitment therapy for anxiety disorders. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 50(7–8), 469–478.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2012.04.007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. A-Tjak, J. L., Davis, M. L., Morina, N., Powers, M. B., Smits, J. J., & Emmelkamp, P. G. (2015). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of acceptance and commitment therapy for clinically relevant mental and physical health problems. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 84(1), 30–36.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000365764.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bond, F. W., Hayes, S. C., Baer, R. A., Carpenter, K. M., Guenole, N., Orcutt, H. K., … & Zettle, R. D. (2011). Preliminary psychometric properties of the acceptance and action questionnaire–II: a revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance. Behavior Therapy, 42(4), 676–688. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2011.03.007.
  6. Chambless, D. L., & Klonsky, E. D. (2013). Compendium of empirically supported treatments. In G. P. Koocher, J. C. Norcross, B. A. Greene, G. P. Koocher, J. C. Norcross, & B. A. Greene (Eds.), Psychologists’ desk reference (pp. 159–166). New York: Oxford University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1093/med:psych/9780199845491.003.0031.
  7. Chambless, D. L., Crits-Christoph, P., Wampold, B. E., Norcross, J. C., Lambert, M. J., Bohart, C., & … Johannsen, B. E. (2006). What should be validated?. In J. C. Norcross, L. E. Beutler, R. F. Levant, J. C. Norcross, L. E. Beutler, R. F. Levant (Eds.), Evidence-based practices in mental health: Debate and dialogue on the fundamental questions (pp. 191–256). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/11265-005.
  8. Chen, C., Lee, S. Y., & Stevenson, H. W. (1995). Response style and cross-cultural comparisons of rating scales among East Asian and North American students. Psychological Science, 6(3), 170–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cheng, J. K. Y., & Sue, S. (2014). Addressing cultural and ethnic minority issues in the acceptance and mindfulness movement. In A. Masuda (Ed.), Mindfulness and acceptance in multicultural competency: A contextual approach to sociocultural diversity in theory and practice (pp. 21–37). Oakland: Context Press/New Harbinger Publications.Google Scholar
  10. Cheng, D., Leong, F. T., & Geist, R. (1993). Cultural differences in psychological distress between Asian and Caucasian American college students. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 21(3), 182–190.  https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1912.1993.tb00598.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dahl, J. C., Plumb, J. C., Stewart, I., & Lundgren, T. (2009). The art and science of valuing in psychotherapy: Helping clients discover, explore, and commit to valued action using acceptance and commitment therapy. Oakland: New Harbinger Publications.Google Scholar
  12. Drake, C. E. (2017). VTDQ and AAQ cross-cultural comparison database. Retrieved from osf.io/ft7jh.Google Scholar
  13. Drake, C. E., & Keusch, A. (2012). The assessment of valuing among undergraduates: Importance, time, difficulty, and anxiety. Presentation at the meeting for the Association for Behavior Analysis, Seattle.Google Scholar
  14. Flaxman, P. E., & Bond, F. W. (2010). Worksite stress management training: moderated effects and clinical significance. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15(4), 347–358.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020522.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Goldberg, D. P. (1978). Manual of the general health questionnaire. Windsor: NFER Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  16. Hayes, A. F., & Preacher, K. J. (2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67(3), 451–470.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12028.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hayes, S. C., Wilson, K. G., Gifford, E. V., Follette, V. M., & Strosahl, K. (1996). Experiential avoidance and behavioral disorders: a functional dimensional approach to diagnosis and treatment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64(6), 1152–1168.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.64.6.1152.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., Wilson, K. G., Bissett, R. T., Pistorello, J., Toarmino, D., … & McCurry, S. M. (2004). Measuring experiential avoidance: a preliminary test of a working model. The Psychological Record, 54(4), 553–578.Google Scholar
  19. Hayes, S. C., Luoma, J. B., Bond, F. W., Masuda, A., & Lillis, J. (2006). Acceptance and commitment therapy: model, processes and outcomes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44(1), 1–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hayes, S. C., Villatte, M., Levin, M., & Hildebrandt, M. (2011). Open, aware, and active: contextual approaches as an emerging trend in the behavioral and cognitive therapies. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 7141–168. doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032210-104449.
