Acta Biotheoretica

, Volume 59, Issue 2, pp 121–137 | Cite as

A History of Animal Welfare Science

  • Donald M. BroomEmail author
Regular Article


Human attitudes to animals have changed as non-humans have become more widely incorporated in the category of moral agents who deserve some respect. Parallels between the functioning of humans and non-humans have been made for thousands of years but the idea that the animals that we keep can suffer has spread recently. An improved understanding of motivation, cognition and the complexity of social behaviour in animals has led in the last 30 years to the rapid development of animal welfare science. Early attempts to define welfare referred to individuals being in harmony with nature but the first usable definition incorporated feelings and health as part of attempts to cope with the environment. Others considered that welfare is only about feelings but it is argued that as feelings are mechanisms that have evolved they are a part of welfare rather than all of it. Most reviews of welfare now start with listing the needs of the animal, including needs to show certain behaviours. This approach has used sophisticated studies of what is important to animals and has replaced the earlier general guidelines described as freedoms. Many measures of welfare are now used and indicate how good or how poor the welfare is. Naturalness is not a part of the definition of welfare but explains why some needs exist. In recent years, welfare has become established as one of various criteria used to decide on whether a system is sustainable because members of the public will not accept systems that cause poor welfare. The study of welfare has become part of the scientific basis upon which important political decisions are made.


Animal Welfare Science History Needs Feelings Health Motivation Naturalness Sustainability 


