Skip to main content
Log in

The Stochastic Encounter-Mating Model

  • Published:
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We propose a new model of permanent monogamous pair formation in zoological populations with multiple types of females and males. According to this model, animals randomly encounter members of the opposite sex at their so-called firing times to form temporary pairs which then become permanent if mating happens. Given the distributions of the firing times and the mating preferences upon encounter, we analyze the contingency table of permanent pair types in three cases: (i) definite mating upon encounter; (ii) Poisson firing times; and (iii) Bernoulli firing times. In the first case, the contingency table has a multiple hypergeometric distribution which implies panmixia. The other two cases generalize the encounter-mating models of Gimelfarb (Am. Nat. 131(6):865–884, 1988) who gives conditions that he conjectures to be sufficient for panmixia. We formulate adaptations of his conditions and prove that they not only characterize panmixia but also allow us to reduce the model to the first case by changing its underlying parameters. Finally, when there are only two types of females and males, we provide a full characterization of panmixia, homogamy and heterogamy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alpern, S., Reyniers, D.: Strategic mating with homotypic preferences. J. Theor. Biol. 198(1), 71–88 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alpern, S., Reyniers, D.: Strategic mating with common preferences. J. Theor. Biol. 237(4), 337–354 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Andersson, M.: Sexual Selection, 2nd edn. Monographs in Behavior and Ecology, vol. 27. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bergstrom, C.T., Real, L.A.: Towards a theory of mutual mate choice: Lessons from two-sided matching. Evol. Ecol. Res. 2, 493–508 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Courtiol, A., Pettay, J.E., Jokela, M., Rotkirch, A., Lummaa, V.: Natural and sexual selection in a monogamous historical human population. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109(21), 8044–8049 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Davis, C.S.: Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Repeated Measurements. Springer Texts in Statistics. Springer, New York (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Dietz, K., Hadeler, K.P.: Epidemiological models for sexually transmitted diseases. J. Math. Biol. 26(1), 1–25 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Etheridge, A.M., Lemaire, S.: Diffusion approximation of a multilocus model with assortative mating. Electron. J. Probab. 16(78), 2122–2181 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Etienne, L., Rousset, F., Godelle, B., Courtiol, A.: How choosy should I be? The relative searching time predicts evolution of choosiness under direct sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, Biol. Sci. 281(1785), 20140190 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ewens, W.J.: Mathematical Population Genetics. I. Theoretical Introduction, 2nd edn. Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics, vol. 27. Springer, New York (2004)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Gillespie, J.H.: Population Genetics. A Concise Guide. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gimelfarb, A.: Processes of pair formation leading to assortative mating in biological populations: Dynamic interaction model. Theor. Popul. Biol. 34(1), 1–23 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Gimelfarb, A.: Processes of pair formation leading to assortative mating in biological populations: Encounter-mating model. Am. Nat. 131(6), 865–884 (1988)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Gün, O., Yilmaz, A.: Fluid limit for the Poisson encounter-mating model. Preprint, available at: arXiv:1411.7220 [math.PR] (2014)

  15. Hadeler, K.P.: Pair formation. J. Math. Biol. 64(4), 613–645 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Higgs, P.G., Derrida, B.: Genetic distance and species formation in evolving populations. J. Mol. Evol. 35(5), 454–465 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jiang, Y., Bolnick, D.I., Kirkpatrick, M.: Assortative mating in animals. Am. Nat. 181(6), E125–E138 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kirkpatrick, M.: Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution 36(1), 1–12 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lande, R.: Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78(6, part 2) 3721–3725 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Mode, C.J.: Some multi-dimensional birth and death processes and their applications in population genetics. Biometrics 18(4), 543–567 (1962)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Mosteller, F.: Association and estimation in contingency tables. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 63, 1–28 (1968)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Romney, A.K.: Measuring endogamy. In: Kay, P. (ed.) Explorations in Mathematical Anthropology, pp. 191–213. MIT Press, Cambridge (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Taylor, C.E.: Differences in mating propensities: Some models for examining the genetic consequences. Behav. Genet. 5(4), 381–393 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to A. Courtiol for introducing us to Gimelfarb’s work on encounter-mating and for suggesting interesting problems. We also thank F. Rezakhanlou and P. Diaconis for valuable comments and discussions. O. Gün gratefully acknowledges support by DFG SPP Priority Programme 1590 “Probabilistic Structures in Evolution”. A. Yilmaz is supported in part by European Union FP7 Marie Curie Career Integration Grant no. 322078.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Atilla Yilmaz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gün, O., Yilmaz, A. The Stochastic Encounter-Mating Model. Acta Appl Math 148, 71–102 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10440-016-0079-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10440-016-0079-9

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

Navigation