Skip to main content

The Function Debate in Philosophy

Abstract

This paper reviews the debate on the notion of biological function and on functional explanation as this takes place in philosophy. It describes the different perspectives, issues, intuitions, theories and arguments that have emerged. The author shows that the debate has been too heavily influenced by the concerns of a naturalistic philosophy of mind and argues that in order to improve our understanding of biology the attention should be shifted from the study of intuitions to the study of the actual practice of biological inquiry.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Adams, F.R. (1979). A goal-state theory of function attributions. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 9: 493–518.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Allen, C., M. Bekoff and G.V. Lauder (Eds). (1997). Nature's Purposes: Analyses of Function and Design in Biology. MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Amundson, R. and G.V. Lauder (1994). Function without purpose: The uses of causal role function in evolutionary biology. Biology and Philosophy 9: 443–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ariew, A., R. Cummins and M. Perlman (Eds). (2002). Functions: New Essays in the Philosophy of Psychology and Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baublys, K.K. (1975). Comments on some recent analyses of functional statements in biology. Philosophy of Science 42: 496–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bedau, M. (1992). Where's the good in teleology? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52: 781–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bigelow, J. and R. Pargetter (1987). Functions. Journal of Philosophy 84: 181–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bock, W.J. (1999). Functional and evolutionary explanations in morphology. Netherlands Journal of Zoology 49: 45–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bock, W.J. and G. von Wahlert (1965). Adaptation and the form-function complex. Evolution 19: 269–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Boorse, C. (1975). On the distinction between disease and illness. Philosophy and Public Affairs 5: 49–68.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Boorse, C. (1976). Wright on functions. Philosophical Review 85: 70–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Boorse, C. (2002). A Rebuttal on Functions. In: Ariew, A., R. Cummins and M. Perlman (Eds). Functions. Oxford University Press, Oxford. pp. 63–112.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brandon, R.N. (1990). Adaptation and Environment. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Buller, D.J. (1998). Etiological theories of function: A geographical survey. Biology and Philosophy 13: 505–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Buller, D.J. (Ed). (1999). Function, Selection and Design. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Canfield, J. (1964). Teleological explanation in biology. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 14: 285–295.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Canfield, J. (1965). Teleological explanation in biology: A reply. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 15: 327–331.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Craver, C.F. (2001). Role functions, mechanisms, and hierarchy. Philosophy of Science 68: 53–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cummins, R. (1975). Functional analysis. Journal of Philosophy 72: 741–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cummins, R. (1983). The Nature of Psychological Explanation. MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Darwin, C. (1859). On the Origin of Species. John Murray, London.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Davies, P.S. (2000). The nature of natural norms: Why selected functions are systemic capacity functions. Noûs 34: 85–107.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Davies, P.S. (2001). Norms of Nature. Naturalism and the Nature of Functions. MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dennett, D.C. (1995). Darwin's Dangerous Idea. Evolution and the Meanings of Life. Simon & Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dretske, F.L. (1988). Explaining Behavior. MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Enç, B. (1979). Function attributions and functional explanations. Philosophy of Science 46: 343–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Enç, B. and F. Adams (1992). Functions and goal directedness. Philosophy of Science 59: 635–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Endler, J.A. (1986). Natural Selection in the Wild. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Frankfurt, H.G. and B. Poole (1966). Functional analyses in biology. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 17: 69–72.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Futuyma, D. (1997). Evolutionary Biology. Sinauer, Sunderland.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ghiselin, M.T. (1997). Metaphysics and the Origin of Species. State University of New York Press, Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Godfrey-Smith, P. (1993). Functions: Consensus without unity. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 74: 196–208.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Godfrey-Smith, P. (1994). A modern history theory of functions. Noûs 28: 344–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gould, S.J. and E.S. Vrba (1982). Exaptation – a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology 8: 4–15.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Griffiths, P.E. (1993). Functional analysis and proper functions. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44: 409–422.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hempel, C.G. (1959). The logic of functional analysis. In: Gross, L. (Ed). Symposium on Sociological Theory. Harper and Row, New York. pp. 271–287.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hempel, C.G. and P. Oppenheim (1948). Studies in the logic of explanation. Philosophy of Science 15: 135–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hinde, R.A. (1975). The concept of function. In: Baerends, G.R., C. Beer and A. Manning (Eds). Function and Evolution in Behavior. Clarendon, Oxford. pp. 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Horan, B.L. (1989). Functional explanations in sociobiology. Biology and Philosophy 4: 131–158, 205–228.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kant, I. (1790). Kritik der Urteilskraft. Lagarde und Friederich, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kitcher, P. (1993). Function and design. In: French, P.A., T.E. Uehling and H.K. Wettstein (Eds). Philosophy of Science. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame. pp. 379–397.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kuipers, T.A.F. (1986). The logic of functional explanation in biology. In: The Tasks of Contemporary Philosophy. Proceedings of the 10th Wittgenstein Symposium (Kirchberg/Wechsel, 1985). Hölder-Pitcher-Tempsky, Vienna. pp. 110–114.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kuipers, T.A.F. (2001). Structures in Science: Heuristic Patterns Based on Cognitive Structures. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kuipers, T.A.F. and A. Wisniewski (1994). An erotetic approach to explanation by specification. Erkenntnis 40: 377–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Lannoo, M.J. and S.J. Lannoo (1993). Why do electric fishes swim backwards? Environmental Biology of Fishes 36: 157–165.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lennox, J.G. (1993). Darwin was a teleologist. Biology and Philosophy 8: 409–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Lenoir, T. (1982). The Strategy of Life. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Mahner, M. and M. Bunge (1997). Foundations of Biophilosophy. Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Mayr, E. (1961). Cause and effect in biology. Science 134: 1501–1506.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Mayr, E. (1993). Proximate and ultimate causation. Biology and Philosophy 8: 93–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Mayr, E. (1997). This Is Biology: The Science of the Living World. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Millikan, R.G. (1984). Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories. MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Millikan, R.G. (1986). Thoughts without laws; cognitive science with content. Philosophical Review 95: 47–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Millikan, R.G. (1989a). An ambiguity in the notion “Function”. Biology and Philosophy 4: 172–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Millikan, R.G. (1989b). In defense of proper functions. Philosophy of Science 56: 288–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Millikan, R.G. (1993a). Propensities, exaptations, and the brain. In: White Queen Psychology and Other Essays for Alice. MIT Press, Cambridge. pp. 31–50.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Millikan, R.G. (1993b). White Queen Psychology and Other Essays for Alice. MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Millikan, R.G. (2002). Biofunctions: Two paradigms. In: Ariew, A., R. Cummins and M. Perlman (Eds). Functions. Oxford University Press, Oxford. pp. 113–143.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Mitchell, S.D. (1989). The causal background of functional explanation. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 3: 213–230.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Mitchell, S.D. (1993). Dispositions or etiologies? A comment on Bigelow and Pargetter. Journal of Philosophy 90: 249–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Mitchell, S.D. (1995). Function, fitness and disposition. Biology and Philosophy 10: 39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Munson, R. (1972). Biological adaptation: A reply. Philosophy of Science 39: 529–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Nagel, E. (1961). The Structure of Science. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Nagel, E. (1977). Teleology revisited. Journal of Philosophy 74: 261–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Neander, K. (1980). Teleology in Biology. Paper presented to the AAP conference in 1980.