  1. Bentham J (1789) An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Boissy A, Manteuffel G, Jensen MB, Moe RO, Spruijt B, Keeling LJ, Winckler C, Forkman B, Dimitrov I, Langbein J, Bakken M, Veissier I, Aubert A (2007) Assessment of positive emotions in animals to improve their welfare. Physiol Behav 92:375–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Broom DM (1981) Biology of behaviour. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Broom DM (1983) The stress concept and ways of assessing the effects of stress in farm animals. Appl Anim Ethol 11:79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Broom DM (1986) Indicators of poor welfare. Br Vet J 142:524–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Broom DM (1988) The scientific assessment of animal welfare. Appl Anim Behav Sci 20:5–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Broom DM (1991a) Animal welfare: concepts and measurement. J Anim Sci 69:4167–4175Google Scholar
  8. Broom DM (1991b) Assessing welfare and suffering. Behav Process 25:117–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Broom DM (1998) Welfare, stress and the evolution of feelings. Adv Study Behav 27:371–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Broom DM (2000) Welfare assessment and problem areas during handling and transport. In: Grandin T (ed) Livestock handling and transport, 2nd edn. C.A.B.I, Wallingford, pp 43–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Broom DM (2001a) The use of the concept animal welfare in European conventions, regulations and directives. Food Chain. SLU Services, Uppsala, pp 148–151Google Scholar
  12. Broom DM (2001b) Coping, stress and welfare. In: Broom DM (ed) Coping with challenge: welfare in animals including humans. Dahlem University Press, Berlin, pp 1–9Google Scholar
  13. Broom DM (2002) Does present legislation help animal welfare? Landbauforschung Völkenrode 227:63–69Google Scholar
  14. Broom DM (2003) The evolution of morality and religion. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Broom DM (2006a) Adaptation. Berliner und Münchener Tierärztliche Wochenschrift 119:1–6Google Scholar
  16. Broom DM (2006b) Behaviour and welfare in relation to pathology. Appl Anim Behav Sci 97:71–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Broom DM (2006c) The evolution of morality. Appl Anim Behav Sci 100:20–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Broom DM (2007a) Cognitive ability and sentience: which aquatic animals should be protected? Dis Aquatic Org 75:99–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Broom DM (2007b) Quality of life means welfare: how is it related to other concepts and assessed? Anim Welf 16:45–53Google Scholar
  20. Broom DM (2008) Welfare assessment and relevant ethical decisions: key concepts. Ann Rev Biomed Sci 10:T79–T90Google Scholar
  21. Broom DM (2010a) Animal welfare: an aspect of care, sustainability, and food quality required by the public. J Veterinary Med Education 37:83–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Broom DM (2010b) Cognitive ability and awareness in domestic animals and decisions about obligations to animals. Appl Anim Behav Sci 126:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Broom DM, Fraser AF (2007) Domestic animal behaviour and welfare, 4th edn. CABI, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  24. Broom DM, Johnson KG (1993) (reprinted with corrections 2000). Stress and animal welfare. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  25. Broom DM, Sena H, Moynihan KL (2009) Pigs learn what a mirror image represents and use it to obtain information. Anim Behav 78:1037–1041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cabanac M (1979) Sensory pleasure. Q Rev Biol 54:1–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Cabanac M (1992) Pleasure: the common currency. J Theor Biol 155:173–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dantzer R, Mormède P (1979) Stress in intensive husbandry. Masson, ParisGoogle Scholar
  29. Dawkins MS (1980) Animal suffering: the science of animal welfare. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. Dawkins MS (1990) From an animal’s point of view: motivation, fitness and animal welfare. Behav Brain Sci 13:1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. de Waal F (1996) Good natured. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  32. Dennett DC (1994) Elbow room: the varieties of free will worth wanting. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  33. Duncan IJH (1993) Welfare is to do with what animals feel. J Agric Environ Ethics 6(Suppl 2):8–14Google Scholar
  34. Duncan IJH (2006) The changing concept of animal sentience. Appl Anim Behav Sci 100:11–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Duncan IJH, Petherick JC (1991) The implications of cognitive processes for animal welfare. J Anim Sci 69:5017–5022Google Scholar
  36. Duncan IJH, Wood-Gush DGM (1971) Frustration and aggression in the domestic fowl. Anim Behav 19:500–504Google Scholar
  37. Duncan IJH, Wood-Gush DGM (1972) Thwarting of feeding behaviour in the domestic fowl. Anim Behav 20:444–451Google Scholar
  38. Dwyer CM, Lawrence AB (2008) Introduction to animal welfare and the sheep. In: Dwyer CM (ed) The welfare of sheep. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Engel JR, Engel JG (1990) Ethics of environment and development: global challenge and international response. Belhaven Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  40. Fraser D (1999) Animal ethics and animal welfare science: bridging the two cultures. Appl Anim Behav Sci 65:171–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Fraser D (2008) Understanding animal welfare: the science in its cultural context. Wiley Blackwell, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  42. Fraser D, Weary DM, Pajor EA, Milligan BN (1997) The scientific conception of animal welfare that reflects ethical concerns. Anim Welf 6:187–205Google Scholar
  43. Gert B (1988) Morality: a new justification of the moral rules. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  44. Hagen K, Broom DM (2004) Emotional reactions to learning in cattle. Appl Anim Behav Sci 85:203–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Harrison R (1964) Animal machines. Vincent Stuart, LondonGoogle Scholar
  46. Harwood D (1928) Love for animals and how it developed in Great Britain. In: Preece R, Fraser D (eds) Republished 2002 as Dix Harwood’s love for animals and how it developed in Great Britain. Edwin Mellen Press, Lewiston, USAGoogle Scholar
  47. Haynes RP (2008) Animal and human health and welfare. A comparative philosophical analysis. J Agric Environ Ethics 21:91–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hemmer H (1983) Domestikation: Verarmung der Merkwelt. Vieweg, BraunschweigGoogle Scholar
