Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of Flow-Mesh Influence in Resin Injection Processes

  • Published:
Applied Composite Materials Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Liquid molding is a versatile composite family of processes largely used in naval and automotive industries. In these processes, a polymeric resin is forced through a mold cavity previously filled with a reinforcement medium. In several cases, the impregnation stage may be too long and, to avoid that a flow-mesh (FM) may be placed over the reinforcement. This FM has very high permeability and high porosity, thus the resin first advances inside it and then impregnates the reinforcement medium. The FM commonly covers the entire reinforcement medium, however this may not the best solution for all situations, since it may produce an irregular resin flow front inside the mold cavity, resulting in void formation or waste of resin. This work performs a study on the most suitable FM length, in relation to the mold length, for rectilinear injections. Main goal is to produce a data set to determine FM length based on mold thickness and in-plane to transverse permeability ratio (\(\uppsi ={K}_{xx}/{K}_{zz}\)). Results have shown that for common industrial application, where \(\uppsi \sim 10\), mold length must be 2.5 times as long as the FM for thick reinforcements. Moreover, for more extreme cases, with \(\uppsi \sim 1000\), this value may reach 25.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Advani S.G., Sozer E.M.: Process Modeling in Composites Manufacturing. 2nd ed. CRC Press - Taylor & Francis Group (2010)

  2. Yenilmez, B., Senan, M., Murat, S.E.: Variation of part thickness and compaction pressure in vacuum infusion process. Compos Sci Technol 69, 1710–1719 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang L.: Design with constructal theory, A. Bejan and S. Lorente, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2008, No. of pages: 529, ISBN 978–0–471–99816–7. Int J Energy Res 34, 743–744 (2010)

  4. Vilà, J., González, C., LLorca, J.: Fabric compaction and infiltration during vacuum-assisted resin infusion with and without distribution medium. J Compos Mater 51, 687–703 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Correia, N.C., Robitaille, F., Long, A.C., et al.: Analysis of the vacuum infusion moulding process: I. Analytical formulation. Compos Part Appl Sci Manuf 36, 1645–1656 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rachmadini, Y., Tan, V.B.C., Tay, T.E.: Enhancement of Mechanical Properties of Composites through Incorporation of CNT in VARTM - A Review. J Reinf Plast Compos 29, 2782–2807 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sas, H.S., Šimáček, P., Advani, S.G.: A methodology to reduce variability during vacuum infusion with optimized design of distribution media. Compos Part Appl Sci Manuf 78, 223–233 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Agogue, R., Chebil, N., Deleglise-Lagardere, M., et al.: Efficient Permeability Measurement and Numerical Simulation of the Resin Flow in Low Permeability Preform Fabricated by Automated Dry Fiber Placement. Appl Compos Mater 25, 1169–1182 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hirt, C.W., Nichols, B.D.: Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. J Comput Phys 39, 201–225 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Weller H.: Greenshields C, de Rouvray C. The OpenFOAM Foundation Ltd. OpenFOAM, https://openfoam.org/

  11. Geuzaine, C., Remacle, J.-F.: Gmsh: A 3-D finite element mesh generator with built-in pre- and post-processing facilities. Int J Numer Methods Eng 79, 1309–1331 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nunes, S.G., de Amorim, W.F., Manes, A., et al.: The effect of thickness on vacuum infusion processing of aramid/epoxy composites for ballistic application. J Compos Mater 53, 383–391 (2019)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior-Brasil (CAPES)—Finance Code 001, and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (FAPERGS) for funding and encouraging the innovation and research in Brazil and abroad.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeferson Avila Souza.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dutra, C.M.B., Amico, S.C. & Souza, J.A. Evaluation of Flow-Mesh Influence in Resin Injection Processes. Appl Compos Mater 28, 369–380 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-021-09868-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-021-09868-0

Keywords

Navigation