Skip to main content
Log in

Application of Change-Point Problem to the Detection of Plant Patches

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Acta Biotheoretica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In ecology, if the considered area or space is large, the spatial distribution of individuals of a given plant species is never homogeneous; plants form different patches. The homogeneity change in space or in time (in particular, the related change-point problem) is an important research subject in mathematical statistics. In the paper, for a given data system along a straight line, two areas are considered, where the data of each area come from different discrete distributions, with unknown parameters. In the paper a method is presented for the estimation of the distribution change-point between both areas and an estimate is given for the distributions separated by the obtained change-point. The solution of this problem will be based on the maximum likelihood method. Furthermore, based on an adaptation of the well-known bootstrap resampling, a method for the estimation of the so-called change-interval is also given. The latter approach is very general, since it not only applies in the case of the maximum-likelihood estimation of the change-point, but it can be also used starting from any other change-point estimation known in the ecological literature. The proposed model is validated against typical ecological situations, providing at the same time a verification of the applied algorithms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Auger IE, Lawrence CE (1989) Algorithms for the optimal identification of segment neighborhoods. Bull Math Biol 51:39–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodsky BE, Darkhovsky BS (1993) Nonparametric methods in change-point problems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Camarero JJ, Gutiérrez E, Fortin MJ (2000) Boundary detection in altitudinal treeline ecotones in the Spanish Central Pyrenees. Arct Antarct Alp Res 32:117–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cserép Sz, Standovár T, Vanicsek L (1991) Tree seedling composition as a function of site quality indicated by herbaceous species in a sessile oak stand. Vegetatio 95:71–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csörgő M, Horváth L (1997) Limit theorems in change-point analysis. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale MRT (1999) Spatial pattern analysis in plant ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Efron B, Tibshirani R (1993) An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman & Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagan WF, Fortin MJ, Soykan C (2003) Integrating edge detection and dynamics modelling in quantitative analyses of ecological boundaries. Bioscience 53:730–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fearnhead P (2006) Exact and efficient Bayesian inference for multiple changepoint problems. Stat Comput 16(2):203–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferger D (1993) Asymptotic distribution theory of change-point estimators and confidence intervals based on bootstrap approximation. Math Methods Stat 3(4):362–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortin MJ, Olson RJ, Ferson S, Iverson I, Hunsaker C, Edwards G, Levine D, Butera K, Klemas V (2000) Issues related to the detection of boundaries. Landscape Ecol 15:453–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins DM (2001) Fitting multiple change-point models to data. Comput Stat Data Anal 37(3):323–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humboldt A (1805) Essai sur la géographie des plantes. Levrault, Schoell et Cie, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Hušková M (2004) Permutation principle and bootstrap in change-point analysis. Fields Inst Commun 44:273–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Hušková M, Kirch C (2008) Bootstrapping confidence intervals for the change-point of time series. J Time Ser Anal 29(6):947–972

    Google Scholar 

  • Körmöczi L (2004) On the sensitivity and significance test of vegetation boundary detection. Community Ecol 6(1):75–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurance WF, Didham RK, Power MF (2001) Ecological boundaries: a search for synthesis. TREE 16:70–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavielle M (2005) Using penalized contrasts for the change-point problem. Signal Process 85(8):1501–1510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebarbier E (2005) Detecting multiple change-points in the mean of Gaussian process by model selection. Signal Process 85(4):717–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh RP (ed) (1978) Phytosociology. Dowden, Hutchinson, and Ross, Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania

    Google Scholar 

  • Podani J (2000) Introduction to the exploration of multivariate biological data. Bacchus Publishers, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz G (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat 6:461–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Standovár T (1988) Vegetation pattern in a sessile oak (Quercus petraea) stand. Abstr Bot 12:189–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Standovár T, Rajkai K (1994) Herbs as soil moisture indicators within a sessile oak stand. Abstr Bot 18(2):71–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Standovár T, Somogyi Z (1998) Corresponding patterns of site quality, decline and tree growth in a sessile oak stand. Eur J Forest Pathol 28:133–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stayred DI, Power ME, Fagan WF, Pickett STA, Belnap J (2003) A classification of ecological boundaries. Bioscience 53:723–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watt AS (1947) Pattern and process in the plant community. J Ecol 35:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worsley KJ (1986) Confidence regions and tests for a change-point in a sequence of exponential family random variables. Biometrika 73(1):91–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zack S (1983) Survey of classical and Bayesian approach to the change-point problem: fixed sample and sequential procedures of testing and estimation. In: Rizvi MH, Rustagi S, Siegmund S (eds) Recent advances in statistics. Academic Press, New York, pp 245–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Zalatnai M, Körmöczi L (2004) Fine-scale pattern of the boundary zone in alkaline grassland communities. Community Ecol 5(2):235–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang NR, Siegmund DO (2007) A modified Bayes information criterion with applications to the analysis of comparative genomic hybridization data. Biometrics 63:22–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the anonymous referees for all their suggestions to improve the paper. The authors also wish to thank the Ministry of Education and Science of Spain, which has partially supported this research (project No: TIN2007-67418-C03-02). In the initial phase if this research József Garay and Tibor Standovár were grantees of the János Bolyai Scholarship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. López.

Appendix

Appendix

1.1 Algorithm 1 (Estimation of the Change-Point K)

  1. 1.

    Introduce sample X. N := Size (X).

  2. 2.

    FOR K = 1 until N − 1:

    1. (a)

      Calculate: \( \overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\frown}$}}{p}_{K,i} \) and \( \overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\frown}$}}{q}_{K,i} \;, \) for each i.

    2. (b)

      Calculate: \( Log\;P_{K} = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{K} {Log\;\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\frown}$}}{p}_{{K,x_{i} }} } + \sum\limits_{s = K + 1}^{N} {Log\;\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\frown}$}}{q}_{{K,x_{s} }} } . \) (Logarithm is introduced to avoid too small probability values.)

  3. 3.

    LogProbSample: = (Log P 1,…, Log P N − 1).

  4. 4.

    EstimateK := Position K with maximum value among the coordinates of LogProbSample.

  5. 5.

    Return Estimate K.

1.2 Algorithm 2 (Estimation of the Change-Interval for K)

  1. 1.

    Introduce the sample X := (x 1, x 2,…, x N ). N := Size (X).

  2. 2.

    FOR K = 1 until N − 1

    1. (a)

      Calculate a weight for each K:

      $$ W_{K} = \left( {\prod\limits_{i = 1}^{K} {10\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\frown}$}}{p}_{{K,x_{i} }} } } \right)\left( {\prod\limits_{s = K + 1}^{N} {10\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\frown}$}}{q}_{{K,x_{s} }} } } \right) $$
    2. (b)

      Normalize the weights (and denote them by WN K ).

    3. (c)

      FOR L = 1 until m (we generate m samples for each K to estimate its change-point):

      1. (c1)

        We draw random samples with replacement from both “homogenous” zones of the original sample separately (using “sample” function of the program “R”):

      2. (c2)

        We apply Algorithm 1 to the sample X L , to obtain an estimate K L for the change-point.

    4. (d)

      From the obtained values K 1,…, K m , (m large enough) we calculate a distribution d k of the change-point, for each fixed K.

  3. 3.

    We combine all these new distributions to obtain a unique distribution \( \sum\limits_{K} {WN_{K} d_{K} } \) for K, for which we calculate the 90%-level change-interval, with percentile 5 and percentile 95 as extremes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

López, I., Gámez, M., Garay, J. et al. Application of Change-Point Problem to the Detection of Plant Patches. Acta Biotheor 58, 51–63 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-009-9093-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-009-9093-x

Keywords

Navigation