  49. Hinde RA (1970) Animal behaviour: a synthesis of ethology and comparative psychology, 2nd edn. McGraw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  50. Hughes BO (1982) The historical and ethical background of animal welfare. In: Uglow J (ed) How well do our animals fare? Proc. 15th annual conference of the reading University Agricultural Club, 1981, pp 1–9Google Scholar
  51. Hughes BO, Duncan IJH (1988) Behavioural needs: can they be explained in terms of motivational models? Appl Anim Behav Sci 20:352–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Jensen P (1986) Observations on the maternal behaviour of free ranging domestic pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci 16:131–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Keeling L, Jensen P (2002) Behavioural disturbances, stress and welfare. In: Jensen P (ed) The ethology of domestic animals. CABI, Wallingford, pp 79–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kendrick KM, Baldwin BA (1987) Cells in the temporal cortex of sheep can respond preferentially to the sight of faces. Sci NY 236:448–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kendrick KM, Atkins K, Hinton MR, Borad KD, Fabre-Nys C, Keverne B (1995) Facial and vocal discrimination in sheep. Anim Behav 49:1665–1676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kendrick KM, da Costa AP, Leigh AE, Hinton MR, Peirce JW (2001) Sheep don’t forget a face. Nature 414:165–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kirkden RD, Edwards JSS, Broom DM (2003) A theoretical comparison of the consumer surplus and the elasticities of demand as measures of motivational strength. Anim Behav 65:157–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mason JW (1968) A review of psychoendocrine research on the pituitary adrenal cortical system. Psychosom Med 30:576–607Google Scholar
  59. Mason JW (1971) A re-evaluation of the concept of ‘non-specificity’ in stress theory. J Psychiatr Res 8:323–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mason GJ, Cooper JJ, Clarebrough C (2001) Frustrations of fur-farmed mink. Nature 410:35–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. McBride G, Parer IP, Foenander F (1969) The social organisation of the feral domestic fowl. Anim Behav Monogr 2:125–181Google Scholar
  62. McFarland DJ, Sibly RM (1975) The behavioural final common path. Philos Trans R Soc B 270:265–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Mendl M, Paul ES (2004) Consciousness, emotion and animal welfare: insights from cognitive science. Anim Welf 13:S17–S25Google Scholar
  64. Mendl M, Burman HP, Parker RMA, Paul ES (2009) Cognitive bias as an indicator of animal emotion and welfare: emerging evidence and underlying mechanisms. Appl Anim Behav Sci 118:161–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Miller NE (1959) Liberalization of basic S-R concepts: extensions to conflict behaviour, motivation and social learning. In: Koch S (ed) Psychology: a study of a science, vol II. McGraw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  66. Moberg GP (1985) Biological response to stress: key to assessment of animal well-being? In: Moberg GP (ed) Animal stress. American Physiological Society, Bethesda, MD, pp 27–49Google Scholar
  67. Morton DB, Griffiths PHM (1985) Guidelines on the recognition of pain, distress and discomfort in experimental animals and an hypothesis for assessment. Vet Rec 116:431–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Mount LE (1979) Adaptation to thermal environment. Edward Arnold, LondonGoogle Scholar
  69. Ouedraogo AP (1998) Ethical consumers? Social representations of stock farming in France. In: Veissier I, Boissy A (eds) Proc. 32nd Cong. Int. Soc. Appl. Ethol. I.N.R.A, Clermont Ferrand, p 204Google Scholar
  70. Panksepp J (1998) Affective neuroscience. The foundation of human and animal emotion. O.U.P, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  71. Panksepp J (2005) Affective consciousness: core emotional feelings in animals and humans. Conscious Cogn 14:30–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Paul ES, Harding EJ, Mendl M (2005) Measuring emotion processes in animals: the utility of a cognitive approach. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 29:469–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Price EO (2002) Animal domestication and behaviour. CABI, WallingfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Regan T (1990) In: Clarke PAB, Linzey A (eds) Political theory and animal rights. Pluto Press, London, pp 176–186Google Scholar
  75. Ridley M (1996) The origins of virtue. Viking, LondonGoogle Scholar
  76. Rollin BE (1990) The unheeded cry. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  77. Rollin BE (1995) Farm animal welfare: social, bioethical and research issues. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IowaGoogle Scholar
  78. Russell WMS, Burch RL (1959) The principles of humane animal experimentation technique. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  79. Singer P (1994) Ethics. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  80. Smulders FJM, Algers B (eds) (2009) Welfare of production animals: assessment and management of risks. Wageningen Academic Publishers, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  81. Sorabji R (1993) Animal minds and human morals: the origins of the western debate. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
  82. Thorpe WH (1965) The assessment of pain and distress in animals. Appendix III in report of the technical committee to enquire into the welfare of animals kept under intensive husbandry conditions, F.W.R. Brambell (chairman). H.M.S.O., LondonGoogle Scholar
  83. Toates F, Jensen P (1991) Ethological and psychological models of motivation: towards a synthesis. In: Meyer JA, Wilson S (eds) Farm animals to animats. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 194–205Google Scholar
  84. Weiss JM (1971) Effects of coping behaviour in different warning signal conditions on stress pathology in rats. J Comp Physiol Psychol 77:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Welfare Quality (2009a) Welfare Quality assessment protocol for cattle. Welfare Quality Consortium, Lelystad, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  86. Welfare Quality (2009b) Welfare Quality assessment protocol for pigs. Welfare Quality Consortium, Lelystad, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  87. Welfare Quality (2009c) Welfare Quality assessment protocol for poultry. Welfare Quality Consortium, Lelystad, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  88. Wilson EO (1975) Sociobiology. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  89. Zimmerman PH, Lundberg A, Keeling LJ, Koene P (2003) The effect of an audience on the gakel-call and other frustration behaviours in the laying hen (Gallus gallus domesticus). Anim Welf 12:315–326Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Veterinary MedicineCentre for Animal Welfare and Anthrozoology, University of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations