Abstract
In order to calculate the failure probability of complex structures such as a 2.5D/SiC composites turbine blade and improve the structure safety, a new adaptive model of Response Surface (RS) analysis has been developed in this paper, which can improve the computational efficiency of structural failure problem while ensure the accuracy. The Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) theory was used to establish the RS and reconstruct the performance function of structure. And, an Adaptive Latin hypercube Sampling (ALHS) strategy was adopted in the process of establishing and correcting the RS. Finally the Direct Simulation Monte Carlo(DSMC)was utilized to calculate the failure probability of the performance function replacing the complex structure. Two numerical examples were calculated to validate the accuracy and computational efficiency of the proposed method. Additionally the finite element stress analysis results of 2.5D C/SiC composite turbine blade were used to structural reliability analysis by the proposed method. The approach in this paper provides a new way to evaluate the risk of the complex structures.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Madsen, O.D.H.O.: Structural Reliability Methods[M]. John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated, New York (2005)
Guoshao Su, Bo Yu,Yilong Xiao,Liubin Yan. Gaussian Process Machine-Learning Method for Structural Reliability Analysis[J]. Advances in Structural Engineering. 17(9), 1257–1270 (2014)
Gao, X., Yu, G., Xue, J., et al.: Failure analysis of C/SiC composites plate with a hole by the PFA and DIC method[J]. Ceram. Int. 43(6), 5255–5266 (2017)
Xue, J., Gao, X., Fang, G., et al. Continuous Damage Constitutive Model of 2.5D C/SiC Composite[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica. 33(03), 606–612 (2016)
Sun, Z., Kong, C., Niu, X., et al.: Optimization and Reliability Analysis of 2.5D C/SiC Composites Turbine Stator Vane[J]. Appl. Compos. Mater. 21(5), 789–803 (2014)
Schmidt, S., Beyer, S., Knabe, H., et al.: Advanced ceramic matrix composite materials for current and future propulsion technology applications[J]. Acta Astronaut. 55(3–9), 409–420 (2004)
Chen, X., Sun, Z., Sun, J., et al: Simulation of Degraded Properties of 2D plain Woven C/SiC Composites under Preloading Oxidation Atmosphere[J]. Applied Composite Materials, (2017)
Chen, M., Xie, W., Qiu, H.: Recent Progress in Continuous SiC Fiber Reinforced SiC Ceramic Matrix Composites[J]. Adv Ceram. 06, 393–402 (2016)
Riedel, R., Chen, I: Ceramics Science and Technology Volume 4: Applications[M]//:172–178 (2013)
Zhang, L., Peng, Z., Guo, S., et al.: Advancement in CMC Research on the Aero-Engine Turbine Components[J]. Aviat Maintenance Eng. 12, 41–43 (2016)
Zhu, S., Huang, H., Peng, W., et al.: Probabilistic Physics of Failure-based framework for fatigue life prediction of aircraft gas turbine discs under uncertainty[J]. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 146, 1–12 (2016)
Sun, Z., Wang, C., Niu, X., et al.: A response surface approach for reliability analysis of 2.5D C/SiC composites turbine blade[J]. Compos. Part B. 85, 277–285 (2016)
Alves F J L, Baptista A M, Marques A T. Metal and ceramic matrix composites in aerospace engineering[J]. Advanced Composite Materials for Aerospace Engineering:59–99 (2016)
Chunyuan Kong, Z.S.X.G.: Tensile property of 2.5D C/SiC composites in warp direction[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica. 29(2), 192–198 (2012)
Chiachio, M., Chiachio, J., Rus, G.: Reliability in composites – A selective review and survey of current development[J]. Compos. Part B. 43(3), 902–913 (2012)
Ghasemi, H., Kerfriden, P., Bordas, S.P.A., et al.: Probabilistic multiconstraints optimization of cooling channels in ceramic matrix composites[J]. Compos. Part B. 81, 107–119 (2015)
Lü, Q., Low, B.K.: Probabilistic analysis of underground rock excavations using response surface method and SORM[J]. Comput. Geotech. 38(8), 1008–1021 (2011)
