Abstract
This article addresses the question whether and how literary documents can be used to further our understanding of a number of key issues on the agenda of the philosophy of biology such as “complexity” and “reductionism”. Kant already granted a certain respectability to aesthetical experiences of nature in his third Critique. Subsequently, the philosophical movement known as phenomenology often used literary sources and literary techniques to criticize and question mainstream laboratory science. The article discusses a number of literary documents, from Moby-Dick to Jurassic Park, that explicitly stage a confrontation between scientific and non-scientific ways of experiencing and understanding the natural world. Special attention is given to the work of Michael Crichton. Its relevance for the philosophy of biology is pointed out.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bachelard, G. (1957). La poétique de l'espace. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.
Bachelard, G. (1938/1947). La formation de l'esprit scientifique (6e Druk). Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.
Bierens de Haan, J.A. (1940). Die tierische Instinkte und ihr Umbau durch Erfahrung. Eine Einführung in die allgemeine Tierpsychologie. Brill, Leiden.
Burkhardt, R.W. (1997). The founders of ethology and the problem of animal subjective experience. In M. Dol et al. (eds.) Animal Consciousness and Animal Ethics. Perspectives From the Netherlands. Series: Animals in Philosophy and Science, Vol. 1. Van Gorkum, Assen, pp. 1–14.
Crichton, M. (1991). Jurassic Park. Arrow/Random House, London.
Dickens, Ch. (1854/1974). Hard Times; For These Times. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Gould, S.J. (1996). “Dinomania”. In: Dinosaur in a Haystack. Reflections in Natural History. Random House, London, pp. 221–237.
Husserl, E. (1935/1977) Die Krisis der Europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. [Hrsg. E. Ströker]. Meiner, Hamburg.
Kant, I. (1781/1975). Werke in zehn Bänden. Band 3: Kritik der reinen Vernunft. [Hrsg. W. Weischedel]. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. English edn.: Critique of pure reason [Translated by N. Kemp Smith]. Mackmillan, London, 1958.
Kant, I. (1788/1975). Werke in zehn Bänden. Band 8: Kritik der Urteilskraft. [Hrsg. W. Weischedel]. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt.
Maeterlinck, M. (1901). La vie des abeilles. Charpentier, Paris.
Melville, H. (1851/1931). Moby-Dick: Or the whale. In: Romances of Herman Melville. Tudor, New York, pp. 745–1102.
Spengler, O. (1918/1923). Der Untergang des Abendlandes. Umrisse einer Morphologie der Weltgeschichte. Erster Band: Gestalt und Wirklichkeit. 33e druk. Beck, München.
Van den Berg, J.H. (1952/1965). Psychologie en theoretische anthropologie (oratie Utrecht). 3e druk. Callenbach, Nijkerk.
Zwart, H. (1997). What is an animal? A philosophical reflection on the possibility of a moral relationship with animals. Environmental Values 6(4): 377–392.
Zwart, H. (2000a). What is a whale? Moby-Dick, marine science and the sublime. In: Mieth, D. Pfaff, D. (Hrsg.) Erzählen und Moral. Narrativität im Spannungsfeld von Ethik und ästhetik. Attempo, Tübingen, pp. 185–214.
Zwart, H. (2000b). The birth of a research animal: Ibsen's The Wild Duck and the origin of a new animal science. Environmental Values 9(1): 91–108.
Zwart, H. (2002). Boude bewoordingen: De historische fenomenologie (“metabletica”) van Jan Hendrik van den Berg. Pelckmans, Kampen, Klement/Kapellen.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zwart, H. Comparative Epistemology: Contours of a Research Program. Acta Biotheor 53, 77–92 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-005-5351-8
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-005-5351-8