  66. Neander, K. (1983). Abnormal Psychobiology. Ph.D. Thesis. La Trobe University.

  67. Neander, K. (1991a). Function as selected effects: The conceptual analyst's defense. Philosophy of Science 58: 168–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Neander, K. (1991b). The teleological notion of ‘Function’. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69: 454–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Neander, K. (2004). Teleological theories of mental content. In: E.E. Zalta (Ed). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2004).

  70. Nissen, L. (1980). Nagel's self-regulation analysis of teleology. Philosophical Forum 12: 128–138.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Nissen, L. (1993). Four ways of eliminating mind from teleology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 24: 27–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Nissen, L. (1997). Teleological Language in the Life Sciences. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Pap, A. (1962). An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. The Free Press of Glencoe, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Papineau, D. (1987). Reality and Representation. Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Prior, E.W. (1985). What is wrong with etiological accounts of biological function? Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 66: 310–328.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Ruse, M. (1971). Functional statements in biology. Philosophy of Science 38: 87–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Ruse, M. (1973). The Philosophy of Biology. Hutchinson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Ruse, M. (2002). Evolutionary biology and teleological thinking. In: Ariew, A., R. Cummins and M. Perlman (Eds). Functions. Oxford University Press, Oxford. pp. 33–59.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Salmon, W.C. (1984). Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Salmon, W.C. (1989). Four Decades of Scientific Explanation. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Schaffner, K.F. (1993). Discovery and Explanation in Biology and Medicine. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Schwartz, P.H. (1999). Proper function and recent selection. Philosophy of Science 66: S210–S222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Sober, E. (1993). Philosophy of Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Tinbergen, N. (1963). On aims and methods of ethology. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 20: 410–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Walsh, D.M. (1996). Fitness and function. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47: 553–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Walsh, D.M. and A. Ariew (1996). A taxonomy of functions. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 26: 493–514.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Williams, G.C. (1966). Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Wimsatt, W.C. (1972). Teleology and the logical structure of function statements. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 3: 1–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Woodfield, A. (1976). Teleology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Wouters, A.G. (1999). Explanation Without a Cause. Utrecht University. Ph.D. Thesis. Electronically available at http://www.knoware.nl/users/arnow/diss/

  91. Wouters, A.G. (2003). Four notions of biological function. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biology and Biomedical Science 34: 633–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Wouters, A.G. (2005). The functional perspective of organismic biology. In: Reydon, T.A.C. and L. Hemerik (Eds). Current Themes in Theoretical Biology: A Dutch Perspective. Springer, Dordrecht. pp. 33–69.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Wouters, A.G. (forthcoming). Functional explanation in biology. In: R. Festa, A. Alisda and J. Peijnenburg (Eds). Cognitive Structures in Scientific Inquiry. Rodopi, Amsterdam.

  94. Wright, L. (1973). Functions. Philosophical Review 82: 139–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Wright, L. (1976). Teleological Explanations: An Etiological Analysis of Goals and Functions. University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arno Wouters.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wouters, A. The Function Debate in Philosophy. Acta Biotheor 53, 123–151 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-005-5353-6

Download citation

Key Words

  • function
  • functional explanation
  • teleology