Fernández, F.G., de Palacios, P., Esteban, L.G., et al.: Prediction of MOR and MOE of structural plywood board using an artificial neural network and comparison with a multivariate regression model[J]. Compos. Part B. 43(8), 3528–3533 (2012)
Carlone, P., Aleksendrić, D., Ćirović, V., et al.: Meta-modeling of the curing process of thermoset matrix composites by means of a FEM–ANN approach[J]. Compos. Part B. 67, 441–448 (2014)
Kwon, D., Azarian, M.H., Pecht, M.: Remaining-Life Prediction of Solder Joints Using RF Impedance Analysis and Gaussian Process Regression[J]. IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Manuf. Technol. 5(11), 1602–1609 (2015)
Costas, M., Díaz, J., Romera, L., et al.: A multi-objective surrogate-based optimization of the crashworthiness of a hybrid impact absorber[J]. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 88, 46–54 (2014)
Kang, F., Han, S., Salgado, R., et al.: System probabilistic stability analysis of soil slopes using Gaussian process regression with Latin hypercube sampling[J]. Comput. Geotech. 63, 13–25 (2015)
Goins, A.K., Carpenter, R., Wong, W., et al.: Implementation of a Gaussian process-based machine learning grasp predictor[J]. Auton. Robot. 40(4), 687–699 (2016)
Rasmussen, C.E., Williams, C.K.I.: Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning[M]. The MIT Press, London (2006)
Peng, L., Su, G., Wang, Z., et al.: Reliability Analysis Method for Geotechnical Engineering Structure Using Gaussian Process Classification Based Monte Carlo Simulation[J]. Sci Technol Eng. 21, 6150–6157 (2013)
Hao, J., Su, G., Wang, Z., et al.: Fast estimation of failure probability for engineering structure using Gaussian Process Regression[J]. Spat Struct. 03, 82–87 (2014)
Mlakar, M., Petelin, D., Tušar, T., et al.: GP-DEMO: Differential Evolution for Multiobjective Optimization based on Gaussian Process models[J]. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 243(2), 347–361 (2015)
Roussouly, N., Petitjean, F., Salaun, M.: A new adaptive response surface method for reliability analysis[J]. Probab Eng Mech. 32, 103–115 (2013)
Blatman, G., Sudret, B.: An adaptive algorithm to build up sparse polynomial chaos expansions for stochastic finite element analysis[J]. Probab Eng Mech. 25(2), 183–197 (2010)
Olsson, A: Latin Hypercube Sampling for Stochastic Finite Element Analysis[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, (2002)
Wang, G.G.: Adaptive Response Surface Method Using Inherited Latin Hypercube Design Points[J]. J. Mech. Des. 125(2), 210–220 (2003)
Molinaro, A.M.S.R.P.R: Prediction error estimation: a comparison of resampling methods[J]. BIOINFORMATICS. 21(15), 3301–3307 (2005)
Zhao, W.: Research on Gaussian process based dynamic response surface method of reliability analysis for complex structure[D]. Guangxi University, (2014)
Wang, C.: Development of Onboard Life Expenditure Monitoring System for Aero-Engine and Research on Robust Optimization Method [D]. Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, (2016)
Siber, MK 202 engine stress standard: EGD-3:EGD-3[S]. BeiJing:International Aviation Editorial Department (1979)
Acknowledgements
Supports of this project provided by National Basic Research Program of China, National Natural Science Foundation of China (51675266), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (NJ20160038, NS2017011),Foundation of Graduate Innovation Center in NUAA (No.kfjj20160213), Foundation of Graduate Innovation Center in NUAA (No.kfjj20170208) are gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chang, Y., Sun, Z., Sun, W. et al. A New Adaptive Response Surface Model for Reliability Analysis of 2.5D C/SiC Composite Turbine Blade. Appl Compos Mater 25, 1075–1091 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-017-9652-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-017-9652-2