Skip to main content
Log in

A parameter choice strategy for the inversion of multiple observations

  • Published:
Advances in Computational Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In many geoscientific applications, multiple noisy observations of different origin need to be combined to improve the reconstruction of a common underlying quantity. This naturally leads to multi-parameter models for which adequate strategies are required to choose a set of ‘good’ parameters. In this study, we present a fairly general method for choosing such a set of parameters, provided that discrete direct, but maybe noisy, measurements of the underlying quantity are included in the observation data, and the inner product of the reconstruction space can be accurately estimated by the inner product of the discretization space. Then the proposed parameter choice method gives an accuracy that only by an absolute constant multiplier differs from the noise level and the accuracy of the best approximant in the reconstruction and in the discretization spaces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bauer, F., Gutting, M., Lukas, M.A.: Evaluation of parameter choice methods for regularization of ill-posed problems in geomathematics. In: Freeden, W., Nashed, M.Z., Sonar, T. (eds.) Handbook of Geomathematics. 2nd edn. Springer (2015)

  2. Bauer, F., Lukas, M.A.: Comparing parameter choice methods for regularization of ill-posed problems. Math. Comp. 81, 1795–1841 (2011)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Brezinski, C., Redivo-Zaglia, M., Rodriguez, G., Seatzu, S.: Multi-parameter regularization techniques for ill-conditioned linear systems. Num. Math. 94, 203–228 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. CHAMP. http://www.gfz-potsdam.de/champ/

  5. Chen, J., Pereverzyev, S. Jr., Xu, Y.: Aggregation of regularized solutions from multiple observation models. Inverse Prob. 31, 075005 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Drinkwater, M.R., Floberghagen, R., Haagmans, R., Muzi, D., Popescu, A.: GOCE: ESA’s first Earth explorer core mission. In: Beutler, G.B., Drinkwater, M.R., Rummel, R., Von Steiger, R. (eds.) Earth Gravity Field from Space - from Sensors to Earth Sciences. Kluwer Academic Publishers (2003)

  7. Driscoll, J.R., Healy, M. H. Jr.: Computing fourier transforms and convolutions on the 2-sphere. Adv. Appl. Math. 15, 202–250 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Freeden, W.: On approximation by harmonic splines. Manuscr. Geod. 6, 193–244 (1981)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Freeden, W.: Multiscale modelling of spaceborne geodata (1999)

  10. Friis-Christensen, E., Lühr, H., Hulot, G.: Swarm: A constellation to study the Earth’s magnetic field. Earth Planet. Space 58, 351–358 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gerhards, C.: A combination of downward continuation and local approximation for harmonic potentials. Inverse Prob. 30, 085004 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. GRACE. http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/missions/gravity-recovery-and-climate-experiment-grace/

  13. Haines, G.V.: Spherical cap harmonic analysis. J. Geophys. Res. 90, 2583–2591 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hesse, K., Sloan, I., Womersley, R.S.: Numerical integration on the sphere. In: Freeden, W., Nashed, M.Z., Sonar, T. (eds.) Handbook of Geomathematics. Springer (2010)

  15. Hesse, K., Womersley, R.S.: Numerical integration with polynomial exactness over a spherical cap. Adv. Comp. Math. 36, 451–483 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Koch, K.R., Kusche, J.: Regularization of geopotential determination from satellite data by variance components. J. Geod. 76, 259–268 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Lu, S., Pereverzyev, S.: Multi-parameter regularization and its numerical realization. Num. Math. 118, 1–31 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Lu, S., Pereverzyev, S.: Multiparameter regularization in downward continuation of satellite data. In: Freeden, W., Nashed, M.Z., Sonar, T. (eds.) Handbook of Geomathematics. 2nd edn. Springer (2015)

  19. Merrick, J.R.: Aggregation of forecasts from multiple simulation models. In: Pasupathy, R., Kim, S.-H., Tolk, A., Hill, R., Kuhl, M.E. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2013 Winter Simulation Conference (2013)

  20. Pavlis, N.K., Holmes, S.A., Kenyon, S.C., Factor, J.K.: The development and evaluation of the Earth Gravitational Model 2008 (EGM2008). J. Geophys. Res. 117, B04406 (2012)

  21. Pereverzyev, S., Schock, E.: Error estimates for band-limited spherical regularization wavelets in an inverse problem of satellite geodesy. Inverse Probl. 15, 881–890 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Pilkington, M.: Aeromagnetic surveying. In: Gubbins, D., Herrero-Bervera, E. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism. Springer (2007)

  23. Shure, L., Parker, R.L., Backus, G.E.: Harmonic splines for geomagnetic modeling. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 28, 215–229 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Simons, F.J., Dahlen, F.A., Wieczorek, M.A.: Spatiospectral localization on a sphere. SIAM Rev. 48, 505–536 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Thébault, E., Schott, J.J., Mandea, M.: Revised spherical cap harmonic analysis (RSCHA): validation and properties. J. Geophys. Res. 111, B01102 (2006)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pavlo Tkachenko.

Additional information

Communicated by: Jan Hesthaven.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gerhards, C., Pereverzyev, S. & Tkachenko, P. A parameter choice strategy for the inversion of multiple observations. Adv Comput Math 43, 101–112 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10444-016-9477-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10444-016-9477-9

Keywords

Navigation