  21. Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (2012). Acceptance and commitment therapy: The process and practice of mindful change. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hill, C. E. (2012). Shopping around for theories for counseling psychology practice: reaction. The Counseling Psychologist, 40(7), 1061–1069.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000012443289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Iwawaki, S., Zax, M., & Mitsuoka, S. (1969). Extremity of response among Japanese and American children. Journal of Social Psychology, 79, 257–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Khan, J. A., & Cross, D. G. (1983). Mental health professional and client values: similar or different? Australian Journal of Sex, Marriage & Family, 4(2), 71–78.Google Scholar
  25. Kinnier, R. T. (1995). A reconceptualization of values clarification: values conflict resolution. Journal of Counseling & Development, 74(1), 18–24.  https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1995.tb01817.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kirschenbaum, H. (2013). Values clarification in counseling and psychotherapy: Practical strategies for individual and group settings. New York: Oxford University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199972130.001.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kishita, N., Tamamoto, T., & Shimada, H. (2008). Development of the Japanese version of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II. Paper presented at the meeting of the Japanese Association of Health Psychology, Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
  28. Levin, M. E., Hildebrandt, M. J., Lillis, J., & Hayes, S. C. (2012). The impact of treatment components suggested by the psychological flexibility model: a meta-analysis of laboratory-based component studies. Behavior Therapy, 43(4), 741–756.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2012.05.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Levin, M. E., MacLane, C., Daflos, S., Seeley, J. R., Hayes, S. C., Biglan, A., & Pistorello, J. (2014). Examining psychological inflexibility as a transdiagnostic process across psychological disorders. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 3(3), 155–163.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2014.06.003.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Levin, M. E., Pistorello, J., Hayes, S. C., Seeley, J. R., & Levin, C. (2015). Feasibility of an acceptance and commitment therapy adjunctive web-based program for counseling centers. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 62(3), 529–536.  https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000083.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (2010). Cultures and selves: a cycle of mutual constitution. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(4), 420–430.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610375557.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Masuda, A., Muto, T., Tully, E. C., Morgan, J., & Hill, M. L. (2014). Comparing Japanese college students’ and U.S. college students’ disordered eating, distress, and psychological inflexibility. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45, 1161–1172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Murdock, N. L., Duan, C., & Nilsson, J. E. (2012). Emerging approaches to counseling intervention: theory, research, practice, and training. The Counseling Psychologist, 40(7), 966–975.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000012460663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Muto, T., & Mitamura, T. (2015). Acceptance and commitment therapy for “Taro,” a Japanese client with chronic depression: a replicated treatment-evaluation. Pragmatic Case Studies in Psychotherapy, 11(2), 117–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Muto, T., Hayes, S. C., & Jeffcoat, T. (2011). The effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy bibliotherapy for enhancing the psychological health of Japanese college students living abroad. Behavior Therapy, 42(2), 323–335.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2010.08.009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Myers, T. A. (2011). Goodbye, listwise deletion: presenting hot deck imputation as an easy and effective tool for handling missing data. Communication Methods and Measures, 5, 297–310.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2011.624490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nakagawa, Y., & Daibo, I. (1985). Manual of the Japanese version of the general health questionnaire. Tokyo: Nihon Bunka Kagakusha.Google Scholar
  38. Rolffs, J. L., Rogge, R. D., Wilson, K. G. (2016). Disentangling components of flexibility via the Hexaflex model: development and validation of the multidimensional psychological flexibility inventory (MPFI). Assessment, 1–25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116645905.
  39. Sain, T., Primeaux, S., & Drake, C. E. (2016). I can’t get no valued action: exploring the valued action and satisfaction questionnaire. Presentation at the meeting for the association for contextual behavioral science, Seattle.Google Scholar
  40. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). San Diego: Academic Press.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6.Google Scholar
  41. Shima, T., Yanagihara, M., Kawai, T., & Kumano, H. (2013). Validation of the Japanese version of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Japanese Psychological Association, Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
  42. Swain, J., Hancock, K., Hainsworth, C., & Bowman, J. (2013). Acceptance and commitment therapy in the treatment of anxiety: a systematic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 33(8), 965–978.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2013.07.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. VanBuskirk, K., West, L., Malcarne, V., Afari, N., Liu, L., Petkus, A., & Wetherell, J. L. (2012). Confirmatory factor analysis of the valued living questionnaire in a Black American sample: implications for cognitive research and practice. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 36(6), 796–805.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-011-9405-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wilson, K. G., Sandoz, E. K., Kitchens, J., & Roberts, M. (2010). The valued living questionnaire: defining and measuring valued action within a behavioral framework. The Psychological Record, 60(2), 249–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wolgast, M. (2014). What does the acceptance and action questionnaire (AAQ-II) really measure? Behavior Therapy, 45(6), 831–839.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2014.07.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Zettle, R. D., Rains, J. C., & Hayes, S. C. (2011). Processes of change in acceptance and commitment therapy and cognitive therapy for depression: a mediation reanalysis of Zettle and Rains. Behavior Modification, 35(3), 265–283.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445511398344.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chad E. Drake
    • 1
    • 2
  • Akihiko Masuda
    • 3
  • David Dalsky
    • 4
  • Kimberly T. Stevens
    • 5
  • Sam Kramer
    • 5
  • Sunni J. Primeaux
    • 5
  • Takashi Muto
    • 6
  • Takashi Mitamura
    • 7
  1. 1.University of South Carolina AikenAikenUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologySouthern Illinois UniversityCarbondaleUSA
  3. 3.University of Hawaii-MānoaHonoluluUSA
  4. 4.Kyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  5. 5.Southern Illinois UniversityCarbondaleUSA
  6. 6.Doshisha UniversityKyotoJapan
  7. 7.Ritsumeikan UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations